The War Between The DOJ And The State Of Kansas
Attorney General Eric Holder is
throwing the full weight of the Department of Injustice at the Governor of
Kansas. But the problem here is - Eric
Holder doesn’t care or know the Constitution, he kind’a sort’a makes it up as
he goes along. Typical despotism!
By de Andréa
May 5, 2013
Recently, the Kansas
legislature passed and Governor Brownback signed into ‘Kansas law’ a rather watered-down version of
the Second
Amendment Protection Act and federal nullification bill. The gist of it was
that federal or state agents attempting to enforce unconstitutional gun laws on
Kansas-manufactured firearms would
face arrest and prosecution for felony violations. It may have been watered down, but it
offended the Attorney General Eric Holder enough so that he found it necessary to
issue a “Fast and Furious” response from the DOJ Gestapo Headquarters. Here’s what
he wrote in part in a letter to
the Kansas State Governor: “In
purporting to override federal law and to criminalize the official acts of
federal officers, your SB102 directly conflicts with federal law and is therefore
unconstitutional. Under the Supremacy
Clause…the state of Kansas
may not prevent federal employees and officials from carrying out their
official responsibilities. And a state certainly may not criminalize the
exercise of federal responsibilities. Because Kansas SB102 conflicts with federal firearms
laws and regulations, federal law supersedes this new statute; all provisions
of federal laws and their implementing regulations therefore continue to
apply.”
Well…It’s hard to know what to say
about this ignorant disgrace of constitutional interpretation. First, my dear robotic Attorney General, where
does the Constitution give the federal government any authority to regulate any
firearms in any
way, any where? Answer…It doesn’t, and that’s why anything the
feds do with respect to so-called gun control, no matter how well-intentioned,
is in fact unconstitutional at its very fundamental core. This is what the Kansas bill is trying to confirm… This is what the little known 10th Amendment
in the constitution is about: “The powers not delegated to the United States
by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the
States respectively, or to the people.”
You can’t get much clearer than that Eric! There is no power delegated to the federal government to regulate any guns
in any way, any where or at any time. Nor is any such law prohibited by the
Constitution from being enacted by any or all of the many the states.
And then Holder has to bring up the
Supremacy Clause. We’ve been through all
this many times before. The Supremacy clause
does not apply to unconstitutional Federal law.
He seems to think that whatever the ‘feds’ do is authorized by
the very nature of it being from the Gestapo.
But that’s not what the so-called Supremacy Clause says. It’s taken from Article VI of the
Constitution: “This Constitution, and the
Laws of the United States which
shall be made in pursuance thereof; and all treaties made, or which
shall be made, under the authority of the United States, shall be the supreme
law of the land; and the judges in every state shall be bound thereby, anything
in the constitution or laws of any state to the contrary notwithstanding.” [Emphasis mine] Well my friend…we’ve already established that
any federal law
restricting or regulating firearms is unconstitutional, because the
Constitution does not grant the feds any such authority, anywhere in the
document. If the federal government is
enacting laws and creating agencies in direct
opposition to what the Constitution says, they are the ones in
violation. They
are the ones that
are unconstitutional. And the Supremacy
clause doesn’t apply to illegal unconstitutional directives or statutes period.
And since the Constitution doesn’t
grant these authorities to the dictator of the Gestapo Regime of Obama, and
since it doesn’t prohibit states from enacting these laws, on the matter of gun
control, the states are sovereign under the Second, Ninth and Tenth Amendments
to U.S. Constitutional law. And on top
of that, the Constitutional law in question, the 2nd Amendment
says it “shall not be infringed.”
(IN ANYWAY BY ANYONE AT ANY TIME) So as usual the criminal feds
are completely wrong on all accounts. I
don’t know if it is ignorance or just plain political flatulence.
Governor Brownback responded
to Holder (in part):
“The right to keep and bear arms is a right
that Kansans hold dear. It is a right
enshrined not only in the Second Amendment to the United States
Constitution, but also protected by the Kansas Bill of Rights…The people of
Kansas have repeatedly and overwhelmingly reaffirmed their commitment to
protecting this fundamental right. The
people of Kansas are likewise committed to
defending the sovereignty of the State of Kansas
as guaranteed in the Ninth and Tenth Amendments to the United States
Constitution…”
Oh Yeah!
THE BOTTOM LINE:
You can help…Right now; Governor Brownback needs encouragement not to
back down from the tyranny of the Obama Regime.
He can be reached here
by e-mail. Kansans can reach him at 785-296-3232. And here’s his address:
Office of the Governor
Capitol, 300 SW 10th Ave., Ste. 241S
Thanks for listening – de Andréa
Copyright © 2013
by Bottom Line Publishing - Permission to reprint in whole or in part is
gladly granted, provided full credit is given.
No comments:
Post a Comment