Saturday, January 31, 2015

Islam: The Religion of Satan

Islam: The Religion of Satan
It is described as the religion of peace, just where is there peace in Islam?
Hello! Maybe you didn’t hear my questionWHERE IS THERE PEACE IN 
ISLAM??? Where?

By de Andréa
January 31, 2015

One need look no further than one’s own front yard to understand that Islam is the ideology of hate, murder, mayhem and misery.  Bloody beheadings in Florida and Oklahoma and attacks and bombings all over America are just the beginning, it will get worse my friend, much worse.  Moreover, as long as there are Muslims, it will never stop.

West Africa
Earlier this month Muslims from the group known as Boko-Haram (war against-the forbidden) that’s you and me by the way …rampaged through the Nigerian town of Baga slaughtering over 2,000 people, (of the ha-ram).
U.S. counterterrorism officials reported that Boko-Haram utilized strategically and placed IED’s and firing squads to slaughter the majority of the town’s residents. And those that weren’t killed by these insidious tactics were tortured, raped, incinerated and or beheaded.   The religion of peace indeed!
After viewing pictures of the bloodlust of these so-called peaceful Muslims and the carnage of murder–there is no denying that Islam is anything but peaceful, it is in fact, the IDEOLOFY FROM HELL.  And yet we still blindly call it the “Religion of Peace”.
What in the *#@&^* is the matter with us. We must have a death wish in the West.  
Let’s face it– the reality is, that no matter where Muslims reside – hate, the carnage of murder, mayhem and misery always follow.

The Philippines
There is a report coming from The Philippines that 49 members of an elite police unit were killed early Sunday while attempting to enter an Islamic NO GO zone to arrest suspected terrorists.

Just last week, in the city of Mosul, Iraq– the IS executed 13 teenage boys for violating Sharia law. And what was their crime? They dared to watch a soccer match on TV.
Saudi Arabia
In a video that just went viral–religious police in Mecca, Saudi Arabia dragged a woman out of her home in broad daylight and then beheaded her in the street. And the Muslim cowards that carried out this nefarious act didn’t even bat an eye.
This woman (who was begging for her life) wasn’t even afforded an ounce of due process because under Islamic Sharia lawwomen are nothing more than vermin.
All this, while our Muslim president pals around with the new king of Saudi Arabia and at the same time he shuns the leader of Israel Netanyahu.  Well…one shouldn’t expect anything else from Obama, Muslims just hate Jews.  Moreover, Obama also had no time to join the leaders of 57 other countries in France after the attack on Charlie Hebdo and the Jewish restaurant by his fellow Muslim terrorist jihadists.  
Not convinced? Read this…
Of course, Islam’s vile footprint isn’t limited to third-world countries and desert fiefdoms. Sadly, Western Civilization has felt the wrath of this archaic and vile ideology from Hell, and still we are willfully blind to the truth of Islam. We are enabling the diggers of our own graves.
Lest we forget the thousands of innocent children who have been raped by Muslim so-called “grooming gangs” throughout Europe simply because under Sharia law they are considered to be “infidel sluts.”  
Not to mention the plethora of “no-go” zones that vitiate the European landscape from the UK to Sweden. These zones are breeding grounds for terrorists and other Islamo-thugs to hatch their machinations like the one executed in France against Charlie Hebdo.  
But we don’t have those NO-GO ZONES here in the U.S. Right!  Wrong…as I said “Let’s face it–no matter where Muslims reside – hate, the carnage of murder, mayhem and misery always follow.”  Take a look at the NO – GO ZONES in Dearborn Michigan.  Yes that’s a city in the state of Michigan, one of the 50 or so states right here in the U.S.. I telling you this just in case you attended one of the Nazi/Islamic anti-American government so called public schools of robotic programming and politically correct indoctrination.
And while we take the Ten Commandments out of our court rooms we have allowed Sharia law to take the place of U.S. law. Look at Sharia in a Texas court.  More on that tomorrow.
THE BOTTOM LINE: The murder, mayhem and misery of this so-called “Peaceful Nation Of Islam” is rapidly taking root and proliferating on our home turf just as it has in every country in the world, and it will continue to get worse unless we elect a president who is not a Muslim Jihadist for a CHANGE, CHANGE, CHANGE, and one who respects Constitutional Law rather than Sharia Law (particularly free speech and the right to bear arms “for the security of a free State” that Obama doesn’t want,)–but who also recognizes Islam for the evil barbaric refuse from Hell that it truly is.
And just for the record…I don’t hate Muslims, I hate h ideology of Islam. And furthermore, as some of you have been writing back to me… I am not a racists.   Just for the purpose of your education, Islam is not a race of people, most but not all are Arabs, and I have nothing at all against Arabs, and not all Arabs are Muslins some are more Christian than you.  Moreover, Islam is not a religion of peace or anything else. It is an Ideology like Nazism, only on steroids, bent on taking control of the entire world, using terror, infiltration, coercion, intimidation, murder or any other means available.  
That’s what Islamic Jihad is’ my friend… Read the Quran and the Hadith’s, it’s in there.
Thanks for listening – de Andréa
If you agree please pass this article on to everyone on your email list.  may be the only chance for them to hear the truth.

Friday, January 30, 2015

Who Is Loretta Lynch?

Who Is Loretta Lynch?
Moreover, is she pro-Muslim?

By de Andréa
January 30, 2015

The question in the title might be one for the new Senate to consider in their confirmation hearings of Obama’s Attorney General Nominee Loretta Lynch, which has already begun. Maybe that is because Chuck Schumer has already declared that Lynch “is a consummate professional, [who] has a first-rate legal mind and is committed in her bones to the equal application of justice for all people.

So what is the real truth and what is Lynch’s position on Islamic jihad and its religious underpinnings? In the 2012 terror plot to bomb New York’s JFK Airport, Lynch, as U.S. Attorney for the Eastern District, weighed in on the sentencing of 66-year-old co-conspirator Kareem Ibrahim, who was given a life sentence. According to the Associated Press (via the Seattle Times.

Lynch said in a statement that “Ibrahim, a Shiite imam from Trinidad, “abandoned the true tenants of his religion’ by participating in the plot.”  In 2007 Lynch was already making excuses and covering up what Kareem Ibrahim attempted to do at Kennedy Airport in NY.  Worse than that she lied as Obama lied when he said “ISIL is not Islamic” covering up the true agenda of Islam.  And why is Obama and members of his regime the only ones to identify the IS as ISIL?  Because he is a Muslim and hates Jews, the reference to ISIL supports that.   

As Robert Spencer (An expert on the history and ideology of Islam) grimly quips at Jihad Watch:
“Yes, I am sure that Loretta Lynch knows so much more about the true “tenants” of Islam than does a 66-year-old Shi’ite imam.”

Lynch’s defense of Islam’s true nature are compatible with those of the president and members of his regime, who have said variously:
·        Now let’s make two things clear: ISIL is not “Islamic.”  No religion condones the killing of innocents…  Said Barack Obama

Uh-oh, he’s going to blame ISIL on the Jews and Christians! 
·        ISIL does not represent Islam and Islam does not condone or honor such depravity.” Said Secretary of State John Kerry.

Lynch seems to be a perfect fit with your Muslim President Barack Hussein Obama— which makes her a less than perfect fit for the role of the nation’s top cop.

Attorney General nominee Loretta Lynch belonged to a student group that brought Jew-hating Palestinian terrorists to Harvard Law School every year she was a member.   Lynch belonged to the Harvard Black Law Students Association (BLSA) from 1981-1984 when she was a student.

During those years the radical black group brought representatives from the Palestinian Liberation Operation (PLO).
The group’s leader, Mohammed Kenyatta, called for the “liberation of Palestine” and expressed support for the terrorist organization.  The BLSA defended bringing the terrorists in a letter to the editor of the Harvard student newspaper, The Harvard Crimson.
Jewish student organizations protested the speeches, especially in 1984. Liberal professor Alan Dershowitz joined the anti-PLO protests.  The Harvard Crimson condemned the response of Lynch’s organization in 1984.
The Black Law Students Association (BALSA) committed an unjustifiable and discriminatory violation of student liberties last week when it denied Jewish students an opportunity to participate in a campus forum featuring a representative of the Palestinian Liberation Organization (PLO).
More than 30 Jewish Law Students Association (JLSA) members attended the panel discussion, outnumbering members of BALSA and the Third World Coalition, the event’s sponsors. But after opening the forum to questions from the floor, BALSA moderator Muhammad I. Kenyatta refused to recognize any of the white hands raised in the audience. BALSA and TWC members were to be given priority, he announced, proceeding to call on a Black student who hadn’t raised his hand.
We defend the PLO’s right to appear in an open forum at Harvard. All groups have a right to present their views; had Kenyatta permitted all students to challenge the speaker with critical questions, the ensuing discussion might have provided a constructive exchange of ideas and opinions.
By stifling debate, however, Kenyatta reduced the event to little more than a propaganda platform for a terrorist organization that has pledged to destroy the State of Israel. His refusal to open the floor to all students’ views showed a glaring disregard for the principles of free discussion that are vital to an enlightened academic community.
Related Articles

Will we jump from the frying-pan into the fire with this one?

Thanks for listening – de Andréa

If you agree please pass this article on to everyone on your email list.  It may be the only chance for them to hear the truth.

Thursday, January 29, 2015

Will the GOP Put Holder on Trial?

Will the GOP Put Holder on Trial?

Well maybe, kind’a, sort of!

By de Andréa
January 29, 2015

I believe the GOP lawmakers just may use yesterday and again today’s examination of Loretta Lynch, the federal prosecutor picked by President Obama to replace Holder as attorney general, to air long-standing grievances with the Obama administration.

They’ve long seen Holder and Obama as skirting the law on hot-button issues such as immigration, counterterrorism, tax enforcement and drug policies.  Moreover, the president’s frequent use of executive action and regulation has drawn accusations that he’s exceeding his authority under the Constitution.
“I think there’s an erosion of confidence in the Department of Justice on the fundamental question of whether the attorney general politicizes the office,” Sen. Jeff Sessions (R-Ala.) said Tuesday. “We need an attorney general that won’t politicize the office.”
But while GOP lawmakers are relishing the opportunity to sink their teeth into Holder’s record, they also concede Lynch — barring any misstep — is likely to be confirmed.  Her reputation as being tough on crime has won praise from both sides of the aisle, with Fox News Host Bill O’Reilly calling her a “hero” last week, leaving the White House confident she’ll win over the Senate.
While Lynch’s nomination appears assured, as Democrats need only a handful of Republicans to cross the aisle and support her nomination, she still might have trouble staying out of the partisan crossfire at her confirmation hearing.
“The Justice Department is a big mess,” said Judiciary Chairman Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa), “and we want to know how she’s going to straighten out the department.” 
One of the biggest points of contention will undoubtedly be immigration on the heels of the president’s announcement late last year that he would use prosecutorial discretion to defer deportation for up to 5 million illegal immigrants.
Sessions, who also sits on the panel, has been among the Senate’s most outspoken opponents of the president’s executive action. And Sen. John Barrasso (R-Wyo.) said he’d judge her qualifications for the job based on how she responded to questions about the president’s immigration plan.
Another Judiciary panel member, Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.), said he had two things he wanted Lynch to address: his push for the DOJ to target Internet gambling more aggressively and his concern over efforts to close the prison at Guantanamo Bay.
The committee has invited former CBS News reporter Sheryl Attkisson, who investigated the Justice Department’s “Fast and Furious” gunrunning program, to appear before the panel. Congress held Holder in contempt for withholding documents from a House panel investigating the program.
After leaving CBS to join the Heritage Foundation, Attkisson filed a $35 million lawsuit against Holder accusing the federal government of spying on her.
Questions about the Justice Department’s treatment of journalists will be amplified by another witness, Jonathan Turley, a George Washington University professor known for having called for Holder’s resignation over the government’s seizure of phone records belonging to The Associated Press.
“I bet every one of the 10 [Republican] senators will have a question about executive action,” Grassley said.
Thanks for listening – de Andréa

If you agree please pass this article on to everyone on your email list.  It may be the only chance for them to hear the truth.

Wednesday, January 28, 2015

18 Year Old Girl To Marry Her Father

18 Year Old Girl To Marry Her Father
I didn’t quite see this coming…

By de Andréa
January 28 2015
Have you ever had one of those, “I told you so” moments? Where you warned, and you predicted. But no matter how well you reasoned, no one seemed to listen. You could tell as you talked, the person was not listening. They were just bent on doing what they wanted because it seemed they were so blind and deceived that they couldn’t hear you or see the truth.
Then, the things you said and then some, all came to pass. Well, here it is, welcome to the slippery-slope of perversion that you voted for my friend. 
But quite honestly, I didn’t see this ‘specific one’ coming.  Gay marriage, Transgender marriage, marriage between a man and his dog, but marrying one’s own child, no, I didn’t think we could become so depraved and perverted.
An unnamed 18 year old girl from New York announced that she was set to marry her biological father. In an interview with New York Magazine, she said that “they were in love and that they were planning to have children”.
The girl and her father were estranged for 12 years. According to reports, she was conceived on prom night when her parents were just 18. That the parents could not make it work and the father was not in her life. The girl’s mother has been in and out of relationships with men the girl’s entire life. She always felt that there was a void of fatherly affection. Until, one day, the father reached out to the girl on Facebook.  This led to the girl spending a week with her father.
She recalls what happened:  “[W]e didn’t know what was going on, but admitted that we had strong feelings for each other,” she told the publication. “We discussed whether it was wrong and then we kissed. And then we made out, and then we made love for the first time. That was when I lost my virginity.”
Clearly this girl is confused, she confessed to a lesbian relationship in high school, and then a relationship with a young man. She was restricted from seeing the young man because her mother was concerned that the relationship was getting too serious.
Christian news reported: “She also had a relationship with a teenage boy, but when her mother felt that matters were becoming inappropriate, she pulled her out of school and homeschooled her for a time.”
Fox News quotes her: “Everyone on my mom’s side of the family sees us as father and daughter,” she told the magazine. “Those who know that he’s my dad, and that we are engaged, include my father’s parents (they can see we are happy together and they can’t wait for us to have babies — they treat us just like any other couple), the woman we live with, and my best friend.”
THE BOTTOM LINE: There are two points to be seen in this situation. First is the fact that if you allow one abomination the next is right behind. As many, including me, who oppose homosexual marriages have stated, if we allow this, what is next? Where does it lead? If you allow misguided love to determine what is moral, all is allowed. “It feels good so it must be okay.”
The situation also points to the fact that children need good and strong male figures in their lives. This is a lesson in the nature that God created.  Two parents, a mom and a dad. This girl would not be confusing love for sex if she had a constant, safe, and proper affection of a father. She would not think that sex is the only way that a man shows a woman affection. This confusion occurs when there is the absence of proper male affection in a young girl’s life before puberty.
And then this pervert took advantage of his own absence to molest his vulnerable child. This is no different than child molestation and incest, and there should be an investigation.
We allowed the Pandora’s Box to be opened:
If you thought that gay marriage was the end, yes you were mistaken. I believe, we have only seen the beginning. This, my friend, is going to be a long descent into the depravity of Hell. We are truly on the slippery slope, and trust me, it could lead to a nightmare.

Thanks for listening – de Andréa
If you agree please pass this article on to everyone on your email list.  It may be the only chance for them to hear the truth.

Copyright © 2014 by Bottom Line Publishing -  Permission to reprint in whole or in part is gladly granted, provided full credit is given.

Tuesday, January 27, 2015

He Got 18 Months For Saying “Islam is Evil”


He Got 18 Months For Saying “Islam is Evil”

Wow…that means I’ will eventually get the death penalty.

By de Andréa
January 27, 2015

I guess it’s not just the Islamic terrorists who hate free speech. Apparently, it’s also the
governments of the so-called free Western nations.  I don’t know if you are brain dead, but I can assure you that I am not.  This tells me, as it should tell you, that most Western Nations such as Canada and shortly the U.S. U.K. France, etc. are already controlled by IS Sharia Law.  Because this certainly is not the law of any Western country that I know, this my friend is pure and simple barbaric Sharia Law.

Like me, Eric Brazau has long been an opponent of Islam – but he has never committed any physical act of violence against anyone. In fact, he has never even suggested that violence be done to anyone else… ever. But the Canadian government recently arrested Brazau for saying Islam is evil, and charging him with a “hate crime.”   Well it is…evil that is. 
What crime did he commit? He was arrested and then denied bail for saying that he hated Islam.
Things got even worse when Brazau went before a judge…
The wise guy judge told him, “You had a ticket to ride, not a pass to harass.” Judge Lapkin sentenced Brazau to 18 months in prison, and an additional 2 years’ probation when he’s released. He even added a weapons ban to these 2 years’ probation, because in Lapkin’s point of view “…words are weapons too.”  What about banning the words “Hate Crime” Judge!  You’re using those words as a weapon against a free people.   Oh! I forgot only tyrants are allowed to have weapons.

This is actually Brazau’s second arrest for this “crime”… (Honestly, it pains me to even pretend that it’s reasonable to call any kind of speech a “crime” especially this speech.)
More proof that the West is becoming an Islamic State: Has a Muslim ever been arrested in any western country for Hate-Speech for saying he hates Christians and/or Jews?  NO!  WHY? Because my friend, we are under Sharia Law and Islam controls the West. 
The right to free speech and free expression is inalienable… not just in American culture, but in Western culture in general.
I don’t know how Western nations like Canada, France and Britain could pretend to rally around Charlie Hebdo… and in the same breath prosecute their own citizens for saying things that may offend other people. It’s completely absurd and hypocritical.
If the government will not allow us to express the things we believe because other people may be offended, then we are not truly free. It is oppressive Sharia Law.  It is not any government’s job to protect our feelings and it is not the government’s job to dictate our beliefs. Folks, if we wish to be free and be able to speak freely, it means that we MUST protect all speech. Even speech we don’t like, maybe ‘especially’ speech we don’t like.
THE BOTTOM LINE: Just how long do you think it is going to take until this IS Sharia law creeps south of the Canadian border? Well, as I said earlier if your brain hasn’t died yet, you will know it already has in one way or another.  And like the evil cancer that Islam is, it will destroy us.

Thanks for listening – de Andréa

If you agree please pass this article on to everyone on your email list.  It may be the only chance for them to hear the truth.

Monday, January 26, 2015

Supporting Gun Control Is Part of Being Pro-Life

Supporting Gun Control Is Part of Being Pro-Life
No it’s not…

By de Andréa
January 26, 2015

In a preamble to the latest pro-life march on January 22’s Forty-First annual March for

Life in Washington DC, pro-life leader and National Clergy Council president Reverend Rob Schenck stressed that supporting gun control is part of being pro-life. 

I am Pro-life, first because I am a Christian and second because I am an American.  And I am Pro-Gun, first because I am a Christian and second because I am an American.
I don’t know what Reverend Rob Schenck is…

According to USA Today, Schenck said:

“It’s time for the pro-life movement and lovers of life everywhere to expand our vision of the sanctity of human life. It’s past time to defend the full spectrum of life, from the tiny unnamed pre-born in the womb, to an oversized Michael Brown, to a New York cop doing his duty, to any young black male who strays into the path of an armed vigilante with a concealed carry permit.

The presence of a gun in the homes of women and children suffering the scourge of domestic violence makes it five times more likely that the woman will be killed.”
The pro-life movement must bring its voice of conscience into the conversation and debate over the ominous proliferation of guns–licensed and unlicensed–in our society.

The pro-life movement has been very vocal on abortion but far too quiet on gun control. That needs to change.”

So who is Robert Lenard "Rob" Schenck? (Pronounced SHANK)

He was born 1958 in Montclair, New Jersey.  He is a leading American Evangelical pastor to
elected and appointed officials in Washington, DC.
He is serving as President of the Christian outreach ministry Faith and Action, Schenck is an ordained minister of the Evangelical Church Alliance and was elected its chairman in July 2012.

Since 1982, he has preached in all 50 states, several Canadian provinces, and over 40 countries. He has created organizations still serving those in need and providing ongoing spiritual and humanitarian support in such places as Mexico, Egypt, and Cambodia.
Media outlets and policy makers seek his opinions on current issues, and he regularly appears as a guest on news and opinion shows. 

And he is deceived and brainwashed by political correctness. He is also anti-Constitution and un-American.  Furthermore he has lost the ability to think for himself if he ever had it. 

THE BOTTOM LINE: Despite the fact that he claims we should all be pro-life (and he’s right, we should) and therefor anti-gun as well, because…well because they go together don’t they? No, you see, they are just the opposite.  This is why I say he hasn’t the ability to reason or think for himself.

Reverend Schenck like many Americans, Christian or not, are caught up in the brainwashing and robotic programing of the American citizenry.  While pro-life or abortion is not specifically covered in the U.S. Constitution, the right to be armed is.  So I say he is anti-constitutional.  And since the U.S. Constitution is part of the foundation of America I say he is un-American. 

And while I am not going to judge his Christian faith I can judge what he stands for.  The fact he is against the murdering of innocent children is Biblical but denying one right of self-defense is not.

In the —Gospel of Luke 22:36-38, NIV it says:

[Jesus speaking to his decuples] “He said to them, “But now if you have a purse, take it, and also a bag; and if you don’t have a sword, sell your cloak and buy one. It is written: ‘And he was numbered with the transgressors’; and I tell you that this must be fulfilled in me. Yes, what is written about me is reaching its fulfillment.” The disciples said, “See, Lord, here are two swords.” “That’s enough!” he replied.

Here, Jesus, the son of God, was trying to explain to his friends that they would need to be prepared to stay mobile (side note: the word fugitive comes from a Latin root meaning "to flee"): they would need to always have a purse (for money) and a bag (to carry basic supplies) ready, and that a sword (for protection against other men) would be more important than a cloak (clothes) in the days to come.

So isn’t anti-gun also anti-Christian? Yes, I’m afraid it is my friend.

Don’t be fooled by so-called intellectual Christians who contradict not only themselves but the word of God for the sake of political acceptance.

So sell your clothes if you have to, but buy at least two guns…

Thanks for listening – de Andréa

If you agree please pass this article on to everyone on your email list.  It may be the only chance for them to hear the truth.

Copyright © 2014 by Bottom Line Publishing -  Permission to reprint in whole or in part is gladly granted, provided full credit is given.