“Better to write for yourself and have no public, than to write for the public and have no self.”- Cyril Connolly (1903 - 1974)

The Constitution is Dead - Soon Freedom Will Be Dead

We will instead be living in Ameri’k’a…

By de Andréa

Opinion Editorialist for

‘THE BOTTOM LINE’

Posted December 2, 2017

The anti-American Supreme Court again ignores Constitutional law.

“A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” – The Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.

This past Monday, the US Supreme Court again refused to deal with a real Constitutional issue, again allowing the states to violate the right of the people to keep and bear arms. It’s just a form of criminal Judicial tyranny my friend.

Historically and legally the U.S. and all state constitutions are the highest laws in the Republic. No subsequent laws can supersede, supplant, replace, or displace constitutional law unless with the due process of an amendment. The last time this legal abrogation was used was in 1992. Now any local, state or federal legislature can just willy nilly pass laws that violate any of the state or federal constitutions. The gate of tyranny is open.

“On every question of construct, [let us] carry ourselves back to the time when the constitution was adopted, recollect the s pirit manifested in the debates. And instead of trying what meaning may be squeezed out of the text, or invented against it, [let us] conform to the probable one in which it was passed.” -President Thomas Jefferson

"The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government. No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms." Thomas Jefferson

The Federal Government and the State of Florida as well as many other states have unlawfully written "laws" that ban people from keeping and bearing arms, and now another man, who merely exercised that God-given right is facing the heavy hand of government bureaucrats and illegal legislation against those basic American rights.

"It is not the function of our government to keep the citizen from falling into error; it is the function of the citizen to keep the government from falling into error." -- U.S. Supreme Court in American Communications Association v. Douds

The Palm Beach Post reports:

“The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday refused to take u p a challenge to a Florida law that bars people from openly carrying firearms in public, ending a case that started nearly six years ago when a man was arrested in St. Lucie

County.

The U.S. Supreme Court, as is common, did not explain its reasons for declining to hear the case. But the move effectively let stand a Florida Supreme Court ruling in March that said the open-carry ban did not violate the constitutional right to bear arms.

The plaintiff in the case, Dale Norman, was arrested in February 2012 in Fort Pierce as he openly carried a gun in a holster. Norman, who had a concealed-weapons license, was found guilty of a second-degree misdemeanor, with a judge imposing a $300 fine and court costs, according to court documents.

Backed by the Second Amendment group Florida Carry, Norman challenged the constitutionality of the state’s longstanding ban on openly carrying weapons. But the state’s 4th District Court of Appeal and the Florida Supreme Court ruled against Norman, leading him to go to the U.S. Supreme Court.

Mr. Norman's attorneys filed a petition with the US Supreme Court in the matter stating, “The Second Amendment provides in part that ‘the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.’ This guarantees not only the right to ‘keep’ arms, such as in one’s house, but also to ‘bear arms,’ which simply means to carry arms without reference to a specific place. When the Framers intended that a provision of the Bill of Rights related to a house, they said so."

Now, clearly the word "right" is used in the Second Amendment and rights come from our Creator, according to the Declaration of Independence, not the State.

"I have a right to nothing which another has a right to take away." -- Thomas Jefferson to Uriah Forrest, 1787.

Yet, the state legislators without a legal amendment, arbitrarily write illegal laws that people can only keep and bear arms in public in a concealed fashion and only if they have permission from the state. Soon laws will be passed to prohibit arms altogether.

“The (U.S. Supreme) Court has never held that the Second Amendment protects a right to openly carry firearms in public, and the reasoning set forth in pertinent case law supports the proposition that states fully accommodate the right to bear arms when they make available to responsible, law-abiding citizens some meaningful form of public carry,” the state attorneys brief said. “That is precisely what Florida has done here. Thus, Florida’s law is valid under any arguably applicable analytical framework.”

First: The Court doesn’t need to decide that the Second Amendment protects a right to carry firearms, the Constitution already supports that God given right.

And second: This is the problem my friend lawyers and judges don’t know the law because they are no longer taught the law, they are taught and are actually dealing with so-called case law which is not law at all, it is opinion, and not constitutional law. They base their arguments on second and third hand flawed rulings over the course of history rather than arguing from original intent and the exact words used in the Constitution.

Where in the Second Amendment does it say anything about people just having a right to keep and bear arms in their homes? Or for the purpose of hunting? Where does it say what kind of arms one may keep and bear? Where does it state government may make law to regulate or restrict the keeping and bearing of said arms (ie. concealed carry permits, banning open carry, etc.)?

NOWHERE!

This is why the attorneys attempting to argue whether or not open carry is constitutional never, ever, argue from the standpoint of law and the Constitution.

These attorneys and judges, through their ignorance or defiance of the law, are just as guilty of criminal activity as anyone else who violates the law, maybe more so because they have a responsibility to uphold the law. But they do it in the name of the people for dishonest gain, and it’s not in order to protect the rights of the people.

We established however some, although not all its [self-government] important principles The constitutions of most of our States assert, that all power is inherent in the people; that they may exercise it by themselves, in all cases to which they think themselves competent, (as in electing their functionaries executive and legislative, and deciding by a jury of themselves, in all judiciary cases in which any fact is involved,) or they may act by representatives, freely and equally chosen; that it is their right and duty to be at all times armed; --------Thomas Jefferson to John Cartwright, 1824.

The State of Florida as well as many other states have unlawfully written "laws" that ban people from keeping and bearing arms in public by open carry and one man, who merely exercised that God-given right is now facing the heavy hand of government bureaucrats and unlawful legislation against those rights.

“No legislative act, therefore, contrary to the Constitution, can be valid. To deny this would be to affirm that the deputy is greater than his principal; that the servant is above his master; that the representatives of the people are superior to the people themselves.”- Opinion by - John Jay, First chief justice US Supreme Court United States of America.

THE BOTTOM LINE: So why is law enforced in this way? Why do the majority of laws written since the constitutional convention in some way encroach, infringe, or in some way violate the U.S. constitution. Because since the very beginning of the Republic “We The People” have been set up for the eventual destruction of our free nation.

The elitist globalist’s oligarchs must eventually disarm this nation so that the floodgates of tyranny can flow out unopposed. And as usual as has been done throughout history, they do it in the name of safety. But it’s not in the name of our safety, it’s in the name of their safety.

"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." -- Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania (1759)

“If you want safety, go to prison, you will have everything you could want except freedom” – Dwight D. Eisenhower

One of the most important rights that the Framers wrote into the Bill of Rights is the second Amendment, because they knew from experience that it was necessary to the security of a Free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

But it has been infringed my friend. Question is what are you going to do for the security of your once Free State? The bear minimum you can do is let the legislators know what you want. Tell them to obey the law! Find your Federal Representatives here, and your state Representatives here.

"The tyranny of a principal in an oligarchy is not so dangerous to the public welfare as the apathy of a citizen in a democracy." --Montesquieu, 1748

Do I need to tell you what the alternative is? Look at Russia, Cuba, China, North Korea and Europe, Australia and even Canada…It’s all in preparation for world domination my friend, a global tyranny. Our Forefathers knew it, do you?

“Our Supreme Court is no longer a court of law. It has become a court of conjecture and political fraud.” - de Andréa

Thanks for listening my friend. Now go do the right thing, pray and fight for truth and freedom.

- de Andréa

Please pass on this article to everyone on your email list. It may be the only chance for your friends to hear the truth.

The Fine Print

Disclaimer - The writer of this blog is not responsible for the language or advertisements used in links to referenced articles as source materials.

The Bottom Line

Saturday, December 02, 2017