State Defense Forces
The Constitutional
Peoples State
Is state session
coming? As
of 2010, 23 states and territories have organized State Defense Forces, 14 of the
governors have now been served with a warning by America
By de Andréa
May 11, 2013
Just in case you are wondering just where you and the
many states stand historically and constitutionally in relation to the Federal
Government on this issue, then this is for you my friend.
A growing number of state governors are
re-establishing State Defense Forces, also known as State Guards, State
Military Reserves, and State Militias. These forces are under the direct
authority of the governor of the state
and are not
subject to federal control. They can be readily deployed when
needed, anywhere in the state for any reason.
As of 2010, 23 states and territories still have
organized State Defense Forces (SDFs) with approximately 18,000 members (and
growing). SDFs were established by federal and state law at the very
beginning of our country’s history. They have played important roles over
the years in helping to defend our nation, however, due to state budget deficits;
more than half of the SDFs have sadly become a thing of the past.
It has been repeatedly reported that President
Barack Hussein Obama is guilty of multiple accounts of treason against the
people and the Constitution of the United States . He has not
been officially charged with any of his many federal crimes because he controls
US Attorney General Eric Holder and the Department of Justice (Holder is just
as guilty of treason as is Obama). The rest of Congress is either too
spineless or fearful to say or do anything about it, ‘and/or’ they are not
getting the needed support and/or pressure from “You The People”.
But let someone else try to stand up against
Obama’s Gestapo and Obama is the first one to start hollering TREASON! Well isn’t that the “Pot Calling The Kettle Black”.
Readying the American states for secession
According to a recent
report, 14 governors have been working to reinstate SDFs in
their states. Governors Tim Pawlenty of Minnesota
and Rick Perry of Texas
have been organizing the drive to get more states to re-establish their SDFs.
The report goes on to say that each of the 14
governors have now received National
Security Letters from the Obama regime demanding that they halt the formation
of their SDFs or face charges of treason. It seems that since Obama has drastically
reduced the size of the Congressional U.S. military and that their forces are
stretched thin with troops still in Afghanistan
and Iraq
that it is because he fears rebellion from the states. Well…he should!
Further evidence of his fear of a rebellion or
revolution is the fact that he has nationalized all of the state National Guard
units. And this my friend is the obvious
reason; he has had his Department of Homeland Security (His private military) purchase
over 2 billion rounds of ammunition and thousands of fully automatic assault
rifles as well as hundreds of armored vehicles.
This is the Personal Army that
Obama promised, and’ although it is funded by congress, it is answerable only
to him.
It is typical of Obama to bully everyone and anyone
who stands up to him and does not bow down and kiss their bottoms goodbye for
him. He’s tried this with many states when they passed voter ID
laws. He bullied and harassed Sheriff Joe Arpaio because he dared to defy
Obama and investigate Obama’s birth certificate. Obama sued the State of Arizona for enforcing a law that he’
illegally failed to enforce.
President Obama is the most corrupt and despicable
president our country has ever had. He considers himself to be above the
people, above law, above Congress above the Constitution and above Almighty God.
He is still actively engaged in giving aide and
support to our enemies in Egypt ,
Libya , Syria , and the Hamas in Gaza , just to name a few which are definable
terms for the charge of treason according to the US Constitution. He is
not acting as our president but rather our dictator. He’s not any
different than Fidel Castro, Stalin or Hitler, or any other dictator in
history. I mean if it walks like a duck’
folks…
If the report on the governors receiving National
Security Letters is true, then America
could well be on the verge of a national showdown between state governors and
the Obama Gestapo. What better way is it for Obama to rid himself of some
of his most ardent state opposition leaders than to start charging them with
treason, the very crime that he is guilty of several times over?
The two Governors leading this move to reinstate and build
up SDFs are Tim Pawlenty, Governor of Minnesota; and Rick Perry, Governor of Texas. Both of these State Governors stated they
have: “…deep fear the President is destroying their
Nation.”
Governor Pawlenty’s fear of Obama is that since Obama took
office he has appeased America ’s
enemies as he has shunned some of America ’s
strongest allies, especially Israel . Governor Perry has also declared that Obama
is punishing his State of Texas by dumping
tens-of-thousands of illegal Mexican immigrants into the cities and small towns
of Texas . Governor Perry further recently stated, “If
Barack Obama doesn’t stop being so oppressive, Texans
might feel compelled to renounce their American citizenry and secede from the
union.” GO PERRY!
So how did we get to such a state of affairs? Well if one knows the Constitution, and has
at least some knowledge of American history and has some ability to think
independently, one would understand that this started a long time ago, 100
years to date. In 1913 one of the several
fatal moves that we the people allowed Congress to make was the passage of the
17th Amendment which totally disconnected the state Governors and
legislators from having any representation in Congress, effectively changing
the American Republic into a true Democracy, something greatly feared by the
Framers. Prior to 1913 and the passage
of the 17th Amendment the state governments voted directly for federal
Senators, who were their representatives in the “State House” or the U.S. Senate. The people already had their direct
representatives as we do today in the “Peoples House”. So today, the U.S. Senate represents no one
but themselves. If this were 1912
instead of 2013 the State Legislators could warn their Senators to either abide
by the Constitution or we will boot you out pronto. Now the states must either give up their
rights or fight for them in a court of law sometimes also rigged by the ‘Federal
Regime’…
Today 14 United State
And so just where do you and the states stand in relation to
the Federal Government if push comes to shove in accordance with constitutional
law and hisotry?
Read and learn my
friend
On September 17, 1787 George Washington was the first to
sign and accept the Constitution even though it had no Bill of Rights. It was Patrick
Henry (God bless him) with his great speeches and lectures who in 1788 forced
an agreement which promised that continued state ratifications of the document
depended solely upon a Bill
of Rights to be forthcoming.
In 1789 when Washington
took office he was faced with the arduous task of pioneering the first presidency
including the structuring of the state militia system. By January 1790 the influence Patrick Henry
had over him became quite apparent. When
Washington
chaired the 1787 Constitutional Convention, provisions had been made for the
defense of the country against invasion and for stifling rebellions, but there was an insufficiency of
safeguards to be applied against tyranny that could be brought on by elitist public
officials in the Federal Government.
By 1790 Washington
began work on his “Plan No. 2 for the Organization of the Militia.” By now he was more able to see the weaknesses
in the Constitution itself. He openly discussed
the threat of tyranny emanating from within the government. By then, Patrick Henry’s wisdom had spread
throughout the 13 original states, and it was inculcated as the basis for the
policies and functions of the militia. Patrick Henry perpetuated the people’s liberty and sustained
the ultimate authority of the people.
George Washington himself took the farmers out for practice. He utilized the knowledge and experiences of
his generals and other valuable officers in the War for Independence by having
them instruct and train the citizens (the whole people) in the techniques of
soldiering, and the maintenance of an ‘energetic
national peoples militia’ and that it
should be armed as well as the Federal Forces.
His “Plan No. 2 for the Organization of the
Militia” was communicated to the Senate, on the 21st of January 1790. This lengthy Plan was permeated with the
proposition that it is the direct duty and responsibility of ‘the people’ themselves to
guard against tyranny from within government.
He warned, “The government would be invaded or
overturned, and trampled upon by the bold and ambitious” — meaning elitist
people in our own country who operated without adherence to vital principles
and/or the law.
The absoluteness of the right of the people to keep and bear
arms was then, and is now, a basic principle.
Unless the right to arms is absolute, the people cannot remain the
ultimate and absolute power. The Bill of
Rights confirmed that we possess many other rights beside the absolute right to
arms. All of the other rights for the preservation
of their own existence depend entirely upon the absoluteness, the force, and
the reasoning that have shaped the Second Amendment. Washington
agreed with Patrick Henry on the purpose of the militia: It was to “oppose the introduction of
tyranny.” Make no mistake about it: The prime reason for the Second Amendment and
the people’s militia is prevention of tyranny in government. Something we are now facing!
To view Washington ’s
statement in the context in which it was delivered, please look over the following
excerpt below taken from Pages 7-8 of an old document published by Gales and
Seaton in 1832 entitled… “American
State Papers – Documents, Legislative and Executive, of the Congress of the
United States, from the First Session of the First to the Second Session of the
Fifteenth Congress, inclusive: commencing March 3, 1789, and ending March 3,
1819”.
This excerpt below is a part of Washington ’s lengthy Plan No. 2 of
1790. While he also referred to the
prevention of invasion and rebellion, Washington
said “the
well informed members of the community (the people) were meant to be the real
defense of the country”; and “the virtues and knowledge
of the people would effectually oppose the introduction of tyranny.”
Source:
EXCERPT DIRECTLY FROM
GEORGE WASHINGTON’S 1790 PLAN No. 2 FOR THE ORGANIZATION OF THE MILITIA
An energetic national militia is to
be regarded as the capital security of a free republic, and not a standing
army, forming a distinct class in the community.
It is the introduction and
diffusion of vice, and corruption of manners, into the mass of the people that
renders a standing army necessary. It is
when public spirit is despised, and avarice, indolence, and effeminacy of
manners predominate, and prevent the establishment of institutions which would
elevate the minds of the youth in the paths of virtue and honor, that a
standing army is formed and riveted forever.
While the human character remains
unchanged, and societies and governments of considerable extent are formed, a
principle ever ready to execute the laws, and defend the state, must constantly
exist.
Without this vital principle, the
government would be invaded or overturned, and trampled upon by the bold and
ambitious. No community can be long held
together, unless its arrangements are adequate to its probable exigencies.
If it should be decided to reject a
standing army for the military branch of the government of the United States ,
as possessing too fierce an aspect, and being hostile to the principles of
liberty, it will follow that a well constituted militia ought to be
established. [Certainly this situation
exists today]
The well informed members of the
community, actuated by the highest motives of self-love, would form the real defense
of the country. Rebellions would be
prevented or suppressed with ease; invasions of such a government would be
undertaken only by mad men; and the virtues and knowledge of the people would
effectually oppose the introduction of tyranny.
But the second principle, a militia
of substitutes, is pregnant, in a degree, with the mischief’s of a standing
army; as it is highly probable the substitutes from time to time will be nearly
the same men, and the most idle and worthless part of the community. Wealthy
families, proud of distinctions which riches may confer, will prevent their
sons from serving in the militia of substitutes; the plan will degenerate into
habitual contempt; a standing army will be introduced, and the liberties of the
people subjected to all the contingencies of events.
The expense attending an energetic
establishment of militia may be strongly urged as an objection to the
institution. But it is to be remembered;
that this objection is leveled at both systems, whether by rotation or by
substitutes: for, if the numbers are equal, the expense will also be equal. The estimate of the expense will show its
unimportance, when compared with the magnitude and beneficial effects of the
institution.
But the people of the United States
will cheerfully consent to the expenses of a measure calculated to serve as a
perpetual barrier to their liberties; especially as they well know that the
disbursements will be made among the members of the same community, and
therefore cannot be injurious.
Every intelligent mind would
rejoice in the establishment of an institution, under whose auspices the youth
and vigor of the constitution would be renewed with each successive generation,
and which would appear to secure the great principles of freedom and happiness
against the injuries of time and events.
The following plan is formed on these general principles:
First, That it is the indispensable
duty of every nation to establish all necessary institutions for its own perfection
and defense.
Secondly, that it is a capital
security to a free state ,
for the great body of the people to possess a competent knowledge of the
military art.
Thirdly, That this knowledge cannot
be attained, in the present state of society, but by establishing adequate
institutions for the military education of youth; and that the knowledge
acquired therein should be diffused throughout the community by the principles
of rotation.
Fourthly, That every man of the
proper age, and ability of body, is firmly bound, by the social compact, to
perform, personally, his proportion of military duty for the defence of the
state.
Fifthly, That all men, of the legal
military age, should be armed, enrolled, and held responsible for different
degrees of military service.
And Sixthly, That agreeably to the
constitution, the United States are to provide for organizing, arming, and
disciplining the militia, and for governing such a part of them as may be
employed in the service of the United States; reserving to the States,
respectively, the appointment of the officers, and the authority of training
the militia, according to the discipline prescribed by Congress.”
End of excerpt from
the 1790 Plan for Organization of the Militia
THE BOTTOM LINE: I hope this sheds some light on, where not
only the states stand, in relation to the Federal Government, but where do you
stand as an individual in relation to the Federal Government. One must understand that the many states are
sovereign just as America
is a sovereign Nation. And the
governments serve at the pleasure of the people of the many states.
The little known and most often
overlooked Ninth’ and the Tenth’ Amendments come into play here. The Ninth Amendment,
“The
enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to
deny or disparage others retained by the people.” The Framers did not intend that the first
eight amendments be construed to exhaust the basic and fundamental rights of
the people... I do not mean to imply
that the... Ninth Amendment constitutes
an independent source of rights protected from infringement by either the
States or the Federal Government... While
the Ninth Amendment - and indeed the entire Bill of Rights - originally
concerned restrictions upon federal power, the subsequently enacted Fourteenth
Amendment prohibits the States as well from abridging fundamental personal
liberties. And, the Ninth Amendment, in
indicating that not all such liberties are specifically mentioned in the first
eight amendments, is surely relevant in showing the existence of other
fundamental personal rights, now protected from state, as well as federal,
infringement. In summery, the Ninth
Amendment simply lends strong support to the view that the "liberty"
protected by the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments from infringement by the
Federal Government or the States is not restricted to rights specifically
mentioned in the first eight amendments. -- Cf. United Public Workers v.
Mitchell, 330 U.S.
75, 94-95.
All of the very few rights and
powers of the Federal Government are listed in the Constitution – all of the
rights of the people are not!
And the Tenth Amendment “The powers
not delegated to the United
States
It’s quite clear that the Tenth Amendment was
written to emphasize the limited nature of the powers
delegated to the federal government. In
delegating just specific powers to the federal government, the states and the
people, with some small exceptions, were free to continue exercising their
sovereign powers.
When states and local communities take the lead on
policy, the people are that much closer to the policymakers, and policymakers
are that much more accountable to the people.
Few Americans have spoken with their president; many however have spoken
with their mayors and/or councilmen, many with their state assemblymen and some
even with their Governor.
The Tenth Amendment clearly states unless the
specific power is listed in the body of the constitution it is left to the many
states and/or to the PEOPLE my friend.
If one would read through the constitution looking
for all the powers that Obama is exercising, one would find very few.
Adherence to the Tenth Amendment is the first step
towards ensuring liberty in the United
States .
This would be Liberty Through Decentralization…
Thanks for listening – de Andréa
Copyright © 2013
by Bottom Line Publishing - Permission to reprint in whole or in part is
gladly granted, provided full credit is given.
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment