Friday, October 20, 2017

Big Pharma Funds ISIS

“Better to write for yourself and have no public, than to write for the public and have no self.”- Cyril Connolly (1903 - 1974)


Big Pharma Funds ISIS


Opinion Editorialist for
‘THE BOTTOM LINE’

Posted October 20, 2017   


Notice in the picture, the ISIS 'War Manual' sticking out of the ISIS soldier's front pocket. Its a Quran...
The disease of greed has overwhelmed corporate patriotism.  The desire for corporate expansion takes precedence over God and Country.  I have been warning for years about the infiltration of Islam into the fabric of America but this my friend is a new twist on treason.  Corporate Greed is aiding and abetting those that have vowed to bury America.   
And corrupt U.S. officials knew all about it and did nothing
The ISIS Mahdi Army was euphemistically called the “pill army” by U.S. officials in reference to the fact that al-Sadr was known to pay his fighters with drugs from U.S. drug companies that they could resell for their wages.
A group of U.S. military veterans and relatives of soldiers killed or wounded in Iraq filed suit against five pharmaceutical and medical equipment giants, accusing them of funding the Islamist terrorist militia responsible for the deaths of hundreds of American soldiers in Iraq. This is a civil suit but what about the criminal aspect of treason against the United States of America in time of war?
As reported by FOX NEWS, the lawsuit names the parent companies and subsidiaries of AstraZeneca, General Electric, Johnson & Johnson, Pfizer and Roche Holding.
These companies stand accused of paying bribes to the Iraqi Ministry of Health to win contracts. The ministry was known to be controlled by the ISIS Mahdi Army, an extremely anti-American, Shiite terrorist militia backed Hezbollah, the Iranian-funded Lebanese terrorist organization.
The suit charges that money from these bribes was used to fund the ISIS militia – allowing them to buy weapons, train fighters and conduct logistic support.
The “Defendants’ corrupt transactions aided and abetted Jaysh al-Mahdi’s terrorist operations against Americans in Iraq,” the lawsuit states.
The U.S. military suffered tremendous losses between 2005 and 2009 at the hands of the Mahdi Army. The lawsuit includes a 27-page itemized list of U.S. soldiers killed or injured at the hands of the terrorist militia, including claims of suffering by relatives.
The lawsuit documents the extent to which the U.S. knew the Mahdi Army controlled the ministry. Inside the Iraqi Health Ministry hung pictures of the Mahdi Army’s leader Muqtada al-Sadr. Banners reading “Death to America” were hung in the ministry and AK-47 assault rifles could readily be found in the Health minister’s office.
By the end of 2004, the office had become too dangerous for Americans to even be inside the building. As the lawsuit claims, the ministry “functioned more as a terrorist apparatus than a health organization.”
The suit claims the drug and medical equipment companies were required by the Mahdi Army to pay a bribe of 20 percent of each sale to the Health Ministry to obtain ministry contracts. The companies acquiesced by providing “free goods” with every sale, which amounted to millions of dollars in bribes per year.
The Mahdi Army was euphemistically called the “pill army” by U.S. officials in reference to the fact that al-Sadr was known to pay his fighters with drugs that they could resell for their wages.
In addition, the suit says the companies gave the ministry money for after-sales support, effectively a “slush fund” that went to pay off ministry officials – the same officials that supported the militia.
The companies are further charged with using the U.S. banking system to channel these payments to Iraq to pay the bribes.
“Most of the defendants have a documented history of paying bribes that supported terrorism as far back as Saddam Husain,” said Ryan Sparacino, one of the plaintiffs’ attorneys.
For example:
In 2011, Johnson and Johnson was accused of paying kickbacks to win contracts in Iraq as well as other countries. They settled a lawsuit against them for $70 million.
In 2010, General Electric was accused by the Securities and Exchange Commission of paying kickbacks to the Iraqi health ministry for contracts under the oil-for-food program. GE paid more than $23 million to settle that lawsuit.
Then it continued and was just swept under the carpet…
THE BOTTOM LINE: So how deep into the corrupt Deep State does this anti-American infiltration go? Under the Obama Regime my friend, it went all the way to Whitehouse, the top of the greedy food chain.  All this corruption is left over from the Grand Muslim Mufti himself, Barrack Husseini Obammah.  Even if Trump can have an influence on Draining the Swamp of corruption that exists in the Federal Government, the effects of this Shadow Government and its infiltration, is so far reaching that it will take decades, if ever, to clean out the pollution and “Make America Great Again.”

Thanks for listening my friend. Now go do the right thing, pray and fight for truth and freedom. 
- de Andréa
Please pass on this article to everyone on your email list.  It may be the only chance for your friends to hear the truth.
The Fine Print
Copyright © 2005 by Bottom Line Publishing, All Rights Reserved -  Permission to reprint in whole or in part is gladly granted, provided full credit is given.

Disclaimer - The writer of this blog is not responsible for the language or advertisements used in links to referenced articles as source materials.

Thursday, October 19, 2017

Another Reason You Might Need a Gun


A strong body makes the mind strong. As to the species of exercises, I advise the gun. While this gives moderate exercise to the body, it gives boldness, enterprise and independence to the mind. Games played with the ball, and others of that nature, are too violent for the body and stamp no character on the mind. Let your gun therefore be your constant companion of your walks.          --- Thomas Jefferson to Peter Carr, 1785. The Writings of Thomas Jefferson, (Memorial Edition) Lipscomb and Bergh, editors.

Another Reason You Might Need a Gun

 


Opinion Editorialist for
‘THE BOTTOM LINE’

Posted October 19, 2017   



I’m often asked: “Why do you need a gun anyway”?  Now’, in addition to all the other reasons that I have given in the past, there is yet’ another.

National Rifle Association spokeswoman Dana Loesch said Sunday - that she has been forced to move from her California home after receiving death threats to her and her family from…hold on to your bullets now… “gun control advocates.”  Yes’, they want your guns controlled, not’ theirs.  Guess who they might be?  Hate America criminals with guns?  Naw!    
The NRA conservative commentator explained her reasons for moving in a series of tweets, relaying a few of the many threats she received, some made recently in the wake of the mass shooting in Las Vegas.  She said she included the hashtag “MeToo” to highlight the sexual harassment and threats she’s had to endure, particularly as a woman who supports the Second Amendment.
“Spent my weekend preparing to move due to repeated threats from gun control advocates,” she tweeted, attaching a picture of garbage bags filled with her belongings.
“One guy hunted down my private cell phone number, called when police were here, threatened to shoot me in my front yard,” she tweeted again.
“Another guy created a string of social media accounts, posted photos of my house, threatened to rape me to death,” she added in a third tweet.
Loesch continued on for several more messages, saying some people had threatened her kids. She also took the opportunity express some of her thoughts related to sexual harassment and abuse when it comes to conservative women.
“I’ve only ever discussed these issues kinda vaguely,” Loesch tweeted. “More I can’t discuss. I and other 2’nd Amendment women are sexually threatened regularly.”
Loesch also went on Fox News to discuss the issue, confirming her family was still in the process of moving due to the threats. She also explained her use of the “MeToo” hashtag and said the experience had solidified her reasons for carrying a firearm.
“I don’t hate anyone that disagrees with me,” said Loesch. “My advocacy for Second Amendment rights isn’t designed to magically put a firearm in the hands of someone else. I just want people to have that choice. And all of this has really underscored why I carry. It makes me so grateful that I can protect myself.”
THE BOTTOM LINE: Just another fine example of the hypocrisy of these hate America anti-Constitutional Fabians.  Isn’t it telling that an anti-Second Amendment anti-gun advocate, “…threatened to shoot me in my front yard.” Said Dana Loesch.

I can’t help having the feeling this Constitution hater didn’t mean he was going to shoot her with a ‘bean in a straw.’ No Just another elitist who believes he should be the only one to be allowed to have a gun.  Not unlike senator gun hater Di Fi who has bodyguards, not to mention the 38 in her purse ever since she was mayor of SF.
This my friend is just another example of why the Framers said possessing a gun was a basic necessity.  

“We need not fear the law abiding citizen ‘with a gun’, he is your protector. We need to fear the advocate of a citizen ‘deprived of a gun’, for he is your attacker.”  
de Andréa, October 2017.                                                                                 

Thanks for listening my friend. Now go do the right thing, pray and fight for truth and freedom. 
Please pass on this article to everyone on your email list.  It may be the only chance for your friends to hear the truth.
The Fine Print
Copyright © 2005 by Bottom Line Publishing, All Rights Reserved -  Permission to reprint in whole or in part is gladly granted, provided full credit is given.

Disclaimer - The writer of this blog is not responsible for the language or advertisements used in links to referenced articles as source materials.

Monday, October 16, 2017

Hidden Secret in Bump Stock Bill

"The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government. No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms." Thomas Jefferson


Hidden Secret in Bump Stock Bill

By de Andréa                                                                        

 
Opinion Editorialist for
‘THE BOTTOM LINE’ 

Posted October 16, 2017    


In the wake of the tragic Las Vegas shooting, it was only a matter of time before un-constitutional legislation was officially proposed in Congress… and now it’s here my friend. But there is a hidden agenda…

The bipartisan bill to restrict so-called “bump stock” devices has been introduced in the House, and is being sponsored by both Florida Republican Carlos Curbelo and Massachusetts Democrat Seth Moulton.

Lawmakers are trying to secretly hurry this proposal through Congress, and unlike those in the congress, concerned citizens have looked into the proposal line-by-line, and as usual, found some disturbing facts that the bill’s sponsors don’t want you to know.

Even though I do not own any bump stocks myself, nor would I waste my money on such a stupid an useless accessory, I am weary of the legislative action wasting their time on illegal and useless laws.  

Incredibly, the bill would not only make bump-stock accessories against the law to buy, but it would also make them illegal to merely possessIn other words, somebody who bought a bump-fire stock years ago — completely legally — and tossed it into the back of their gun safe would face five years in prison if this bill became law.

How would the government enforce such a ban? The only answer is, the illegal searches a seizures of lawful gun owners and confiscation of previously-legal items. This is once again a violation of the Constitution.

“Are the manufacturers going to be compelled by the government to turn over lists of customers who legally acquired [products] that were declared by the regulatory authority to be legal?” asked Congressman Thomas Massie of Kentucky.  “This could set the precedent for confiscation if you’re retroactively banning these things,” he continued, according to Reason Magazine.

Speaking of retroactively banning things, as I said, doing so is also a violation of the U.S. Constitution.  But by now most people know that the Constitution has become irrelevant in Congress.  Anyway just for the record, Article I, Section 9 of the Constitution declares: “No Bill of Attainder or ex post facto Law shall be passed.” Period… In other words, the Constitution prohibits lawmakers from making something illegal and then going after people who engaged in the act previously, when it was still legal. It seems highly likely that this my friend is the real agenda for the proposed “bump stock” ban and it would do exactly that.  Even the much-maligned “assault weapons ban” of the Clinton era had a grandfather clause that allowed legal owners to keep firearms they already possessed. Shockingly, this new bill includes no such provision.

There are more problems, as well. The wording of the bill is so vague that it could apply to a wide variety of common gun accessories and gunsmithing services. Most troubling, it could, (and if it could, it would,) conceivably be used as a “backdoor” confiscation scheme against millions of legal firearm owners.

The bill’s terminology targets “any part or combination of parts that is designed and functions to increase the rate of fire of a semi-automatic rifle.” Think about that for a moment.  Rifle accessories such as lighter trigger kits and heavier recoil springs are just two of the many common off-the-shelf products that could suddenly be illegal if the bill passes. Each carrying a 5 year sentence.  

What have I said in the past?  “Laws are no longer to prevent crime, laws are to create criminals”.

“There are a hundred ways to make a semiautomatic firearm fire more quickly, and there is no way to prevent them,” Rep. Massie explained. “You can use common household items. There is an industry that takes your off-the-shelf firearm and improves the trigger so that you can be more accurate and shoot it faster,” the libertarian-leaning lawmaker continued. “Those implements aren’t designed to simulate full auto fire, but they could be read into the language of that bill.”

THE BOTTOM LINE: Take a look at a previous article I published that blows most of the so-called gun safety laws away, mostly because anti-American lawmakers know absolutely nothing about guns.  Or’ the U.S. Constitution.

Anti-Constitutional America-hating politicians know that they can’t directly go after firearms — at least not yet anyway — so they’re targeting a myriad of accessories and adjustments that even casual gun owners often use on their rifles.
Congress is trying to pass this deeply flawed bill before Americans have a chance to read and understand it… and that should set off alarm bells for every person who values self-defense and the Second Amendment.  Read the text of the bill here.

Write your Representatives here, and tell them to vote ‘no’ on this anti-American unconstitutional bill, and tell them that you vote too!

Thanks for listening my friend. Now go do the right thing, pray and fight for truth and freedom. 
- de Andréa
Please pass on this article to everyone on your email list.  It may be the only chance for your friends to hear the truth.
The Fine Print
Copyright © 2005 by Bottom Line Publishing, All Rights Reserved -  Permission to reprint in whole or in part is gladly granted, provided full credit is given.
Disclaimer - The writer of this blog is not responsible for the language or advertisements used in links to referenced articles as source materials

Sunday, October 15, 2017

Allegations of Hate Speech A Tool of The Globalists to Silence Dissent


“Better to write for yourself and have no public, than to write for the public and have no self.”- Cyril Connolly (1903 - 1974)

Allegations of Hate Speech A Tool of The Globalists to Silence Dissent

 

By de Andréa

Opinion Editorialist for
‘THE BOTTOM LINE’

Posted October 15, 2017   


The Left is working hard to destroy freedom of speech and silence those who oppose the globalist, internationalist, socialist and a pro-Islamic jihad agenda.
Leftist ‘hate America’ politicians, have already maneuvered Trump into signing one measure against so-called “hate groups,” when the anti-American Southern Poverty Law Center’s manipulative and propagandistic “hate group” list, throws legitimate groups in the bucket along with the KKK and the neo-Nazis, in an attempt to destroy Americanism.
Now I don’t want the reader to misunderstand my defense of hate speech. I do not support hate speech, but I do support the freedom to speak any kind of speech including the hate America speech of the Globalists Tyrants.
This whole concept of “hate groups” and “hate speech” is contrary to the first Amendment and the freedom of speech.
If “hate speech” is banned by the government, a tyranny will be established in which the anti-constitutionalists can simply outlaw and deny all platforms to those they hate by labeling them in this way.
This is truly a throwback to America’s early beginnings when as colonists we were not allowed to speak contrary to our oppressors. We are now coming full circle my friend.
It’s coming, unless enough people wake up in time, contact their representatives and voice their outrage now while one still can without being put into stocks in the town square or worse.
Read “‘War on free speech’: Conservatives warn Trump of ‘hate’ measure,” by Art Moore, World Net Daily, October 6, 2017:
A collection of conservative leaders have written to President Trump, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell and Speaker of the House Paul Ryan expressing “grave concern” about a joint resolution approved by the Senate and House targeting “hate speech.”
Hastily enacted Sept. 14 without public debate, Public Law 115-58, the leaders write, could “lead to unconstitutional suppression of freedom of expression aimed at silencing those smeared by political opponents as, for example, ‘haters,’ ‘racists’ or ‘bigots.’”
“Many of us have been slandered in this fashion, falsely characterized as ‘white supremacists’ or some other, similarly disparaging epithet simply because we support, for example, traditional marriage, civil liberties rather than Sharia, secure borders and the enforcement of our immigration laws and/or effective counterterrorism policies,” they write. Yours truly has been accused of racism countless times simply because I believe the Islamic ideology and Sharia to be anti-constitutional and anti-American, even though Islam or Muslims are not in any way considered a race. They just want to demonize me because I believe in a Biblically principled America and a Constitutional Republic.
Even worse, they say, the name-calling is “just the leading edge of an aggressive campaign to ruin the financial condition and prevent the widespread dissemination of the work of individuals and groups being targeted for what amounts to unrestricted political warfare.”
The statute “urges the President and his administration to speak out against hate groups that espouse racism, extremism, xenophobia, anti-Semitism, and White supremacy and use all resources available to the President and the President’s Cabinet to address the growing prevalence of those hate groups in the United States.”
The letter calls upon the attorney general, the secretary of homeland security and the heads of other federal agencies to engage in such activities as investigating “thoroughly all acts of violence, intimidation, and domestic terrorism by White supremacists, White nationalists, neo-Nazis, the Ku Klux Klan, and associated groups and to improve the reporting of hate crimes and to emphasize the importance of the collection, and the reporting to the Federal Bureau of Investigation, of hate crime data by State and local agencies.”
The problem, the leaders say, is that the statute does not define terms such as “hate group,” “white supremacist,” “extremist,” “anti-immigrant” and “xenophobia.”
“These open-ended mandates, they argue, “invite abuses of power by the state.”
Among the signatories are Frank Gaffney of the Center for Security Policy, retired U.S. Navy Admiral James Ace Lyons Jr., Mat Staver of Liberty Counsel, Robert Spencer of Jihad Watch, and Brigitte Gabriel of ACT! For America, Joseph Farah of WND.com and DHS whistleblower Philip Haney.
The statute particularly gives legitimacy and power to self-appointed arbiters of ‘hate,’ such as the discredited anti American Southern Poverty Law Center and others on the radical left and their Islamic Jihadi allies, the conservative leaders warn….
In their letter, the conservative leaders point to other bills designed to further advance this agenda and now awaiting consideration may similarly be foisted upon the American people to their grave detriment.
The bills include:
“The National Opposition to Hate, Assault, and Threats to Equality Act of 2017” — the “No HATE Act” — which would expand governmental efforts to collect “hate crimes” data and create private rights of action for “crimes motivated by actual or perceived race, color, religion, or national origin.”
Senate Resolution 118, passed in April, which condemns “any other form of racism, religious or ethnic bias, discrimination, incitement to violence, or animus targeting a minority in the United States.” The conservative leaders contend it cites discredited data about hate crimes to justify intensified federal action to “detect and deter hate crimes to protect minority communities.”
“The Disarm Hate Act,” House Continuing Resolution 77, urges the president “to prohibit the hiring of individuals … who have supported or encouraged support for White supremacists” and “to use all available resources of the office of the President and the Cabinet to address the growing prevalence of such hate groups domestically.”
The conservative leaders contend the legislative initiatives “share a false narrative, namely that the United States is overwhelmed with large numbers of ‘white supremacists’ and individuals and groups allegedly associated with them who pose a threat to the rights of minorities and other Americans.”
“This narrative is unsupported by the facts,” they write. “More importantly, this narrative is based on the same undefined terms now codified in PL115-58, terms that are used to defame and incapacitate people and organizations like the signatories of this letter simply because they effectively oppose the agenda of those who have made a cottage industry of ‘hate’ and employ it as an instrument of political warfare.”…
THE BOTTOM LINE: The objective of all these hate speech bills are to make seditionists out of anyone that disagrees with the Globalists agenda of overthrowing the U.S. Government as bound by the U.S. Constitution.  This Globalist autocracy will know no boundaries.
Please contact your Representatives Here and tell them to vote no and stop the attack on free speech no matter what it is.
Thanks for listening my friend. Now go do the right thing, pray and fight for truth and freedom. 
- de Andréa
Please pass on this article to everyone on your email list.  It may be the only chance for your friends to hear the truth.
The Fine Print
Copyright © 2005 by Bottom Line Publishing, All Rights Reserved -  Permission to reprint in whole or in part is gladly granted, provided full credit is given.
Disclaimer - The writer of this blog is not responsible for the language or advertisements used in links 

Saturday, October 14, 2017

The U.S. And Israel to Withdraw From UNESCO

When all the nations of the earth gather against her. In that day, I will make Yerushalayim a stone for all the peoples to lift; all who lift it shall injure themselves.” Zechariah 12:3 (The Israel Bible™)

 

The U.S. And Israel to Withdraw From UNESCO

 

By de Andréa

Opinion Editorialist for
‘THE BOTTOM LINE’

Posted October 14, 2017   


The United States and Israel announced on Thursday they were withdrawing from The United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) amid claims the organization is biased against Israel, putting the future of the organization in doubt. UNESCO is either ignorant about history or it is trying to rewrite history.
“This decision was not taken lightly, and reflects U.S. concerns with mounting debts at UNESCO, the need for fundamental reform in the organization, and continuing anti-Israel bias,” State Department spokeswoman Heather Nauert said in a statement.
Totally ignoring a fact of history, UNESCO has passed multiple resolutions negating any Jewish connection to historical religious sites in Israel, even though the Jews have their historical roots in Israel since 3100 BC as Semites when it was called Canaan. In 2016, UNESCO passed a resolution declaring the Temple Mount “a Muslim site of worship”, while labeling Israel an illegal “occupying power”.  The truth be told, the so-called Temple mount is not anyone’s religious site, but - it is’ in fact an historical site of Israel. It was historically used as King Herod’s Roman Fort of Antonia where 6000 roman troops were quartered during the 1st century AD when in 28AD the roman aqueduct was built bringing the first much needed water from Bethlehem to the soldiers at fort or the misnamed Temple Mount.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu was highly supportive of the decision by the U.S. and announced on Thursday night that Israel will also be withdrawing from UNESCO, stating: “This is a brave and moral decision because UNESCO has become a theatre of absurd. Instead of preserving history, it distorts it.”
UNESCO Director-General Irina Bokova expressed her disappointment in the U.S. decision. “At the time when conflicts continue to tear apart societies across the world, it is deeply regrettable for the United States to withdraw from the United Nations agency promoting education for peace and protecting culture under attack,” she said. “This is a loss to the United Nations family. This is a loss for multilateralism.”
 “Today is a new day at the U.N. when there is a price to pay for discrimination against Israel,” Israel’s Ambassador to the United Nations Danny Danon said.
The price is indeed steep. In accordance with an amendment mandating a complete cutoff of American financing to any United Nations agency that accepts the so-called Palestinians as full members, the U.S. began withholding its funding for UNESCO in 2011. American funds account for $70 million annually, about 20 percent of the organization’s budget. This was in protest to UNESCO admitting Palestine as a full member. Washington’s arrears on its $80 million annual dues are now over $500 million. The organization is struggling financially and this recent development puts its future in question.
Under UNESCO rules, the U.S. withdrawal will take effect in December 2018.
UNESCO has been in the process of selecting a new head and after four days of secret balloting, Qatar’s Hamad bin Abdulaziz al-Kawari qualified for the Friday runoff. Qatar is a small oil-rich nation and an ally of the U.S. that has been sponsoring terrorism and allowing terror financiers to operate within its borders.

THE BOTTOM LINE: The United Nations is nothing but a United Communist Islamic Jihadist promoting organization. And the only reason that the U.S. should continue to be a member of the U.N. is the old proverb of “keep your friends close and your enemies closer.” The United Nations is the enemy of the Free World. 

And folks hang on to your camel dung, as I have been claiming for longer than I can remember, there is really no such people as the Palestinians.  The existence of the Palestinian people is truly the biggest hoax ever perpetrated on the entire world.  Read about it and watch a video.  

Why then are the Palestinians even recognized as a nation or a people?  For two reasons. One - the world is ignorant about their own history. And two - the world is ignorant about their own history.

I hope that answers the Question… 
Thanks for listening my friend. Now go do the right thing, pray and fight for truth and freedom. 
- de Andréa
Please pass on this article to everyone on your email list.  It may be the only chance for your friends to hear the truth.
The Fine Print
Copyright © 2005 by Bottom Line Publishing, All Rights Reserved -  Permission to reprint in whole or in part is gladly granted, provided full credit is given.

Disclaimer - The writer of this blog is not responsible for the language or advertisements used in links to referenced articles as source materials.