Tuesday, June 30, 2015

Will The Communist Ideology Overtake America?

"The greatest tyrannies are always perpetrated in the name of the noblest causes." -- Thomas Paine

Will The Communist Ideology Overtake America?

The Supreme Court’s same sex marriage decision is really just another Red-herring for the goal of Communism in America. 

By de Andréa, Opinion Editorialist
Published June 30, 2015


In reading this, you may again accuse me of being a conspiracy nut because this is so bizarre, but hear me out, this is an agenda, not a conspiracy, then you do the research and prove me wrong!  Remember…truth can be stranger than fiction!  If you really want to know what is behind most every deviant issue in America…this is a must read.

Oh! You didn’t know that in 1963 the Congress passed and entered into the Congressional record the
45 Communist Goals.  A warning that Communism would take over America from the inside.  Well’  stay with me now!

Let’s stand back a ways, and look way’ down the road ahead. Get your intellectual and spiritual binoculars on and take a look at the big picture…  The really ‘big picture’. It will read like a Clancy novel, ‘God rest his soul’.  

We’ll discuss the U.S. Governments “45 Communist goals” as well as Karl Marx 10 Planks of The Communist Manifesto.”  After reading both of these lists, ask yourself how many have been fulfilled in America.  And then you will wonder…are we there yet? 

The Supreme Court’s Same Sex Marriage Decision Is Just another fulfilled Communist Goal.  And the ignorant programed robotic “useful idiots”, an idiom coined by Vladimir Lenin, have perpetuated it.

While I have written many articles on the topic of so-called education in America as well as same sex marriage, as well as abortion and gun confiscation, it can't be stressed enough that achieving these goals such as "marriage equality" for homosexuals for example, wasn’t for the purpose that you have been led to believe.  But it definitely was one of the 45 communist goals. Read them!

The Supreme Court's decision on Friday, June 26 was no surprise to many of us. The whole point of the same sex marriage brief was to use it to continue the moral degradation of our society. Like Scalia said, it had nothing to do with the Constitution.
The Obama Administration, as surely we have all seen by now, took the pleasure of flaunting their victory by posting pictures of the White House lit up with the colors of the homosexual's rainbow flag. This was the "stick in your eye gesture" as they know that the vast majority of Americans disapprove of the homosexual agenda, and there is an agenda.  The agenda is listed in one of the 45 Communist goals for America.

First they “came out” then they stole a word in the English language that can no longer be used for what it was intended.  “GAY” was now a word to describe and agenda to degrade the American society. Then they stole all “the colors of the rainbow”. Now any banner displaying many colors automatically identifies with this agenda.  Then they stole an American Christian institution “Marriage” as well as a law of science “between a male and a female.”

Make no mistake America, this ruling pushes the United States one step further away from Liberty, and Freedom, and one step closer to an all-out Communistic Regime.

Many people have a difficult time understanding this concept; after all, granting protection to homosexuals to "marry" allegedly embodies the ideals of liberty and equal justice for all, right? But this is a misguided Communist worldview, what it actually does is open the floodgates to the depravation of humanity, as I will explain in this article.

The goal I am referring to is Number 26 of the 45 communist goals, which were entered in to the congressional record in 1963: 
#(26) Present homosexuality, degeneracy, and promiscuity as "normal, natural, and healthy."

One of the main goals of communism has always been the destruction of the Judeo-Christian worldview. Man will not allow himself to become subservient to an all-powerful state as long as he believes in, and follows the Laws of God. The Bible commands us to follow God's Law and not the ways of men. So, in order to enslave the mind, belief in God must be discredited. The communists don't care about marriage equality; they don’t care about marriage at all.  The issue is used as a means of demoralizing society. In fact, it is not at all uncommon for communist regimes to brutally oppress homosexuals, if not outright murder them no different than Muslims.

Many people find themselves wondering why the left is silent as Islam’o’nazi's continue to throw accused homosexuals from rooftops, and burn them alive. It would seem that any organization truly dedicated to special rights for those who engage in sodomy would acknowledge these atrocities while pointing out the safety most homosexuals enjoy in the United States.

The goal, as mentioned previously, is not to give sodomites equal rights, but to demoralize society in order to make us susceptible to an all-out communist takeover. In order to do this, religion must be destroyed says Phillis Schlafly. Phyllis Schlafly has been a powerhouse in the conservative movement for over 50 years. Now at 90 years old, she is generally regarded as an iconic figure whose lifetime of work has endeared her to many thankful conservatives.”

Again, this is a concept many people have a difficult time understanding. The goal is to completely remake society in the image of communism. Sadly, these homosexual activists fail to realize that they are no more than "psychopolitical dupes," or useful idiots being used to push an agenda that in the end will strip them of all humanity as well.

To understand this further we need to once again, refer to the Soviet Manual on Pyschopolitics. The whole communist agenda can be best summed up saying that they are attempting to label America as a sick society in need of mental healing, well they may be right. For centuries, men looked to the clergy in order to solve problems of the mind and spirit. Communists despise this because they want to rule over man, and as mentioned previously, men who follow Gods laws cannot be ruled by men. Consider this quote from page 60 of the Soviet manual.  "You must work until religion is synonymous with insanity. You must work until the officials of the city, county and state governments will not think twice before they pounce upon religious groups as public enemies."

The attack on Christianity is in full swing in almost all aspects of our culture. The homosexuals are
being used in an effort to label Christians as being bigoted and homophobic while simultaneously tearing at the moral fabric of our society.

Unfortunately, as many of us are well aware, the same-sex "marriage" issue is just the beginning and it is the symbolic "slippery slope" leading to the unimaginable.

To be against homosexuality is now viewed as a bigoted position. Those who enjoy the benefits of marriage are now considered the oppressors of those who are allegedly being denied these privileges. This spans well beyond the scope of just same-sex "marriage" my friend, as the issue of pedophilia is making its way into main stream acceptability.

If you remember, not too long ago Rutgers-Camden professor Margo Kaplan declared that pedophilia is not a crime, rather a condition one might be born with.

This is how the argument was made that homosexuality might in fact be normal. She also declared that pedophilia should be considered a human right because people who identify as having sexual orientations towards young children are often marginalized because they have to keep these orientations to themselves.

This is sick beyond comprehension; however it serves as further proof of a communist agenda. Once again we need to refer to a quote from the Soviet Manual, page 62.
"Technical papers should exist as to the tremendous number of cures effected by psychiatry and psychology, and whenever possible, percentages of cures, no matter how fictitious, should be worked into legislative papers, thus forming a back ground of evidence which would immediately rebut any effort to actually discover anyone who had ever been helped by psychiatry or psychology."

 What this quote is essentially admitting is that communists lie. They have subverted every aspect of our culture and submit false evidence that attempts to discredit the Judeo-Christian worldview and turn the minds of men towards communistic solutions, through the social sciences. Issues that can be disguised as human right struggles are being used to actually denigrate society in an effort to demoralize the nation, making us ripe for conquering.

Homosexual rights, the "black lives matter" campaign, racism, feminism and wealth inequality, abortion, the anti-gun campaign, Agenda 21 and the EPA are all being used in this manner, and the activists pushing these issues are nothing but the proverbial "useful idiots" of our time. If we do not reverse course now, we will certainly follow the same path as other communist countries before us. Once men have become completely demoralized they no longer have a leg on which to stand to defend their nation.

Again, if you have read them, I want to share two lists with you. The first is a list that was entered into 1963 Congressional Record. The 45 communist goals. The second is the 10 Planks of “The Communist Manifesto:”

Read number 2 and 10 of Karl Marx 10 Planks
2. “A heavy progressive or graduated income tax.”
We have a progressive income tax designed to redesibute the wealth.
10.Free education for all children in government schools. Abolition of children’s factory labor in its present form. Combination of education with industrial production, etc.”  Obama is trying hard to get free community college tuition as I write this article. Then it will expand to 4 year and graduate schools. With a curricula that is ordered by the illegal Federal Department of Education. Brainwashing indoctrination, cranking out nothing but young communist robots.  
THE BOTTOM LINE: So when you stand back a ways to look at the bigger picture, what do you see?  I like to visualize it as sitting on a beach and watching the waves come in.  They say that most waves are small, even some smaller ones in between, but every 7th wave or so is the big one.  The one the surfers wait for. The main wave with all the power behind it that pushes the smaller waves in front of it. If you think of the smaller waves as the political unrest in America and the world, such as North Korea, China, the Ukraine, North Africa,  even Iran and ISIS.   And the little waves in between such as education or as I refer to it robotic programing, same sex marriage, abortion, Christian bashing, pornography, gun bans and the like.  They are all pushed by the one big wave that’s coming.  ‘Social Communist Dependence.’
I have written scores of articles claiming that Islam will take over most of the world and while I still believe that, I also see the big wave of Communism using the Muslims as “Useful Idiots” as Vladimir Lenin called them, doing all the dirty work for them.  Then out of the chaos Communism will overtake us like the really big wave, because it is even more entrenched and infiltrated in America than the agenda of Islamic Jihad. 
I can trace the agenda of Communist ideology in America back before 1900. In and around 1913 much of the foundation of Communism was laid in America by Congressional action. And the left wing so-called progressives have been building on that foundation ever since.  
Of the 55 things I would be curious to what your personal scorecard might read. Feel free to comment below, or for subscribers just reply with the email notification. My interpretation is that progress or completion has been made on almost every single Communist goal or plank laid out today. If you would like to do further research on this topic I would highly recommend a movie trailer that you can access today:

Thanks for listening – de Andréa

Please pass on this article to everyone on your email list.  It may be the only chance for your friends to hear the truth.

Monday, June 29, 2015

Believers in Traditional Marriage Now’ Risk Being Treated as Bigots

Let us then begin with the affirmations, not prohibitions. Genesis 1-2 says the male was incomplete without the female: "It was not good for man to be alone." The woman was created to be a suitable companion for the man. Indeed, as the rabbis were to say later, the woman is seen as the crown of creation--that which not merely completes creation, but prompts the benediction that now finally all was  “tov m'od” --very good.

Believers in Traditional Marriage Now’ Risk Being Treated as Bigots

By de Andréa, Opinion Editorialist
Published June 29, 2015
Justice Samuel Alito (AP Photo/Charles Dharapak)

In Justice Samuel Alito dissent from the Supreme Court’s 5-4 decision in Obergefell v. Hodges, which declared that same-sex marriage is a right, Alito said the court had falsely likened opposition to same-sex marriage to racism and that its decision “will be used to vilify Americans unwilling to assent to the new orthodoxy.”

Guess what: according to the Declaration of independence our right’s come from our Creator, not the government.  And somehow I can’t see God advocating the right of SAME SEX MARRIAGE or Sodomy!

“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights…” Marriage is intrinsically a man and a woman, (it belongs to a thing by its very nature.)  Sodomy is unnatural my friend and if you think otherwise then you are ignorantly and willfully perverted.

And as the declaration says: “All men are created equal” and I can assure you that God didn’t Create Sodomites.  But He did create man’s ability to choose the sin and perversion of Sodomy.  He wouldn’t have created the very thing He obviously despised.  
Alito warned that in the wake of the court’s ruling, Americans who dare to publicly express views in favor the traditional understanding that marriage is between a man and a woman will risk recrimination.

“I assume that those who cling to old beliefs will be able to whisper their thoughts in the recesses of their homes, but if they repeat those views in public, they will risk being labeled as bigots and treated as such by governments, employers, and schools,” Alito wrote.
“By imposing its own views on the entire country,” he continued, “the majority facilitates the marginalization of the many Americans who have traditional ideas.”  This by the way, is why the 

U.S. Constitution was written the way it was. 

Here is a key excerpt from Alito’s dissent:

“Today’s decision usurps the constitutional right of the people to decide whether to keep or alter the traditional understanding of marriage. The decision will also have other important consequences. It will be used to vilify Americans who are unwilling to assent to the new orthodoxy. In the course of its opinion, the majority compares traditional marriage laws to laws that denied equal treatment for African-Americans and women.E.g., ante, at 11–13. The implications of this analogy will be exploited by those who are determined to stamp out every vestige of dissent.
Perhaps recognizing how its reasoning may be used, the majority attempts, toward the end of its opinion, to reas­sure those who oppose same-sex marriage that their rights of conscience will be protected. Ante, at 26–27. We will soon see whether this proves to be true. I assume that those who cling to old beliefs will be able to whisper their thoughts in the recesses of their homes, but if they repeat those views in public, they will risk being labeled as bigots and treated as such by governments, employers, and schools.
The system of federalism established by our Constitu­tion provides a way for people with different beliefs to live together in a single nation. If the issue of same-sex mar­riage had been left to the people of the States, it is likely that some States would recognize same-sex marriage and others would not. It is also possible that some States would tie recognition to protection for conscience rights. The majority today makes that impossible. By imposing its own views on the entire country, the majority facili­tates the marginalization of the many Americans who have traditional ideas. Recalling the harsh treatment of gays and lesbians in the past, some may think that turn-about is fair play. But if that sentiment prevails, the Nation will experience bitter and lasting wounds.”


THE BOTTOM LINE: If the ‘Left Wing Despots’ are so concerned about Constitutional Rights for all and not just certain rights for certain people. Then what about the rights of those bigoted heterosexuals that choose not to enable Sodomy. 


You see the Federal government doesn’t have the right to govern marriage it is not in the constitution and the Tenth Amendment requires it. So constitutionally it must be “…reserved to the States respectively or to the people.”  But certainly not the Courts.  If the five Justus’s even new anything about the American Constitution they would know that they cannot legislate from the bench.


Obviously knowing the law or upholding the Constitution is not a requirement for being appointed to the U.S.  Supreme Court…


Post Script: Even the Muslims, the demonic followers of Satan himself, do not tolerate sodomy…


“This is no longer a Christian Nation, it is a Muslim Nation” Barack Hussein Obama.


‘The IS’ will be God’s curse on America.


Thanks for listening – de Andréa

Please pass on this article to everyone on your email list.  It may be the only chance for your friends to hear the truth.

Sunday, June 28, 2015

There is No Dignity in Sodomy

“Better to write for yourself and have no public, than to write for the public and have no self.”- Cyril Connolly (1903 - 1974)

There is No Dignity in Sodomy

By de Andréa, Opinion Editorialist
Published June 28, 2015
WARNING: I print the truth, even if it’s graphic or distasteful.

I thought about a different title for this op-ed because “Muslims” already want to kill me and my family.  Now the “Sodomites” will want to kill me as well!  Or on the other hand it could be something less dramatic, I might be arrested for a hate crime just for telling the truth.

Many websites will not publish this because it has the "S" word in the title, but Sodom is a Biblical word. And I am not ashamed to call it what the Bible calls it. It refers to the homosexual city of Sodom and you know what happened to that city.  Moreover, because of legal and enabled Sodomy and the murder of more than 50 million American Children the same will happen to America!

The skin is off of the onion. We now know what it is that the homosexuals were after: they wanted "dignity." The ignorant and deceived Supreme Court Justus Anthony Kennedy used the term "dignity" throughout his entire written decision on sodomy-based "perverted marriage." 

I went to the dictionary because, until recently, words had meaning:  DIGNITY—"A way of appearing or behaving that suggests seriousness and self-control; the quality of being worthy of honor or respect."

Got news for you my perverted robotic friend, there is no dignity in sodomy! No matter what five degenerates in black robes might say, there is no dignity in sodomy.

Dignity cannot be bestowed by any court. No judge can make male-on-male sodomy "worthy of honor and respect." Honor and respect come from within. No man can ever feel dignified as another man violates his anus. It is the ultimate desecration of manhood.

There are several men in my life that I genuinely love and admire. My friend Wayne and Jim are two of them. I love Wayne and Jim, but I have no desire to engage them in sodomy. I express my love for them in many ways, but none of them involve sodomy. Sex is not love and love is not sex. I love my dog…you get the picture?

There is no dignity in male-on-male oral sex either.  No judge can ever dignify that. You can call it "marriage" if it makes you feel better, but two men doing despicable things to each other's bodies can never be dignified.

Calling it "gay" does not make it so. Sodomy is dirty; in fact, God calls it abominable. Calling it "gay" is nothing more than trying to dignify what they know to be deviant. They are looking for society to tell them it is OK. It is not. It is abominable. The Supreme Judge said so.

Often, homosexuals try to nullify the Biblical prohibition against male-on-male sodomy by comparing it to eating shellfish or wearing mixed thread robes (see the book of Leviticus). If I didn’t like lobster which I do, I wouldn't hesitate to taste one in public. Some things were meant to go into the mouth…some things weren't.

Writing about this makes me sick, and I know reading it makes you sick as well, but can you image actually doing that? How undignified would you feel while and after having done that?

Going to a church that approves of sodomy does not dignify the sin.  "Her priests have violated My law and have profaned Mine holy things. They have put no difference between the holy and profane, neither have they shown difference between the unclean and the clean, and have hid their eyes from My Sabbaths, and I am profaned among them." Ez. 22-26

Definition of PROFANE—"To treat (something sacred) with abuse, irreverence, or contempt." Marriage is sacred.  One cannot dignify it with the profanity of Sodomy.

Marriage is sacred, but many of America's pastors have profaned it. They have lied to you. Homosexual behavior is vile, abominable, debaucherous, perverse and deviant. And now entire so-called Christian denominations have embraced SODOMY.

So, now those who practice sodomy have looked to the perverted judges for dignity. What they fail to understand (or choose to ignore) is the fact that the courts have neither the power nor the authority to dignify such perverse behavior. No court decision can possibly give dignity to men who service other men.

Homosexuals must hate themselves. It is so sad. They wish they weren't trapped in that sin, but validating the behavior simply will not dignify it. I hate what homosexuality does to the soul of a man. I absolutely hate it. There is no way to dignify it. Only Jesus can help. He will give you your dignity back.

Clarence Thomas, in his dissent, wrote, "Slaves did not lose their dignity because the government allowed them to be enslaved. Those held in internment camps did not lose their dignity because the government confined them. And those denied government benefits did not lose their dignity because government denied them those benefits. The government cannot bestow dignity, and it cannot take it away."

Dignity comes from within. Dignity can never come from doing what one knows to be wrong.

I fully understand that I'll be criticized for writing so graphically and many will be offended by my words.

But that's OK—we should all be offended by what homosexuals do. It is not them I hate…it is their behavior!

Someday, speaking frankly and candidly, as I just did, will get me thrown in jail, and someone in jail may try to sodomize me. That wouldn't be love or marriage; that would be an attempt to steal my dignity. But that won't work. My dignity cannot be stolen.

When and if that day comes, I will put that orange jumpsuit on with my dignity still intact.


May God have mercy on us all! 


Thanks for listening – de Andréa

Please pass on this article to everyone on your email list.  It may be the only chance for your friends to hear the truth.

Saturday, June 27, 2015

Scalia: The SCOTUS Majority A 'Threat to America’


“8 But we know that the law is good if one uses it lawfully, knowing this: that the law is not made for a righteous person, but for the lawless and insubordinate, for the ungodly and for sinners, for the unholy and profane, for murderers of fathers and murderers of mothers, for manslayers,” [and for murders of children] 1 Timothy 1:8-9New King James Version (NKJV)  

Scalia: The SCOTUS Majority A 'Threat to America’

By de Andréa, Opinion Editorialist
Published June 18, 2015

 (Alex Wong/Getty Images)

Justice Antonin Scalia wrote a dissenting opinion of the Supreme Court's decision and called the majority on the high court a "threat to American democracy."

Even though Antonin Scalia hasn’t gone as far as I have when describing the useless Federal Supreme Court that hasn’t upheld the U.S. Constitution since the John Jay Court, and in case you didn’t know that was the First U.S. Supreme Court in history.  But at least he has stated the obviousness of the current court.  

The ruling "says that my ruler and the ruler of 320 million Americans coast-to-coast, is a majority of the nine lawyers on the Supreme Court," Scalia said.
Chief Justice John Roberts, along with Samuel Alito, Scalia and Clarence Thomas all dissented in separate opinions.

There are currently 13 state bans in place, while 8 state appellate court overturned the will of the people and Alabama, currently has contested a court ruling that lifted the ban there.

Scalia's dissent was among the strongest:

"The substance of today’s decree is not of immense personal importance to me," he wrote. "It is of overwhelming importance, however, who it is that rules me. Today’s decree says that my Ruler, and the Ruler of 320 million Americans coast-to-coast, is a majority of the nine lawyers on the Supreme Court. Until the courts put a stop to it, public debate over same-sex marriage displayed American democracy at its best." 

"But the Court ends this debate, in an opinion lacking even a thin veneer of law," Scalia argued. "Buried beneath the mummeries and straining-to-be-memorable passages of the opinion is a candid and startling assertion: No matter what it was the People ratified, the Fourteenth Amendment protects those rights that the Judiciary, in its 'reasoned judgment,' thinks the Fourteenth Amendment ought to protect."

"The opinion is couched in a style that is as pretentious as its content is egotistic," he writes. "If, even as the price to be paid for a fifth vote, I ever joined an opinion for the Court that began: 'The Constitution promises liberty to all within its reach, a liberty that includes certain specific rights that allow persons, within a lawful realm, to define and express their identity,' I would hide my head in a bag. The Supreme Court of the United States has descended from the disciplined legal reasoning of John Marshall and Joseph Story to the mystical aphorisms of the fortune cookie.

"And to allow the policy question of same-sex marriage to be considered and resolved by a select, patrician, highly unrepresentative panel of nine is to violate a principle even more fundamental than no taxation without representation: no social transformation without representation," he argued. "But what really astounds is the hubris reflected in today’s judicial Putsch."

Scalia took the harshest decent against the majority:

THE BOTTOM LINE: The Fourteenth Amendment that was supposedly the bases for the majority opinion was adopted on July 9, 1868, as one of the Reconstruction Amendments. The amendment addresses citizenship rights and equal protection of the laws, and was proposed in response to issues related to former slaves following the American Civil War.


So specifically the Equal Protection clause was meant for former slaves to be protected by the law as equals. Which prior to that time African slaves had not.  The Equal Protection was later used in courts for other applications but always as the law pertains to a criminal cases, which this is not.


As Justus Scalia said the Constitution had nothing to do with the majority decision because the Equal Protection clause in the fourteenth Amendment has nothing to do with marriage rights or any other rights only that due process of the law is enforced for Blacks as well as anyone else. And prevents the States from passing or enforcing laws that arbitrarily discriminate against anyone. 
Guess what? The United States didn’t pass any law regarding marriage that changed the law. Marriage between a man and a woman has been a law of science for six thousand years. If it had not been so, the human race would not have survived beyond the first generation.


Thanks for listening – de Andréa

Please pass on this article to everyone on your email list.  It may be the only chance for your friends to hear the truth.

Friday, June 26, 2015

The New American Civil War

 "The great enemy of the truth is very often not the lie-- deliberate, contrived and dishonest-- but the myth, persistent, persuasive and unrealistic. Belief in myths allows the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought." -John F. Kennedy
The New American Civil War
Will the new non-specific definition of marriage cause riots and civil disobedience.

By de Andréa, Opinion Editorialist
Published June 6, 2015

So, what issue will be the catalyst that will begin the civil unrest and civil disobedience possibly culminating in an all-out war against the state and federal governments in the U.S. that Jade Helm 15 is preparing for?

It may be something other than what you thought.

Both Rick Santorum and Tom Delay say “the U.S. Supreme court doesn’t have the final say on Constitutional Law.”  This is ultimately a government by the people not the courts.  

In light of this morning’s Supreme Court RULING, which is not a legal rule at all, a rule is a law and Courts can’t make law only elected legislators can make law.  The court can write opinions that’s all. Moreover the U.S. Supreme has not written a proper constitutional opinion that actually upheld the Constitution since the John Jay Court.

Five Supreme Court justices said that this was a constitutional issue and made their decision on that bases.  Except not one of those five justices actually said where the constitution addresses this issue. Because it doesn’t.  As Justas Scalia said this is a people issue and should be decided by the people which states like Californian did…twice…and both times it was illegally overturned by the courts.
Justice Antonin Scalia wrote a dissenting opinion of the Supreme Court's decision and called the majority on the high court a "threat to American democracy."
Justice Antonin Scalia wrote a dissenting opinion of the Supreme Court's decision and called the majority on the high court a "threat to American democracy."
No matter what side one comes down on this issue this has illegally become a legal issue and the courts can’t make law.   

Former House Majority Leader Tom DeLay tells Newsmax TV he is ready to fight the U.S. Supreme Court tooth and nail should it rule that same-sex marriages must be recognized nationwide — including staging acts of civil disobedience.

"Rick Santorum is absolutely right. If this Supreme Court rules against marriage, all hell is going to break loose," said DeLay, a Texas Republican who represented the Lone Star State's 22nd District, said on "The Steve Malzberg Show."

"In fact, I'm a signatory of a document that basically says you can rule any way you want to, but we're going to stand for marriage even if it takes civil disobedience." Continued DeLay.

DeLay did not outline exactly what forms of civil disobedience would be used, but insisted that a Supreme Court ruling is not necessarily enforceable. 

"A ruling by the Supreme Court is nothing but a court opinion, if the legislative branch and the executive branch do not enforce it," he told Steve Malzberg.

"Not only that, if the states would just invoke the 10th Amendment and assert their sovereignty, they can defy any ruling by the Supreme Court. It's in the Constitution. We can tell the court what cases they can hear.”

Note: The 10th Amendment is the most violated Amendment of the U.S. Constitution by both the federal government and the U.S. Supreme Court.
The 10th amendment: “The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.” (Emphasis mine.)
"I passed six bills out of the House limiting the jurisdiction of the courts saying you can't hear a case on prayer in schools or you can't hear a case on a nativity scene on the county lawn." Said DeLay.

The Supreme Court is set to rule on whether same-sex marriage is a constitutional right and many legal experts believe the nation's top jurists will invalidate gay marriage ‘bans’ (meaning an opinion supporting gay marriage nationwide.) because five of them voted to advance gay rights as recently as 2013.  DeLay said if that happens, the United States will be bucking the longstanding and historical definition of marriage.

"For all of time, not just Christians and Jews, but all’ religions have defined marriage as one man and one woman to come together as one and have children and raise those children," he said.

"You cannot redefine it. It is set in stone. You can call it something else and create civil unions, but you cannot redefine marriage. Plus, this is about religious liberty. Look at what's already happened and the Supreme Court has not ruled yet.  We have a photographer losing their business, a baker losing her business, a florist losing her business because the government and its heavy hand came down on them because under their religious tenets and religious standing, they could not bring themselves to service a same-sex marriage ceremony … This is about religious liberty more than anything else.”  Said DeLay.

THE BOTTOM LINE: Whether one believes in a million year old civilization on earth or a 6 thousand year old civilization recorded in history, as Tom Delay says Marriage has always been between a Man and a Woman. Any and every belief system supports that, even the stannic religion of Islam.  If that were not true, the population of the earth would likely be a pitiful few and wouldn’t have survived.  I am not a biologist but even I know that two of the same gender in the human species cannot propagate the earth.  One only needs to do a little research to understand that it is just the way we were designed, if you believe either randomly or with purpose. Moreover, and in spite of the desire to pervert that fact, it still only works one way.

The not so obvious problem here is that marriage has always been specific. Meaning that it is specifically between a male and a female of the human species.  But if the U.S. Supreme court in all their bias and ignorance, should for some reason defy the laws of nature then the specificity of marriage is now... well it’s gone, unless a man and a woman can no longer marry and the specificity has then changed to same gender marriage only. Then it would be specific to those of the same gender.  But alas it will have no specificity so a woman or a man could show up at the magistrate’s office with his or her tree or turtle or baboon, because marriage is no longer specific.  It is now anything goes. Well I guess it is one way to solve the population explosion of 7 billion people and counting.

But that is not the end of the not so obvious problem.  As the population of heterosexuals decrease, because the population of homosexuals increases, and the population of Muslims increase, then the population of homosexuals will decrease because you see, Muslim kill homosexuals and infidels. Then…catch your breath… the population of heterosexual infidels will decrease. Because Muslims kill them as well.  Then finally, all that will be left are Muslim heterosexuals.  Because Muslim have an average of 15 – 18 children.  Osama Ben laden for example was one of 52 siblings. Osama himself had 27 children before Obama had him killed…because… Obama himself wanted to be top dog in the Muslim Brotherhood…but I digress…

Tom DeLay seems to think that if the Supreme Court decides to ‘Rule’ Marriage as being between two of anything. Then yes I agree that could have long term and far reaching repercussions that could spark off civil unrest all across the nation.

If a man wants to live with his goat, or a woman want’s to live with her pig. Or two men what to live with each other or two women want to live with each other.  I don’t personally care. But why does the law for the rest of us, the vast majority of us, have to change.  FROM SPICIFICLY BETWEEN A MAN AND A WOMAN, TO…. I don’t know I like it just the way it has always been, thank you very much.

Read an important article and watch a video by the AFA here. 

Thanks for listening – de Andréa

Please pass on this article to everyone on your email list.  It may be the only chance for your friends to hear the truth.