Friday, July 31, 2009

This Guy Is Coming Down

So says blogger Parker Shannon, a 70-year-old retiree who has documented legal violations by Obama for the past two years from his home in Boston.

By de Andréa
July 31, 2009, an extensive information depot questioning Barack Obama's eligibility to hold the office of president, has vanished off the Internet, and its publisher believes the political end is also near for the commander in chief.

"This guy is coming down, there's nothing anybody can do about it," declares Parker Shannon, But Shannon stresses his decision to shut down the site had nothing to do with any kind of pressure from the government.

"The Obama camp didn't get to me. They can't," he said. "What got to me is my fellow Americans."

"I'm disappointed,"
he said, explaining he lives on Social Security and a small retirement pension. "I just am tired of doing what I'm doing, and I get 50 e-mails a day telling me I'm a great patriot and they're praying for me. I don't want to hear it. Just send me $10."

Shannon says he spent 60 to 70 hours a week on his efforts and received only $240 in the entire two years despite displaying prominent donation buttons. The home page now just has a logo and the words, "Closed. Lack of support."

Shannon says he decided to pull the plug on the Obama File after celebrating his 70th birthday, and he is now going to reassess what to do with his reams of information, including the possibility of writing a book.

"I've got more stuff on Obama than anybody on the planet. I'm not gonna let it go to waste," he said, adding, "I'm not doing it for free anymore."

Shannon's site didn't claim Obama is not an American citizen. In fact, it clearly stated, "Obama is a citizen. He's just not a natural born citizen."

The phrase "natural born citizen" is key, because the Constitution, Article 2, Section 1, states, "No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President."

Shannon featured charts and quotes from Congress on his page claiming a person needs to have both parents as U.S. citizens to be considered a "natural born" citizen, as opposed to just being born in the U.S., which would make someone a "native born" citizen.

His site explained: "Obama is not a 'natural born citizen' because his father was a Kenyan national and a British subject. To be a natural born citizen, a person's parents must BOTH be citizens of the United States of America. Further, that person must be born in the United States."

Parker Shannon of the Obama File highlighted excerpts from the 1st U.S. Congress in his effort to demonstrate a natural born citizen must be the child of two U.S. citizens.

It is interesting that the father’s race is designated as African. African is not a race it is in fact not even a country, it is a continent and therefore never has been officially used to identify a race. It would be tantamount to identifying the Caucasian race as North American. There are in fact many Caucasian Africans so the designation of African has never been used to identify race.

A widely circulated image of a Certification of Live Birth often touted by the White House and some members of the national media as proof Obama was born in Hawaii, Shannon also claims is a forgery.

He cites as just one example the use of the term "African" to describe the race of Obama's father on the certificate of live birth.

Parker Shannon of the Obama File says the use of the word "African" to denote the race of President Obama's father is evidence the Certification of Live Birth touted by the Obama camp is actually a forgery.

"There was a narrow list of [acceptable] words, none of which were 'African,' which is what is on Obama’s certification of Live Birth. Whoever counterfeited the thing couldn't bring himself to say 'Negro.'“ Even though this was the term used at the time.

Indeed, a 1961 summary of U.S. vital statistics by the Department of Health, Education, and Welfare (now known as Health and Human Services) indicates:

Births in the United States in 1961 are classified for vital statistics into white, Negro, American Indian, Chinese, Japanese, Aleut, Eskimo, Hawaiian and Part-Hawaiian (combined), and "other nonwhite.” The category "white" includes, in addition to persons reported as "white," those reported as Mexican or Puerto Rican. With one exception, a reported mixture of Negro with any other race is included in the Negro group; other mixed parentage is classified according to the race of the nonwhite parent and mixtures of nonwhite races to the race of the father.

Many people remain unaware that someone doesn't even have to be born in Hawaii to receive a COLB, as those birth documents can be granted to children born out of state or even America. Note; they are not long form certificates.

To date, Obama has steadfastly refused to release his long-form hospital-generated birth certificate including details such as the name of his birth hospital and attending physician if it exists.

But his original birth certificate is not the only document at issue. Some of the documentation not available for Obama are his kindergarten records, Punahou school records, Occidental College records, Columbia University records, Columbia thesis, Harvard Law School records, Harvard Law Review articles, scholarly articles from the University of Chicago, passport, medical records, files from his years as an Illinois state senator, Illinois State Bar Association records, any baptism records and adoption records.

THE BOTTOM LINE: If this isn’t proof that Obama is a fraud then it is at least enough evidence to cause a grand jury investigation. And yet, there is none in sight.

Even if Obama were to be impeached for fraud today, it would take years to undo the damage this man has done to foreign relations alone, not to mention the toll on the economy, a debt that cannot ever be paid off unless the American dollar is inflated to the point of worthlessness, which incidentally could be part of the plan to totally wreck the American capitalistic economy. Then the door would be wide open to usher in the new socialistic utopia that will save us all from the ravages of freedom and liberty.

The question is not whether there is enough proof. The question is, just how much do you need? Because, there is more!

Much more…

de Andréa

See a trailer of the movie Obama doesn't want you to see: Get the 1st documentary on presidential eligibility

Monday, July 20, 2009

Is Obama a real Commie?

It is certain the Communists he hires are real Commies
By de Andréa
July 20, 2009

At least Barack hires the best of the best. The communists he hires are REAL red Commies. The new Green Czar Obama hired, Mr. Van Jones himself stated in a 2005 interview, that his environmental activism was a means to fight for racial and class justice, and that he is rowdy black nationalist, and a communist socialist.

Let’s see: the bigoted Black Muslim Jeremiah Wright is his spiritual mentor.

Bill Ayres, the unrepentant communist, terrorist, and mad bomber is his political advisor

What was the name of that criminal who went to jail, his neighbor and financial advisor?

Then you have the numerous tax evaders he appointed. After all Taxes are for the common people.

Let us not forget the openly bigoted Sonia Sotomayor who legislates from the bench.

So, Obama selecting a self proclaimed communist to run the "Green" program makes sense. After all Green is not about Green, it is about power, oppression, and control.

Note: he appointed a "czar"--that means as any good communist dictator would do, he does not have to go before a Senate committee for confirmation.

Makes you proud of your president does it, huh?

Like all the other Obama appointees, the administrations Green Jobs czar, Van Jones, has a very checkered past deep-rooted in radical politics, including Black Nationalism, anarchism, and communism. The broadcast network newscasts have mostly failed to report on Mr. Jones’s past political affiliations which are in lock-step with the networks downplay of coverage regarding President Obama’s associations with the radical and terrorist William Ayers during the election.

At 6:47 a.m. EDT on the July 10 edition of Fox and Friends, Americans for Prosperity Policy Director Phil Kerpen, told interviewer Brian Kilmeade that Jones is somebody who is involved in radical politics in San Francisco, who was self-admittedly radicalized in jail and found Communism and anarchism like some find God. Kerpen compares Van Jones’s Communist past, with his new quest for environmentalism and the creation of a green oppressive economy and jobs: In other words, they are one in the same…

Because the administrations czars do not go through congressional confirmation, and are therefore not scrutinized or vetted, many Americans have no idea who they are or where they come from.

Kudos to Fox News for bringing Van Jones’s controversial past and political ideology to light. The following was aired on the July 10 edition of Fox and Friends:

BRIAN KILMEADE, co-host, Fox and Friends: “Phil, we have a czar, he’s a green jobs czar, he’s Van Jones, he’s got a deep history in communism.”

PHIL KERPEN, AFP Policy Director: “He does. He has a very checkered past. This is somebody who was involved in radical politics out in San Francisco, California. He was arrested during a demonstration/riot following the Rodney King verdict. And he said himself that he was radicalized in jail, that he found communism and anarchism. And then he started a pretty radical, kind of communist, socialist, utopian group that was supposed to end all racism though central planning. And then he decided that the real path the sort of progressive nirvana was the --- this green jobs idea. I think its pretty instructive what his past is, I am not just trying to smear the guy, but I think its the same sort of philosophy, the idea that government ought to be reordering society in accordance with some utopian vision that failed with communism and socialism, and will fail with this green jobs idea. We are imposing a top-down vision.”

GRETCHEN CARLSON, co-host: “And more importantly for America Phil, is the fact that we already have an Energy Secretary, who by the way had to go through Congress to be approved. And the reason that these czars, you don’t know anything about them is because they don’t have to go through that process.”

THE BOTTOM LINE: There is no doubt that whether Obama is a one or two term president that he will do an enormous amount of political, structural, and economic damage to America not to mention the long term effects of his oppressive Islamic and Communist ideology.

If you still don’t believe that Al-Barrack Hussein Obammah is a Communist Muslim, who is bent on the destruction of your freedom and liberty, then it just proves my point that you are blindly deceived.

The worst part is, you may never see the long term consequences of your mistakes.

But your children will…

de Andréa

Thursday, July 16, 2009

America is Abandoning Israel

So Israel is defying America

By de Andréa
One might say…Well I am not abandoning Israel. But unfortunately you do not represent America. The president does, and he has traded our long time ally, friend, and part of the historical religious foundation of America for the illegitimate terrorist organization who call themselves the Palestinians.

Although the so-called Palestinians have no historical ties to any land anywhere on planet earth, the rest of the ignorant world has been deceived by Islam into believing that these Muslim murdering terrorist refugees from Jordan somehow have a historical right to Israel’s historical land.

One should not expect anything different from al- Barrack Hussein Obammah, after all he has been robotically brain washed by these same Muslim terrorists since he was born in only God knows what country.

In the picture, Obama strikes a deal in support of Palestinian terrorist President Mahmoud Abbas in the Oval Office May 28, 2009.

“The Obama administration recently demanded Israel halt all settlement activity, including natural growth, in apparent abrogation of a deal made by President Bush to allow for natural growth”. So says David Ha'Ivri, a spokesman for the West Bank's regional Jewish council

Israeli activists have launched a campaign using Barack Obama's name to construct Jewish housing projects on West Bank hilltops in defiance of the U.S. president's demands for a halt to all Jewish building in the strategic territory.

"Mr. President, your policy that aims to destroy the historic Jewish communities of Judea, Samaria and eastern Jerusalem will no longer go unchallenged," states a press release from the Obama Hilltop Project. "We aim to rally the worldwide pro-Israel community to support the rebirth of these communities and counter your unjust, illegal policies."

The goal is to increase the Jewish presence in the West Bank, beginning with the re-establishment of the town of Homesh, which was one of four Jewish communities evacuated by Israel during the country's 2005 retreat from the Gaza Strip.

Who and what gives the president of the United States the authority to demand a halt to building anything in any sovereign nation anywhere in this world??? Islam…Yes, Islam is the authority for al-Barrack Hussein Obammah. (Don’t forget he made a deal to support the ‘Palestinian Terrorists’)

Critics pointed out the West Bank evacuations served no practical purpose other than to send a signal to West Bank Jews they might be next on the chopping block. Homesh was not taken over by the Palestinian terrorists, and the Israeli army continued to operate there. Indeed, the Israeli court system recently has ruled Jews can still be present in Homesh, leading to the establishment there of a Torah center.

Activists are now looking for donations of any amount to help them expand Homesh, including a new hilltop community to be named after Obama.

Those making online donations are being encouraged to also send a formal letter to Obama making the White House aware of the effort to support Jewish growth in the West Bank
The letter states: "Mr. President, your current foreign policy contradicts the most sacred values of the Jewish Nation. It is written in our holy Torah, 'The Lord your God will bring you into the land that your ancestors possessed, and you will possess it; he will make you more prosperous and numerous than your ancestors.” (Deuteronomy, 26:3-5). Good people throughout the world will continue to support Jewish building and growth in all parts of our sacred land of Israel."

The effort is being supported by multiple organizations, including Shalom International, the Jewish community of Hebron and the Homesh First Movement.

"We are aware of the fact that Obama is very interested in the issue of our presence in Judea and Samaria. So we will call a hilltop there in the name of Obama in his honor,"

David Ha'Ivri, a spokesman for the West Bank's regional Jewish council said : “The Obama administration recently demanded Israel halt all settlement activity, including natural growth, in apparent abrogation of a deal made by President Bush to allow for natural growth”.
The deal was forged just prior to Israel's 2005 retreat from the Gaza Strip. It was confirmed by Sharon aide Dov Weissglas in 2005 and in a Wall Street Journal column last week by Elliott Abrams, a former deputy national security adviser to Bush who reportedly negotiated the arrangement. The deal was in line with an official letter from Bush the year before stating Israel cannot be expected to withdraw from the entire West Bank and that the Jewish state would retain major settlement blocs there.

The West Bank borders major Israeli cities and is within rocket-firing range of Jerusalem, Tel Aviv and Israel's international airport.

Military strategists long have estimated Israel must maintain the West Bank to defend itself from any ground invasion. Terrorist groups have warned if Israel withdraws, they will launch rockets from the West Bank into Israeli cities.

Many villages in the West Bank, which Israelis commonly refer to as the "biblical heartland," are mentioned throughout the Torah.

The book of Genesis says Abraham entered Israel at Shechem (Nablus) and received God's promise of land for his offspring. He later was buried in Hebron.

The nearby town of Beit El, anciently called Bethel, meaning "house of God," is where Scripture says the patriarch Jacob slept on a stone pillow and dreamed of angels ascending and descending a stairway to heaven. In that dream, God spoke directly to Jacob and reaffirmed the promise of territory.

And in Exodus, the holy tabernacle rested in Shiloh, believed to be the first area the ancient Israelites settled after fleeing captivity in Egypt

Palestine or Canaan and the city state known as Hazor is historical. But nowhere in history is there any such race of people known as Palestinians or any such country known as Palestine. Interestingly enough though there is an historical race known as Jews (Israeli’s) and an historical country known as Israel.

There were a people who occupied the area south of Gezer on the West Bank known as the Philistines (sea people) but they were from Caphtor or Crete, they certainly were not Arabs. As I recall they also were a pain in backside to the Israeli’s.

But north of Gezer on the West Bank, to Carmel was Israel. Israel occupied land all the way up to Hazor north of the Sea of Chinnereth or Galilee, Syria on one side and Phoenicia (now Lebanon) on the other.

I believe we could straighten this whole Middle Eastern mess out, if we could just get those involved to read their history book, or better yet the Bible.

Why??? Because that my friend, is where the answers are…
de Andréa

Thursday, July 09, 2009

Cong. McKinney Returns from Israeli Prison.

This of course is where all the liberal treasonous Democrats belong, in prison.

By de Andréa

Will the FBI arrest Terrorest Supporter Cynthia McKinney?

Cynthia McKinney admits to giving food and medical supplies to the terrorist organizations Hamas and Hezbollah. Moreover, ‘she is proud of it.'

We have a new Jane Fonda, only this time she is an ex-congresswoman.

Now that Cynthia is back in the United States has the Obama administration taken her passport away? NO.

Has the FBI arrested her for committing Treason? NO

Has the FBI arrested her for assisting terrorism? NO

Is the Department of Justice going to indict her for her crimes? NO

Why hasn't Couric, Williams, Wolf, the Times (any variety), Post or the Huffington Post demanded answers as to why McKinney is still walking among us?

McKinney is a criminal, helping terrorists and she is being protected by the liberal Communist Left and Barack Obama.

It is time to put all supporters of terrorists in prison--Gitmo is the right place for McKinney. Why is the President of the United States protecting an agent of terrorism?

He needs to be asked at the next press conference. We need answers.

Former Rep. Cynthia McKinney (D-Ga.) arrived in Washington, D.C., on Tuesday the 7th of July, 2009 after being detained in an Israeli prison for more than a week with others protesting the Israeli occupation of Gaza and aiding and abetting the enemy.

McKinney, who arrived at Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport around noon, will meet with reporters to discuss how the Israeli navy detained her and 20 other human rights advocates aboard a boat attempting to deliver supplies to the Palestinian terrorists in Gaza.

Their action violates the Israel-Gaza embargo, and the US article of war. But human rights advocates say the Israeli navy broke the law since the activists’ boat was in international waters when they were seized. During her detention, McKinney refused to sign a statement saying she violated Israeli law, which extended her time in jail.

“State Department and White House officials have not effected our release or taken a strong public stance to condemn the illegal actions of the Israeli Navy of enforcing a blockade of humanitarian assistance to the Palestinians of Gaza, a blockade that has been condemned by President Obama,” McKinney said last week in a statement.

In the coming days, McKinney will take part in a daily vigil for others in her group — “Free Gaza 21” — still being detained by Israeli authorities, and for “Palestinians suffering the effects of the Israeli occupation and the invasion of Gaza” according to a press release issued by the Green Party. The vigil will take place every evening at the Van Ness-UDC Metro Station, which is near the Israeli embassy.

McKinney served in the House from 1993 to 2003 and from 2005 to 2007. She was also the 2008 Green Party presidential nominee.

THE BOTTOM LINE: To answer the questions at the beginning of this article of why McKinney will not be indicted for treason or aiding the enemy of the United States, Israel and the world in time of war, is an easy answer. The entire liberal, enemy loving, treasonous multicultural, America hating, Communist Congress and Administration of the United States would be and should be indicted for Treason for aiding and abetting the enemy.

And you know that won’t happen…

…”That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.” Excerpt from the Declaration of Independence.

Maybe we need to reinstitute the ‘Declaration’.

And reinstate the precepts of ‘Revolution’.

de Andréa

Tuesday, July 07, 2009

CAIR Re-indicted Under RICO

“CAIR and the ISNA had essentially tried to get me killed”

By de Andrae

I can relate to this story told by Daved Gaubatz, because members of CAIR ‘The Council on American-Islamic Relations" as well as respondents from ISNA ‘The Islamic Society of North America", have made repeated threats against my own life, such as “If we find out who and where you are, we will hang you upside down, slit your throat and bleed you like the pig that you are” or the most resent “We know who your are, and we are coming to get you”.

Daved Gaubatz attended a convention with a high-profile Christian keynote speaker, Rick Warren, the Islamic Society of North America billed its July 4 national convention in Washington D.C. as a so-called major outreach to non-Muslims, but it chose to eject by force an American investigating Islamist terrorism in the U.S.

Dave Gaubatz, a former Air Force special agent who has traveled the country investigating terrorist Islamist mosques and attempts at imposing Shariah law in the U.S., he was forcibly removed from the conference after paying the $100 attendance fee.

"It was apparent that I was 'flagged,' Eight or nine ISNA, CAIR and other men surrounded me. They refused to tell me who they were or why they wanted me to leave. One then said CAIR wants you out. They began crowding me. I was a professional and told them to step away from me, tell me who they are, and why was I being illegally detained. I told them this could have been avoided if ISNA would have emailed me a cancellation. I told them I want my $100 back. Meanwhile I was asking them some tough questions they could not answer."

Get the hot new video "The Third Jihad" to understand the threat Islamists pose to all Americans. See the trailer!

If that wasn’t enough, after ISNA officials let Gaubatz out of the Washington Convention Center, he was then quickly surrounded by Washington police.

"I was on the street and noticed at least three D.C. patrol cars," he said. "I took pictures. Then I started walking toward my parked car. One patrol car was following me slowly. I stopped, took a few pictures of him, and then walked to my car. I got in my car. Three patrol cars surrounded me and my vehicle. I was told to get out. I asked what the problem was. Finally one officer showed me pictures that CAIR had given them and told them I was a terrorist threat.

There were four pictures – three were of me in Iraq with my M-16 and 9mm, and in two, I was holding an AK-47 in Iraq. CAIR had a photographed of me helping a sick Iraqi child in the picture. Then CAIR had cropped out the child [photoshopped] my head shot onto a Nazi uniform, which was obvious."

The police said members of CAIR had given them the pictures, saying he was a threat.

"I told them about the pictures, my background in Iraq, and who I was," Gaubatz said. "They knew nothing of this. CAIR and ISNA had essentially tried to get me killed. The officer reminded me they just had the Holocaust Museum shooting. CAIR intentionally misled the officers to make them believe I was just someone who carries guns. CAIR failed to tell them these were pictures from Iraq when I was serving my country."

CAIR, a long time friend of the deceived FBI is now being indicted for the third time, this time under the RICO statute.

Four plaintiffs contacted their attorney David Yerushalmi only after they had spoken to Gaubatz, who is a private researcher that had been investigating CAIR for its connections to the Muslim Brotherhood and its ties to global jihad.

The complaint identifies CAIR as a racketeering enterprise under the federal Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO), which is a criminal racketeering statute that allows victims to sue the defendants in civil court. In addition to damages, the plaintiffs are seeking injunctive relief under this and other statutes to shut down CAIR and to prevent the individual defendants from engaging in public interest legal work in the future.

The named defendants are: the Council on American-Islamic Relations Action Network Inc. (dba CAIR); Nihad Awad aka Nihad Hammad, who serves as executive director of CAIR National; Parvez Ahmed, who was the chairman of the board of CAIR National during the relevant time period; Tahra Goraya, who was the national director of CAIR but who has since resigned; Khadijah Athman, who is the manager of the "civil rights" division of CAIR; and Nadhira al-Khalili, Esq., who is in-house legal counsel for CAIR. All were handed subpoenas that evening.

According to the complaint, CAIR's in-house Washington, D.C.-based attorney Khalili was directly involved in taking the legal files out of the CAIR Virginia office and concealing them in the D.C. office.

Also named as defendants are Ibrahim Hooper and Amina Rubin, CAIR's director of communications and coordinator of communications, respectively. According to the complaint, these two were directly responsible for issuing fraudulent press releases about the Days fraud scheme, thus aiding and abetting the CAIR cover-up.
CAIR officials were not available for comment.

Also addressing the dinner was Rep. Keith Ellison, D-Minn., the nation's first Muslim member of Congress. Rep. Ron Paul, R-Texas, reportedly turned down an invitation to address the banquet.

The quick truth about CAIR is that it is nothing but a ‘Front’ for terrorist fund raising, with the agenda of over throwing the United States of America. Something I have been screaming at the FBI about, for the past three and a half years.

CAIR defrauded a number of Muslims recently seeking help with citizenship delays, and then threatened to sue them if they complained to the media, according to a security watchdog group which has obtained internal CAIR documents.

The former legal director of CAIR's Maryland/Virginia chapter shook down Muslim hardship cases for thousands of dollars without providing promised services, officials with the Mapping Sharia Project charge.

CAIR, a legal nonprofit group, promoted the services of the employee, Morris L. "Jamil" Days, whom it publicly described as a civil-rights attorney, even after discovering Days was unlicensed and was fraudulently representing CAIR's clients.

CAIR's board covered up the scandal by paying defrauded Muslim families partial restitution payments while insisting they sign agreements releasing CAIR from legal liability, officials said.

Earlier this year, the board also fired Days and closed the chapter's offices in Herndon, Va. The chapter director, Khalid Iqbal, is no longer with CAIR.

Earlier this year, CAIR launched a $250,000 fundraising campaign that included a promotional on its website touting its mission to help Muslims, particularly those confronting citizenship problems.

"Everyday, CAIR works hard to defend the rights of American Muslims who encounter a delay in gaining citizenship," the group said.

In fact, CAIR has victimized poor Muslim immigrants”, says Gaubatz.
"CAIR continues to put Muslim Americans at risk through the pretense that they represent them in any way," Gaubatz said. "CAIR is receiving support from big foreign donors, not because of their effectiveness in discrimination cases, but because of their false image in the media."

CAIR, which last year was named an unindicted co-conspirator in a federal terror-financing case involving Hamas, controls some $7 million in real estate assets in Washington D.C. through a limited liability holding company that includes silent Middle Eastern investors. (Terrorists)

The group has filed a formal complaint against CAIR concerning the fraud with the District of Columbia.

Read an article by WorldNetDaily about CAIR's extensive ties to terrorism .

Although CAIR is a nonprofit organization, it does not disclose complete directories of its staff or advisory boards, and even refuses to make its federal tax filings readily available to the public. But a review of federal criminal court documents, past IRS 990 tax records and Federal Election Commission records detailing donor occupations, reveals that Washington-based CAIR has been associated with a disturbing number of convicted terrorists or felons in terrorism probes, as well as suspected terrorists and active targets of terrorism investigations.

"Their offices have been a turnstile for terrorists and their supporters," said one FBI veteran familiar with recent and ongoing cases involving CAIR officials.

Congressional leaders say they are warning lawmakers and other Washington officials to disassociate from the group due to its growing terror ties.

"Groups like CAIR have a proven record of senior officials being indicted and either imprisoned or deported from the United States," said U.S. Rep. Sue Myrick, R-N.C., co-founder of the House Anti-Terrorism/Jihad Caucus.

Since its creation by the world wide Isamic terrorist organization supported by Saudi Araba ‘The Brothehood’ who also created al-Qaida, Hamas and Hisbala, all of the previous directors of CAIR have been indicted and convicted of supporting terrorism. In spite of this CAIR has been a trusted ally of the FBI until this year.

CAIR itself recently was named as an unindicted co-conspirator in an alleged scheme to funnel $12 million to the terrorist group Hamas. In the Holy Land Foundation case, federal prosecutors also listed CAIR as a member of the U.S. branch of the Muslim Brotherhood, a worldwide jihadist movement that gave rise to Hamas, al-Qaida and other terrorist groups. The government will retry the Holy Land case, which ended in a hung jury.
"There was a lot of evidence presented at the recent Holy Land Foundation trial which exposed CAIR and others as front groups for the Muslim Brotherhood in the United States," Rep. Myrick said.

Still, and in spite of this, CAIR is lobbying House Judiciary Committee Chairman John Conyers and other sympathetic members of Congress to pressure the Justice Department to expunge its name from the case, arguing the negative publicity has hurt membership and fundraising. (Fundraising for terrorism) This is why I continue to say that America is ignorantly enabling terrorism.

Although the federal judge during the trial refused a written request by the group to strike its name from the list of co-conspirators, the petition is still pending before the court.

CAIR, which runs 33 offices and chapters nationwide, also recently helped defeat an anti-terror plan by Los Angeles police to map the local Muslim community for terrorist neighborhoods.

Critics like myself counter that CAIR has no legitimate voice to make any complaints, because the group is itself an extremist organization that has employed or appointed to its boards of directors and advisers an inordinate number of radical co-conspirators, suspected and convicted terrorists, and other criminals.

If you wish to skip all the details of which individuals in the CAIR organization has already been found guilty of terrorism against the United States, then page down to THE BOTTOM LINE: However you might want to scan them…

Indeed, the long and growing list, includes:

Muthanna al-Hanooti: The CAIR director's home was raided last year by FBI agents in connection with an active terrorism investigation. Agents also searched the offices of his advocacy group, Focus on Advocacy and Advancement of International Relations, which al-Hanooti operates out of Dearborn, Mich., and Washington, D.C.

FAAIR claims to be a consulting firm raising awareness of Sunni grievances in Iraq, but investigators suspect it's a front supporting the Sunni-led insurgency. Al-Hanooti, who emigrated to the U.S. from Iraq, formerly helped run a suspected Hamas terror front called LIFE for Relief and Development. Its Michigan offices also were raided last September. In 2004, LIFE's Baghdad office was raided by U.S. troops, who seized files and computers.

Al-Hanooti is related to Shiek Mohammed al-Hanooti, an unindicted co-conspirator in the 1993 World Trade Center bombing. He currently leads prayers at a Washington-area mosque that aided some of the 9/11 hijackers.

The FBI alleges al-Hanooti, an ethnic-Palestinian who also emigrated from Iraq, raised money for Hamas. In fact, "Al-Hanooti collected over $6 million for support of Hamas," according to a 2001 FBI report, and was present with CAIR and Holy Land officials at a secret Hamas fundraising summit held last decade at a Philadelphia hotel.
Prosecutors recently added his name to the list of unindicted co-conspirators in the Holy Land case.

Al-Hanooti denies supporting Hamas, although he's praised Palestinian suicide bombers as "martyrs" who are "alive in the eyes of Allah."

Earlier this year, his younger brother, Hamid al-Hanooti, was found dead in Iraq after reportedly being held by local security forces as a suspected terrorist.

Laura Jaghlit: A civil-rights coordinator for CAIR, her Washington-area home was raided by federal agents after 9/11 as part of an investigation into terrorist financing, money laundering and tax fraud. Her husband Mohammed Jaghlit, a key leader in the Saudi-backed SAAR network, is a target of the still-active probe.

Last decade, Jaghlit sent two letters accompanying donations – one for $10,000, the other for $5,000 – from the SAAR Foundation to Sami al-Arian, now a convicted terrorist. In each letter, according to a federal affidavit, "Jaghlit instructed al-Arian not to disclose the contribution publicly or to the media."

Investigators suspect the funds were intended for Palestinian terrorists via a U.S. front called WISE, which at the time employed an official who personally delivered a satellite phone battery to Osama bin Laden. The same official also worked for Jaghlit's group.
In addition, Jaghlit donated a total of $37,200 to the Holy Land Foundation, which prosecutors say is a Hamas front. Jaghlit subsequently was named an unindicted co-conspirator in the ongoing case.

Abdurahman Alamoudi: Another CAIR director, he is serving 23 years in federal prison for plotting terrorism. Alamoudi, who was caught on tape complaining bin Laden hadn't killed enough Americans in the U.S. embassy bombings in Africa, was one of al-Qaida's top fund-raisers in America, according to the U.S. Treasury Department.

Nihad Awad: For the first time, wiretap evidence from the Holy Land case puts CAIR's executive director at a Philadelphia meeting of Hamas leaders and activists that was secretly recorded by the FBI. Participants allegedly hatched a plot to disguise payments to Hamas terrorists as charitable giving.

During the meeting, according to FBI transcripts, Awad was recorded discussing the propaganda effort. He mentions Ghassan Dahduli, whom he worked with at the time at the Islamic Association for Palestine, another Hamas front. Both were IAP officers. Dahduli's name also was listed in the address book of bin Laden's personal secretary, Wadi al-Hage, who is serving a life sentence in prison for his role in the U.S. embassy bombings. Dahduli, an ethnic-Palestinian like Awad, was deported to Jordan after 9/11 for refusing to cooperate in the terror investigation.

Awad's and Dahduli's phone numbers are listed in a Muslim Brotherhood document seized by federal investigators revealing "important phone numbers" for the "Palestine Section" of the Brotherhood in America. The court exhibit shows Hamas fugitive Mousa Abu Marzook listed on the same page with Awad.

Omar Ahmad: U.S. prosecutors also named CAIR's founder and chairman emeritus as an unindicted co-conspirator in the Holy Land case. Ahmad too was placed at the Philly meeting, FBI special agent Lara Burns testified at the trial. Prosecutors also designated him as a member of the Muslim Brotherhood's "Palestine Committee" in America. Ahmad, like his CAIR partner Awad, is ethnic-Palestinian.

(Though both Ahmad and Awad were senior leaders of IAP, the Hamas front, neither of their biographical sketches posted on CAIR's website mentions their IAP past.)

Nabil Sadoun: A current CAIR board member, Sadoun has served on the board of the United Association for Studies and Research, which investigators believe to be a key Hamas front in America. In fact, Sadoun co-founded UASR with Hamas leader Marzook. The Justice Department added UASR to the list of unindicted co-conspirators in the Holy Land case.

Mohamed Nimer: CAIR's current research director also served as a board director for UASR, the strategic arm for Hamas in the U.S.

(Tellingly, CAIR neglects to mention Nimer's and Sadoun's roles in UASR in their bios.)

Rafeeq Jaber: A founding director of CAIR, Jaber was the long-time president of the Islamic Association for Palestine. In 2002, a federal judge found that "the Islamic Association for Palestine has acted in support of Hamas." In his capacity as IAP chief, Jaber praised Hezbollah attacks on Israel. He also served on the board of a radical mosque in the Chicago area

Rabith Hadid: The CAIR fund-raiser was a founder of the Global Relief Foundation, which after 9/11 was blacklisted by Treasury for financing al-Qaida and other terror groups. Its assets were frozen in December 2001. Hadid was arrested on terror-related charges and deported to Lebanon in 2003.

Siraj Wahhaj: A member of CAIR's board of advisers, Wahhaj was named as an unindicted co-conspirator in the 1993 World Trade Center bombing. The radical Brooklyn imam was close to convicted terrorist Sheik Omar Abdel Rahman, and defended him during his trial.
He was also a featured speaker at the dinner.

Randall "Ismail" Royer: The former CAIR communications specialist and civil-rights coordinator is serving 20 years in prison in connection with the Virginia Jihad Network, which he led while employed by CAIR at its Washington headquarters. The group trained to kill U.S. soldiers overseas, cased the FBI headquarters, and cheered the space shuttle Columbia tragedy. Al-Qaida operative Ahmed Abu Ali, convicted of plotting to assassinate President Bush, was among those who trained with Royer's Northern Virginia cell.

Bassam Khafagi: Another CAIR official, Khafagi was arrested in 2003 while serving as CAIR's director of community affairs. He pleaded guilty to charges of bank and visa fraud stemming from a federal counterterror probe of his leadership role in the Islamic Assembly of North America, which has supported al-Qaida and advocated suicide attacks on America. He was sentenced to 10 months in prison and deported to his native Egypt.
Ghassan Elashi

Ghassan Elashi: One of CAIR's founding directors, was convicted in 2004 of illegally shipping high-tech goods to terror state Syria, and is serving 80 months in prison. He's also charged with providing material support to Hamas in the Holy Land Foundation trial. He was chairman of the charity, which provided seed capital to CAIR. Elashi is related to Hamas leader Marzook

Hamza Yusuf: The FBI investigated the CAIR board member after 9/11, because just two days before the attacks, he made an ominous prediction to a Muslim audience. "This country is facing a terrible fate and the reason for that is because this country stands condemned," Yusuf warned. "It stands condemned like Europe stood condemned because of what it did. And lest people forget, Europe suffered two world wars after conquering the Muslim lands."

THE BOTTOM LINE: CAIR, which receives financial backing from Saudi and Emirati royalty, denies charges that it has a secret agenda to Islamize America. But a Muslim Brotherhood document declassified in the Holy Land case reveals that CAIR's parent (the Brotherhood) was among Muslim organizations enlisted in a secret plot to destroy the American system from within and eventually take over this country.

Written early last decade in Arabic, the manifesto lays bare the subversive role of CAIR's forerunner, the Islamic Association for Palestine, and other Muslim groups in America to carry out a "grand Jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within and sabotaging its miserable house by the hands of the believers, so that it is eliminated and Allah's religion is made victorious over all other religions."

CAIR's founder Ahmad, while claiming to be a moderate and patriotic American, last decade told a group of Muslims in Northern California that they are in America to help assert Islam's rule over the country.

Ahmad insists he was misquoted. However, an FBI wiretap transcript quotes Ahmad agreeing with terrorist suspects gathered last decade at the secret meeting in Philadelphia to "camouflage" their true intentions.

He compared it to the head fake in basketball. "This is like one who plays basketball: He makes a player believe that he is doing this, while he does something else," Ahmad said. "I agree with you. Like they say, politics is a completion of war."

What's more, Hooper, CAIR's communications director, also has expressed his wish to overturn the U.S. system of government in favor of an "Islamic" state. "I wouldn't want to create the impression that I wouldn't like the government of the United States to be Islamic sometime in the future," Hooper said in a 1993 interview with the Minneapolis Star Tribune. "But I'm not going to do anything violent to promote that. I'm going to do it through education."

Though conceding he made the remark, Hooper argues that he's never advocated violence. He says he and Muslims like him should work instead through the media and use "education" to help turn America into an Islamic state.

This, my friend, is exactly what they are doing; only it is not education, it is deceptive indoctrination, or more descriptively called “Brainwashing”. It is the deceptive brainwashing of America.

Islam has successfully infiltrated nearly all aspects of our Governments, local, State and Federal, our court system, our security system, the educational system, and the White House.

America is deceived:
Even though bits and pieces of the American government are beginning to wake up from the Islamic deception of a peaceful nation, such as Reprsentitive Sue Myrick, R-N.C, the bulk of the American government is still mesmerized by the almost supernatural deception of the nation of Islam. This is of course aided by the perverted Socialist liberal belief that every one is equal and therefore should be raised to equality by the government to equal social and economic status. So in order to be politically correct one must accept all ideologies and cultures even if its intent is to destroy our own.

Left completely unchecked, America would be and Islamic nation by 2020, not 2050 as Islamic Jihadist project. This only because of the few people that throw an occasional road block in the path of Islam from time to time, such as these nasty grand jury indictments.

I have often said if Islam would organize under one flag and one leader they would be unstoppable. As Islam continues to remain as disorganized as the west is, we have at least an equal chance at defeating them. But if they all hear the beat of a distant drum and begin to march in unison, all 1.9 billion of them, the world would soon be Islam, and the Caliphate will rule the Ummah.

de Andréa

Friday, July 03, 2009

Proof of Life in 2012

President Obama may have to prove his eligibility if he intends to run for re-election in 2012

By de Andréa

While no matter what we do at present, it may prove fruitless in Obama’s obvious masquerade as a U.S. citizen. If he were truly a legal natural born citizen, he would gladly show “proof of life” on U.S. soil at the time of his birth.

In 2012 however, it may be another issue altogether. It seams strange to me that it is necessary to write a law that forces one to obey yet another law, but that is exactly what is happening right now in a House committee. It is House Bill #1503

U.S. Rep. Marsha Blackburn, a Tennessee Republican, has become the sixth co-sponsor of a proposal by Rep. Bill Posey, R-Fla., that would require documentation of eligibility from presidential candidates. As stated in Article 2, Section 1 of the Constitution.

She has joined Reps. John Campbell, R-Calif.; John R. Carter, R-Texas; John Culberson, R-Texas; Bob Goodlatte, R-Va.; and Randy Neugebauer, R-Texas, in support of Posey's H.R. 1503 plan.

The bill's provisions are simple:
"To amend the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971 to require the principal campaign committee of a candidate for election to the office of President to include with the committee's statement of organization a copy of the candidate's birth certificate, together with such other documentation as may be necessary to establish that the candidate meets the qualifications for eligibility to the Office of President under the Constitution."

It also provides:
"Congress finds that under section 5 of article II of the Constitution of the United States, in order to be eligible to serve as President, an individual must be a natural born citizen of the United States who has attained the age of 35 years and has been a resident within the United States for at least 14 years."

The sponsors' goal is to have the bill become effective for the 2012 presidential election, and it now is pending in a committee of the U.S. House of Representatives.

A participant at a forum on a political website noted "average citizens have to have a copy of our birth certificate just to apply for a passport, but the president of the United States doesn't have to show theirs??? This doesn't make sense at all."

Besides the support that is growing in the U.S. House, Sen. Tom Coburn R-Okla says he's in favor of both state and federal demands that future presidential candidates have a formal procedure to document their qualifications.

"The bill requires any federal candidates' campaign committee filing with the Federal Election Commission to produce a copy of the candidate's birth certificate," Coburn wrote. "If the bill makes it to the Senate, I will likely support it."

"The last election is over," Posey said in the interview. "I don't think that outcome is going to change. Personally, I think it's futile to go there, but looking toward the future I think it would be reckless if we do not do everything we could to eliminate problems like that in the future. And that's why I filed the bill. I don't think a Supreme Court would remove a president from office if they heard the case. But ... we should make a good faith effort to make sure that things in the future are as they should be," he said.

THE BOTTOM LINE: As I said at the beginning of this article: “It seams strange to me that it is necessary to write a law that forces one to obey yet another law…” Constitutional law clearly states in Article 2, Section 1, “No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President..." And yet it seams that we must pass a law that says precisely what Constitutional law (the highest law of the land) already stipulates. How a subsequent federal law can offer credence to Constitutional law is a mystery to me. But it is what it is…

Please write, call, or otherwise contact your Senators and Representative, and ask them to support and vote for HB 1503. Needless to say, even if it passes both the House and the Senate, Obama will veto it. So, beyond that, the Congress must have 2/3’s majority to override. If this doesn’t happen we will likely see Al-Barrack Hussein Obammah as dictator of America for as long as he shall live. As of this writing it is being discussed in the oval office of how to go about abolishing the 22nd Amendment which restricts a president to two terms.

Remember your history: The last Socialist President was F.D.R. who was Dictator for nearly four terms, until he died. Moreover, was also bent on the destruction of a “Free Economy”.

In 2012 tell Obama “WE WANT PROOF OF LIFE” as an American Citizen…

de Andréa

Wednesday, July 01, 2009


Is there anything that ‘His Majesty Al-Barrack Hussein Obammah’ isn’t an expert in?

By de Andréa

Obama is CEO of several American manufacturing companies, as well as production manager. He runs several American financial institutions. He is president of the once great United States of America. He is an expert in history and foreign affairs. He is an expert reader of Teleprompters. All this - and he may not even be an American. And if that is not enough, he now wants to be your primary care physician.

"Now that the cameras have been put away and the media is no longer watching, their secret emerges: They are going to cut medical costs by cutting your medical care. Right now! These decisions will not be medical but financial. They will not be based on a doctor's opinion of what his or her patient needs, but a bureaucrat's and an accountant s opinion of what the new health care system can afford,” says political pundit, writer, and speaker, Dick Morris. But that's not all. Morris issues the following dire warning:

"But this is just the very beginning... rationing is coming, and coming soon."

To paraphrase Morris; if you need a CAT scan or an MRI, forget it. If you need antibiotics, forget it. As for potentially life-saving or life-extending treatments, take a number and stand in line. Is that why Barack Obama wants to bankrupt the nation? Isn't America a republic? Do we not all have the God-given right of life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness?

Obama describes his health care scheme with the usual pie-in-the-sky rhetoric, claiming – with fingers crossed behind his back – that his approach will heal the sick, miraculously reduce costs, and resurrect a moribund health system.

First – there is nothing wrong with America’s present “Health Care System”. The only negative aspect is cost. If one would just take the time to analyze the reason for the high cost of American health care one would find…One -- good stuff cost more money. One can’t expect a Cadillac limousine health care system to be the price of a Yugo. But that isn’t the largest slice of the ‘Health Care Pie’. Number two, it’s the courts. Don’t you know by now it’s the courts that run the country? It’s the courts that make law; it’s the courts that encourage tort. Lawyers are lined up around the block to prosecute doctors for just doing their job, and it is the best in the world. Take the frivolous law suites out of the equation and you will cut the cost of medicine by a third. And it is not only doctors that pay outrageous and exorbitant liability Insurance premiums, but it is pharmaceutical companies as well. An ever increasing cost of a hospital, a doctor, a hospice, a pharmaceutical company, an ambulance service, anything remotely connected to medicine or health care is that they are fair game for the “Ambulance Chasers” looking for the deep pockets of insurance companies.

Obama has told you that if you want to keep your doctor, you'll be able to keep your doctor and if you want to keep your present health plan, you'll be able to keep your present health plan. Specifically, Obama said: "If you like your doctor, you will be able to keep your doctor, period. If you like your health care plan, you will be able to keep your health care plan, period. No one will take it away."

No, no one will take it away; it will simply be put out of business by the government. Obama can't keep that promise and he knows it.

Jim Lindgren writing for the Internet blog the “Volokh Conspiracy” puts it this way…"If the Obama plan is enacted, a substantial portion of employers will cut their health subsidies — raising their employees' share of contributions to the company plan — in order to drive some of the employees into the government exchange and the public option. Other employers may drop their plans altogether — after all, workers could buy their own coverage in the government exchange — or simply fund part of their workers' participation in the exchange. These changes, which would be the direct results of the implementation of the Obama plan, would make it virtually impossible for Obama to keep these promises...."

Health care rationing:
Will keeping your doctor or your health care provider really matter when government bureaucrats start calling the shots and telling your doctor and provider exactly what they can and cannot do... what they are allowed to treat... what they will pay for?.

Make no mistake, Obama's takeover of health care will be nothing more than a raw power grab, more cogent than his takeover of the banks and the automobile industry. Its goal will not be to improve health care but, to reward political allies with ‘ more power and control’ – and in the process punish people like you.

You can stop him by letting the Congressional leadership know – right now... today – that there will be a political price to pay if they allow the world's best health care system turn into a medical disastrous wasteland.

Let's examine the real repercussions of health care rationing:
Think of it this way, to Obama, people represent health costs. The fewer people, the lower the costs. Are we saying that Obama will target the elderly, the handicapped, and the unborn to reduce costs?

Consider Obama's own words remarks as reprinted in the Washington Times and make that call yourself. "Part of what I think government can do effectively is to be an honest broker in assessing and evaluating treatment options.” Obama also said: "The chronically ill and those toward the end of their lives are accounting for potentially 80 percent of the total health care bill...."

Regarding those in the last phases of life, Obama specifically says: "There is going to have to be a conversation that is guided by doctors, scientists, ethicists. And then there is going to have to be a very difficult democratic conversation that takes place. It is very difficult to imagine the country making those decisions just through the normal political channels." Can you see the tap-dance routine from what he is really saying?

Obama's top health advisers have emphasized that America should value the lives of young, healthy people more than those of old, sick individuals. One such adviser is Dr. Ezekiel Emanuel, brother of Obama's chief-of-staff Rahm Emanuel.

Kevin Williamson of National Review Online describes Dr. Emanuel's views: "He wrote in The Lancet in 2008: 'Unlike allocation by sex or race, allocation by age is not invidious discrimination.’ We all were young once, the argument goes, and so denying the elderly and weak in order to care for the young and fit is just."

Just what do you think Obama's talking about here? Trust me, these are scary times and if you're over the age of 55, be concerned, be very concerned. If you're chronically ill with diabetes or high blood pressure or multiple sclerosis – or dying with heart disease or cancer – your future under a rationed healthcare plan doesn't look very bright.

Would Obama empower the federal government and bureaucratic pencil-pushers to decide exactly when your presence on earth is no longer feasible, viable, or sustainable?

Do we really want to find out the answer the hard way?
Obama claims that his health plan won't involve rationing or reduced care. But that's ridiculous, because all government-run health systems suffer from those drawbacks.

For a real-world, practical example, we only need look at the Canadian system.

Dr. David Gratzer, a Canadian-trained physician who practices in the United States, describes his own revelation about Canada's medical horror show: "On [my way to medical school class]... I cut through a hospital emergency room and came upon dozens of people on stretchers – waiting, moaning, begging for treatment. Some elderly patients had waited up to five days in corridors before being admitted to beds. They smelled of urine and sweat. As I navigated past the bodies, I began to question everything I thought I knew about health care – not only in Canada, but also in the United States. ... I had begun a journey into the heart of one of the great policy disasters of modern times."

Is the situation really any better in Europe – should we, for instance, emulate the French?

Consider a French journalist's words at the Heritage Foundation: "The majority of France's state-owned hospitals are managed in a way that is reminiscent of the old U.S.S.R. ... In the average French public hospital, it is not uncommon for every window to be open, even in winter, because the heating system in the building cannot be regulated. With the only options being no heat or unbearably high heat, everyone opts for the latter. Predictably, this is not very cheap."

What about Germany?
The British medical journal Lancet states: "The German health care system is facing bankruptcy on an unprecedented scale."

In Great Britain, one current cost-saving measure is the denial of essential medications to women in advanced stages of certain cancers. And yet, on June 15, Barack Obama told the American Medical Association (AMA) that other developed countries – he meant nations like Canada, Germany, France, and Britain – pay much less per capita for health care than Americans.

Tell us something we don't know... you also get exactly what you pay for. You get a Yugo instead of a Cadillac. And if the government system breaks down and you are left a quadriplegic invalid with brain damage after a surgeon’s stupid mistake or maybe no treatment at all, try to get any just compensation.

So why does Obama want to bring millions of people into the system literally overnight? What happens when there are suddenly many more patients than there are practitioners to care for them?

Will the health care system start to follow the Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) model... where you take-a-number.... and wait... and then wait some more? Moreover, if you're really sick, what are the chances that you might die in line, waiting for treatment that simply does not come in time?

Dr. Gratzer tells us what's going on in Canada: "I trained in emergency rooms that were chronically, chaotically, dangerously overcrowded... all across Canada. I met a middle-aged man with sleep problems who was booked for an appointment with a specialist three years later; a man with pain... who was referred to a pain clinic with a two-year wait list; a woman with breast cancer who was asked to wait for four months before starting the life-saving radiation and chemo-therapy."

When you consider the evils of health care rationing, consider the following.
Addressing the AMA, Obama implied that costs were rising because patients were getting unneeded care. In fact, the opposite is true.

A 2003 survey by the Rand Corporation found that only 11% of patients got treatments they didn't need, and 80 present of these were to cover the doctors behind in case of a tort law suite– while a whopping 46% failed to receive needed care because ‘Medicare’ wouldn’t cover the cost. Are you sure you want a government healthcare system?

And strangely, there's tremendous irony in Obama's mindless drive toward a government-run system. In Great Britain, France, Germany – and even Canada – there's a growing push to get people back into private insurance systems again, Hello! -- taking the pressure off public facilities and doctors. It's a move toward – you guessed it –cost savings. Because it doesn’t work.

THE BOTTOM LINE: Government run anything simply doesn’t work, has never worked, and will not work. Can you think of anything, in any part of history, that the government has run, that is better and cheaper than a private system?
It's time to tell Congress – loudly and clearly – that being pushed off a cliff is hazardous to the health of children, old people, and all other living things, as individuals as well as a nation...

It is time to be responsible. Contact your Representative and Senators now.

de Andréa

P.S. The truth is, Obama is not an expert in anything, except deception…