The Amicus brief
Who is Ed
Snowden? A traitor says the NSA, he has
been called a leakier of classified information, and the media says he has
committed treason. He has been ridiculed
because he didn’t finish high school. He
has been called everything except what he is…a whistle blower, a pragmatist
maybe who sees things the way they really are’ instead of the way he may have
been indoctrinated. He might just be’ a
great American hero.
By de Andréa
June 15, 2013
Just how damaging is the information Snowden released?
“I don’t think it is
damaging at all,” said Jesselyn Radack, national
security and human rights director for Government Accountability Project
(GAP). “Terrorists already know they are
surveilled eight ways to Sunday. It’s only
damaging to the Obama administration, the NSA wants to collect data on all’ U.S. persons.” That’s illegal!
The U.S. government has been collecting
personal data for years to use as a “currency of power” and the recent whistle
blown by Edward Snowden about the National Security Agency is just the tip of
the iceberg, according to a leading government accountability activist.
It's appalling to hear the Washington bureaucrats
and their media allies trash Edward Snowden as a traitor, when it's our leaders
and the NSA who have betrayed us, writes
Kirsten Powers.
Information is the currency of power.
“They are acting as a totalitarian
state,” continued Radick. “This is totally unacceptable.” According to its website, GAP’s mission is to
promote corporate and government accountability by protecting whistleblowers,
advancing occupational free speech, and empowering citizen activists. It is a non-profit, nonpartisan public
interest group. Radack, who is an
attorney representing whistleblowers, added, “My four NSA clients have been
warning about this for three years and no one paid attention. There are other programs besides PRISM. There is much more to come.”
“People need to think
about what the government might have on them, and think hard about whether that
is right”, said Radack.
The NSA surveillance
issue is one of the few out there where conservatives, liberals, progressives,
and libertarians might be able to find common ground. All’ except the criminal in the Big White
House that is, and the rest of his despotic bunch.
“We're strange
bedfellows, but that is one of the advantages of it,” Radack said.
On the Hill, some Republicans
and Democrats are working together to protect citizens from the surveillance of
the Obama regime.
“We’re very active on
this issue,” said Will Adams, deputy chief of staff
for Rep. Justin Amash, R-Mich. Amash is among the congressmen working with
Democratic Rep. John Conyers to write a broad bill that will limit the NSA’s
ability to spy on Americans, according to Adams .
In addition, Adams said they are involved in litigation against the
government, including an amicus
brief with the ACLU, and are considering
joining other congressmen, who are Verizon customers, in suing the government
directly.
One of the big
challenges, according to Adams , is that
members of Congress have a tough time debating the issue when they have not been
made privy to the administration and FISA court’s spinning of the law. Only members of the House and Senate
Intelligence Committees have access to the FISA court’s decisions. Adams said
this type of information should be opened up to everyone in Congress. On Tuesday, a bipartisan group of senators,
including Sens. Ron Wyden, D-Ore.; Mike Lee, R-Utah; Dean Heller, R-Nev.; and
Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., introduced a bill that would declassify FISA court
opinions.
PRISM was described
in an article in The Guardian as a program “which allows officials to collect material
including search history, the content of emails” and more through “direct
access to the systems of Google, Facebook, Apple and other U.S. Internet
giants,” according to top secret documents obtained by the publication.
Larry Page,
co-founder of Google, and Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg both denied knowledge of
PRISM. However there seems to be no
expression of surprise or indignation from these companies.
“It seems impossible
for them not to know,” said Radack. “Google did make a Freedom of
Information Act request, which would imply they didn’t know, which would make
this even creepier.”
Dave Maas, public
relations coordinator for The Electronic Frontier Foundation, agreed that there
is reason to believe the CEOs.
“[I]n many if not
most cases, they’re simply forbidden by law to talk about national security
requests,” he said. “It’s possible, for example,
that only certain individuals within a company are authorized to know about a
spying program, keeping the rest in the dark.
We have, however, noted the careful language some of the companies are
using that could leave wiggle room.”
U.S.
The situation is
serious, but not hopeless, according to Radick: “Call members of Congress and
tell them, ‘I don’t want my personal data to be surveilled by my country.
Public opinion
matters to public officials,” added Adams .
THE BOTTOM LINE:
So…since the National Security Agency apparently answers only to Obama
and is collecting data on all U.S.
Citizens, and Obama is a Muslim stealth Jihadist who has illegally infiltrated
this country…I wonder just how long citizens like me will be able to continue
printing the truth about Obama’s part in the Islamic takeover of America . Mmmm!
Who is in that black SUV parked in front of my house…?
Oh well…If CAIR doesn’t kill me,
Obama’s spooks will!
Thanks for listening – de Andréa
Copyright © 2013 by Bottom Line Publishing - Permission to
reprint in whole or in part is gladly granted, provided full credit is given.
No comments:
Post a Comment