There is no Free Speech in Islam. In fact there is no freedom of any kind in Islam.
By de Andréa
By de Andréa
One of the many dangerous and noxious doctrines within Islamic Sharia law is the prohibition against “blasphemy” or the “defamation” of Islam and/or the prophet Mohammed, which is an automatic death sentence under Islamic law.
Sharia is a direct affront to our Constitution and our cherished first amendment right of free speech, as it silences any critique or criticism of the tyranny of Islam in any way. This autocratic and barbaric law of Sharia is for the expressed purpose of total submission of the Infidelic Dhimmah to Islamic supremacism and/or the extermination of all who live in the free world. In spite of this fact our ignorant and deceived Department of Justice is considering its implementation.
European countries are already prosecuting people for “speech” against Islam, in effect implementing, and enabling this Sharia prohibition. ACT! for America’s” chapter leader and author Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff is one of those people sued by the United Kingdom of the Islamic State of Britanniah. The Islamic State of Canadah’s Human Rights Commission which of course supports Sharia, went after American author and actor Mark Stein for his outspoken truth about Islam. Could this eventually happen in the U.S.? Well my friend, it is already happening right here in what used to be the Constitutional Free Republic of America.
Consider the latest.
Muslim leaders, including the head of ISNA (Islamic Society of North America, a Muslim Brotherhood terrorist front organization), recently urged the Department of Justice officials to take steps to criminalize among other things, the criticism of Islam. They are calling the criticism of Islam “discrimination” and “racist,” and the DOJ is buying into it, even though only brain dead people are robotically programmed into believing that Islam is a race. I don’t think Nazism is considered a race either, although I might be wrong about that too. This brainwashing program is just to send one down a dead end road so one doesn’t think about the fact that Islam is a supremacist hateful, murdering Ideology not unlike Nazism.
Communist Secretary of State Hillary Clinton also embraces the OIC (Organization of the Islamic Conference) push for a UN resolution calling for an International global law for governments to criminalize defamation of religion. I can’t help wondering if this applies to Christianity as well --- probably not! This is serious folks! I hope you can you see why I am putting so much emphasis on combating Sharia law? They’re now trying to confiscate and destroy our first amendment rights!! Next up is our entire Constitution and then our country… and then well… they get rid of you and me!
In a DOJ hearing this past week:
Top Justice Department officials convened a meeting Wednesday where invited Islamist advocates lobbied them for cutbacks in anti-terror funding, changes in agents’ training manuals, and additional curbs on investigators and a legal declaration that U.S. citizens’ criticism of Islam constitutes “racial discrimination”. Well of course they did, our enemy wants us to stop defending ourselves and just surrender to the supremacy of Islamic tyranny, can’t they see this? This is how powerful Islamic deception is my friend, and then if one couples it with ignorance there is no chance of seeing or understanding the truth.
Holder & Perez, besides Obama himself, are two of the most criminally dangerous and treasons men in America. A little background on Obama’s Attorney General Eric Holder --- the reason Obama picked Holder for Attorney General was because Holder made a career out of defending Muslim terrorists in US courts. Yeah! I know… “It’s a dirty job, but somebody’s got to do it.” The thing of it is, is that as Attorney General, Holder is still doing it!
Listen to what an American Muslim lawyer has to say:
“The DOJ’s civil rights lawyers are top of the line — I say this with utter honesty — I know they can come up with a way” to redefine criticism as discrimination,” said Sahar Aziz, a female, Egyptian-Islamic American lawyer. “I’d be willing to give a shot at it,” said Aziz, who is a fellow at the Islamic State of Michigan-based Islamic Jihad advocacy group, code named “The Institute for Social Policy & Understanding”. More like the Institute of Islmic disinformation and deception.
The audience of Islamist advocates and department officials included Tom Perez, who heads the DOJ’s division of civil rights. “We must continue to have the open honest and critical dialogue that you saw in this robust debate,” Perez responded in an enthusiastic closing speech a few minutes after Aziz made her demands at the event. “I sat here the entire time, taking notes,” Perez said. “I have some very concrete thoughts … in the aftermath of this.” I’ll bet you do Tom…
“The DOJ meeting showcased the expanding alliance between [so-called] American progressives [communists] and Islamists”, said Andrew McCarthy, a former federal prosecutor in New York. "Progressives are making these Islamist groups into the political representatives of Muslims in the United States,” he told The Daily Caller.
McCarthy investigated and prosecuted Egyptian-born Imam Omar Abdel-Rahman, dubbed “the blind sheik,” for urging Muslims to kill New Yorkers. Abdel-Rahman was sentenced to life imprisonment in 1996.
“Progressives ally with the Islamic lobby because they think it will be a political voting bloc that will be reliably Democratic,” said Robert Spencer, an author and expert on Islam. None of the Islamist advocates of civil rights officials in attendance, including Perez, objected to Aziz’s call for free-speech restrictions and adherence to Sharia. The conference did not include any influential critics, such as McCarthy and Spencer, who argue that Islamist terror attacks are motivated by Islamic texts. These texts include for example the Koran’s verse 9:5, which says, “when the sacred months have passed away, then slay the idolaters wherever you find them.”
Aziz, however, used her invitation to argue that Americans fear of Islamic Jihadist bombs’ has evolved into ‘racism’ towards dark-skinned men. Guess what Aziz, all dark skinned men are not Muslim Terrorists and all terrorists are not dark skinned men, at least not anymore they aren’t. The word “Muslim,” she said, “has become radicalized. … I don’t accept this formalistic cop-out that this is all about religion.” Aziz did not offer any evidence for her claim, which she said justifies the use of Title VI anti-discrimination laws against institutions and individuals who argue that Islamic texts spur Islamic violence. Truth is Aziz, the word Muslim is synonymous with the word RADICAL.
This legal redefinition, she said, “would also take [federal] money away from local police departments and fusion centers who are spying on us.” (By “us”, I guess she means terrorists) Aziz also argued against the commonplace police practice of informally talking with people in communities, including Muslim communities. “This has been a real problem with this outreach stuff,” she said. “Muslims are acting in good faith, and then they find that their imams, who were going to outreach meetings, were being spied on,” she complained. “Some have been deported. Some have been prosecuted.”
Aziz was of course referring to cases like Afghan-born New York Imam Ahmad Wais Afzali who was ordered deported In March after he admitted he lied to the FBI about warning a suspected Muslim terrorist that he was being investigated. That terrorist, Najibullah Zazi, was planning to place bombs in the New York City subway.
“People are going in good faith to talk with police”, Aziz said. “They being very honest about what their grievances are. They telling the government, ‘This what we want you to do … [and] we want you to not spy on our community.” She needs to brush up on her English grammar just a little, but then who am I to criticize. You will notice however that she is vehemently opposed to US counter terrorism departments spying on terrorist activities. Well… I can certainly understand that. What I don’t understand, is why the DOJ doesn’t understand it…
Dwight Holton, a Justice Department legal counsel based in Oregon, said the threat of criminal gangs or terror attacks justifies routine police contacts with locals. “When we go to a barber shop to talk to the community, we don’t tell them you can have a lawyer present,” he said. “You should,” Aziz immediately replied. Aziz’s outburst was supported by a second Islamist advocate, Islamic Society of North America president Mohamed Magid. He argued that “teaching people that all Muslims are a threat to the country… is against the law and the Constitution.” Oh contraire my dear terrorist enemy, it is in fact' constitutional because it is the truth, and has been proven repeatedly in a court of law, and has stood the test of time and history! I’m sure at least Holton caught that!
Magid asked Perez to change the federal government’s rules, would you believe ---governing terror investigations, for more private meetings with top justice department officials, for the reeducation (brainwashing) of FBI agents, and for more arrests of people who oppose Islam, which he labeled “religious bigotry and hate.” No Magid!…it is not bigotry and hate it’s called the truth Magid… and furthermore Magid, Islam is not a religion it is in fact, Ideological despotism. As I said before…”not unlike Nazism”
A little background on Magid
In a 2009 federal court case the United States V’s the Muslim Holyland foundation, the government named Magid’s terrorist organization an unindicted co-conspirator in the successful 2009 trial of three Muslims who smuggled $12 million tax free dollars to the Islamist terror group Hamas and is now on the FBI list of Muslim terrorist supporters. Two of the Jihadist smugglers in that trial received life sentences.
Just as a side note and FYI: the IRS still accepts all of these terrorist fund raising organizations as tax free non-profit Muslim charities. So this is just one of the many hundreds of ways the American people unknowingly support terrorism and enable the enemy of America the West and the free-world.
During his speech, Perez applauded the Islamist lobbyists for persuading government officials to end extra security checks on airline passengers from Nigeria and 12 Islamic countries. The checks which were adopted in 2010 after a Nigerian Muslim terrorist tried to blow up a passenger aircraft on Christmas Day. Yeah! We don’t need to scrutinize Muslim terrorists from Nigeria. They are just warm-fuzzy Moderate Terrorists with bombs in their shoes.
“What did we hear in the aftermath of that? We heard a lot of feedback from people in this room and from leaders across the country that we could be doing a better job [by ending these checks]… and a few months later, and thanks to you, we did just that,” Perez told the Islamic Jihadists.
McCarthy, the former prosecutor, said, “Few people recognize the expanding alliance between progressives and Islamists. Americans just don’t realize that Islamist ideology is among other things, collectivist and redistributionist, so it works seamlessly with the liberal left,” he said. “They disagree over gay rights and women’s rights, [but] on some items they’re on the same page,” McCarthy added, citing Islamist groups’ support for the administration’s health sector law as an example.
Perez repeatedly promised extensive consultations and flattered the Muslim attendees, while speaking in a style that blended the cadences of an academic lecturer and a rural preacher. “There will be times where we have honest differences of opinion, but if we don’t talk and don’t actively listen and if we don’t reflect and recalibrate where necessary, then we won’t be doing our job, and you have our continuing commitment to that end,” Perez declared. Does that mean that there will be a Federal Sharia law coming out of the DOJ that will include the death penalty for sassing a Muslim? I don’t know, but you had better watch for it.
Progressive[s] [Communists], including Holder, Holton, and Perez, choose to ignore the Islamists’ stated goals, Spencer said. “They assume — and force us’ to assume on pain of charges of ‘Islamophobia’ — that all Muslims are moderate, peaceful and have no intentions of bringing Sharia [Islamic law] here,” said Spencer. “No amount of evidence to the contrary, no amount of jihadi plots, and no number of demands for accommodation of Sharia’s provisions, ever disabuses them of this deceptive dogma.” Bravo Spencer!
When the session ended, Perez — a Maryland resident, a progressive communist, a terrorist enabler, and a former staffer to Sen. Ted Kennedy (almost as bad)— climbed the stage to embrace Imam Magid a known terrorist supporter who was born in Sudan and trained at a Saudi Wahhabist Seminary. (Wahhabism is the most extreme form of Islamic tyranny.) Does Perez know this? Well… I know it! Go figure…
THE BOTTOM LINE: My hope in publishing this article is that the reader will clearly see the Islamic satanic spell of ignorance and deception that controls our government. And if those of us, who are somehow miraculously unaffected or shielded from this deception of Islam, fail to do whatever we can to rid this country of this horrifying enemy of haltered and death, then we will soon be in the same quagmire that Europe is just now beginning to wakeup to. The thing of it is, is that Europe is just now finding itself for the second time in their history, in the same quicksand of Islam that they were in a thousand years ago. And that historical mistake resulted in 200 years of what appeared to be civil war, when actually it was Islamic Jihad! One would think that at least they’ wouldn’t make exactly the same mistake again! Yeah! One would think!
In a DOJ hearing this past week:
Top Justice Department officials convened a meeting Wednesday where invited Islamist advocates lobbied them for cutbacks in anti-terror funding, changes in agents’ training manuals, and additional curbs on investigators and a legal declaration that U.S. citizens’ criticism of Islam constitutes “racial discrimination”. Well of course they did, our enemy wants us to stop defending ourselves and just surrender to the supremacy of Islamic tyranny, can’t they see this? This is how powerful Islamic deception is my friend, and then if one couples it with ignorance there is no chance of seeing or understanding the truth.
Holder & Perez, besides Obama himself, are two of the most criminally dangerous and treasons men in America. A little background on Obama’s Attorney General Eric Holder --- the reason Obama picked Holder for Attorney General was because Holder made a career out of defending Muslim terrorists in US courts. Yeah! I know… “It’s a dirty job, but somebody’s got to do it.” The thing of it is, is that as Attorney General, Holder is still doing it!
Listen to what an American Muslim lawyer has to say:
“The DOJ’s civil rights lawyers are top of the line — I say this with utter honesty — I know they can come up with a way” to redefine criticism as discrimination,” said Sahar Aziz, a female, Egyptian-Islamic American lawyer. “I’d be willing to give a shot at it,” said Aziz, who is a fellow at the Islamic State of Michigan-based Islamic Jihad advocacy group, code named “The Institute for Social Policy & Understanding”. More like the Institute of Islmic disinformation and deception.
The audience of Islamist advocates and department officials included Tom Perez, who heads the DOJ’s division of civil rights. “We must continue to have the open honest and critical dialogue that you saw in this robust debate,” Perez responded in an enthusiastic closing speech a few minutes after Aziz made her demands at the event. “I sat here the entire time, taking notes,” Perez said. “I have some very concrete thoughts … in the aftermath of this.” I’ll bet you do Tom…
“The DOJ meeting showcased the expanding alliance between [so-called] American progressives [communists] and Islamists”, said Andrew McCarthy, a former federal prosecutor in New York. "Progressives are making these Islamist groups into the political representatives of Muslims in the United States,” he told The Daily Caller.
McCarthy investigated and prosecuted Egyptian-born Imam Omar Abdel-Rahman, dubbed “the blind sheik,” for urging Muslims to kill New Yorkers. Abdel-Rahman was sentenced to life imprisonment in 1996.
“Progressives ally with the Islamic lobby because they think it will be a political voting bloc that will be reliably Democratic,” said Robert Spencer, an author and expert on Islam. None of the Islamist advocates of civil rights officials in attendance, including Perez, objected to Aziz’s call for free-speech restrictions and adherence to Sharia. The conference did not include any influential critics, such as McCarthy and Spencer, who argue that Islamist terror attacks are motivated by Islamic texts. These texts include for example the Koran’s verse 9:5, which says, “when the sacred months have passed away, then slay the idolaters wherever you find them.”
Aziz, however, used her invitation to argue that Americans fear of Islamic Jihadist bombs’ has evolved into ‘racism’ towards dark-skinned men. Guess what Aziz, all dark skinned men are not Muslim Terrorists and all terrorists are not dark skinned men, at least not anymore they aren’t. The word “Muslim,” she said, “has become radicalized. … I don’t accept this formalistic cop-out that this is all about religion.” Aziz did not offer any evidence for her claim, which she said justifies the use of Title VI anti-discrimination laws against institutions and individuals who argue that Islamic texts spur Islamic violence. Truth is Aziz, the word Muslim is synonymous with the word RADICAL.
This legal redefinition, she said, “would also take [federal] money away from local police departments and fusion centers who are spying on us.” (By “us”, I guess she means terrorists) Aziz also argued against the commonplace police practice of informally talking with people in communities, including Muslim communities. “This has been a real problem with this outreach stuff,” she said. “Muslims are acting in good faith, and then they find that their imams, who were going to outreach meetings, were being spied on,” she complained. “Some have been deported. Some have been prosecuted.”
Aziz was of course referring to cases like Afghan-born New York Imam Ahmad Wais Afzali who was ordered deported In March after he admitted he lied to the FBI about warning a suspected Muslim terrorist that he was being investigated. That terrorist, Najibullah Zazi, was planning to place bombs in the New York City subway.
“People are going in good faith to talk with police”, Aziz said. “They being very honest about what their grievances are. They telling the government, ‘This what we want you to do … [and] we want you to not spy on our community.” She needs to brush up on her English grammar just a little, but then who am I to criticize. You will notice however that she is vehemently opposed to US counter terrorism departments spying on terrorist activities. Well… I can certainly understand that. What I don’t understand, is why the DOJ doesn’t understand it…
Dwight Holton, a Justice Department legal counsel based in Oregon, said the threat of criminal gangs or terror attacks justifies routine police contacts with locals. “When we go to a barber shop to talk to the community, we don’t tell them you can have a lawyer present,” he said. “You should,” Aziz immediately replied. Aziz’s outburst was supported by a second Islamist advocate, Islamic Society of North America president Mohamed Magid. He argued that “teaching people that all Muslims are a threat to the country… is against the law and the Constitution.” Oh contraire my dear terrorist enemy, it is in fact' constitutional because it is the truth, and has been proven repeatedly in a court of law, and has stood the test of time and history! I’m sure at least Holton caught that!
Magid asked Perez to change the federal government’s rules, would you believe ---governing terror investigations, for more private meetings with top justice department officials, for the reeducation (brainwashing) of FBI agents, and for more arrests of people who oppose Islam, which he labeled “religious bigotry and hate.” No Magid!…it is not bigotry and hate it’s called the truth Magid… and furthermore Magid, Islam is not a religion it is in fact, Ideological despotism. As I said before…”not unlike Nazism”
A little background on Magid
In a 2009 federal court case the United States V’s the Muslim Holyland foundation, the government named Magid’s terrorist organization an unindicted co-conspirator in the successful 2009 trial of three Muslims who smuggled $12 million tax free dollars to the Islamist terror group Hamas and is now on the FBI list of Muslim terrorist supporters. Two of the Jihadist smugglers in that trial received life sentences.
Just as a side note and FYI: the IRS still accepts all of these terrorist fund raising organizations as tax free non-profit Muslim charities. So this is just one of the many hundreds of ways the American people unknowingly support terrorism and enable the enemy of America the West and the free-world.
During his speech, Perez applauded the Islamist lobbyists for persuading government officials to end extra security checks on airline passengers from Nigeria and 12 Islamic countries. The checks which were adopted in 2010 after a Nigerian Muslim terrorist tried to blow up a passenger aircraft on Christmas Day. Yeah! We don’t need to scrutinize Muslim terrorists from Nigeria. They are just warm-fuzzy Moderate Terrorists with bombs in their shoes.
“What did we hear in the aftermath of that? We heard a lot of feedback from people in this room and from leaders across the country that we could be doing a better job [by ending these checks]… and a few months later, and thanks to you, we did just that,” Perez told the Islamic Jihadists.
McCarthy, the former prosecutor, said, “Few people recognize the expanding alliance between progressives and Islamists. Americans just don’t realize that Islamist ideology is among other things, collectivist and redistributionist, so it works seamlessly with the liberal left,” he said. “They disagree over gay rights and women’s rights, [but] on some items they’re on the same page,” McCarthy added, citing Islamist groups’ support for the administration’s health sector law as an example.
Perez repeatedly promised extensive consultations and flattered the Muslim attendees, while speaking in a style that blended the cadences of an academic lecturer and a rural preacher. “There will be times where we have honest differences of opinion, but if we don’t talk and don’t actively listen and if we don’t reflect and recalibrate where necessary, then we won’t be doing our job, and you have our continuing commitment to that end,” Perez declared. Does that mean that there will be a Federal Sharia law coming out of the DOJ that will include the death penalty for sassing a Muslim? I don’t know, but you had better watch for it.
Progressive[s] [Communists], including Holder, Holton, and Perez, choose to ignore the Islamists’ stated goals, Spencer said. “They assume — and force us’ to assume on pain of charges of ‘Islamophobia’ — that all Muslims are moderate, peaceful and have no intentions of bringing Sharia [Islamic law] here,” said Spencer. “No amount of evidence to the contrary, no amount of jihadi plots, and no number of demands for accommodation of Sharia’s provisions, ever disabuses them of this deceptive dogma.” Bravo Spencer!
When the session ended, Perez — a Maryland resident, a progressive communist, a terrorist enabler, and a former staffer to Sen. Ted Kennedy (almost as bad)— climbed the stage to embrace Imam Magid a known terrorist supporter who was born in Sudan and trained at a Saudi Wahhabist Seminary. (Wahhabism is the most extreme form of Islamic tyranny.) Does Perez know this? Well… I know it! Go figure…
THE BOTTOM LINE: My hope in publishing this article is that the reader will clearly see the Islamic satanic spell of ignorance and deception that controls our government. And if those of us, who are somehow miraculously unaffected or shielded from this deception of Islam, fail to do whatever we can to rid this country of this horrifying enemy of haltered and death, then we will soon be in the same quagmire that Europe is just now beginning to wakeup to. The thing of it is, is that Europe is just now finding itself for the second time in their history, in the same quicksand of Islam that they were in a thousand years ago. And that historical mistake resulted in 200 years of what appeared to be civil war, when actually it was Islamic Jihad! One would think that at least they’ wouldn’t make exactly the same mistake again! Yeah! One would think!
Couldn’t we also take a lesson from that ignorant mistake? I guess not…But I am going to pray and pray hard that you do my friend. Your lives and the lives of your children are depending on it…
de Andréa
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment