Another Suit on Obama’s Eligibility

Despite the obvious conspiracy to ignore the fact that Al-Barrack Hussein Obammah is not an American, the socialist party continues to get away with the cover-up

de Andréa

If you think that I am just being a conspiracy nut, then why the cover up if there is nothing to hide? In any kind of ‘White-Collar Crime’ or ‘Political Crime’ it is usually the cover-up that gives them away.

For the first time in the history of the United States of the American Republic there has not been an official Congressional inquiry into the eligibility of a presidential candidate as is required by the law of the U.S. Constitution.

McCain is checked out but not Obama
The latest lawsuit, one of more than two dozen individual lawsuits in the Obama eligibility issue, contends that Congress failed to qualify the Democrat candidate for the Oval Office. Does this sound at least just a little bit bias maybe? This is especially suspicious in light of the fact that Congress did check to see if Mc Cain, the Republican candidates birth in the American possession of the ’The Canal Zone’ in Panama at the time, qualified him as a natural born citizen. The congress was unanimously satisfied that because his parents were both American citizens in the military and stationed in Panama that candidate Mc Cain was in fact eligible as natural-born.

But no such required congressional investigation was made regarding Obama.
The latest lawsuit accuses Congress of failing to investigate President Obama's birthplace and Natural-born eligibility before approving the Electoral College vote giving him the presidency has been amended to include additional claims of rights violations, including unequal treatment, because Congress did such an investigation into the GOP candidate Sen. John McCain.
This is especially interesting, because in Mc Cain’s case, there was no suspicion whatsoever that Mc Cain might not be eligible, it was just the required Constitutional formality. But in Obama’s case there was a plethora of suspicion and yet no formality of the required investigation into the allegations that he might not be eligible. Go figure, Conspiracy maybe? Naw…

That word comes from Mario Apuzzo, the lawyer handling the new case on which WorldNetDaily previously has reported. The case of Kerchner vs Obama

The new case was brought by Apuzzo on behalf of Charles F. Kerchner Jr., Lowell T. Patterson, Darrell James Lenormand and Donald H. Nelson Jr. It names as defendants Barack Hussein Obama II, the U.S., Congress, the Senate, the House of Representatives, and former Vice President Dick Cheney along with House Speaker Nancy Pelosi.

Congress last year raised the issue of whether McCain was a "natural born" citizen, a requirement set out in the U.S. Constitution for the office of president, because of his birth in Panama.

Where's the proof Barack Obama was born in the U.S. or that he fulfills the "natural-born American" clause in the Constitution? If you still want to see it, join more than 235,000 others and sign up now!

According to a report in the Washington Post, the Senate unanimously declared McCain to be a "natural born" citizen, meeting the demand of Article 2 of the Constitution, which states, "no person except a natural born citizen … shall be eligible to the office of president."

However, even though his clients wrote to Congress requesting a similar review of Obama's birthplace, they were refused.

"The question is: Why do you do it for McCain, but not Obama," Conspiracy anyone? Apuzzo said. More specifically, those who doubted McCain's eligibility had an opportunity for a review but not those who doubt Obama. This violates a liberty right for his clients, because as members of a republic, they have a Constitutional right to know that their president is legitimate.

"What I'm arguing is that Congress and President Obama have violated my clients' due process under Article 5 [of the U.S. Constitution]," Apuzzo said.

Congress holds a responsibility to make certain Obama is qualified for the post. And the public outcry, evidenced by the dozens of lawsuits over the issue, should have prompted due diligence on the part of members of Congress.

“Obama, meanwhile, has consistently refused to hand over sufficient documents to verify his "natural born" status”, Apuzzo said. "We're not a monarchy; the People have a right to know."

He said his case in U.S. District Court in New Jersey is at the point where the court notices about the case are being distributed. And the fact that Obama already has been inaugurated changes nothing in his case. "Before that, everything really was premature," he said. "He has a right to run for office. But when you get down to the nitty gritty, he still has to qualify for the position. Even though you ran, and everybody loves you, you still have got to qualify under the Constitution," Apuzzo said.

Further, the lawsuit explains, “not only are there legitimate questions about Obama's birth, and therefore eligibility, he might not be a legal U.S. citizen, even today. So there exists a possibility that Obama could be an illegal alien," the lawsuit said. "Obama has yet to adequately prove that he was born in the United States. [Further], Obama has publicly conceded that his father was born in Kenya and a British subject/citizen at the time of Obama's birth which precluded Obama from gaining any U.S. citizenship from his father." And therefore at best Obama has dual citizenship which is not allowed according to the Constitution.

The lawsuits over Obama's eligibility, in various ways, have alleged Obama does not meet the "natural born citizen" clause of the U.S. Constitution, Article 2, Section 1, which reads, "No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President."

Some of the legal challenges have alleged Obama was not born in Hawaii, as he insists, but in Kenya. Obama's American mother, the suits contend, was too young at the time of his birth to confer American citizenship to her son under the law at the time.

Other challenges have focused on Obama's citizenship through his father, a Kenyan subject to the jurisdiction of the United Kingdom at the time of his birth, thus making him a dual citizen. The cases contend the framers of the Constitution excluded dual citizens from qualifying as natural born.

Several details of Obama's past have added twists to the question of his eligibility and citizenship, including his family's move to Indonesia when he was a child an the requirement of Indonesian citizenship in order to attend school there, as well as on what nation's passport did he travel to Pakistan in the '80s, as well as reports from Obama's own family that he was born in Kenya.

The biggest reason to investigate further is the fact that Obama has refused the constitutional requirement to allow public release of a signed "vault" copy of his original birth certificate.

Several of the legal cases – including those brought by Orly Taitz, Cort Wrotnowski, Leo Donofrio and Philip Berg, already have been discussed in conference at the U.S. Supreme Court, which has failed to have a hearing on any of the merits involved, so even our Supreme Court maybe involved in this cover-up. Hard to believe huh?

Taitz, in fact, is requesting information from the Supreme Court about a meeting eight of its justices held with Obama, a defendant in her case, before the justices reviewed the issues of the case in a private conference. Again, I say Conspiracy anyone???

"I know that Mr. Obama is not a constitutionally qualified natural born citizen and is ineligible to assume the office of president of the United States," Berg said in a statement on his ObamaCrimes.com website. "Obama knows he is not 'natural born' as he knows where he was born and he knows he was adopted in Indonesia; Obama is an attorney, Harvard Law grad who taught Constitutional law; Obama knows his candidacy is the largest 'hoax' attempted on the citizens of the United States in over 200 years; Obama places our Constitution in a 'crisis' situation; and Obama is in a situation where he can be blackmailed by leaders around the world who know Obama is not qualified," Berg's statement continued.

Obama's campaign team called the cases “garbage”. But then the entire Obama socialist administration obviously believes the ‘U.S. Constitution’, Capitalism, Freedom, and the ‘Bill of Rights’ are garbage.

THE BOTTOM LINE: Is this the way the ‘Free State of America’ comes to its end?

As hard to believe as this is, these are the facts, and of course some speculation and questions, which Obama could put to rest if he where just a tiny bit more transparent. If Obama is, as Apuzzo says, “an illegal alien” and is trying to destroy the U.S. Capitalist economy which is undeniably apparent, he had better do it surreptitiously and ASAP, as well as create a point of no return scenario, before the people ask for an impeachment or his four year contract runs out.

If Obama is successful in creating the Socialist Republic of America that is at the end of the road he is on, and the majority of the people have been successfully programmed and indoctrinated as to the benefits of communal living and socialism, then yes, that will be the end of America as we and our ancestors have known it.

If the courts allow it to be proven that Obama is a fraud and a liar regarding his citizenship, which I believe him to be, and therefore ineligible to be president, then the conspiracy will be out of the bag and Socialist Democrat party will be toast. Biden will take over and finish out Al-Barack’s term and we will elect a conservative president in 2012

Hopefully who ever that is, will be able to select the undo button and all will be well in the land…

de Andréa