Monday, December 31, 2012

A Billon Dollar Islamic Deception

A Billon Dollar Islamic Deception

Being passed off as a factual documentary, a Muslim-owned company in the Middle East is planning an epic movie project on Mohammad and his life – and is expecting to spend $1 billion to get it finished.  I wonder if they will show the part where he was a pedophile.  Probably not…

By de Andréa
December 31, 2012
“Scholars say movie to foster world’s understanding of genuine Islamic values”.  This, coming from the religion of deception!

Gulf News, this movie was launched by United Arab Emirates businessman Abdullah Abulhoul.  The site serves as a media portal now for the Al Nisr Group.
According to the report out of Al Manamah the capital of Bahrain, the project is being produced by Doha, Qatar, based Al Noor Holdings.

The announcement said the media company has confirmed endorsements from prominent Islamic scholars such as Yusuf al Qaradawi, the chief of the International Union of Muslim Scholars.  The movie is to be made in several parts and is to be “produced according to the highest international standards using the most sophisticated technical and audio-visual systems.”

Al Noor officials confirmed earlier “they were facing challenges because of the difficulty of correctly portraying Muhammad and his consorts while still observing Shariah.”  Yeah!  I bet they were…“This is why we have consulted many famous Islamic scholars … who will guide us on the Shariah aspect of the film,” Al Noor Holdings confirmed in a statement.

The price of the movie is perhaps the most unusual aspect.  Although accounting in Hollywood makes it unclear exactly how much movie projects always cost, there are reports that Spider-Man 3 cost 258 million, most are around 100 million.

One of the issues that had to be resolved was that the Islamic world disallows representations of Muhammad’s companions, but Al Qaradawi said he asked around.  “I have come to the conclusion that there was nothing wrong with showing the companions in dramatic work,” he told GulfNews. “There is no text or reference in the Quran or in the prophet’s tradition and sayings that does not allow it.”  This typifies the Islamic religion; the Grand Mufti proclaims a fatwa of convenience, Muhammad himself did this many times contradicting the Quran.  But let an infidel portray Muhammad in a “dramatic work” and all Hell will break loose.  Plans are for the movie to be made in English, but with translations to several other languages.

The American side of the Islamic world, embodied in the Council on American-Islamic Relations, CAIR, (a known Islamic terrorist fund raising organization receiving support from the American Federal Government) said “the project would hold special significance because it will address the negative impressions of Islam”.  This is Islam speak for… it will hold special significance because it will really deceive the world about what Islam is.

Nihad Awad of the Council on American-Islamic Relations said some 750 movies with negative messages about Islam or Mohammad were produced by Hollywood in the last decade.  Yes!  But were these negative messages ‘true’?

THE BOTTOM LINE:  If you choose to view this movie, if and when, it hits American theaters, be aware that there is no truth in Islam.  Moreover this will be portrayed as the true life of Muhammad but is designed to be nothing more than a propaganda effort to support the current spell of deception that the world is already experiencing.  This deception is supported partly because the Ten Commandments of God has been removed from the public forum and replaced with Sharia law of Satan!  

This is nothing but a modern attempt of World Jihad (the struggle to win the world for Allah/Satan).  Don’t be ignorant, don’t be deceived or you will be part of the enablement of the destruction of our own American freedom and Judeo Christian culture of Liberty in Jesus Christ the Son of the real living God.  The First Commandment in Exodus 20:2-6 (WEB) says: I am Yahweh your God, who brought you out of the land of Egypt, out of the house of bondage.  You shall have no other gods before me. You shall not make for yourselves an idol, nor any image of anything that is in the heavens above, or that is in the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth: you shall not bow yourself down to them, nor serve them, for I, Yahweh your God, am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers on the children, on the third and on the fourth generation of those who hate me, and showing loving kindness to thousands of those who love me and keep my commandments.”    Thanks for listening – de Andréa 

Sunday, December 30, 2012

Public Schools Teach "Allah is God"

Public Schools Teach 
"Allah is God"

Texas public school curriculum is now teaching students "Allah is the Almighty God," which is beginning to catch the attention of critics.  The creators of that curriculum, however, claim critics are taking information out of context.  In what context could Satan ever be God?

By de Andréa
December 30, 2012

  I can’t decide which is the most dangerous, the loss of our Second Amendment rights, or the brain-washing of our children with the lies of Islam in public schools.  It probably doesn’t matter since both’ will eventually destroy everything’ we hold dear.  That’s everything my friend!

Obama’s Communist Islamic private brain-washing propaganda curriculum, CSCOPE, is now being used in 70 percent of  Texas K-12 public school classes.  The "comprehensive, customized, user-friendly curriculum support system" was developed in cooperation with the Department of Education and the Texas Education Service Center Curriculum Collaborative as an experiment.  This, or something like this, will shortly creep into all American schools Nation wide.

But critics like Ginger Russell, are finding that the program teaches, "Allah alone is the Creator" as fact…and without any opposing viewpoint.

"They had a PowerPoint presentation there on Islam, and it did say that, -- that 'Allah is the Almighty God,'" Russell accounts.  "It doesn't give any controversial view to it, or disprove of that."

In addition, portions of the Quran are handed out to children to accompany the PowerPoint presentation, according to Russell.

"The lesson that went with this PowerPoint asked you to hand out the verses of the Quran to the kids to go over," the critic reports.

CSCOPE, which is independent of the Texas State Board of Education, also teaches that the Boston Tea Party was carried out by a band of terrorists and that the Second Amendment, contrary to a supreme court ruling, is limited to state-run organizations, a typical tyrannical philosophy.

But because the program operates outside the board of education, public review of the content is not permitted.  Even parents are denied access to this online program.
CSCOPE claims that accusations its curriculum promotes "Allah is the Almighty God" are inaccurate and "taken out of context.”  My brain is itching trying to imagine in what context is Allah properly portrayed as God, none - except in Satan’s Quran, he has always wanted to be’ God.  Don’t send your kids to a school where you are not allowed to view the curricula.

As for the Boston Tea Party example, CSCOPE says the writer of that lesson -- meant to "engage students with an activity on perspective, over the topic of terrorism" and to demonstrate "how an act of patriotism to Americans could be perceived differently by an outside party ....”  Who bloody cares how others perceive our patriotism!  What they are really saying here is…”How ‘Islam’ perceives our patriotism”.  Americans shouldn’t care how Islam perceives anything.  This is what is contributing to our downfall, trying to be friends with the Devil.

THE BOTTOM LINE:  So’, Islam perceives our fight for freedom as an act of terrorism, and we should be understanding???  We should teach our kids this garbage?  The only thing we need to understand about Islam is that it is a deception of the worst kind; it is the religion from Hell.  Moreover, that Allah is certainly not God in any context…Allah is in ‘real fact’, none other than ‘Satan’, the Devil himself, who has disguised himself as a serpent in Eden then as an angel sent from God in Mecca, and now Allah disguises himself as God Himself in the Judeo Christian West. 

Our children’s heads are full of oatmeal; it is a big responsibility as to what we do with that oatmeal.  So far, the illegal Department of Education, as well as our State and local school districts, have been irresponsible.  They are more interested in making nice with the enemies of God and of this Nation than they are in teaching the truth and origin of freedom and the liberty of God, the real God.  Allah/Satan has deceived a nation, ‘and’… he has deceived the world.  

Because of our Ignorance and lack understanding of who and what Islam really is, we as a nation are deceived and will allow the sacrifice of our kids heads full of mush to enable and perpetuate the lie of Islam until the Judeo Christian Nation of America will not even be a memory.  The history of freedom and Christianity will be nothing but fiction.

If you can’t see this coming down the road, then it’s because you are blind Ignorant and deceived.  By the time you become aware of this, it will already be too late.  The time to wake-up is now my friend!  Don’t sacrifice your children’s future to the Devil…

Thanks for listening - de Andréa 

Saturday, December 29, 2012

Bureaucratic Leaders Suffer From Political and Social Brain Damage

Bureaucratic Leaders Suffer From Political and Social Brain Damage 
One may as well throw in delusions of grandeur…

By de Andréa

While 61 percent of the nation is swinging toward some kind of armed security in schools, the Communist haters of children that would just as soon kill them all, ‘before birth’ - are trying to lead us down a path of false security and certain destruction, all in the name of safety.  Sounds Hitleresque to me!

New York’s Mayor, Michael Bloomberg for example lives in a fairy tale world… a place of make believe where Communist dictators direct every aspect of citizens’ lives … from what and how much  they are allowed to eat and/or drink, to what  they can legally own, to what they can even think.

Mayor Bloomberg said over the weekend that President Obama should bypass Congress and by EXECUTIVE ORDER, take [dictatorial] action on gun control or thousands of people will die.  He even named a number: 48,000 people: “If he does nothing during his second term, something like 48,000 Americans will be killed with illegal guns.”  Has he lost his mind?  The reason why thousands of Americans are dying is because in many cases the crazies like Bloomberg are the only ones that are armed.  Since its gun ban in 1994, the UK’s death rate do to violent gun crime has doubled, look it up, it is now in the millions per year, all in a GUN FREE COUNTRY!  How do you think that’s working out for them?  Not to bloody good I’d say!

Why is no one looking into Bloomberg’s mental stability?  First let’s examine some of the phrases he uses: “Bypass Congress.”  “Executive Orders.”  It seems to me that Bloomberg’s view of the America Presidency is more like a Communist Dictatorship rather than an elected President of a Republic.  Of course, Bloomberg knows the only way dictators can rule people is to take away their ability to rise up and fight back against tyranny, he must have read Mien Kampf, that’s how Hitler did it, incidentally, he was considered crazy too.

NY Governor Andrew M. Cuomo said Thursday that he had started discussions with leaders of the State Legislature about new gun control measures, and that he planned to propose a package of gun legislation in his State of the State address on Jan. 9.

The New York Assembly, controlled by Democrats, has voted for a number of proposed gun control measures in recent years, only to have the legislation falter in the Senate, which has been controlled by Republicans.  (Starting next month, the Senate is to be led by a coalition of Republicans and a breakaway faction of Democrats.)  NY, second only to Illinois in gun control laws, is ironically also second in gun murders right after Illinois who is number one.  Are these people in addition to being mentally impaired, also deaf, dumb, and blind?

In the interview, Mr. Cuomo did not offer specifics about the measures he might propose, but, while discussing assault weapons, he said: “Confiscation could be an option.  Mandatory sale to the state could be an option.  Permitting could be an option — keep your gun, but permit it.”

The mere idea that the New York government could confiscate private, legally owned property that one does have a constitutional right to own is bad enough.  Cuomo, however seems to think this is actually within his power to do so…

Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.)—author of the original federal “assault weapon” and “large” ammunition magazine ban of 1994-2004—has announced that on the first day of the new Congress—January 3rd— she will introduce a bill to which her 1994 ban will pale by comparison.  On Dec. 17th, Feinstein said, “I have been working with my staff for over a year on this legislation” and “It will be carefully focused.”  Indicating the depth of her research on the issue, she said on Dec. 21st that she had “personally looked at PICTURES of guns in 1993, and again in 2012.” 

Oh!  Well…Di-Fi looked at pictures…Twice!  It is so comforting to have a brain-dead expert in government making illegal unconstitutional laws banning guns who has looked at pictures of guns.  I have personally looked at pictures of the human brain…at least twice, maybe a hundred times; by Feinstein’s sick logic, that makes me a brain surgeon.  I think Di-Fi would be hard pressed to decide which end the bullet comes out of an assault rifle.  I know she may at least know which end the bullet comes out of a revolver because she carries one.  Kind of hypocritical don’t you think!  Incidentally the Columbine High School shooting took place in April of 1999, right smack dab in the middle of Di-Fi’s first “Assault Weapons Ban”.  Oh well… crazy people always want to do the same thing over and over again expecting a different result.

Di-Fi’s new Gun Ban that she plans to introduce on January 3rd 2013 expands the definition of “assault weapon” by including: Three very popular rifles: The American M1 Carbine (introduced in 1944 and for many years it was sold by the federal government to individuals, a model of the Ruger Mini-14, and most or all models of the Russian SKS.  I may shortly become a felon along with approximately 68 percent of all Americans.  “Laws don’t prevent crime they create criminals” de Andréa December 2012.

The new law will ban any “semiautomatic, centerfire, or rimfire rifle that has a fixed magazine with the capacity to accept more than 10 rounds,” except for tubular-magazine .22s.

Any “semiautomatic, centerfire, or rimfire rifle that has an overall length of less than 30 inches,” any “semiautomatic handgun with a fixed magazine that has the capacity to accept more than 10 rounds,” and any semi-automatic handgun that has a threaded barrel.  The bill goes on, and on, and on, creating a whole new category of criminal, called a “constitutional criminal”.  One who is protected by the US Constitution but is condemned by illegal national laws.  It bans every gun except the assault weapon she has carried for nearly 20 years, a 38 revolver.  But of course she needs a weapon, because her life is worth more than your life, or the life of your children.

The new National gun ban will require owners of existing “assault weapons” to register them with the federal government under the National Firearms Act (NFA).  This is of course so the BATF can come to your front door with or without a warrant and confiscate your constitutionally protected arms, nearly guaranteeing the ability of the new National Dictatorship to enact the new martial law, and if by magic, over night, we will have instant tyranny. 

The bill would also include a requirement that all gun owners to be fingerprinted.  Well, there is much more to the story.  The handguns mentioned were pretty specific and if this bill is passed, you can say “Goodbye” to purchasing a new Glock, Sig Sauer, Smith & Wesson, M&P, H&K, or Colt among other name brands.
What is the reasoning for this?  According to Feinstein’s site:

Certain other semiautomatic rifles, handguns, shotguns that can accept a detachable magazine and have one military characteristic.

I point this out because most in the line of the above mentioned brands fit the criteria outlined in this bill.  Additionally, you’ll notice it isn’t just assault weapons or even semi-automatic handguns Feinstein mentions.  Included are shotguns with detachable magazines that have one military characteristic.  These would include pump action shotguns with magazines, as well as, semi-automatic shotguns with magazines.

You may be thinking to yourself that the weapons you already own that fit into these categories will be grandfathered in.  You would be correct.  However, as I pointed out grandfathering requires the following:
  It Requires that grandfathered weapons be registered under the National Firearms Act, to include:
  Background check of owner and any transferee;
  Type and serial number of the firearm;
  Positive identification, including photograph and fingerprint, you will be registered as a militant criminal.
  Certification from local law enforcement of identity and that possession would not violate State or local laws;

Also there is an additional tax for you to pay when you register those weapons under the National Firearms Act that you already own!  According to the NRA’s Institute for Legislative Action, “The NFA imposes a $200 tax per firearm.”  So, they are going to charge you a couple of hundred bucks more for every weapon you already own that falls into these categories!

So while we’ve been hearing lots about the AR-15, an excellent and accurate rifle, and the snooty remarks about how “no one needs a 30 round magazine,” no one needs’ a Lamborghini either, so are we going to outlaw everything the brain-dead legislators decide we don’t need.  The sneakiness of the Democrats on the new bill doesn’t disappoint us as Senator Feinstein has gone way beyond any of that.  The focus of late has been on the military style rifles, in the wake of the shootings recently, including the one that took place in Newtown, Connecticut.  Semi-automatic handguns have had some degree of light cast upon them as well, but the call for banning is not just about these weapons and it isn’t just about children murdered at Sandy Hook.  It’s the old adage of the “camel getting its nose in the tent.”

This is just a way for brain-damaged Democrats and anti American gun grabbers to get their foot in your door, on their way to attempt to ban and confiscate all guns.  Right now they claim to want to do it only prospectively, but should this pass and more shootings occur, there will be a push to do it retroactively.  You should wonder how they would enforce it.  If you still have the ability to think for yourself you will know that Martial Law will easily take care or that.

Should it come to that, I believe there are many Americans who will give their guns to the government.  In fact, many are doing so now for next to nothing gift cards.  Other Americans however, in the spirit of the founding fathers, will give the feds their guns….bullets first, of course.

But what will be next?  Now it’s military style rifles, semi-automatic handguns, and shotguns.  How long before revolvers are included?  What about Derringers?  How long before even a simple .22 rifle or handgun, or even a BB gun will be pushed as a “threat to society?

Do gun buybacks work?
Periodically, some cities offer a gun buyback program in an attempt to get as many guns off the streets as possible.  Cities such as Detroit, Cincinnati, Boston, San Diego and Los Angeles have tried this program.  This past week, Los Angeles  offered a $200 grocery gift card for anyone turning in an automatic weapon and a $100 gift card for handguns, rifles, and shotguns.

Generally, the police don’t ask any questions about the guns or where they came from and so no arrests are made.  In LA this past week, they asked people to place the guns in the trunk of their cars, pull up to the buyback locations, open the trunk and allow the police to remove the gun.

The preliminary count in Los Angeles yielded around 1400 guns, 49 of which were assault weapons and 477 were handguns.  Officials in Los Angeles and other cities with buyback programs say the programs are a success and help to keep the streets safer, but are those claims really true?

According to the National Research Council of the National Academies report (Firearms and Violence: A Critical Review) in 2004, the buyback programs’ effect on crime rates is negligible at best.  Their studies showed that many of the guns turned in are old, inherited from previous owners, and/or are in need of serious repair.  None of the guns were found to be useful or used in crimes.  Not in this century anyway!

I wonder just how many criminals turned in their guns.  Likely none!  There was however an increase in home break-ins and gun thefts just prior to the buyback program, and many of those guns were recovered in the program.  The conclusion can only be that the gun buyback program actually served to promote an increase in criminal break-ins and thefts just so the criminals could get the money from the police without any questions being asked.  Therefore, the police were promoting crime and serving as a fence for stolen merchandise.  

The only positive effect there is from gun buyback programs is that it makes the city officials look like they are doing something worthwhile to help prevent crime, even though they may actually be increasing crime.  Other than that, the programs are useless or negative and should be stopped before any more houses are burglarized for their antique useless guns.

Awr Hawkins is right: “If we are foolish enough to embrace a ban on any weapon in the coming Congress then we are unwittingly embracing a ban on every weapon.”  Moreover, we are subsequently banning all God given rights, because even as our present bureaucrats are suffering from Political Brain-damage, at least our Framers new that an armed Citizenry was “necessary for the Security of a free State”, and therefore necessary for the security of a public school…

Sent by my son Brad:
“The primary-school shooting in Newtown, Connecticut, approximately 45 miles from the Colt Arms Factory, is just another one in the long line of government psyops designed to persuade the public to allow the government to take away their guns, and their means to defend themselves against the government and the banksters that the politicians really serve.

The small children murders are designed to create hysterical emotions in women to get them to demand that guns are banned. If that doesn’t work they will continue with their evil agenda with worse and worse atrocities on younger children, until they get their way and disarm the people, so that they cannot fight back against government tyranny.

Newtown is the U.S.A.’s Dunblane, which was orchestrated in Scotland in 1996 by the British establishment, to whip up hysteria in order to ban all handguns from the U.K. It was a follow-up to the Hungerford Massacre in England in 1987, which was carried out by mind-controlled Michael Ryan, who then shot himself so he could not be questioned, and it was used to ban semi-automatic rifles and shotguns.

It’s always the same people behind it – the gun-grabbers who want the people to be defenceless against the gun-grabbers’ employers – the banksters who own all of the politicians.  They get their politicians to pass legislation for them, in order to remove the people’s freedoms and means of defending themselves, and enslave them in a draconian police-state, under a mountain of debt, and then exterminate the useless-eaters.

The Dunblane  massacre was supposedly carried out by Thomas Hamilton, who was a paedophile and procurer of children, for a high level paedophile ring involving senior members of the Tony Blair Labour-Party shadow-cabinet and others. The massacre served two purposes, it achieved their desired handgun-ban and killed the abused children, so they could not be witnesses against the elite-paedophiles. They then had the findings of the inquiry sealed for 100 years, which is proof of the above.

Like Newtown there were two shooters, Hamilton and a hit-man who shot Hamilton and made it look like Hamilton committed suicide after shooting 16 children, so that he couldn’t be questioned .  Hamilton was found in the school gymnasium slumped against a wall and still gurgling, when an off-duty policeman PC Grant McCutcheon entered the gym and saw two semi-automatic pistols, one on either side of Hamilton’s body.

The autopsy revealed that Hamilton was killed with a .38 revolver. These people always slip-up with their crimes. There was no .38 revolver for him to have shot himself with. Thus, there was a second shooter who killed Hamilton.

Similarly, the first reports from Newtown were of two shooters, just like mind-controlled James Holmes in the Denver Batman Cinema massacre, the story then quickly changes to just one.

Columbine was similar, in that a team of shooters in black outfits were seen there and the two accused were on mind-altering prescription-drugs.

Wake up and see the pattern and their modus operandi and don’t fall for it. Never let them take your guns, except from your cold dead hands.

All of these are staged events to whip-up hysterical public support for banning the people from having guns. It works the same in every country – Hungerford in England, Dunblane in Scotland, Port Arthur in Australia and the list in America is endless, because of the Second Amendment and the people having a pro-gun culture. That makes it much more difficult to break the Americans’ love of guns and the Second Amendment, which was put in place to protect the people from the government.

Gun bans work well for tyrants. They worked well for Hitler, Stalin and Chairman Mao, to name just three.

If you want to stop these massacres, wake-up and get rid of the banksters, their puppet-politicians and all gun-grabbers; arm teachers and ban gun-free zones.

From one who can see the pattern and hopes to enable you to see it too.”

A Columbine father - 12 years later sent by one of my readers!

Guess our national leaders didn't expect this, hmm?

Darrell Scott, the father of Rachel Scott, a victim of the Columbine High School shootings in Littleton , Colorado , was invited to address the House Judiciary Committee's subcommittee.  What he said to our national leaders during this special session of Congress was painfully honest.

They were not prepared for what he had to say, nor was it received very well.  But It needs to be heard by every parent, every teacher, every politician, every sociologist, every psychologist, and every so-called expert!  These courageous words spoken by Darrell Scott are powerful, penetrating, and deeply personal.  There is no doubt that God sent this man as a voice crying in the wilderness...  The following is a portion of the transcript:

"Since the dawn of creation there has been both good & evil in the hearts of men and women. We all contain the seeds of kindness or the seeds of violence. The death of my wonderful daughter, Rachel Joy Scott, and the deaths of that heroic teacher, and the other eleven children who died must not be in vain. Their blood cries out for answers."

"The first recorded act of violence was when Cain slew his brother Abel out in the field. The villain was not the club he used... Neither was it the NCA, the National Club Association. The true killer was Cain, and the reason for the murder could only be found in Cain's heart."

"In the days that followed the Columbine tragedy, I was amazed at how quickly fingers began to be pointed at groups such as the NRA. I am not a member of the NRA. I am not a hunter. I do not even own a gun. I am not here to represent or defend the NRA - because I don't believe that they are responsible for my daughter's death. Therefore I do not believe that they need to be defended. If I believed they had anything to do with Rachel's murder I would be their strongest opponent.

I am here today to declare that Columbine was not just a tragedy -- it was a spiritual event that should be forcing us to look at where the real blame lies! Much of the blame lies here in this room. Much of the blame lies behind the pointing fingers of the accusers themselves. I wrote a poem just four nights ago that expresses my feelings best."

Your laws ignore our deepest needs,
Your words are empty air.
You've stripped away our heritage,
You've outlawed simple prayer..
Now gunshots fill our classrooms,
And precious children die.
You seek for answers everywhere,
And ask the question "Why?"
You regulate restrictive laws,
Through legislative creed.
And yet you fail to understand,
That God is what we need!

Men and women are three-part beings.  We all consist of body, mind, and spirit. When we refuse to acknowledge a third part of our make-up, we create a void that allows evil, prejudice, and hatred to rush in and wreak havoc.  Spiritual presences were present within our educational systems for most of our nation's history. Many of our major colleges began as theological seminaries. This is a historical fact. What has happened to us as a nation? We have refused to honor God, and in so doing, we open the doors to hatred and violence. And when something as terrible as Columbine's tragedy occurs -- politicians immediately look for a scapegoat such as the NRA. They immediately seek to pass more restrictive laws that contribute to erode away our personal and private liberties. We do not need more restrictive laws. Eric and Dylan would not have been stopped by metal detectors. No amount of gun laws can stop someone who spends months planning this type of massacre. The real villain lies within our own hearts.

As my son Craig lay under that table in the school library and saw his two friends murdered before his very eyes, he did not hesitate to pray in school. I defy any law or politician to deny him that right! I challenge every young person in America , and around the world, to realize that on April 20, 1999, at Columbine High School prayer was brought back to our schools. Do not let the many prayers offered by those students be in vain. Dare to move into the new millennium with a sacred disregard for legislation that violates your God-given right to communicate with Him. To those of you who would point your finger at the NRA -- I give to you a sincere challenge... Dare to examine your own heart before casting the first stone!

My daughter's death will not be in vain!  The young people of this country will not allow that to happen!"
Darrell Scott

Thanks for listening-de Andréa

Thursday, December 20, 2012

Outlaw Assault Magazines

Outlaw Assault Magazines

Nan alluded to, if “Assault Magazines” were outlawed the massacre at Newtown wouldn’t have occered.

By de Andréa
December 20, 2012

Now I don’t know what mental institution Nancy Pelosi escaped from or what she means by “Assault Magazines”, surly she doesn’t mean the Saturday Evening Post, I don’t think that is an assault magazine.  Maybe she means the magazine published by the NRA.  And then, how would one assault someone with a magazine anyway?

Yes you read that correctly.  Nancy Pelosi used the term assault magazines in an interview with MSNBC’s Andrea Mitchell in talking about how the kind of firepower used in the Sandy Hook Elementary School shootings should be outlawed.  And if those high capacity magazines were Illegal would the shooter have said to himself, “these magazines are illegal, so I guess I will not go to the school and kill a bunch of kids today”.  Oh Yeah!

Even some guns I own myself are considered by the left to be “assault weapons.”  I have not cared what people have called them in the past, to be honest, that does not make them anymore or less dangerous than any other gun. 

However, in reading a piece by Jan Morgan, I think I’m going to stop referring to them as such.  Here’s what Morgan writes:
My AR is not an assault rifle.
It is not an assault weapon.
It will never be used to criminally assault anyone.
My AR will only be used for defensive and sporting purposes.
It is simply a modern musket.

Continuing with that point, let’s define our terms here.  “Assault” is defined by Noah Webster as:
“1. An attack or violent onset, whether by an individual, a company, or an army.  An assault by private persons may be made with or without weapons.  As assault by an army is a violent hostile attack; and when made upon a fort or fortified place is called a storm, as opposed to sap or siege.

2. An attack by hostile words or measures; as, an assault upon the prerogatives of a prince, or upon a constitution of government.

3. In Law, an unlawful setting upon one’s person; an attempt or offer to beat another, without touching his person; as by lifting the fist or a cane, in a threatening manner.  If the blow aimed takes effect, it is a battery.
So Morgan is correct.  My weapons, and I’m sure many of yours, will never be used to criminally assault anyone.  In fact, if we were to use the term “assault weapon,” it could literally be applied to anything; a baseball bat, knife, pencil, barbed wire, or even a car!”

However, Pelosi moves the argument up a notch.  Now she is not even calling for a ban on what she wrongly calls “assault weapons,” but is calling for “assault magazines” to be outlawed!

She told Mitchell on Tuesday:
“How does something like this happen?  Because a person with impaired judgment had access to firepower that should be outlawed.  There is no reason why these assault magazines – and that’s what they are.  We’ve got to call them what they are, assault magazines.  You aren’t even allowed to have that on a hunting gun in California, which has three shots.”  Pelosi thinks the fire-power originates with the magazine.  It is doubtful Nan even knows what a magazine is much less which end of the gun the bullet comes out of.  Yes Nancy Pelosi should be banned from coming within 1000 feet of a gun.  And Nancy’…hunting rifles in California have a minimum of 5 rounds not 3…a 3 round magazine wouldn’t even be worth manufacturing.

What the heck is an assault magazine anyway?  Are people with AR-15s and AK-47s now throwing their fully loaded magazines at people?  This is so far over the top it’s rather difficult to take seriously, but we must because these are the mentally disabled people that are framing the argument, and if we do not correct the misuse of language, then we will inevitably lose the argument and the fight over our rights and freedom.

That being said, I’ll remind Pelosi and the rest of the ignorant communists that the Second Amendment has nothing whatsoever to do with hunting.

“A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.”

Since the Supreme Court has ruled that this right applies to individuals and since the Amendment begins by defining the purpose for the right to keep and bear arms is with regards to a “well regulated militia and the security of a free State, not hunting, so the reference to hunting is irrelevant.  The problem comes for both the courts and the Congress with that nagging little bit at the end, Shall not be infringed.  This is the beginning point of where the liberals start.  Our voices must be loud in pointing that out.

Thanks for listening – de Andréa

Wednesday, December 19, 2012

Gun Free Cities

Gun Free Cities
What will happen if American cities are turned into GUN FREE ZONES?  Bear in mind, this is what Di Fi, Bloomberg, Obama and other anti-American Hitlerites that are stuck on stupid want to do to your country…

By de Andréa
December 19, 2012

Did you know for example that our own beloved city of Chicago is the deadliest most gun violent city in America?  It is actually the most violent city in the world, yes, IN THE WORLD, except for Caracas Venezuela.  No it’s not an exaggeration my friend, it is documented.  And do you know what else it is!  It is a GUN FREE CITY… 

Gun toting criminals from all over the world are coming to Chicago to kill Americans.  19 and a half per 100,000 is the gun violence murder rate in Chicago, more than 300 percent higher than that of New York City’s 6 per 100,000.  NYC is a SODA FREE CITY so they have the highest consumption of soda in the world…I don’t know!  

NBC Chicago reports on some of those "Chicago values" the city's Mayor Rahm Emanuel (Democrat, Communist naturally) touted, justifying his alderman's refusal to grant a license to a Chick-fil-A potential franchisee.

Chicago likes to compare itself to other world cities, so Ward Room of Channel 5 NBC Chicago thought it would find out how they ranked in violence.  It turns out no one can top them.  Among what are considered Alpha world cities, Chicago has the highest murder rate -- higher even than the Third World metropolises of Mexico City and Sao Paolo.

Chicago's murder rate increased to 19.4 per 100,000 since its increase in gun-laws,  more than three times that of New York's (6 per 100,000) and more than two and a half times that of Los Angeles' (7.5 per 100,000), its closest American competitors.  Caracas, Venezuela, which apparently is not an Alpha world city--thank you Hugo Chavez--has a higher murder rate of 130 per 100,000 and Damascus Syria might have a higher murder rate. 

In the American cities mentioned, most of the murders are committed with guns.  These cities all have laws against murder.  They even have some laws regarding guns; Chicago however has some of the strictest gun control laws in the nation.

As President Barack Obama (D) approvingly quoted from the gangster movie The Untouchables when on the campaign trail in Philadelphia four years ago, “If they bring a knife to the fight, we bring a gun," Obama said.  Of course, this attitude was prior to Obama's evolution on gun control and his absolute corrupt power.

Interestingly, Obama thought guns were a rural, small town phenomena, not part of normal life in his big city, as evidenced by the comments he made at an elite fund raiser in San Francisco also four years ago.  "They get bitter, they cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren't like them or anti-immigrant sentiment or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations."  Hmmm, wrong again Obama.  Most of the murderers and murdered look like “the sons Obama never had”.  Many of the murdered in Chicago live in the district Obama represented in the Illinois state legislature, another corrupt body representing Chicago and Illinois values. 

So, with this kind of Chicago leadership and its Chick-fil-A priorities it was not too surprising to read Sunday morning's news about a typical Saturday summer night in the city, further confirmation of Chicago's #1 violent ranking.

THE BOTTOM LINE: So why has Gun control become such a big issue with Obama?  I can tell you right off, it has absolutely nothing to do with the reduction in violent crime, even though that’s how it is being packaged and sold.  No, Obama is caught up in the absolute power syndrome and gun restriction and eventually gun bans and confiscation is paramount to absolute power and control.  Obama is copy-cating Hitler’s protocol of gun bans for the purpose of safety and we all know how that turned out.  

Chicago’s extreme gun restrictions makes it near impossible for its residents to own a gun, that is unless you are a criminal where restrictions and laws are meaningless. 

So if you want your city to have a murder rate as high, or higher than Chicago, then by all means push for more gun laws, restrictions and even a total gun ban.  The Newtown incident will pale in the face of a gun ban reality.

If you want to attract aphids to your trees, then be sure to put up a sigh that reads:  LADY BUG FREE ZONE…

Thanks for listening – de Andréa 

Tuesday, December 18, 2012

How To Make Schools Safe

How To Make Schools Safe
Are schools Safe?  Sandy Hook is being touted as a model school for student safety…  Well… you failed, Sandy Hook!  Here’s Why…

By de Andréa
December 18, 2012

On December 14, a twenty year old man entered through a window in the locked Sandy Hook elementary school of Newtown Connecticut and killed 27 people including himself and 20 children under the age of seven. 

Schools, movie theaters, churches and the like are among the safest places on earth…for the criminally insane.  Because they all have at least one thing in common, guns are not allowed! 

How does one enter a locked school?  Answer…the same way one enters a locked house.  The thing is’, inside a locked house there may be someone with a loaded gun, inside a locked school one will not find a gun except in the hands of a criminal. 

Children are safer on the street or in a mall than they are in school.  According to statistics, and common sense, schools are among the most dangerous places for children.  Why?  Because they are a politically correct GUN FREE ZONE!  The safest place for a gunman to go crazy…

Over shadowed by the Sandy Hook massacre was the shooting last week at the mall in Clackamas Oregon.  Two innocent human beings lost their lives there, but the carnage was cut short by Nick Meli, it could have been a lot worse.  But Mali has a concealed carry permit, and was in the mall when the gunman opened fire.  (Didn’t hear about that on the 6 o’clock news did you?)  Meli pulled his weapon, but did not shoot the gunman because there were bystanders who could have been injured.  The gunman saw Meli, an armed citizen, and rather than shoot more innocent people he pointed his weapon at himself.  “He was working on his rifle,” said Meli.  ”He kept pulling the charging handle and hitting the side.”  The break in gunfire allowed Meli to pull out his own gun, but he never took his eyes off the shooter.  “As I was going down to pull, I saw someone in the back of the shooter, and I knew if I fired and missed, I could hit them,” he said.  “I’m not beating myself up cause I didn’t shoot him,” said Meli.  “I know after he saw me, the last shot he fired was the one he used on himself.”

An interesting bit of information nearly parallel to this case in Oregon is that the shooter shot himself when he saw the citizen with a gun…a nearly identical reaction occered in the Sandy Hook school, the shooter stopped his rampage and killed himself when he heard the sirens of the police cars arriving.  The point is, these people are cowards and will stop or run or shoot themselves at the slightest resistance. 

It's Time to PROTECT School Children, Instead of Criminals -- Select HERE to DEMAND Congress REPEAL the "Gun-Free School Zones" Act! 

In 1996, the Gun Free amendment was rammed through congress as an addition to a giant last-minute "must-pass" appropriations bill.  The bill, call the "Gun-Free School Zones Act," was originally passed in 1990, but had been struck down as unconstitutional -- so the Communist Radical anti-gun Senator Heb Kohl re-worded it a little, and President Bill Clinton signed it into law.  Guess what?  It is still dangerous and unconstitutional. 

This legislation disarmed school staff and other adults -- leaving elementary and secondary school children totally defenseless to criminal killers. 

It also made it virtually impossible to drive your car down the street with a gun inside without violating the law, by creating a 1000-foot so-called "gun-free zone" around every public and private school in the country. 

Schools were now "Gun free," that is, EXCEPT for CRIMINALS OBVIOUSLY. 

We've seen the results of this misguided mindless law over, and over, again... most recently, in the tragic events in Newtown, Connecticut. 

It's time to put an END to "Criminal Safe Zones", including in our nation's public schools -- it's time to protect citizens by finally repealing the unconstitutional "Gun-Free School Zones" Act!  Now, more innocents have been slaughtered -- and their murders could have been prevented, if not for the "Gun-Free School Zones" Act which gives nothing but a dangerous false sense of security. 

Thankfully, legislation HAS been introduced to REPEAL this blatantly unconstitutional – and obviously dangerous -- law:  It’s called the "Citizens Protection Act" (H.R. 2613).  If we can get this bill passed, we could take a giant leap towards preventing murderous madmen like Adam Lanza from killing dozens of unarmed Americans -- because now, some of them could be armed and could STOP the assassin, dead in his tracks. 

The "Citizens Protection Act" is STUCK IN COMMITTEE -- it's up to you to FORCE Congress to vote on it QUICKLY, before they go home and this Congressional Session is OVER!  Call and/or write your Congressman.

Insane criminals seek out GUN FREE ZONES
"One of the things I've written about in the passed, is the attack at the Aurora Colorado movie theater.  But this is something you will never hear on your favorite news program. 

Seven movie theaters that were showing the Batman movie when it opened at the end of July but the killer went to Aurora.  Why???  Out of those seven movie theaters, only one theater was posted as banning permit-concealed handguns, A GUN FREE ZONE!  The killer didn't go to the movie theater that was closest to his home.  He didn't go to the movie theater that was the largest movie theater in Colorado, which was essentially the same distance from his apartment as the one he ended up going to.  Instead, the one he picked was the only one of those movie theaters that banned people taking permit-concealed handguns into that theater.  The Aurora was THE ONLY GUN FREE THEATER…

The problem is, whether it is the Portland shooting earlier this week, or the Connecticut shooting Friday, or the Sikh temple attack in Wisconsin, or any one of the other 37 times this has happened since 1977 these attacks always take place in the few areas within a state where permit-concealed handguns are banned.  It's not just this year; it's all these years in the past.  And at some point people have to recognize that continuing to do the same thing over, and over, and expecting a different result isn’t working folks.  It causes me to wonder who is really’ insane here?  Is it the criminals or the legislators?

If you don't think that arming teachers and administrators would work to thwart crazed killers like Lanza you would be wrong because -- IT ALREADY HAS my friend.  Rep. Dennis Richardson, a State Representative in Oregon who's also saying that gun bans on school property should be overturned, has pointed to a 1999 school shooting in Mississippi in which an assistant principal held a shooter at bay with a handgun while police arrived.  The shooter killed two students and injured seven others before the principal was able to retrieve his handgun from his truck.  Just think for a moment if you can…how many more students would have been killed if the principal hadn’t had a gun, maybe 20, or 30?  And what if the principal was allowed to carry his gun instead of having to lock it in his truck?  Maybe no one would have been killed.  You can apply this to every one of these mass murders including 9/11.

Read what Geraldo Rivera and Bo Dietl said about guns in schools, they have changed their minds.  OR - Read what brain-dead Diane Feinstein said she is going to do, more of the same is her answer. 

Newtown Connecticut: Gun free zones invite mad mass-murderers, say law enforcement officers: The shocking murder spree at a Connecticut elementary school that claimed the lives of 27 people, including 20 children, will undoubtedly be used by the U.S. government, the United Nations, and the establishment news organization to push for laws that would violate an already compromised Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, say law enforcement officials on Saturday. But former police detective Mike Snopes believes that gun free zones invite killers.

“The killer in [Newtown] came armed for bear and couldn’t care less about some gun law.  The school’s anti-gun law prevented any adults working at the school from having access to a firearm.  If the school’s principal had been armed and trained, she might have saved many lives.  Had several people been armed at that school, the shooter, suspect Adam Lanza, would have possibly been stopped at the front door by a hale of bullets,” said the former NYPD detective.

While being interviewed by Fox News anchorman Rick Folbaum, NYPD Detective John Baeza noted that the location of the Colorado movie theater shootings occurred at a large shopping mall that was a gun free zone.  Click here to read the entire article.

THE BOTTOM LINE:  It is not illegal or bad to own or carry a gun!  What is’ illegal, is the killing of innocent people.  Almost no one, including some of the parents of the dead children, are blaming the shooter for this heinous massacre.  Instead, the bulk of the blame goes to the implement of death, the gun.  Not only is it illegal to kill innocent people no matter how one does it, it is illegal to deny people the right of self defense.  So if you think children are too young to carry a gun for their own self defense, then what about those who are responsible for their well being…the parents, the teachers, the administrators.  What does it mean to be responsible for innocent helpless children?  Oh well…we locked the door!  Let me ask you this, you Communist control freaks, how is this GUN FREE ZONE with locked doors, working out for you irresponsible brain-dead robots?  Maybe you should get your head out of your computer and just think for yourself for a change…

If you want to see more and even worse tragedies than this, then let your representatives know that you support more of the same, more GUN FREE ZONES, more anti gun laws that only law abiding people obey.  The criminals are laughing at your moronic stupidity…

Yeah!  You bet I’m direct, and I get more, and more, angry, every time this happens.  Because it doesn’t have to happen at all my friend, at least not this way; there is an intelligent purpose for the Second Amendment.  But you programmed anti-American Bloomberg Commies wouldn’t know anything about that, now would you… 

Thanks for listening – de Andréa