“Better to write for yourself and
have no public, than to write for the public and have no self.”- Cyril Connolly (1903
- 1974)
Comey, Lynch, and
The Clinton’s, are Dirty
By
de Andréa,
Opinion Editorialist for
‘THE BOTTOM LINE’
If you really want to
know the truth about Hillary Clinton and why she created her own private dark
email servers for classified government documents and communications, then you
will want to read this rather lengthy dot connecting assemblage of highly
documented Intel, blowing the lid off of the history of Hillary’s lies, connections,
and cover-ups, all for personal monetary gain. Follow
the money as they say! And if you doubt the authenticity of this research, then
be sure to click on all the highlighted underlined hyperlinks connecting you to
the source. This dirt won’t wash…
The first thing that smelled funny when I began
this research, is that it is NOT FBI
Director James Comey's job to decide to prosecute or not to prosecute. His job is to collect and present the
evidence in the case against Hillary Clinton over her use of private email
servers, and not to decide whether or not to prosecute the case.
I'm not really surprised about the outcome of the investigation against Hillary Clinton. But the statement “that no reasonable prosecutor would bring such a case”, tells me that somebody got to Comey. Or is he just one of the good ole boys?
I'm not really surprised about the outcome of the investigation against Hillary Clinton. But the statement “that no reasonable prosecutor would bring such a case”, tells me that somebody got to Comey. Or is he just one of the good ole boys?
So, here is my opinion for whatever it may be
worth. Very simple---these things
usually are. Part of it speaks to Bill Clinton’s so called innocent rendezvous
with Loretta Lynch. There is nothing
innocent about Bill Clinton, good ole “it depends on what the meaning of ‘is’,
is.”
On Tuesday, after making his announcement about the findings in Clinton's case, in which Comey
presented all’ the reasons why it was against the law to use a private e-mail
server for high security Intel and how Hillary lied, committing perjury to the Congress
and the FBI and after presenting all the evidence and making the case that
should have given Hillary a long vacation in Club–Gitmo, Comey concluded with "no
reasonable prosecutor would bring criminal charges against the former Secretary
of State and presumptive Democratic presidential nominee.”
To say that “no reasonable prosecutor would bring such a
case,” means that if anyone dare disagree, you're unreasonable if Attorney
General Loretta Lynch decides to move forward, she's unreasonable. What it
told me was that they are all in bed with each other. As it turns out they have
quite a history…
Lynch, said, following a highly criticized
meeting with former President Bill Clinton, said that she would follow the
recommendations of Comey and other prosecutors in determining whether to file
criminal charges against Clinton. Of
course she would. Especially after her
subtle talk with Billy. A complete
setup.
The normal protocol, is the evidence would be presented to the prosecutors at the Department of Justice, even though oftentimes you ask the F.B.I. agents involved if you have a recommendation on whether the prosecution should go forward, but it's up to the prosecutors whether there should be an indictment. The federal standard is a probability a crime has occurred based upon the evidence given to you by the FBI.
The normal protocol, is the evidence would be presented to the prosecutors at the Department of Justice, even though oftentimes you ask the F.B.I. agents involved if you have a recommendation on whether the prosecution should go forward, but it's up to the prosecutors whether there should be an indictment. The federal standard is a probability a crime has occurred based upon the evidence given to you by the FBI.
Meanwhile, Lynch could still decide to move
forward, but Comey has locked her into a ‘between a rock and a very hard place’
position.
Now why would Comey look the other way?
Well
for one thing I scraped up a little history on Comey, Lynch, and the Clintons,
and it seems FBI Director James Comey as well as the AG Loretta Lynch have a
long history of involvement in Department of Justice actions that arguably
ended favorably to the Clintons. All these criminals should share the same
cell.
Cases such as the 2004 criminal investigation of Sandy Berger. Comey, then serving as a deputy attorney
general in the Justice Department, apparently limited the scope of the criminal
investigation of Sandy Berger, which left out former Clinton administration
officials who coordinated with Berger in his removal and destruction of
classified records from the National Archives. The documents were relevant to
accusations that the Clinton administration was negligent in the build-up to
the (9/11) terrorist attack.
Oh, what a tangled web we have found, and wait, just you wait
until the end of the article. The
question of…why did Hillary illegally use her own private servers to process and
store government classified documents and communiques. You will find that it was not
just a mistake to use private servers, as Hillary has said. It
was actually quite deliberate.
And curiously, Berger, Lynch and Cheryl Mills of the CIA all
worked as partners in the Washington law firm Hogan & Hartson, which
prepared tax returns for the Clintons and did patent work for a software firm
that played a role in the three private email servers Hillary Clinton used when
she was secretary of state.
Lynch and Comey both served as U.S. attorney for the Southern
District of New York. They crossed paths in the investigation of HSBC bank,
which avoided criminal charges in a massive money-laundering scandal for which
the bank paid a bribe of $1.9 billion.
After Attorney General John Aschroft recused himself in the outing
of CIA agent Valerie Plame affair in 2004, Comey appointed as special counsel
Patrick J. Fitzgerald, who ended up convicting “Scooter” Libby, a top aide to
then Vice President Dick Cheney, of perjury and obstruction of justice. The
charge affirmed the accusations of Plame and her former ambassador husband, Joe
Wilson – both partisan supporters of Bill and Hillary Clinton – that Libby outed
her as a CIA agent. The thing of it was
Plame worked, at the time, as an office worker, not a field agent.
New
York Times reporter Judith Miller’s 2015 memoir strongly suggests Fitzgerald
improperly manipulated testimony and withheld crucial evidence like Plame was not a field agent in
obtaining a conviction against Libby in his 2007 trial.
Prosecutor in Berger case
Deputy attorney general,
Comey was involved in the investigation of Berger, as Fox News reported in 2004
Berger at that time was under criminal investigation by the
Justice Department for removing from the National Archives various classified
documents that should have been turned over to the independent commission
investigating the 9/11 terror attacks and for removing handwritten notes he
made while reviewing the documents.
The New York Times reported in 2005 that Republican leaders
speculated Berger removed the documents from the National Archives because he
was trying to conceal material that could be damaging to the Clinton
administration.
Various
statements Comey made about Berger’s mishandling of classified documents bear
comparison to his comments regarding Hillary Clinton’s email server.
In 2004, Fox News noted Comey told reporters he could not
comment on the Berger investigation but did address the general issue of mishandling
classified documents.
“As a general matter, we take issues of classified information
very seriously,” Comey said in response to a reporter’s question.
He added that the department had prosecuted and sought
administrative sanctions against people for mishandling classified information.
“It’s our lifeblood, those secrets,” Comey continued. “It’s
against the law for anyone to intentionally mishandle classified documents
either by taking it to give to somebody else or by mishandling it in a way that
is outside the government regulations.”
So what is he saying now?
That Hillary unintentionally mishandled classified documents? That she didn’t intend to hide the fact that
she violated the law hiding classified Intel? What? The devil made her do it???
On April 1, 2005, Berger pleaded guilty to a misdemeanor charge
of intentionally removing documents from the National Archives and destroying
some of them. He was fined $50,000, sentenced to 100 hours of community service
and two years’ probation. A slap on the wrist if I ever saw one, oh, also, his
national security license was stripped for two years. What about Hillary’s top
security clearance.
Several messages
found stored on one of Clinton’s private email servers showed that Berger – a convicted thief of classified documents with a
revoked classification license – had been advising Clinton while she served as
secretary of state and had access to emails containing classified information.
For example, in an email
dated Sept. 22, 2009, Berger advised Clinton of
how she could leverage information to make Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin
Netanyahu more cooperative in discussions with the Obama administration over a
settlement freeze.
Oh! You want more? Okay, a
Washington Law firm ties Berger, Lynch, Mills together. Berger worked as a partner
in the Washington law firm Hogan & Hartson from 1973 to 1977, before taking a position as the deputy director of policy
planning at the State Department in the Carter administration.
When Carter lost his re-election bid, Berger returned to Hogan
& Hartson, where he worked until he took leave in 1988 to act as foreign
policy adviser in Gov. Michael Dukakis’ presidential campaign.
When Dukakis was defeated, Berger returned to Hogan & Hartson
until he became foreign policy adviser for Bill Clinton’s presidential campaign
in 1992.
On March 28, WorldNetDaily
reported Lynch was a litigation
partner for eight years at Hogan & Hartson, from March 2002 through April
2010. All one big happy family.
Mills also worked at Hogan & Hartson, for two years, starting in 1990, before she joined then President-elect Bill Clinton’s transition
team, on her way to securing a position as White House deputy counsel in the
Clinton administration.
According to documents Hillary Clinton’s first presidential
campaign made public in 2008, Hogan & Hartson’s New York-based partner
Howard Topaz was the tax lawyer who filed income tax returns for Bill and
Hillary Clinton beginning in 2004.
In addition, Hogan & Hartson in Virginia filed a patent
trademark request on May 19, 2004, for Denver-based MX Logic Inc., the computer
software firm that developed the email encryption system used to manage
Clinton’s private email server beginning in July 2013. A tech expert has
observed that employees of MX Logic had access to all the high level clarified emails
that went through her account.
In 1999, President Bill Clinton nominated Lynch for the first of
her two terms as U.S. attorney for the Eastern District of New York, a position
she held until she joined Hogan & Hartson in March 2002 to become a partner
in the firm’s Litigation Practice Group.
She left Hogan & Hartson in 2010, after being nominated by
President Obama for her second term as U.S. attorney for the Eastern District
of New York, a position she held until Obama nominated her to serve in her
current position as attorney general.
A
report published April 8, 2008, by The American Lawyer noted Hogan & Hartson was among Hillary Clinton’s biggest
financial supporters in the legal industry during her first presidential
campaign.
“Firm lawyers and staff have donated nearly $123,400 to her
campaign so far, according to campaign contribution data from the Center for
Responsive Politics,” Nate Raymond observed in The American Lawyer article.
“Christine Varney, a partner in Hogan’s Washington, D.C., office, served as
chief counsel to the Clinton-Gore Campaign in 1992.”
While Lynch may not have played
a direct role either in the tax work done by the firm for the Clintons or in
linking Hillary’s private email server to MX Logic, the
ethics of the legal profession hold all partners jointly liable for the actions
of other partners in a business. “If Hogan and Hartson previously represented the
Clintons on tax matters, it is incumbent upon U.S. Attorney General Loretta
Lynch to disclose what, if any, role she had in such tax matters,” said Tom
Fitton, president of Washington-based Judicial Watch.
HSBC link
When Lynch’s nomination as attorney general was considered by
the Senate one year ago, the Senate Judiciary Committee examined her role in
the Obama administration’s decision not to prosecute the banking giant HSBC for laundering
funds for Mexican drug cartels and Middle Eastern terrorists.
WorldNetDaily was first to report in a
series of articles beginning in 2012 money-laundering charges brought by John Cruz, a former HSBC
vice president and relationship manager, based on his more than 1,000 pages of
evidence and secret audio recordings.
The staff of the Senate
Judiciary Committee focused on Cruz’s allegations that Lynch, acting then in
her capacity as the U.S. attorney for the Eastern District of New York, engaged in a Department of Justice cover-up. Obama’s
attorney general nominee allowed HSBC in December 2011 to enter into a
“deferred prosecution” settlement in which the bank agreed
to pay a $1.9 billion fine and admit “willful criminal conduct” in exchange for
dropping criminal investigations and prosecutions of HSBC directors or employees.
Cruz
called the $1.92 billion fine the U.S. government imposed on HSBC “a joke” and filed a $10
million lawsuit for “retaliation and wrongful termination.”
From 2002 to 2003, Comey held the position of U.S. Attorney for
the Southern District of New York, the same position held by Lynch.
On March 4, 2013, Comey
joined the HSBC board of directors, agreeing to serve as an
independent non-executive director and a member of the bank’s Financial System
Vulnerabilities Committee, positions he held until
he resigned on Aug. 3, 2013, to become head of the FBI.
Comey, Fitzgerald and Valerie
Plame connection
On Jan. 1, 2004, the Washington Post reported that after
Attorney General John Aschroft recused himself and his staff from any
involvement in the investigation of who leaked the name of CIA employee Valerie
Plame after journalist Robert Novak named her in print as a CIA operative,
Comey assumed the role of acting attorney general for the purposes of the
investigation.
Comey appointed Patrick J. Fitzgerald, a U.S. attorney in
Chicago, to act as special counsel in conducting the inquiry into what became
known as “Plamegate.”
At the time Comey made the
appointment, Fitzgerald
was already godfather to one of Comey’s children.
On April 13, 2015,
co-authoring a USA Today op-ed piece, Plame and her husband, retired ambassador
Joseph Wilson, made
public their support for Hillary Clinton’s 2016 presidential campaign, openly acknowledging
their political closeness to both Hillary and Bill Clinton.
The first two paragraphs
of the editorial read:
“We have known Hillary Clinton both professionally and
personally for close to 20 years, dating back to before President Bill
Clinton’s first trip to Africa in 1998 — a trip that they both acknowledge
changed their lives, and gave considerable meaning to their post-White House
years and to the activities of the Clinton Foundation. Joe, serving as the
National Security Council Senior Director for African Affairs, was instrumental
in arranging that historic visit.
Our history became entwined with Hillary further after Valerie’s
identity as a CIA officer was deliberately exposed. That criminal act was taken
in retribution for Joe’s article in The New York Times in which he explained he
had discovered no basis for the Bush administration’s justification for the
Iraq War that Saddam Hussein was seeking yellowcake uranium to develop a
nuclear weapon.”
In January 2016, Chuck
Ross of the Daily Caller reported that Hillary Clinton
emails made public made clear that one of her “most frequent favor-seekers when
she was secretary of state was former Ambassador Joseph Wilson, a longtime
Clinton friend, an endorser of Clinton’s 2008 presidential campaign, and an
Africa expert with deep business ties on the continent.”
Ross noted that Wilson emailed Clinton on Dec. 22, 2009, seeking
help for Symbion Power, an American engineering contractor for whom Wilson
consulted, in the company’s bid to pursue a U.S. Agency of International
Development contract for work in Afghanistan.
In the case of the Afghanistan project, Ross noted, Clinton
vouched for Wilson and Symbion as she forwarded the request to Jack Lew, who
served then as deputy secretary of state for management and resources. Ross further reported Wilson’s request might
also have been discussed with President Obama, as one email indicates.
In 2005, Fitzgerald prosecuted Libby, a prominent adviser to
then Vice President Dick Cheney, in the Plame investigation, charging him with
two counts of perjury, two counts of making false statements to federal prosecutors
and one count of obstruction of justice.
On March 6, 2007, Libby
was convicted of four of the five counts, and on June 5, 2007, was sentenced
by U.S. District Judge Reggie B. Walton to two and a half years in federal
prison.
On April 6, 2015, the
Wall Street Journal reported the publication of New York Times reporter Judith Miller’s
memoir “The Story: A Reporter’s Journey” exposed “unscrupulous conduct” by
Fitzgerald in the 2007 trial of Libby. WSJ
reporter Peter Berkowitz noted Miller “writes that Mr. Fitzgerald induced her to
give what she now realizes was false testimony.”
“By withholding critical information and manipulating her memory
as he prepared her to testify, Ms. Miller relates, Mr. Fitzgerald ‘steered’ her
‘in the wrong direction.’”
Why three private off the
grid computer servers?
So why did Hillary purposely choose
to use her own private computer servers to process and store all her emails
including all the highly classified and top secret U.S. Government
Intelligence? Well “the
crime partnership of Bill and Hillary Clinton had the perfect set-up with Bill
heading the Clinton Foundation and Hillary appointed secretary of state,”
said Corsi, a WorldNetDaily senior staff writer. “The opportunity for the Clintons
to enrich themselves was never greater with Bill positioned to solicit
donations from those desiring favorable State Department policy decisions from
Hillary.”
So hear it is, this scam would not work if Hillary’s State Department
emails were available to be archived on the State Department system, thus
subject to FOIA requests. According to Corsi, the scam required emails passing
classified information to top officials in the Clinton Foundation as well as
Teneo, a corporate advisory firm established by Clinton ally Doug Band.
“With advance knowledge of U.S. foreign
policy initiatives – including meetings being scheduled with foreign heads of
state – the Clinton Foundation
and Teneo could work overtime to make sure foreign operatives seeking favors
knew where to send checks in their ‘pay to play’ scheme,” Corsi explained.
“By keeping all her emails on a private
servers, Hillary and her trusted operatives in the State Department – Huma
Abedin and Cheryl Mills – could play like an orchestra on Hillary’s schedule,
orchestrating her policy decisions for maximum gain – provided Bill Clinton and top officials at the Clinton Foundation
and Teneo had inside access to classified top secret national security
information sure to pass through Hillary’s email traffic.”
All of this adds up to two crimes, in
Corsi’s estimation.
“The crime was not only corruption –
the selling of ‘official acts’ as secretary of state for personal gain obtained
via ‘donations’ to the Clinton Foundation – the crime was also inurement –
operating a 501 3(c) tax-favored charity for personal gain.”
Read Corsi’s entire article which comes from his new publication
“Parteners in Crime” Be sure to watch the video trailer.
THE BOTTOM LINE: So does that show intent to violate the law or what? Is the FBI, the State department and the DOJ digging themselves a bigger hole, enough to bury them all, or, will the good ole boys in Washington again be able to fool all the people all of the time? A lot depends on how corrupt the media has become. Bear in mind they know all of this information, they have just refused to report it.
Yeah! Well...my guess is that it will become just
so much corrupt judicial dust swept into the round file archives of political
history…
But
that’s just my opinion!
What
can you do? Well you can contact your Representatives Here
and tell them to continue to investigate the corruption of the Clintons,
the FBI and the DOJ. Or ‘…you can just go sit by your swimming
pool, sip your Mint Julips and just let the whole world go by in a blur. Bear in mind that is what got us into this apathetic
mess in the first place. Come on! Do your
job…
Thanks
for listening - de Andréa
Please pass on this
article to everyone on your email list.
It may be the only chance for your friends to hear the truth.
Copyright © 2014 by Bottom
Line Publishing, All Rights Reserved - Permission to reprint in whole or
in part is gladly granted, provided full credit is given.
Disclaimer - The writer of
this blog is not responsible for the language or advertisements used in links
to referenced articles as source materials.
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment