More’ Proof That U.S. Schools Are Nazi
Indoctrination Centers
“Every scientific revolution took place because a
non-consensus view was eventually allowed to gain a hearing,” Anything else is not education it is indoctrination.
By de Andréa
August 12, 2013
Ball State University
president Jo Ann Gora stated that to allow Physics Professor Eric Hedin,
pictured at right, to present intelligent design as a valid scientific theory
would “violate the academic integrity” of the course Hedin was
teaching. My point exactly Ms. Gora, you
are demonstrating the very indoctrinational robotic programming that is at issue
here. If anything, it actually proves’
the integrity’ of the mathematics that Professor Hedin was presenting.
The origin and evolution of the species
by the odds of chance is mathematically impossible. It is even more impossible than believing
that the materials necessary to cause the existence of the Empire State
building just by chance, appearing out of the slime, and as if by magic all the
parts lifted themselves up and fell all into the proper place, and ‘POP’ the
Empire State building. Yeah right! And how much more complex is the
universe? The Empire State
building didn’t happen by chance my friend, it was designed, and so was the
universe.
I can guarantee you Ms. Gora has never
studied the science of intelligent design.
Intelligent design has in fact been proven by the sciences of,
mathematics, biology, and archeology.
And my friend it has been historically proven beyond any doubt that Darwin ’s theory of the “Origin of the Species” was influenced
by ancient religious paganism, making Darwin ’s
theory closer to paganism than science.
In a statement to Ball State
faculty and staff, Gora said: “Intelligent design is overwhelmingly deemed
by the scientific community as a religious belief and is not a scientific
theory .... To allow intelligent design
to be presented to science students as a valid scientific theory would violate
the academic integrity of the course as it would fail to accurately represent
the consensus of science scholars.”
I have news
for you Ms. Gora, “Darwinism is
overwhelmingly deemed by the religions community as a false religion and to
allow the religion of Darwinism to be presented to science students as a valid
scientific theory violates the integrity of education as it fails to accurately
represent the consensus of world wide acceptance.” That was a quote from me and it holds as much
water as yours.
World
Magazine writes: “Students
at Indiana 's Ball State University will no longer hear
intelligent design perspectives in honors science classes after the school
president blasted it as just a “theory”
overwhelmingly rejected by the scientific community”. Oh really, just what does the word “THEORY” actually mean in “Darwin ’s Theory of Evolution” I would
like to know!
“Students at Indiana 's Ball State
University will no longer
hear…” Again proof that there is no education going
on here. Denying students to “HEAR” all
Ideas regarding a subject is not education it is controlled indoctrination.
According to WORLD Magazine, Gora was responding to pressure from the Freedom from
Religion Foundation, which had been alerted to Hedin’s material by a University of Chicago ecology professor. More proof that political presser drives
education rather than the exploration of ideas.
Again it is called Indoctrination.
Atheists are on par with Islamic ideology in that it is my way or the highway aditude, read and article about atheists attack on Home Schooling in Texas.
And then the legal aspect
Casey Luskin, an attorney who works as
a research coordinator at the Discovery Institute, says the university appears to have violated its own policy in the way
it has handled the situation. “If
you look at Ball State ’s faculty guidelines, it has some
very strong protections for academic freedom.
In fact, their guidelines say that teachers should be able to talk about
controversial or unpopular views. But
yet apparently when it comes to intelligent design, they apply a double
standard."
Luskin also says to restrict the
exchange of ideas in the classroom, even though they are controversial or
unpopular, is dangerous. “Every
scientific revolution took place because a non-consensus view was allowed to
gain a hearing,” Luskin explains.
“And then that view gained popularity and eventually it became a
consensus view. So it’s very dangerous,
I think, to the health of the scientific community when you shut down an idea
simply because it’s not the ‘consensus.’”
In July, Discovery Institute vice
president Dr. John G. West submitted a letter the Ball State Board of
Trustees, encouraging the university to “guarantee Prof. Hedin’s freedom to teach
without the threat of censorship or intimidation.”
Attached to that letter was a petition
signed by more than 7,000 supporters of Hedin’s academic freedom.
THE BOTTOM LINE: The absence of academic freedom,
results in indoctrination not education.
Our schools and colleges have followed Darwin ’s theory ‘and have evolved’ into
nothing but the production of human machines, stamping out programmed robots
that will eventually put a chock in the cog of scientific progress.
The dictatorship of putting science and
technology into a prepackaged box has historically put the brakes on educational
progress completely. Darwinism is worse
than a false religion; it is not even a scientifically provable theory it is just
a hypothesis that takes more blind faith to believe than intelligent design. But it is part of the unquestionable
indoctrination that we have been subjected to since the 1930’s gaining
popularity in the 1950’s. Then by not
allowing opposing views, this science of how the earth began has just STOPPED
DEAD IN ITS TRACKS. I recall that a few
scientists of history went against the consensus including Galileo
Galilei who discovered the Heliocentric system that all the rest of the
planets in our solar system rotated around the sun instead of the accepted Ptolemaic
system where the Earth was the center of the then known Universe. If the exchange of ideas was not allowed, (and
at the time it wasn’t) the truth would not have eventually risen to the
surface. And then the Earth along with
science would still be ‘standing still’, in the center of the cosmos.
If the only purpose of the talking heads is to indoctrinate,
then the truth of our origins or the truth about anything for that matter, will
never be known. Let this discourse
freely flow and the truth will eventually prevail and set us free to move on my
friend.
Latest information…though Hedin will no
longer be allowed to teach “The
Boundaries of Science Course,” he has thus far remained at Ball State .
Doing what…sweeping up the debris in the campus parking lot?
The name of the course ironically proves my point as well, they
are putting science in a box, there should be no “boundaries” in science…
Thanks for listening – de Andréa
Copyright © 2013
by Bottom Line Publishing - Permission to reprint in whole or in part is
gladly granted, provided full credit is given.
No comments:
Post a Comment