Obama’s Agenda: Restore The Ottoman Empire
Obama is helping advance a grand plan
by Turkey and Egypt , with the support of Germany , to restore the Islamic Ottoman
Empire. This according to Islam will resurrect
the Islamic Caliphate to usher in the Grand Mahdi the Muslim Messiah, the antichrist
of Christian theology.
By de Andréa
May 31, 2013
I may have found
someone with a great deal of credibility that supports my four year stand that
Obama is a sleeper Muslim Jihadist bent on creating the world wide Nation of
Islam by restoring the Ottoman Empire.
His name is Dr. Robert E. Kaplan,
a modern European historian educated at Cornell University .
The Ottoman Empire was the catalyst by
which the last Islamic Caliphate controlled much of southeast Europe, Western
Asia, and North Africa for more than six
centuries. The Ottoman
Empire, dismantled in 1924, followed the Byzantine Empire which followed the
eastern part of the original Roman Empire.
At the end of this article is some of
the documented evidence that Obama’s Agenda is to Restore The Islamic Ottoman
Empire.
This suggestion that Obama is engaged
in the support of the Ottoman resurrection, which the Muslim Brotherhood is a part of, created
in 1928 just 4 years after the demise of the Ottoman Empire - is posed by
Robert Kaplan in an article titled “The U.S. Helps Reconstruct
the Ottoman Empire.” It was published this week by the international policy
council and think tank at the Gatestone Institute.
Kaplan, says history suggests a
partnership between Turkey
and Germany , which has seen
influence over Turkey
as a means of influencing Muslims worldwide for its own interests. He asks why the U.S. government “would
actively promote German aims,” including the destruction of Yugoslavia
in the 1990s and the re-creation of the Ottoman Empire through the
Brotherhood’s “Arab Spring”, supported by Obama.
Kaplan points to Obama’s support of
the Muslim Brotherhood, the ultimate victor in the “Arab Spring”; the U.S. backing of Jihadist Islamic “rebel”
groups in Libya with ties to
al-Qaida; and current support for similarly constituted Islamic rebel groups in
Syria
aligned with al-Qaida. Each of these U.S. military interventions occurred in areas
that were under the original Ottoman Empire .
Kaplan sees a similarity between the
Clinton-era attacks against the Serbs and the Obama administration hostility to
well-established regimes in Libya
and Syria . He writes:
“Since the mid-1990s the United States has intervened militarily in
several internal armed conflicts in Europe and the Middle East: bombing Serbs
and Serbia in support of Izetbegovic’s Moslem Regime in Bosnia in 1995, bombing
Serbs and Serbia in support of KLA Moslems of Kosovo in 1999, bombing Libya’s
Gaddafi regime in support of the Brotherhood rebels in 2010. Each intervention was justified to Americans
as motivated by humanitarian concerns: to protect Bosnian Moslems from
genocidal Serbs, to protect Kosovo Moslems from genocidal Serbs, and to protect
Libyans from their murderous dictator Muammar Gaddafi.” Kaplan observes that neither
President Clinton nor President Obama ever mentioned the reconstitution of the
Ottoman Empire as a justification for U.S. military intervention.
The U.S.
offered other reasons for intervening in Serbia ,
including a desire to gain a strategic foothold in the Balkans, to defeat
communism in Yugoslavia , to
demonstrate to the world’s Muslims that the U.S. is not anti-Muslim, and to
redefine the role of NATO in the post-Cold War era.
Recurring pattern
At its height in the 15th and 16th
centuries, the Ottoman Empire stretched from its capital in Turkey , through the Muslim-populated areas of North Africa , Iraq ,
the costal regions of the Arabian Peninsula
and parts of the Balkans.
Kaplan points out that since the
1990s, “each European and Middle Eastern country that experienced American
military intervention in an internal military conflict or an ‘Arab Spring’ has
ended up with a government dominated by Islamists of the Muslim Brotherhood or
al-Qaida variety fits nicely with the idea that these events represent a return
to Ottoman rule.”
In these conflicts, Kaplan sees
recurring patterns employed by Clinton and Obama to justify U.S. military
intervention: Each U. S. military action
in Europe and the Middle East since 1990, with the exception of Iraq, has
followed an overt pattern: First there is an armed conflict within the country
where the intervention will take place. American
news media heavily report this conflict.
The “good guys” in the story are the rebels part of the Muslim
Brotherhood. The “bad guys,” to be
attacked by American military force, are brutally anti-democratic, and
committers of war crimes, crimes against humanity, and genocide. Prestigious public figures, NGOs, judicial
and quasi-judicial bodies and international organizations call for supporting
the Brotherhood rebels and attacking the regime. Next, the American president orders American
logistical support and arms supplies for the rebels. Finally the American president orders military
attack under the auspices of NATO in support of the Brotherhood rebels The ultimate outcome of each American
intervention is the replacement of a secular government with an Islamist regime
in an area that had been part of the Ottoman Empire.
Kaplan cites a recent report
published by John Rosenthal in the online
Asian Times that discloses reports prepared by the German foreign intelligence
service, the BND, attributing the massacre in the Syrian town of Houla on May 25, 2012, to
the Syrian government. Rosenthal linked
the conclusions of the BND regarding the Houla massacre to the policy of the
German government to support the Syrian rebellion and its political arm, the
Syrian National Council.
Recalling that Germany invaded Serbia
in both World Wars I and II and actively sought the destruction of Yugoslavia
in the Cold War era, Kaplan wonders if the administration’s joining with
Germany in the bombing of Libya, and possibly Syria as well, is an effort to
help Germany fill its foreign policy objective of restoring the Ottoman Empire. Kaplan notes that the Obama Regime’s foreign
policy orders the downplay of the Muslim Brotherhood and al-Qaida terrorist
threat to U.S.
national security.
Follow the evidence…
Is al-Qaida really defeated, or is it
actually embraced by Obama?
In the 2012 presidential campaign, Obama spoke at a campaign event in Las
Vegas one day after the Sept. 11 Benghazi attack, proclaiming, “A
day after 9/11, we are reminded that a new tower rises above the New York
skyline, but al-Qaeida is on the path to defeat and bin Laden is dead.”
On Nov. 1, 2012, CNSNews.com
reported that Obama had described al-Qaida as
having been “decimated,” “on the path to defeat,” or some other variation
at least 32 times since the attack on the U.S.
consulate in Benghazi . It was Obama’s repeated theme last week in
his counter-terrorism policy speech at the National Defense University
at Fort McNair
in Washington , D.C.
Obama also has advanced a narrative
expressing U.S.
acceptance of Islam.
In
his foreign policy speech delivered at Cairo University June 4, 2009, Obama explained he had known Islam “on three continents before
coming to the region where it was first revealed.”
In a joint press availability with Turkey’s
President Gul at Cankaya Palace in Ankara, Turkey, on April 6, 2009, Obama
repudiated U.S. history since George Washington, declaring the U.S. “is no longer a Christian Nation, it is a
Muslim Nation”. Yet, despite
Obama’s attempt to establish a narrative in which Islamic terrorism is not a
threat to U.S. national
security, evidence abounds that the Islamic Brotherhood rebels responsible for
opposing Gadhafi in Libya
and Assad in Syria
have extensive ties to al-Qaida and to Obama.
In September 2012, WorldNetDaily
broke the story that the slain U.S. ambassador, Christopher Stevens, played a
central role in recruiting Jihadists to fight the Syria regime, according to Egyptian
security forces.
In December 2012, WorldNetDaily
reported top level al-Qaida operatives are
functioning with impunity in Libya
under a NATO-established provisional government.
In February 2013, WorldNetDaily
reported that the U.S. special mission in Benghazi
was used to coordinate Arab arms shipments and other aid to rebels in Libya
who are known to be saturated by al-Qaida and other Islamic terrorist groups.
On May 14, 2013, WorldNetDaily
reported the attack that killed Stevens
and three other Americans was an al-Qaida revenge killing that took place one
day after al-Qaida chief Ayman al-Zawahiri called for retaliation for a U.S.
drone strike that killed a top Libyan al-Qaida leader.
On Jan. 3, 2013, WorldNetDaily
reported that the Muslim Brotherhood has
infiltrated the Obama White House, with several American Muslim leaders who
work with the Obama administration identified as Muslim Brotherhood operatives
who have significant influence on U.S. policy.
On Feb. 10, 2013, WorldNetDaily
reported President Obama’s nominee to
head the CIA, John Brennan, converted to Islam years ago in Saudi Arabia .
The Gatestone Institute website
describes the organization as a non-partisan, not-for-profit
international policy council, and think tank dedicated “to educating the public about
what the mainstream media fails to report.”
As the organization’s website explains, “Gatestone Institute conducts
national and international conferences, briefings and events for its members
and others, with world leaders, journalists and experts – analyzing,
strategizing, and keeping them informed on current issues, and where possible
recommending solutions.”
THE BOTTOM LINE:
For the past four years since Obama became a presidential candidate, and
despite all the ridicule, I have stood my ground and maintained that Obama is a sleeper Jihadist Muslim. Throughout
his first term I connected the dots and concluded that Obama’s agenda was to
destroy America ’s
economy with social communism and in its place create an Islamic State. I still stand by that statement. This is all happening before our very eyes
but our eyes have been blinded, our ears are deaf and our brains are dead. This is the road were on my friend. It’s just a matter of time…
Thanks for listening – de Andréa
Thanks for listening – de Andréa
Copyright © 2013 by
Bottom Line Publishing - Permission to reprint in whole or in part is
gladly granted, provided full credit is given.
No comments:
Post a Comment