Monday, April 06, 2009

‘Weapons Ban’ Mentality

Henry Kissinger, George Shultz, Sam Nunn and William Perry, are ‘Obama’s pawns’ being used in the U.S./Russian nuclear arms talks.

By de Andréa

A meeting in London between US President Al-Barrack Hussein Obammah and Russian President Dmitry Medvedev ended with the announcement that the U.S. and Russia will seek to further reduce their stockpiles of nuclear weapons. This while Islam, the enemy of the free world is as busy as rats building a nest, developing nuclear weapons to be used against any and every nation that is not Muslim. Oh yes!

Obama’s new arms ban/reduction was set in motion by a quiet little meeting last month involving the Russian KGB thug, Valdmir Putin and the two American elderly statesmen, Henry Kissinger and George Shultz. It seams that Obama may be doing most things in quiet little backroom meetings these days.

The two former Secretaries’ of State, traveled to Moscow along with former Sen. Sam Nunn and former Defense Secretary William Perry. While acting as private citizens and not on an official visit, Obama was nevertheless using the statesmen to sound out the Russians on his ‘arms ban/reduction’.

Obama has repeatedly voiced his strong support for a world wide nuclear ban initiative. Obama reportedly said the matter was a priority for his new administration, though economic issues were taking center stage at the moment.

Kissinger, Shultz, Nunn, and Perry made their views on arms reduction clear in an article that was published in The Wall Street Journal in January. The four statesmen advocate “reversing reliance on nuclear weapons globally as a vital contribution to preventing their proliferation into potentially dangerous hands, and ultimately ending them as a threat to the world.”

They argue that the end of the Cold War made the doctrine of mutual deterrence obsolete, but warn that the world is now “on the precipice of a new and dangerous nuclear era” in which North Korea and Iran could become nuclear powers and terrorists might obtain nuclear weapons. May I ask a question Mr. Kissinger? Where is the deterrence In Islam and North Korea?

To deal with the threat, what is needed is “intensive work with leaders of the countries in possession of nuclear weapons to turn the goal of a world without nuclear weapons into a joint enterprise,” the Kissinger team wrote in the Journal. “Such a joint enterprise, by involving changes in the disposition of the States possessing nuclear weapons, would lend additional weight to efforts already under way to avoid the emergence of a nuclear-armed North Korea and Iran.”

Among the steps the statesmen suggest are “continuing to reduce substantially the size of nuclear forces in all states that possess them.” Oh yes Mr. Shultz, rid the world of weapons and there’ll be no war…@#$%^&*!!!

THE BOTTOM LINE: Trying to prevent nuclear war by banning nuclear weapons… One might wonder just where one has heard that mush for brains philosophy before. I can’t help but wonder if during the Second World War we would have simply advised the Nazis that we were going to ban the development of nuclear weapons in the U.S., and would they please join with us in this commendable effort??? I wonder how that would have worked out for us. Not so good, you think? Then just how is that going to work out for us know???

This kind of ignorant, ideal, unrealistic, fool-hardy mentality --- brings to mind the same kind of brain-washed philosophy in an effort to stop crime in Washington D.C. by banning all guns. I mean, no guns, no gun-crime right? Not to leave out incidents like Georgia Tech University, where guns were and still are banned so what happened there --- could not happen. That’s why I wrote a tongue-in-cheek article back then, that the Georgia Tech massacre didn’t really happen, it was all fabricated. Because how could that happen where there quite simply are no guns?

Indecently: The gun ban of Washington D.C. occurred over 30 years ago. But then that’s ancient history, no one pays any attention to history. Therein of course lies the problem. You see, during that 30 year ‘plus’ ban on guns in the inner-city of Washington D.C., the capital of this Nation became known also as the “gun murder capital of the Nation”, sometimes even exceeding the death-rate by gun, of the city of Baghdad, a war zone --- yes that ‘Baghdad’.

Ban nuclear weapons, then only our enemy will have them.

Great Idea…

de Andréa

No comments: