Nearly Thirty Percent
Say: We May Need An Armed Revolution
But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the
same Object, evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is
their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new
Guards for their future security. – Declaration
of Independence, 1776, as reflected in the Second Amendment.
By de Andréa
Monday, May 6, 2013
I have been talking about reaching this
point in our willingness to accept oppression from government institutions for
nearly 30 years; I guess banning the “Big Gulp” was finally more than free
Americans could take.
People are beginning to consider the
Federal Government the enemy, the truth be known, it has always been the enemy,
that’s why we have the Federal Constitution to bind their evil hands!
According to a survey titled “Beliefs About Sandy Hook Cover-Up, Coming
Revolution Underlie Divide On Gun Control”, that has been put
out by Fairleigh Dickinson University, nearly one third of American voters
believe an “armed revolution” might be needed in the next few years in
order to protect liberty in the United States.
It indicated that nearly three-quarters (73%) of Democrats say that
Congress needs to pass new laws to protect the public from gun violence, but
the views of Republicans are almost completely opposite: 65 percent don’t think
new laws are necessary. Overall,
registered voters are divided over the need for new gun control legislation. Fifty percent agree that some control is
needed, with 39 percent who disagree.
Obviously there is quite a difference
of opinion among voters about the role of guns in society, though the gun
control advocates really are on the wrong side of the Second Amendment do to
ignorance of history and the constitution.
However, this same poll found that 29 percent of Americans think that an
armed revolution will be necessary within the next few years in order to
protect the liberties, which are supposed to be protected under the US
Constitution and upheld by those that swear an oath to support and defend it,
but instead are in the process of undermining it.
These beliefs fall along party lines as
well. Only 18 percent of Democrats
believe an armed revolution may be necessary, as opposed to 44 percent of
Republicans and 27 percent of independents.
Still, those numbers slightly exceed the same numbers that were present
during the War for Independence . Historians have estimated that less than 30
percent of the colonists supported Independence
from Great Britain ,
while 18 to 22 percent remained loyal to the Crown. The remainder attempted to be neutral, until
they had no other alternative.
The differences in views of gun
legislation are really a function of differences in what people understand that
the Second Amendment is for. “If you truly believe an armed revolution is
possible in the near future, you need weapons and you’re going to be wary about
government efforts to take them away.” said Dan Cassino, a professor of
political science at Fairleigh Dickinson, and an analyst for the poll.
Amazingly there is whopping thirty-seven
percent of Americans who actually believe that Sandy Hook was a complete
enactment (a Reichstag) by the government in order to push gun control debate
while 59 percent of Americans do not believe there was a conspiracy in Newtown , Connecticut
While I don’t really trust the Federal
government, I don’t believe the Sandy Hook
shooting was a government conspiracy, unless one could say that advertising the
school as totally vulnerable because it was a GUN FREE ZONE and is an invitation
to kill little kids…well of course it is! But I certainly do believe the despotic degenerates
who are hell bent to disarm Americans and take every opportunity to advance
their control agenda against free Americans, simply exploited this tragic event
in order to push that despotic agenda, such as DiFi chomping at the bit just
waiting and hoping something like Sandy Hook
would happen. But it didn’t work. They fell flat on their collective faces as
usual.
That doesn’t mean they aren’t going to
be coming back with more gun legislation, as well as a plethora of other
oppressive controlling legislation. They
most certainly are going to do that, as I have been saying for more years than
I care to remember.
This leads me to a conclusion regarding
an armed revolution as a last resort for which the Second Amendment was
designed. I truly believe the next step
for the states
is to begin secession. I think it will not be long until that becomes
a reality. We’ve already seen petitions signed
by citizens , now for every state in
the Union and we know the White
House’s response to that sentiment. It was certinally not patriotic, what is was,
was patronizing. It was also
presumptuous to think that when the States joined the Union
that they didn’t think they had the right to withdraw from it. Having just seceded from what they saw as a
despotic, powerful central government that was too distant from its citizens,
Americans were skeptical about giving too much power to any government other
than that of their own states, where they could exercise more direct control. To think they didn’t clearly hold to
peacefully withdrawing is to divorce the Constitution from its historical
context. Eventually, it was the belief that the States did possess a right of secession
that led to the War of Northern Aggression.
Despite the reason, note who demonstrated aggression. It was not the Southern States, but
Washington.
I’m not a prophet as I have been
accused of, or the son of a prophet. However,
I know my American history and why it occurred, and if you look to 1774-1776 and
the years running up to the Civil War of Northern Aggression I see a pattern. Even though I side with those that do see an
armed resistance in our future, I am always hopeful that we might be able to
secede peacefully. The only aggressors
in a matter like that would be our
creation, our creature, the Federal Government.(Watch a video, its really good!) Should they attempt to invade a peacefully seceded state, I would
hope we would have learned a lesson and that we would stop Union troops at the
borders of our state should they attempt such a measure, as they did in South Carolina under
President Abraham Lincoln. As always, I
believe we should seek a peaceful resolution and secession could be that means. States could then band
together like we were, prior to the
Constitution, under the Articles
of Confederation , our
first American Constitution, which allowed full
local government in the state as an individual country. FYI - This Constitutional balance of power in
the Republic ended in 1913 with the passing of the 17th Amendment
that took away any representation the states had in the Federal
Government. 1913 was the turning point
in American history that has led to the destruction of the American Free
Republic
THE BOTTOM LINE: If you want to know about the present
and the future of America , try
reading the history’ of America !
Thanks for listening – de Andréa
Copyright © 2013 by Bottom Line Publishing - Permission to reprint in whole or in part is gladly granted, provided full credit is given.
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment