The
Mysterious Khorasan
Abracadabra
Obama O’sama, yet another Muslim terror group…or’ is it?
By de
Andréa
October 17,
2014
A Muslim, terrorism, Jihad and the
agenda of Islam of world domination are inseparable. Meaning ONE IN THE SAME
my friend. A Muslim is a Muslim is a
Muslim.
A little insight: In the game of Chess one sacrifices his own
for the greater good.
Despite the fact that Obama has the same Islamic ideology as ISIS, the president has been compelled to go through the motions and has seemed to ‘act against’ jihad (part of Islamic taqiyyah by the way) that has obviously neither ended, nor been “decimated” as he has said. The jihad, in fact, has inevitably intensified under his counterfactual worldview, which holds, for one thing, that empowering Islamic supremacists to fight against other Islamic supremacists, is the path to security and stability. Yet even as war intensifies in Iraq and Syria — even as jihadists continue advancing, continue killing and capturing hapless so-called opposition forces on the ground, despite Obama’s futile air raids — the president won’t let go of the charade, he can’t. Moreover if you absorb all the media politically correct propaganda that somewhere out there, beyond all the brutal terrorism, is a moderate, moral, peaceful Islam, then you have consumed the poison of ‘Islamic Taqiyyah’ my friend. You have been supernaturally deceived.
And now’, Obama gives us The Khorasan Group.
The who?
There is a reason that no one has heard of such a group until a nanosecond ago, when the new and improved “Khorosan Group” suddenly with seemingly no history, appeared from anonymity to the “imminent threat” that became the rationale for an emergency air war that there was supposedly no time to ask Congress to authorize.
Despite the fact that Obama has the same Islamic ideology as ISIS, the president has been compelled to go through the motions and has seemed to ‘act against’ jihad (part of Islamic taqiyyah by the way) that has obviously neither ended, nor been “decimated” as he has said. The jihad, in fact, has inevitably intensified under his counterfactual worldview, which holds, for one thing, that empowering Islamic supremacists to fight against other Islamic supremacists, is the path to security and stability. Yet even as war intensifies in Iraq and Syria — even as jihadists continue advancing, continue killing and capturing hapless so-called opposition forces on the ground, despite Obama’s futile air raids — the president won’t let go of the charade, he can’t. Moreover if you absorb all the media politically correct propaganda that somewhere out there, beyond all the brutal terrorism, is a moderate, moral, peaceful Islam, then you have consumed the poison of ‘Islamic Taqiyyah’ my friend. You have been supernaturally deceived.
And now’, Obama gives us The Khorasan Group.
The who?
There is a reason that no one has heard of such a group until a nanosecond ago, when the new and improved “Khorosan Group” suddenly with seemingly no history, appeared from anonymity to the “imminent threat” that became the rationale for an emergency air war that there was supposedly no time to ask Congress to authorize.
The media journalists look at each
other and shrug their brainwashed shoulders and occasionally use the name so
they won’t appear ignorant when in fact they have no foggy idea what it is, or
where it came from.
For six years, your Muslim President Obama has
endeavored to brainwash the country into accepting two pillars of his
alternative national-security reality. First,
he willfully lies when he claims to have dealt “decisively with the al-Qaida terrorist
threat, rendering it a disparate series of ragtag jayvees”. And second, he again knowingly lies when he asserts
that “the
current threat of ISIS is unrelated to “Islam”, which [he maintains] is
innately peaceful, moderate, and opposed to the wanton violent extremists
who
purport to act in its name”.
When in point of fact, IS, ISIS,
ISIL Khorosan or any other Muslim Mujahedeen organization that claims to do
whatever they do in the name of Allah, as I said in point of fact according to
the Quran, the Muslim book of satanic ideology this new version of terrorism is
totally and completely Islamic. Check a
previous article “ALL
MUSLIMS LIE”
You haven’t heard of the Khorosan Group before this because there isn’t one my indoctrinated friend. It is a name that Obama came up with, calculating that Khorosan — the –Iranian– Afghan border region — had sufficient connection to jihadist lore that no “ignorant Westerner” would call him on it. Except me of course! Moreover so far he’s right!
The “Khorosan Group” is nothing but the so-called decimated al-Qaeda. That’s the warm fuzzy peaceful Muslim religious group that Obama said he destroyed, remember?
You haven’t heard of the Khorosan Group before this because there isn’t one my indoctrinated friend. It is a name that Obama came up with, calculating that Khorosan — the –Iranian– Afghan border region — had sufficient connection to jihadist lore that no “ignorant Westerner” would call him on it. Except me of course! Moreover so far he’s right!
The “Khorosan Group” is nothing but the so-called decimated al-Qaeda. That’s the warm fuzzy peaceful Muslim religious group that Obama said he destroyed, remember?
Now
get ready for this…
It is simply a faction within the
global terror network’s Syrian franchise, “Jabhat al-Nusra.” Its leader, Mushin
al-Fadhli (believed to have been killed in this week’s U.S.-led air strikes),
was an intimate of Ayman al-Zawahiri, the emir of al-Qaeda who dispatched him
to the jihad in Syria. Except that if you listen to administration officials
long enough, you come away thinking that Zawahiri is not really al-Qaeda,
either. Instead, he’s something the administration is at pains to call “core
al-Qaeda.”
“Core al-Qaeda,” you are to understand, is different from “Jabhat al-Nusra,” which in turn is distinct from “al-Qaeda in Iraq” (formerly “al-Qaeda in Mesopotamia,” now the “Islamic State” al-Qaeda spin-off that is, itself, formerly “al-Qaeda in Iraq and al-Sham” or “al-Qaeda in Iraq and the Levant”). That al-Qaeda, don’t you know, is a different outfit from al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula . . . which, of course, should never be mistaken for “al-Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb,” “Boko Haram,” “Ansar al-Sharia,” or the latest entry, “al-Qaeda in the Indian Subcontinent.”
Coming soon, “al-Qaeda on Hollywood and Vine.” In fact, it wouldn’t surprise me if, come 2015, Obama issued an executive order decreeing twelve new jihad jayvees stretching from al-Qaeda in January through al-Qaeda in December. There! Did you get all that?
Moreover, you’ll hear only about the jayvees, not the jihad. You see, there is a purpose behind this dizzying proliferation of names assigned to what, in reality, is a global network with multiple tentacles and occasional internecine rivalries. As I said all Muslims are potential Islamic terrorists whether radical or moderate.
As these columns have long contended, Obama has not quelled our enemies; he has miniaturized them. The jihad and the sharia supremacism that fuels it form the glue that unites the parts into a whole — a worldwide, ideologically connected movement rooted in satanic Islamic scripture that can project brutal power on the scale of a nation-state and that seeks to conquer the West and the world if it can. Your Muslim president of course does not want you to see the threat this way.
For a product of Islam and the radical Left like Obama, terrorism is a conduit to achieving the agenda of Islamic world domination. But it must be seen as regrettable but understandable consequence of American arrogance. That it happens to involve Muslims is just the coincidental fallout of Western imperialism in the Middle East, not the doctrinal command of a belief system that perceives itself as engaged in an inter-civilizational conflict. For the Left, America has to be perceived as the culprit. Despite its inbred pathologies, which we had no role in cultivating, for Obama, Islam must be seen as the victim, not the cause. As you’ll hear from Obama and his Islamist allies, who often double as Democrat activists, the problem Obama see’s in his evil heart is “Islamophobia,” not Muslim terrorism.
“Core al-Qaeda,” you are to understand, is different from “Jabhat al-Nusra,” which in turn is distinct from “al-Qaeda in Iraq” (formerly “al-Qaeda in Mesopotamia,” now the “Islamic State” al-Qaeda spin-off that is, itself, formerly “al-Qaeda in Iraq and al-Sham” or “al-Qaeda in Iraq and the Levant”). That al-Qaeda, don’t you know, is a different outfit from al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula . . . which, of course, should never be mistaken for “al-Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb,” “Boko Haram,” “Ansar al-Sharia,” or the latest entry, “al-Qaeda in the Indian Subcontinent.”
Coming soon, “al-Qaeda on Hollywood and Vine.” In fact, it wouldn’t surprise me if, come 2015, Obama issued an executive order decreeing twelve new jihad jayvees stretching from al-Qaeda in January through al-Qaeda in December. There! Did you get all that?
Moreover, you’ll hear only about the jayvees, not the jihad. You see, there is a purpose behind this dizzying proliferation of names assigned to what, in reality, is a global network with multiple tentacles and occasional internecine rivalries. As I said all Muslims are potential Islamic terrorists whether radical or moderate.
As these columns have long contended, Obama has not quelled our enemies; he has miniaturized them. The jihad and the sharia supremacism that fuels it form the glue that unites the parts into a whole — a worldwide, ideologically connected movement rooted in satanic Islamic scripture that can project brutal power on the scale of a nation-state and that seeks to conquer the West and the world if it can. Your Muslim president of course does not want you to see the threat this way.
For a product of Islam and the radical Left like Obama, terrorism is a conduit to achieving the agenda of Islamic world domination. But it must be seen as regrettable but understandable consequence of American arrogance. That it happens to involve Muslims is just the coincidental fallout of Western imperialism in the Middle East, not the doctrinal command of a belief system that perceives itself as engaged in an inter-civilizational conflict. For the Left, America has to be perceived as the culprit. Despite its inbred pathologies, which we had no role in cultivating, for Obama, Islam must be seen as the victim, not the cause. As you’ll hear from Obama and his Islamist allies, who often double as Democrat activists, the problem Obama see’s in his evil heart is “Islamophobia,” not Muslim terrorism.
Again I refer to the game of Chess, where one sacrifices his own for the greater good!
Obama has been telling us for years that he handled al-Qaeda by killing bin Laden. He has been telling us for weeks that the Islamic State —(an al-Qaeda renegade that will soon reconcile with the mother ship for the greater good of unity in the anti-American jihad) — is a regional nuisance that posed no threat to the United States. In recent days, however, reality intruded on this fiction. Suddenly, tens of thousands of terrorists, armed to the teeth, were demolishing American-trained armies, beheading American journalists, and threatening American targets moreover now it has come to this country, here and here as I warned you it would.
Obama is not the manner of man who can say, I was wrong: It turns out that al-Qaeda is actually on the rise, its new Islamic State faction is overwhelming the region, and American interests — perhaps even American territory — are profoundly threatened.” So instead . . . you now have “the Khorasan Group.” Oh Yeah! A brand new enemy…or in reality it is the same old Islam still carrying out its robotic program of world domination at any cost.
You also have been given a warm fuzzy smiley-face story about five Arab states joining the United States in a coalition to confront the terrorists. Finally, as the story goes, Sunni governments were acting decisively to take Islam back from the so-called “un-Islamic” elements that falsely commit “violent extremism” under Islam’s banner.
Sounds uplifting … until you read the fine print. You’ve got to dig deep to find it. It begins, for example, 42 paragraphs into the Wall Street Journal’s report on the start of the bombing campaign. After the business about our glorious alliance with “so-called moderate” allies like Saudi Arabia and Qatar who use the satanic Islamic art of taqiyyah to say they so despise terrorism, but again in reality, we learn:
“Only the
U.S. — not Arab allies — struck sites associated with the Khorasan group,
officials said. Khorasan group members were in the final stages of preparations
for an attack on U.S. and Western interests, a defense official said. Khorasan
was planning an attack on international airliners, officials have said. . . .
Rebels and activists contacted inside Syria said they had never heard of
Khorasan and that the U.S. struck several bases and an ammunition warehouse
belonging to the main al Qaeda-linked group fighting in Syria, Nusra Front.
While U.S. officials have drawn a distinction between the two groups, they
acknowledge their membership is intertwined and their goals are similar.”
Oops. So it turns out that our so-called “moderate Islamist partners” have no interest in fighting Syria’s al-Qaeda new Obama affiliate the Khorosan. ”…they acknowledge their membership is intertwined and their goals are similar.” The WSJ writes…Why? Because in fact they are the same so-called defeated al-Qaida that Obama has conveniently renamed Khorasan pretending it’s a whole new group in order to save face. Khorasan is sort of like instant coffee, just add a Muslim!
Yes, as Obama is, our so-called Arab allies are reluctantly are going through the motions of an ally, and to a very limited extent, joined U.S. forces in the strikes against the Islamic State renegades. But that’s not because the Islamic State is jihadist while they’ are moderate. It is because the Islamic State has made mincemeat of Iraq’s forces, is a realistic threat to topple Assad, and has our partners fretting that they are next on the menu. Which go to show you that in the Islamic quest to dominate the world, each group wants to dominate the other. In the end each sect wants to be king of the hill. That will last only until an Islamic Caliphate is chosen, then Islam will become the new and improved Ottoman Empire. All the sects that are now wasting energy fighting each other will then fight as one mujahedeen to conquer the world for Allah/Satan.
It has been reported that our so-called ally the Turkish forces, are massed on the Turkey Iraqi border, but have been firing on the Curd’s, who maybe our only real ally in the area. Meantime, though, the Saudis and Qatar want no trouble with the rest of al-Qaeda, particularly with al-Nusra. After all, al-Qaeda’s Syrian branch is tightly allied with the “moderate opposition,” these “so-called moderate” Gulf States with the help of Obama, have been funding, arming, and training for the jihad against Assad, now we are fighting them.
And Oh…what about those other “moderates” Obama has spent his presidency courting, like CAIR the Counsel for American Islamic Relations, and the Muslim Brotherhood for example? It turns out they are not only all for al-Qaeda, but the Brotherhood even commended what one of their top sharia jurists, Wagdy Ghoneim, has labeled “the Crusader war against the Islamic State.”
“The Crusaders in America, Europe, and elsewhere are our enemies,” Ghoneim tells Muslims. For good measure he adds, “We shall never forget the terrorism of criminal America, which threw the body of the martyred heroic mujahedeen, Bin Laden, into the sea.”
While Obama has his story and he’s sticking to it, the same can be said for our enemy Islam.
Do
you think there just might be a connection? Oops. So it turns out that our so-called “moderate Islamist partners” have no interest in fighting Syria’s al-Qaeda new Obama affiliate the Khorosan. ”…they acknowledge their membership is intertwined and their goals are similar.” The WSJ writes…Why? Because in fact they are the same so-called defeated al-Qaida that Obama has conveniently renamed Khorasan pretending it’s a whole new group in order to save face. Khorasan is sort of like instant coffee, just add a Muslim!
Yes, as Obama is, our so-called Arab allies are reluctantly are going through the motions of an ally, and to a very limited extent, joined U.S. forces in the strikes against the Islamic State renegades. But that’s not because the Islamic State is jihadist while they’ are moderate. It is because the Islamic State has made mincemeat of Iraq’s forces, is a realistic threat to topple Assad, and has our partners fretting that they are next on the menu. Which go to show you that in the Islamic quest to dominate the world, each group wants to dominate the other. In the end each sect wants to be king of the hill. That will last only until an Islamic Caliphate is chosen, then Islam will become the new and improved Ottoman Empire. All the sects that are now wasting energy fighting each other will then fight as one mujahedeen to conquer the world for Allah/Satan.
It has been reported that our so-called ally the Turkish forces, are massed on the Turkey Iraqi border, but have been firing on the Curd’s, who maybe our only real ally in the area. Meantime, though, the Saudis and Qatar want no trouble with the rest of al-Qaeda, particularly with al-Nusra. After all, al-Qaeda’s Syrian branch is tightly allied with the “moderate opposition,” these “so-called moderate” Gulf States with the help of Obama, have been funding, arming, and training for the jihad against Assad, now we are fighting them.
And Oh…what about those other “moderates” Obama has spent his presidency courting, like CAIR the Counsel for American Islamic Relations, and the Muslim Brotherhood for example? It turns out they are not only all for al-Qaeda, but the Brotherhood even commended what one of their top sharia jurists, Wagdy Ghoneim, has labeled “the Crusader war against the Islamic State.”
“The Crusaders in America, Europe, and elsewhere are our enemies,” Ghoneim tells Muslims. For good measure he adds, “We shall never forget the terrorism of criminal America, which threw the body of the martyred heroic mujahedeen, Bin Laden, into the sea.”
While Obama has his story and he’s sticking to it, the same can be said for our enemy Islam.
Or
maybe a better question should be…do you think beyond what you have been
brainwashed with?
THE BOTTOM LINE: I believe that even the biggest sceptic, of
some kind of a conspiracy to over throw the American Republic, in one way or
another, must take another look at the reality of what is going on in the White
House.
I
have been called a prophet by some and an insane conspiracy nut by others. I don’t make a claim to either title. I am, in this respect, just what every
American should be…possibly what most every American has lost. I am nothing but an independent thinker. I analyze everything, I read what is behind
the words, and trust very few. But in the end, I can see down the road, and
you can too.
In
order to do that you must think for yourself, turn off the easy road of indoctrination,
political correctness and take another road.
Don’t just follow the dependent flock of sheep who are led by the Obama
indoctrination machine called the Main Stream News Agencies. They have obviously become just a propaganda
machine to control the non-thinking low-information masses.
You
don’t have to be one of Obama’s programed robots, you can be an independent
thinker and help put America back on the road to the Free Republic that our
independent thinking Fore Fathers designed it to be.
Thanks
for listening – de Andréa
If you
agree please pass this article on to everyone on your email list. It may be the only chance for them to hear
the truth.
Copyright © 2014 by Bottom Line Publishing - Permission to
reprint in whole or in part is gladly granted, provided full credit is given.
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment