Monday, March 02, 2009

AOL News Reports on Obama’s Eligibility Conspiracy

Internet reports mock so called “Birthers” who want constitutional proof

By de Andréa

It is interesting, that in my February 23 article titled The Obama Cover Up it was the Obama team of lawyers that were conspiring to cover up all documents about Obama’s past, not only his birth records but his trip to Pakistan as well as his college records.

And now the Internet giant America Online headlined its daily news coverage today with a story and polls calling a group of people it describes as "fringe conservatives a bunch of right wing extremist conspiracy theorists that are perusing the possibility that Barack Obama is ineligible to be president because of supposed questions surrounding his birth.

Just who are the conspiracy nuts here? Obama and his high powered group of lawyers obviously doing everything they can to cover up Obama’s past--- or a group of 300,000 American citizens that want nothing but the truth according to the U.S. Constitution.

The AOL coverage quotes an extensive Politico article and cites WorldNetDaily as the source for news on the United States Justice Foundation's most recent attempt to demand Obama give legal evidence of his constitutional eligibility to serve as president.

“Viewed as irrelevant by the Whitehouse, and as embarrassing by much of the Republican Party," writes Politico blogger Ben Smith, "the subculture still thrives from the conservative website WorldNetDaily, which claims that some 300,000 people have signed a petition demanding more information on Obama's birth."

Smith then states unequivocally that there is no basis for questioning Obama's eligibility, that Obama "was in fact born in Honolulu in 1961" and that a "long-settled law" resolves his dual citizenship at birth, another fount of legal questions surrounding the sitting president's eligibility to serve in the Oval Office, when in fact there is no long settled law regarding the Constitutionality of a dual citizen being eligible under the natural born clause. Smith then cites Hawaii officials who are satisfied that there does exist, records – though unreleased to the public or the courts – verifying Obama's American birth.

The question that burns of course is, if the records in fact do exist, then why not release them to the public and be done with it. But instead the 300,000 citizens who want nothing more than to have the Congress follow the Constitution and settle this eligibility issue as they have done with all the other candidates running for president, they are referred to by the congress as “conspiracy theorists, embarrassing, destructive, crazy, nutburger, demagogue, money-hungry, exploitative, irresponsible, filthy conservative imposters, the worst enemy of the conservative movement, weird, demented, sick, troubled and not suitable for civilized company.”

Politico quotes David Emery, an urban legends writer for About.com, who suggests those that want to see proof of Obama's eligibility are fueled by revulsion and rage.
"Thanks to the relentless agitation of the conspiracy theorists and the sheer quantity of hypothetical scenarios and legal arguments floating around," Emery states, "they've clearly succeeded in planting unreasonable doubts in reasonable people's minds."

As I have reported on several occasions, however, none of the so-called "evidence" of Obama's constitutional eligibility produced thus far is beyond reasonable doubt nor as iron-clad as simply producing an authentic birth certificate, something everyday Americans are required to do on a regular bases, but the president still refuses to do so.

As Jerome Corsi, WND senior staff writer, explained, "The main reason doubts persist regarding Obama's birth certificate is this question: If an original Hawaii-doctor -generated and Hawaii-hospital-released Obama birth certificate exists, why wouldn't the senator and his campaign simply order the document released and end the controversy? "That Obama has not ordered Hawaii officials to release the document," Corsi writes, "leaves doubts as to whether an authentic Hawaii birth certificate actually exists for Obama."

In AOL’s own poll, it is asking readers: "Do you have any doubt about Obama's eligibility to be president because of his birth status?" With more than 250,000 responses, results were nearly split with 47 percent saying yes, and 53 percent saying no.

THE BOTTOM LINE: Somehow I can’t buy the idea that it is a nutty conspiracy by 300, 000 voters and more than 50 lawyers and more than a 150 plaintiffs in more than 18 different law suits, to want the Federal government of this Republic to comply with the Constitutional legal requirements regarding the eligibility of a presidential candidate and the equal protection under the law that the Constitution requires. Especially in light of the fact that all the other candidates were investigated by Congress and were found to be eligible except ‘The Messiah Al-Barrack Hussein Obammah’

Just who are the real conspirators here anyway???

de Andréa

1 comment:

USMJP.com United States Marijuana Party said...

digital photos of actual relevant Laws in Obama citizenship Issue, scroll below certificate
SEE actual relevant Laws!