Once Again, Obama Uses Taqiyyah
to Lie to Americans
But he may have outsmarted
himself this time, and stepped in the camel dung anyway!
By de Andréa
December 8, 2014
December 8, 2014
At right, President Obama
strides to the podium in the East Room at the White House Nov. 20 to deliver an
address to the nation on his illegal immigration actions.
(Screenshot is from White House video).
It’s common knowledge President Obama signed an executive order on
November 21, directing the Department of Homeland Security to forgive millions
of illegal aliens for their past violations of immigration law, and it’s true
right?
WRONG! It’s just another Fraud…
National Archives and Records Administration, responsible for
maintaining such filings, said no such executive order was ever
signed or filed. National Archives librarian, Jeffrey Hartley,
made the confirmation in an email Thursday.
“As I said, it would appear that there is not an Executive Order
stemming from the President’s remarks on November 20 on immigration,” Hartley wrote.
Hartley said that neither of the executive orders Obama signed in Las
Vegas on the 21st, the day after his announcement fulfilled his plan
to defer deportations and grant work permits to up to 5 million illegal aliens.
Obama again used Islamic Taqiyyah
to lie and mislead the press and subsequently the American People.
“The only two documents that I have located are two Presidential
Memoranda, which are available from the White House site,” Hartley’s email continued. “They
can also be found in the November 26, 2014 issue of the Federal Register.”
The two documents Hartley referenced were the two executive orders Obama
signed in Las Vegas Nov. 21, that Obama led the press to believe was the “Executive Amnesty Orders.”
They were presidential proclamation creating a White House Task
Force on New Americans and a presidential memorandum instructing both the Secretaries
of State and Homeland Security to consult with various governmental and
non-governmental entities to reduce costs and improve service in issuing
immigrant and non-immigrant visas.
Meanwhile, the office of Texas Attorney General and Governor-elect Greg
Abbott – who has filed a lawsuit against Obama’s immigration action –said it
was aware there was no executive order signed by Obama implementing the actions
outlined to the nation in his Nov. 20 speech.
But on Wednesday, attorneys general in 16 other states still joined in
the lawsuit with Abbott charging Obama’s immigration action violated the U.S.
Constitution’s “Take Care” clause and failed to follow the Administrative
Procedure Act’s guidelines for implementing new policies, including a comment
period to outline the changes’ benefits.
Abbott said in a statement the president “is abdicating his responsibility
to faithfully enforce laws that were duly enacted by Congress and attempting to
rewrite immigration laws, which he has no authority to do – something the
president himself has previously admitted.”
Guess What? The complaint states: “The President’s new policies were effectuated through Defendant
Johnson’s DHS Directive.” As I
said Obama outsmarted himself and stepped in it anyway. He may have just bought himself a one-way
ticket to Gitmo…well…probably not. But
one can only hope!
It confirms the only Obama administration document relevant to the
plan Obama announced Nov. 20, is a DHS memorandum signed by Johnson, titled “Exercising
Prosecutorial Discretion with Respect to Individuals Who Came to the United
States as Children with Respect to Certain Individuals Who Are the Parents of
U.S. Citizens or Permanent Residents.”
Abbott’s complaint further indicated the only basis for the DHS memo
directing the change in the operation of the Deferred Action for Child Arrivals
program was not a presidential executive order but a legal opinion written by
the principal deputy assistant attorney general in the Office of Legal Counsel,
Karl R. Thompson, to advise Johnson and White House counsel.
The principal argument in Abbott’s complaint is that the DHS directive
violates the president’s constitutional duty to “take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed,” as set forth by the U.S. Constitution
in Article II, Section 3, Clause 5.
“The Take Care Clause limits the President’s power and ensures that he
will faithfully execute Congress’s laws – not rewrite them under the guise of
executive ‘discretion,’” Abbott’s complaint stated in the first count.
The second count further confirmed the reporting that Johnson’s Nov. 20
memorandum has not been filed in the Federal Register, which means it has not
been available for public comment as required by federal law for federal
administrative agencies seeking to engage in rulemaking.
“The Defendants promulgated and relied upon the DHS Directive without
authority and without notice-and-comment rulemaking,” Abbott’s complaint specified in Count
Two. “It is therefore unlawful.”
The “Guide to the Federal Rulemaking Process” published by the Office of the
Federal Register specifies agencies to “get their authority to issue regulations
from laws (statutes) enacted by Congress.”
In an interview Wednesday, Tom Fitton, president of Washington-based
watchdog Judicial Watch, said the legal status of Johnson’s memo is a serious
constitutional question that deserves to be adjudicated.
He said Obama’s “entire implementing authority”
regarding the immigration action is Johnson’s memo, “which changes the immigration law, directing
federal money to be spent that has not been appropriated by Congress.”
“In my view, there is a serious question whether Jeh Johnson should be
impeached for taking this action, and a criminal investigation should be
initiated to determine how and why federal funds are being misappropriated,” he declared.
How
did everyone get it wrong?
How then did the White House manage to convince the mainstream media,
Congress and the nation that Obama had signed in Las Vegas two executive orders
to implement the immigration actions he announced in his Nov. 20 speech from
the White House? Most of the Media is
still in the dark about this.
On Nov. 20 at approximately 6 p.m., the White House press office
released a “Fact Sheet” titled “Immigration Accountability Executive
Action.”
The first sentence read: “The President’s Immigration Accountability
Executive Actions will help secure the border, hold nearly 5 million
undocumented immigrants accountable, and ensure that everyone plays by the same
rules. Acting within his legal authority, the President is taking an important
step to fix our broken immigration system.”
The second sentence stated: “These executive actions crack down on
illegal immigration at the border, prioritize deporting felons not families,
and require certain undocumented immigrants to pass a criminal background check
and pay their fair share of taxes as they register to temporarily stay in the
U.S. without fear of deportation.”
While neither sentence claimed Obama was about to sign an implementing
executive order, both conveyed the impression that “executive actions” would
be taken to somehow legitimize the status of some 5 million illegal immigrants
currently in the country.
In his Nov. 20 speech, Obama said: “Now, I continue to believe that the best
way to solve this problem is by working together to pass that kind of common
sense law. But until that happens, there are actions I have the legal authority
to take as President – the same kinds of actions taken by Democratic and
Republican presidents before me – that will help make our immigration system
more fair and more just. Tonight, I am announcing those actions.”
The next day, the White House press office issued a “travel pool report”
documenting that at about 12:15 p.m. local time in Las Vegas, shortly after
landing and still aboard Air Force One, President Obama “signed two memoranda associated
with his executive actions on immigration,” giving the impression the
documents were orders to implement the changes in policy the president had
specified in his speech.
The pool report said only still photographers were invited to record the
signing, with no pool reporters allowed to be present or to answer questions.
Upon landing in Las Vegas, the White House press office released a
statement saying, “Today aboard Air Force One the president signed two Presidential
Memoranda associated with his executive actions.”
The White House press office did properly identify the contents of the
two presidential memoranda, but no White House reporter at the time observed
that they had nothing to do with modifying prosecution under DACA but dealt
instead with unrelated immigration matters.
In his Las Vegas speech at Del Sol High School, Obama said: “We’re
going to keep on working with members of Congress to make permanent reform a
reality. But until that day comes, there are actions that I have the legal
authority to take that will help make our immigration system more fair and more
just. And this morning, I began to take some of those actions.”
So what is this magic voodoo Taqiyyah that Obama used on the American
Public? First – this isn’t the first and
only time the ‘Grand Mahdi Obama’ has used this supernatural deception on the
American public. Oh no! He has been
using this all of his life my friend. I
would like to say, suffice it to say Barrack Hussein Obama is a
Muslim, but in case you may need more information on Taqiyyah Click on This.
THE BOTTOM LINE: What I conclude from this is that
Obama in his desire to fool the American public into believing that he boldly
and blatantly violated the U.S. Constitution so false charges would be filed
against him, all while thinking he didn’t, and was legally innocent…he blatantly
violated the U.S. Constitution by writing what he thought were those two
innocent memos.
In addition it is evidence that a Dictatorship exists in America, as few
dictators document their laws, they are just given verbally by decree. They simply speak laws into existence.
Something like Obama does…
And he thinks he is a constitutional guru!
Thanks for listening – de Andréa
If you agree please pass this article on to everyone on your
email list. It may be the only chance
for them to hear the truth.
Copyright © 2014 by
Bottom Line Publishing, All Rights Reserved - Permission to reprint in
whole or in part is gladly granted, provided full credit is given.
No comments:
Post a Comment