Wednesday, December 29, 2010

Kill The Messenger

Apparently the federal law that protects whistle blowers on antiterrorism doesn’t apply to airline pilots

By de Andréa

Jackbooted Federal Martials showed up unannounced at a Sacramento airline pilots home with warrants to search and ransack his private home and confiscate his TSA authorized hand gun.

According to the pilots attorney “the message was -- you've angered us by telling the truth and by showing America that there are major security problems despite the fact that we've spent billions of dollars allegedly to improve airline safety,"

Chris Liu an airline pilot is being disciplined by the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) for posting a video on YouTube pointing out what he believes are serious flaws in airport security.

The 50-year-old pilot, who lives outside Sacramento, asked that his airline not be identified. He has worked for the airline for more than a decade and was deputized by the TSA to carry a gun in the cockpit. He is also a helicopter test pilot in the Army Reserve and flew missions for the United Nations in Macedonia.

Three days after he posted a series of six video clips recorded with a cell phone camera at San Francisco International Airport, four federal air marshals and two sheriff's deputies arrived at his house to confiscate his federally-issued firearm. The pilot recorded that event as well.

At the same time as the federal marshals took the pilot's gun, a deputy sheriff asked him to surrender his state-issued permit to carry a concealed weapon. A follow-up letter from the sheriff's department said the CCW permit might be reevaluated following the outcome of the federal investigation.

The YouTube videos, posted Nov. 28, (now removed by order of TSA) show what the pilot calls the irony of flight crews being forced to go through TSA screening while ground crew who service the aircraft are able to access secure areas simply by swiping a card.

"As you can see, airport security is kind of a farce. It's only smoke and mirrors so you people believe there is actually something going on here," the pilot narrates.
Watch the Video:

Video shot in the cockpit shows a medieval-looking rescue ax available on the flight deck after the pilots have gone through the metal detectors. "I would say a two-foot crash ax looks a lot more formidable than a box cutter," the pilot remarked.

Chris Liu in a news interview said that “Drug traffickers have successfully smuggled 20,000 lbs of heroin and cocaine into the U.S. this year using commercial airlines, what causes us to feel secure when it comes to terrorism?”

A letter from the TSA dated Dec. 6, informed the pilot "an administrative review into your deputation status as a Federal Flight Deck Officer has been initiated."
What one has to do with other is a mystery.

According to the letter, the review was directly related to the discovery by TSA staff of the YouTube videos. "The content and subject of these videos may have violated regulations concerning disclosure of sensitive security information," the letter said.
The pilot's attorney, Don Werno of Santa Ana, said the federal government sent six people to the house to send a message. "And the message was, you've angered us by telling the truth and by showing America that there are major security problems despite the fact that we've spent billions of dollars allegedly to improve airline safety,"

Chris Liu now faces potential civil penalties from the TSA. He said “he would likely go public when it becomes clear what the government plans to do with him”.

THE BOTTOM LINE: Whistle Blower protection law or not… Don’t expose the ignorance of the Federal Government when it comes to counterterrorism. They are embarrassed enough that they have no Idea how to protect the public from the agenda of Islam. The reactionary procedures of the FBI, Homeland Security, and the TSA are at best a Band-Aid to the knee-jerk reaction to what the Islamic terrorist have already tried and have learned from their failures.

Once the Hamas has ironed out all the wrinkles in their mission to begin the militant Jihad in America they will surly not telegraph their strategy for an attack on America that will make 9/11 appear as just some teenage vandalism.

This strategy of the so-call Federal Security Systems is obviously to defame anyone who exposes these ignorant feel good tactics that only serve to satisfy, but have nothing to do with any prophylactic procedures that are absolutely necessary to continue to at least stay one step ahead of this deceptive enemy.

Even if the TSA finally begins to use some preventative procedures it will never defeat this enemy; they will only serve to keep them at bay. It’s tantamount to trying to catch a waterfall in a cup.

I hope that you, along with the majority of Americans are feeling safe, warm, and fuzzy, relying on the ignorance of the Federal Government when it comes to the enemy of this Free Nation. We can never make this country safe and secure from an enemy that we refuse to identify much less refuse to make the effort to understand.

de Andréa

Friday, December 17, 2010

Federal Reserve: Muslim Terrorists OK, but Christians have to go…

This, according to Federal Reserve examiners, one might say that the Federal Reserve is the Grinch that stole Christmas in Perkins Oklahoma.

By de Andréa

A small-town bank in Perkins Oklahoma said the Federal Reserve wouldn’t let them keep religious signs and symbols on display, including, would you believe, Thomas Kinkade Christmas paintings hanging in the bank's lobby, you know, the ones that sparkle.

The Federal Reserve doesn’t like things that ‘sparkle’. That’s why they only print worthless paper monopoly money and don’t want you to trade it for gold…

According to Oklahoma City television station KOCO, the Federal Reserve has ordered a small-town bank in Oklahoma to remove Christmas from their Bank.

The Federal Reserve Bank, long noted for patronizing Islamic Sharia Financial Law, is apparently doing the terrorists biding in the destruction of the fundamental moral character in American Finance.

As long as I can remember American Banks have participated in the celebration of ‘Christmas’. Apparently, no more my friend, they likely will be celebrating ‘Ramadan’ and ‘Eid’ instead.

Federal Reserve examiners come once every four years to make sure banks are still complying with a long laundry list of regulations. The examiners came to Payne County Bank in Perkins Oklahoma last week.

The Federal Reserve team from Kansas City deemed a Bible verse of the day, crosses on the teller's counter and buttons that say "Merry Christmas, God With Us" were inappropriate. Inappropriate, maybe in July, but this is December, its Christmas, come on!

The Bible verse of the day on the bank's Internet site also had to be taken down, along with Thomas Kinkade paintings hanging in the bank's lobby.

So how do I make this leap from a so-called Federal Regulation, to Islamic Sharia law? It’s easy, this certainly cannot be American law, which is historically and traditionally founded on Judeo Christian principals can it? And since we have a Muslim President and a Federal Reserve Bank that enforces Islamic Sharia Financial law, it’s really not a leap at all is it?

The bank is quietly fighting for a clearer interpretation of the clause. What clause? Is that the clause that violates the First Amendment to the Federal Constitution? The…the one that says that the Federal Reserve Bank “…shall make no [regulation] law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof…”

Well… now, I know the Constitution doesn’t say The Federal Reserve Bank, it actually says, “Congress”. But did you know that, first of all, the Federal Reserve isn’t any more Federal than Federal Express. Moreover it can make no law of any kind; only elected legislatures can make law, such as Congress.

Bank officials have contacted their two U.S. legislators, Rep. Frank Lucas and Sen. Jim Inhofe, and the Oklahoma Bankers Association to help.

THE BOTTOM LINE: My first question would be…Just who makes the Federal Reserve regulations. If it is the Federal Reserve, the little bank should just thumb their nose at the big bully and tell the Grinches to go suck an egg. If it is the Congress, then take the unconstitutional regulation all the way to the Supreme Court if necessary.

I did this once with a business regulatory agency and won my case. But that was a long time ago when the courts used to follow the Constitution. But still, no one can legally make law except an elected body of legislators and then, they must comply with the Constitution, it’s really as simple as that.

But alas…no one is willing to fight anymore so increment by increment we will lose our Constitutional rights. They will surreptitiously be replaced with the tyranny of Islamic Sharia law.

It’s called boiling the frog my friend…

de Andréa

Thursday, December 16, 2010

Get The Fed Out Of Our Kids Bedrooms

Seriously, why doesn’t the Fed do what they’re supposed to do and get out of our personal lives and the lives of our kids?

By de Andréa

Taking freedom of choice and personal responsibility away from individual citizens is one of the very favorite preoccupations of the Federal Government.

The Federal Government has no constitutional right or responsibility to ban a piece of furniture.

The federal government is coming down on drop-side cribs saying “the risk they pose to children is not worth the convenience to caregivers”. Says the CPSC

This insanity is tantamount to banning air filled automobile tires because some of them blow out or leak. If it’s a faulty line of tires, then recall the tires, but banning them completely would obviously be quite insane.

Dropside Baby cribs have been made, sold, and safely used longer then air filled tires. And yet now we are banning them.

I personally grew up sleeping in one of these so-called death traps and so did my brother 10 years later. And I can testify that both of us are very much alive and unharmed in spite of the dangerous ordeal.

They are defiantly not the dangerous monsters that the Consumer Product Safety Commission claims. Granted they may have found some cheep cribs made in Indonesia or Sri Lanka that were badly designed and poorly built. But is this a reason to ban an American made quality designed and manufactured product that has been used safely for over 100 years?

The Consumer Product Safety Commission voted unanimously Wednesday to ban the manufacture, sale, and resale of the cribs - which have been blamed for at least 30 deaths and multiple injuries in the last 10 years.

Note: Tricycles and SUV’s kill 100’s of children a year and we don’t see those banned. Why? Because it would be insane, that's why.

For as long as most can remember, babies have spent their early years in cribs with side drop down gates that make it easier to take a baby in and out. It saves the parents from serious injury to their backs. (The original reason for the design)

Parents interviewed by CBS News were split about whether they really are safe or not. “I haven't had any problems with them and I personally like it,” said one woman on TV News. “The one that I have is a 3-in-1 so you can keep it for a long time. It goes from a crib to a toddler bed then it can go to a full-size bed.”

For at least one parent, these products can't be off the shelves soon enough, “I don't think it's safe," said another woman. “Because it could fall down and a kid could get hurt or it's not just sturdy enough for nowadays.”

Mother with a mission:
Mother Michele Witte says, “My son Tyler got his neck caught between the rail and the sideboard of his 2-year-old new oak drop side crib when a single metal screw became loose, entrapping him.” The Long Island mother's 10-month-old son later died, setting her on a path to work to get drop-side cribs off the market.

Owners of recalled cribs have already been urged to stop using them if possible, and they can get repair kits from the manufacturers.

Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand’s office sent out a news release about the ban and legislative efforts to ban these cribs:


Washington, DC – U.S. Product Safety Commission (CPSC) Chairman Inez Tenenbaum, U.S. Senator Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY), Representatives Joseph Crowley (D-NY) and Jan Schakowsky (D-IL), and a parent whose child died from a faulty crib announced today that the CPSC has approved new federal rules to end dangerous, traditional drop-side cribs. The new federal crib standards, set to take effect in June, would stop the sale, re-sale, manufacture, and distribution of drop-side cribs and would also prohibit drop-side cribs at motels, hotels and childcare facilities. Drop side cribs have resulted in the deaths of at least 32 infants since 2001.

This is interesting:
This is the first time in nearly 30 years that federal crib standards have been updated.
Maybe we should have tried this first, maybe, ya think? Or enforced the standards that have existed for more than one hundred years.

In May 2010, Senator Gillibrand and Representative Crowley launched an effort in Congress to ban all drop-side cribs, including in daycare centers and hotels, introducing legislation in the Senate and the House. Today’s new crib safety rules address a requirement, authored by Rep. Jan Schakowsky, in the Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act (CPSIA) of 2008 that calls for all major juvenile products, including cribs, to have the strongest possible mandatory safety standards. The CPSIA is a sweeping child safety law. Question, why wasn’t that enforced for at least the past two years???

THE BOTTOM LINE: One woman’s vendetta, Michele Witte, whose 10 month old son tragically died because the 2 year old crib was in disrepair. The report said a screw had come undone over the years and obviously malfunctioned so we blame the crib instead of the parent. That’s like blaming the SUV instead of the driver or the gun instead of the shooter.

The second line idem on the crib safety guide provided free by the Consumer Protection Board reads as follows : “Their should be --- No missing, loose, broken or improperly installed screws, brackets, staples, rails or other hardware on the crib or mattress support”. Read it for yourself. I guess Mrs. Witte was just too busy or irresponsible to check the safety of her 10 month old son’s two year old crib.

Oh…right! She’s not responsible, the government is…

As I said at the beginning of this article “Taking freedom of choice and personal responsibility away from individual citizens is one of the very favorite preoccupations of the Federal Government.”

The next things they’ll be banning are toys with children’s meals or forcing us to wear safety items or banning certain foods. Oh…sorry! They’ve already done that…

de Andréa

Wednesday, December 15, 2010

America’s Colleges Support Terrorists

This is just one of them…

By de Andrae

Action Alert:
Barry Sommer had a contract to teach a class about Islamic studies at Lane Community College in Eugene, Oregon—that is until last week. The class was canceled because he told the truth, something one just does not do in American Colleges and universities anymore… not if you want to keep your ‘job’ you don’t.

But Barry did, and the result… CAIR, the Council on American-Islamic Relations, using its typical propaganda smear tactics, put pressure on the college to cancel the class and remove Barry as an instructor. Shamefully, Lane Community College caved in to the tyranny of Islam and canceled the class.

Note: this typifies the politically correct stance of American College and University’s indoctrination to paint Islam, the enemy of the free world, in a good light by avoiding the truth. In doing so, the college made itself complicit and supportive of CAIR’s continuing assault on our first amendment and its mission to impose the tyranny of Sharia law in American college’s, schools and local State and Federal governments, as well as our court system.

One by one across our Nation, colleges, and universities are falling prey to Sharia and the tyranny of Islam.

We cannot sit by and do nothing anymore. We MUST send a message to Lane Community College that caving in to CAIR, which is a front group for the terrorist organization Hamas, and a co-conspirator in Charity and money laundering fraud --- is outrageous and unacceptable.

If you would like to do something for your family and your country, let your voice be heard against this violation of freedom and truth, here is an easy way to do it.

Call the Lane Community College main switchboard, 541-463-3000. THIS IS MORE IMPORTANT THAN SENDING AN EMAIL. Why? Because we want to barrage the college with hundreds, even thousands of phone calls, today and tomorrow. This way the college will KNOW without a doubt that there are many Americans who object to the college’s actions

When you call, ask to speak to Mary Spilde, college president, or the college’s public relations employee. In a firm but respectful tone, tell the person you speak to (or leave a voice mail) “that you are outraged by the college’s decision to cave in to the demands of an organization like CAIR and suppress free speech on its campus. And that you are asking the college to reconsider and reinstate the class and Barry Sommer as instructor”.

If you’re unable to get through when you call, that’s a good thing! That means many others are calling. Please try again later, or tomorrow.

If you can’t get through on the phone, or just can’t call for some reason, please send an email to Ms. Spilde expressing your outrage and asking that the class be reinstated—again, in a firm but respectful tone. Her email address is But remember—calling is better than emailing.

Lane Community College receives federal dollars, so everyone of us who pays taxes, no matter where we live, are helping to support the college. Thus, we have a right to make our voice heard!

What’s more, we need to send a message to other colleges across the country that Americans are not just going to sit back and watch while a terrorist organization like CAIR assaults the first amendment in its goal to impose Sharia law on America!

Please place your phone call today or tomorrow! And please email this article to others so they can do the same.

Thanks, de Andréa

Monday, December 13, 2010

TSO’s, Terrorist Security Officers???

The TSO’s are inappropriately named as Transportation Safety Officers. Oh! You think I’m kidding… Check out the picture of a Muslim terrorist padding down a Catholic Nun.

By de Andréa

What’s wrong with this picture? I’ll tell you, the enemy of the free world is doing security at American airports. What are they looking for--- the good guys?

We live in an upside-down world when we hire the bad-guys to hunt down the good-guys.

The Muslim Public Affairs Council (MPAC) has completed training for 2,200 Transportation Safety Officers (TSOs) at the Los Angeles International Airport according to a press release found on the MPAC website.

The MPAC release notes that the two-month training course informed officers of "the diversity of Muslims around the world from cultural dress to language, to tenets. The four Muslim terrorist trainers taught the TSOs how to properly handle a Quran and discussed the different ways Muslim women and men choose to cover or dress. For example, the TSOs learned if a woman is wearing the hijab or burka and needs a secondary screening she should be screened in a private area by a female TSO officer only. Of course as you can see, this same courtesy obviously does not apply to Catholic Nun’s.

(The Drudge Report shocked the nation with this photo of a Nun being patted down by a Muslim woman in head garb. Apparently Christian women are afforded only public groping sessions.)

A little background on MPAC
In 1986, MPAC was formed as a political action arm of one of the largest Wahhabi terrorist mosques in America, the Islamic Center for Southern California.

The Center for Security Policy's Team B II report is entitled:
"Sharia: The Threat to America" notes, "The founders of the Islamic Center for Southern California are Hassan Hathout and his brother Maher Hathout. The late Hassan Hathout was a senior member of the Muslim Brotherhood Movement, that has been convicted by a Texas federal court of money laundering for terrorist organisations. The two brothers Maher spent time in an Egyptian prison during the early days of the Muslim Brotherhood’s activities there, led by the Brotherhood’s founder Hassan Al Banna. MPAC’s own publication, The Minaret, has proudly called Hassan a 'companion of' and Maher 'a close disciple of' Brotherhood founder Hassan al Banna."

Maher Hathout also founded and is currently a senior advisor for MPAC. He and others at MPAC also currently work for and maintain a close relationship with the Islamic Center of Southern California.

Hathout was also on the board of directors and a member of the American Muslim Council (AMC) from 1993 to 1997. AMC was founded by the al Qaeda financier and Hamas operative Abdurahman Alamoudi who is currently serving 23 years in prison for funding terrorist groups including al Qaeda.

Maher Hathout served on the AMC Board of Directors at the same time Alamoudi was serving as its Executive Director.

The Team B II report states:
”Maher Hathout has publicly voiced his approval of Designated Terrorist Organizations such as Hezbollah; decried many U.S. counterterrorism efforts; called for the destruction of Israel; and, openly supported known terrorists such as Hasan al Turabi, the leader of the National Islamic Front of Sudan. Yet, the organization he founded, MPAC, enjoys a reputation in official U.S. circles as a so-called 'moderate' Muslim organization. Salam al-Marayati is the current president of MPAC. Al-Marayati was denied a leadership position on the National Commission on Terrorism by then-House Democratic Leader Richard Gephardt when it came to light that Al-Marayati claimed that the terrorist group, Hezbollah, was a legitimate organization and has the right to attack the Israeli Army.”

"Edina Lekovic is MPAC’s Communications Director. Previously, Lekovic was editor of the magazine Al-Talib when it editorialized that Osama bin Laden was a freedom fighter and warrior for Allah, who should be defended by Muslims. Al-Talib is the magazine published by the UCLA chapter of the Muslim Student’s Association. ... The MSA was the first Muslim Brotherhood organization established in the United States."

Islamic stealth Jihad:
MPAC works as a propaganda and misinformation ministry for the Muslim Brotherhood. One example offered in the Team B II Report is its aggressive and successful pursuit of total control of the language used by the United States government in regard to Muslim terrorists.

MPAC attacked the language used to describe the events of September 11, 2001 detailed in the 9/11 Commission Report. MPAC demanded an end to the use of words such as jihad, ummah, caliphate, shariah and others in relation to terrorist doctrine, the report states.
As I have so often pointed out, the National Counterterrorism Center, the Department of Homeland Security and the Federal Bureau of Investigation have all issued strategic counterterrorism documents devoid of these terms. Such conformity to Shariah by U.S. government entities as the FBI and DHS is an extraordinary strategic victory for the enemy in the surreptitious infiltration and manipulation of American culture as well as the incremental control of U.S. security agencies.

This stealth Jihad historically always precedes the dreaded “Militant Jihad” of terror in the streets of the host nation. Militant Jihad will inevitably occur when there is sufficient control of the culture as well as the local and federal governmental agencies.

The Investigative Project offers our government security agencies an extensive background study of MPAC's links to jihadi terrorist groups. And yet we continue to buy into the dangerous deception of Islam.

THE BOTTOM LINE: Over the years I have had my run-ins with the FBI. Most recently, accusing the federal investigative agency of outright treason, aiding and abetting the enemy in time of war. Read the unfolding progressive saga yourself. “The FBI Connection Part I Part II and Part III.

Why and how does this happen? ‘Deception’, pure and simple, well… maybe not so simple, the entire western culture is under the spell of Islamic deception. If you want to learn about this powerful form of deception, it’s in the Quran…read it, it’s called the Islmic doctrine of Taqiyyah.

Every Muslim child is programmed with this art of deception and powerful form of manipulation from birth.

Do yourself a favor read the enemies handbook and find out who he is. It will be more than the pentagon or our security agencies have done. They instead learn from the deceivers.

This is why the Muslim terrorists can pass themselves off as moderate, (there is no such thing as a moderate Muslim), and the murdering militant nations of Islam are blindly accepted and treated as peaceful. There is no such thing as peace in the Nation of Islam.

The IRS grants tax free non-profit status to Muslim so-called “Charities”. There is no such thing as “Charity” in Islam.

With a small amount of effort you can learn the truth about the best kept secret of the worst and most dangerous enemy the world has ever encountered.

To show you just how powerful this deception is… It is nothing new, it has been going on for 1400 years, and, it has never stopped. Moreover it never will, unless ‘you’ stop it.

You can start by obtaining a copy of the Team B II report on the Center for Security Policy website here.

And, you can purchase an unaltered direct English translation of the Quran or Koran from Random house for just $6.99 Here.

Begin taking control of your own future and the future of your children. Instead if leaving it in the hands of a deceived government, or worse yet, in the hands of the enemy and the tyranny of Islam!!!

de Andréa

Friday, December 10, 2010

Evangelical Pastors Say Obama A Christian, Not a Muslim

Four in ten American Protestant pastors believe Obama is a Christian… the deception is working?

By de Andréa
December 8, 2010

While Protestant pastors overwhelmingly believe that Oprah Winfrey isn’t a Christian, 75 percent of them say former president George W. Bush is. And 41 percent say they believe Obama to be a Christian.

Winfrey and Bush, along with Glenn Beck, Barack Obama and Sarah Palin, comprised the list that LifeWay Research presented to Protestant pastors along with the question, “Which, if any, of the following people do you believe are Christians?”

The majority of Americans self-identify as Christian, and Protestant is the largest category of Christian denominations. With that in mind, LifeWay Research set out to examine the beliefs of pastors in leading Protestant churches. The national telephone survey took place Oct. 7-14 and included 1,000 interviews.

Winfrey earned the lowest affirmative response, with only 19 percent of pastors saying they believe she is a Christian. The other television personality on the list, Glen Beck, earned the second lowest affirmative response at 27 percent.

Among the politicians on the list, Bush earned the highest affirmative response, of pastors (75 percent) saying they believe he is a Christian. Palin earned the next highest response at 66 percent, and Obama received the lowest affirmative response with less than half of Protestant pastors (41 percent) saying they believe him to be a Christian.

Four percent of pastors say none of the listed prominent personalities are Christians, and 15 percent respond only with “Not sure.”

“For many people, ‘Christian’ is a box they check on a demographic survey “Protestant pastors, should have a more detailed view – many apply terms like ‘born again,’ ‘evangelical’ and ‘a changed life’ as synonyms for ‘Christian.’ Thus, their standard is often different than the prevailing view.

“Using their standard, the majority would not agree that President Obama is a Christian, though they do believe he is a mainline Protestant. And it is likely that Glenn Beck’s Mormonism, widely viewed by Protestants as a different religion rather than a different Christian denomination, probably caused many to indicate he is not a Christian.”

Protestant pastors who self-identify as Democrats, politically liberal or very liberal, or mainline are more likely to indicate these prominent personalities are Christians. For example, 88 percent of those who self-identify as liberal or very liberal say Obama is a Christian compared to only 31 percent of those who say they are conservative and 12 percent of those who say they are very conservative.

For many, ‘Judge not’ are the only words of Jesus they know. To those people, it may be inconceivable that Protestant pastors might consider some Christians and others not. Yet Jesus said much more about following Him. Protestant pastors have theological views and beliefs about what it means to be a Christian – and those opinions influence many in America, so it’s important to know what they believe.”

Obama Speaks of His Christian Faith in Jesus Christ

President Barack Hussein Obama was forced to open up about his Christian faith when an Albuquerque woman asked him "Why are you a Christian?"

President Barack Obama addresses an invited group of guest at the home of Andy Cavalier, in what the administration is calling a backyard discussion, Tuesday, Sept. 28, 2010 in Albuquerque, N.M.

He responded, "I'm a Christian by choice." Oh yeah! Just when did that happen Obama?
It was a hot topic question, the woman recognized during a backyard conversation on the economy.

Providing a brief account of how he grew up, Obama said his family members "weren't folks who went to church every week." That’s because they were either Muslims or Communists.

"My mother was one of the most spiritual people I knew, but she didn't raise me in the church," he said.

Obama said he became a Christian later in life.
What drew him to Christianity was "the precepts of Jesus Christ" which spoke to him in terms of the "kind of life he would want to lead”, he explained.

Those precepts include "being my brothers' and sisters' keeper; treating others as they would treat me." Is that why your brother in Kenya lives in a grass hut on $75.00 a year? And the Golden rule says " you would have them treat you", Obama!

He continued, "I think also understanding that ... Jesus Christ dying for my sins spoke to the humility that we all have to have as human beings – that we're sinful and we're flawed and we make mistakes; we achieve salvation through the grace of God."

In terms of how he's living out his Christian faith, he said he strives and prays to "see God in other people" and "help them find their own grace."

Obama may be good with words “just words” but he is definitely not a Christian. Gods word says you will know them by their fruit. A fig tree just does not bare olives my friend.

THE BOTTOM LINE RESPONSE: First off, I am appalled at the criteria that these surveyed pastors use to define Christianity. Actually Obama did a better job explaining what a Christian is, than the so-call Christian Pastors.

When Obama spoke at a Christian university he had the cross on the stage covered. Why? Because he can’t stand the sight of it. Does that sound like a Christian? 'I said'…Does that sound like a Christian???

Obama with one fell swoop got rid of America’s “National day of Prayer”. Why? Because it is regarded as Christian.

He said his Mama was the most spiritual person he knew and yet she never set foot in a Christian Church. His mama was a Communist.

Obama did however attend Mosque and went to Muslim Madrassas for his early education and indoctrination in Indonesia.

Obama’s Father was a Muslim. Obama’s Step Father was a Muslim. Obama was brought up as a Muslim by his stepfather, and a Communist by his grandfather.

Let me ask you this, would your spiritual Christian mother marry a Muslim man, ‘TWICE’? Well, you may not know the answer to that unless you know what a Muslim is, and for that matter what a Christian is… Actually they do have something in common…They are both, very ‘Spiritual’.

A brief explanation
While a Christian is filled with the Spirit of his God Jehovah, the Muslim is filled with the spirit of his god Satan. I know; his name is Allah. Satan has had several names throughout eternity. His first name was Lucifer, a good name, which means the Angel of light.

When Lucifer, the Angel of light, wanted to be the God of Creation, he challenged his Creator and lost. God Jehovah changed Lucifer’s name to Satan which means the Angel of Darkness.

After God created this beautiful blue ball called Earth out of the “void” that was left from a previous creation, Satan deceived Eve, Adam, and all the people for 2000 years, all except the family of Noah. God destroyed the Earth again and after Jehovah again recreated a new earth, then again, 2000 years later Satan deceived the Jews to reject Christ their own Messiah, and Christianity was later born out of the failed “Jesus Jews” or Messianic Jews, in Antioch Turkey.

After unsuccessfully doing everything he could for 610 years to destroy Christianity, Satan once again used his deception and became Allah the angel of Death, the evil god of Muhammad Satan’s prophet, Satan’s “Perfect Man”, Satan’s answer to Jesus Jehovah God’s Son, the “Perfect Man”. Satan would destroy Gods people, the Jews and now these Christians once and for all. (Islamic Jihad)

Today 1400 years later nearly a third of the world population identifies itself with Islam, Muhammad its prophet, and Allah its satanic evil god.

Now that you know what Islam is, and Christianity is, maybe you can answer the question would your Christian mama marry a Muslim man. I didn’t think so…

What ‘I’ think Obama is, is irrelevant. What Obama says he is, is relevant. And Obama Says he is a Muslim. He says “I am one of them.” Listen to him… He says, “America is no longer a Christian Nation”. He says, “America is a Muslim Nation, the largest Muslim Nation in the world.” He defends Islam; he lies about the history and achievements of Islam. Would a Muslim do that? Yes…Would a Christian do that? I say, No… Those 41 percent of so-called Christian Pastors are deceived my friend.

You decide…

de Andréa

Survey Methodology:

The LifeWay Research telephone survey was conducted among Protestant pastors Oct. 7-14, 2010. Churches were selected randomly and each interview was conducted with the church’s senior pastor, minister, or priest. Responses were weighted to reflect the geographic distribution of Protestant churches. The sample of 1,000 provides 95 percent confidence that the sampling error does not exceed ±3.2 percent for the total sample. Margins of error are slightly higher in subgroups.

Related reading
“Why does Comedy Central give such deference to Islam while mocking Christianity,” asked Tony Perkins, president of Family Research Council, in a teleconference Thursday. “Is it because they confuse the civility of Christianity with weakness?” Answer, yes they do… Read More

Wednesday, December 01, 2010

WikiLeaks doesn’t leak

While the government condemns WikiLeaks, U.S. National Security should patch the leaky hole in the bottom of their own boat.

By de Andréa
No! its not WikiLeaks that leaks, it’s the Government agencies that leak. WikiLeaks is the media, the media prints information. If the government wants to keep classified information ‘classified’ then why are they passing it to the media?

Hundreds of thousands of State Department documents that leaked Sunday revealed a hidden world of backstage international cloak and dagger diplomacy, divulging candid comments from world leaders and detailing occasional U.S. pressure tactics aimed at hot spots in Afghanistan, Iran, and North Korea.

The classified diplomatic cables released by online whistle-blower WikiLeaks and reported on by news organizations in the United States and Europe provided often unflattering assessments of foreign leaders, ranging from U.S. allies such as Germany and Italy to other nations like Libya, Iran, and Afghanistan.

The cables also contained new revelations about long-simmering nuclear trouble spots, detailing U.S., Israeli and Arab world fears of Iran’s growing nuclear program, American concerns about Pakistan’s atomic arsenal and U.S. discussions about a united Korean peninsula as a long-term solution to North Korean aggression.

Long Island Rep. Peter King said the release of the information puts “American lives at risk all over the world. This is worse even than a physical attack on Americans, it’s worse than a military attack.”

Kill the messenger
Rep. King has written letters to both U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton asking for swift action to be taken against WikiLeaks and its founder Julian Assange.

King wants Holder to prosecute Assange under the Espionage Act and has also called on Clinton to determine whether WikiLeaks could be designated as a Foreign Terrorist Organization.

Doing that we will be able to seize their funds and go after anyone who provides them with any help or contributions or assistance whatsoever,” King said. “The Attorney General and I don’t always agree on issues. But I believe on this one, he and I strongly agree that there should be a criminal prosecution,” King said.

Embarrassing memos
The leaked cables also include American memos encouraging U.S. diplomats at the United Nations to collect detailed data about the U.N. secretary general, his team and foreign diplomats — going beyond what is considered the normal run of information-gathering expected in diplomatic circles.

The documents published by The New York Times, France’s Le Monde, Britain’s Guardian newspaper, German magazine Der Spiegel and others laid out the behind-the-scenes conduct of Washington’s international relations, shrouded in public by platitudes, smiles and handshakes at photo sessions among senior officials.

The White House immediately condemned the release of the WikiLeaks documents, saying “such disclosures put at risk our diplomats, intelligence professionals, and people around the world who come to the United States for assistance in promoting democracy and open government.”

It also noted that “by its very nature, field reporting to Washington is candid and often incomplete information. It is not an expression of policy, nor does it always shape final policy decisions.”

“Nevertheless, these cables could compromise private discussions with foreign governments and opposition leaders, and when the substance of private conversations is printed on the front pages of newspapers across the world, it can deeply impact not only U.S. foreign policy interests, but those of our allies and friends around the world,” the White House said.

On its website, The New York Times said “the documents serve an important public interest, illuminating the goals, successes, compromises and frustrations of American diplomacy in a way that other accounts cannot match.”

Assange claimed the administration was trying to cover up alleged evidence of serious “human rights abuse and other criminal behavior” by the U.S. government.

Free press
In a session Sunday with a group of Arab journalists, Assange said, “The State Department understands that we are a responsible organization, so it is trying to make it as hard as it can for us to publish responsibly.” He called the Obama administration “a regime that doesn’t believe in the freedom of the press.”

Extracts of the more than 250,000 cables posted online by news outlets that had been given advance copies of the documents showed deep U.S. concerns about Iranian and North Korean nuclear programs along with fears about regime collapse in Pyongyang.

The Times highlighted documents that indicated the U.S. and South Korea were “gaming out an eventual collapse of North Korea” and discussing the prospects for a unified country if the isolated, communist North’s economic troubles and political transition lead it to implode.

The paper also cited documents showing the U.S. used hard-line tactics to win approval from countries to accept freed detainees from Guantanamo Bay. It said Slovenia was told to take a prisoner if its president wanted to meet with President Barack Obama and said the Pacific island of Kiribati was offered millions of dollars to take in a group of detainees.

It also cited a cable from the U.S. Embassy in Beijing that included allegations from a Chinese contact that China’s Politburo directed a cyber intrusion into Google’s computer systems as part of a “coordinated campaign of computer sabotage carried out by government operatives, private security experts, and Internet outlaws.”

Le Monde said another memo asked U.S. diplomats to collect basic contact information about U.N. officials that included Internet passwords, credit card numbers and frequent flyer numbers. They were asked to obtain fingerprints, ID photos, DNA and iris scans of people of interest to the United States, Le Monde said.

The Guardian said some cables showed King Abdullah of Saudi Arabia repeatedly urging the United States to attack Iran to destroy its nuclear program. The newspaper also said officials in Jordan and Bahrain have openly called for Iran’s nuclear program to be stopped by any means and that leaders of Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates and Egypt referred to Iran “as ‘evil,’ an ‘existential threat’ and a power that ‘is going to take us to war,’” The Guardian said.

The Times said another batch of documents raised questions about Italian Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi and his relationship with Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin. One cable said Berlusconi “appears increasingly to be the mouthpiece of Putin” in Europe, the Times reported.
Italy’s Foreign Minister Franco Frattini on Sunday called the release the “Sept. 11 of world diplomacy,” in that everything that had once been accepted as normal has now changed.

Der Spiegel reported that the cables portrayed German Chancellor Angela Merkel and Foreign Minister Guido Westerwelle in unflattering terms. It said American diplomats saw Merkel as risk-averse and Westerwelle as largely powerless.

The Obama administration has been bracing for the release for the past week. Top officials have notified allies that the contents of the diplomatic cables could prove embarrassing because they contain candid assessments of foreign leaders and their governments, as well as details of American policy.

The State Department’s top lawyer warned Assange late Saturday that lives and military operations would be put at risk if the cables were released. Legal adviser Harold Koh said WikiLeaks would be breaking the law if it went ahead. He rejected a request from Assange to cooperate in removing sensitive details from the documents.

Assange, in a response released Sunday by his London lawyer, said he had no intention of halting the release. The New York Times said the documents involved 250,000 cables — the daily message traffic between the State Department and more than 270 U.S. diplomatic outposts around the world. The newspaper said that in its reporting, it attempted to exclude information that would endanger confidential informants or compromise national security.

The Times said that after its own redactions, it sent Obama administration officials the cables it planned to post and invited them to challenge publication of any information they deemed would harm the national interest. After reviewing the cables, the officials suggested additional redactions, the Times said. The newspaper said it agreed to some, but not all.

THE BOTTOM LINE: My first question would be: How does Julian Assange from WikiLeaks get 250,000 top secret classified documents? Our so-called Government Security leaks like a sieve with a big hole. This is not the first time the security agencies have leaked classified information to WikiLeaks. While Assange should and did try to use some restraint by requesting to cooperate with a state department lawyer to remove “sensitive details from the documents” it was rejected.
Whistle blowers blow whistles that’s what they do. Moreover the government ought to do what it is supposed to do and clean up its act. The Obama administration is angry because it was once again caught with its pants down.

de Andréa