Bill of Rights Day

Imagine todays Washington D.C. Gun Ban Law in 1775

By de Andréa
December 17, 2008

How can the people vote for a President that doesn’t believe in the Bill of Rights? President Elect Barry Hussein Soetoro or Barack Hussein Obama or Barry Hussein Dunham or what ever his name is, born some where on planet Earth, I think, does not believe in the Bill of Rights, and therefore does not believe in America. Barry is for example, more against the right of the American people to maintain the security a free state than King George the III was before the American Revolution.

But this is obviously what the people want, to be ruled by King Barack Hussein Obama the II

Does anybody know what the British were coming to do in 1776, when Paul Revere rode all over the country side shouting---“The British are coming, the British are coming”. Well I can guarantee you, it wasn’t to collect the tea tax. No---the British were coming to collect all the firearms from all the colonists, just as Hitler did in Europe and just as Obama plans to do here in the near future.

Monday December 15 was the little known and never celebrated ‘United States´ Bill of Rights Day,(possibly because our rights are a thing of the past) however, the District of Columbia residents are second-class citizens when it comes to the Second Amendment right/privilege. President-elect Barack Obama certainly does not support it, even as a privilege.

When an amicus brief was filed with the Supreme Court this June supporting the respondent in District of Columbia v. Heller on behalf of 55 senators, the senate president, and 250 representatives as well as the American people and the residents of D.C., Obama declined. Moreover, his voting record in the Illinois State legislature and the U.S. Congress has been more hostile to American gun owners than King George III was in 1775.

What’s in store for the Second Amendment which as the Amendment says “is necessary for the security of a Free State”, come January?

Imagine that at Lexington and Concord, British Major John Pitcairn did not shout "Disperse you Rebels—damn you, throw down your Arms and disperse!” …and that the shot heard ´round the world was not fired. Imagine that instead he read to the assembled colonists the following decree by British Commander-in-Chief General Thomas Gage, modeled of course after the newly-minted and revised 2008 District of Columbia gun ban law:

This even though the Supreme recently ruled that “…the right to keep and bear arms”... is in fact an individual right as the Amendment says. No--- as I have so often said, we have no rights at all, what we have here are privileges with a plethora of restrictions, bans, and rules.

The Newly Revised Washington DC Second Amendment gun ban law…

1. Bans "assault weapons," defined by a long list of various rifles, pistols, and shotguns, and concludes with the catch-all: "Any firearm that the Fuhrer may designate as an assault weapon by rule.” Anyone who disobeys will be imprisoned, ‘said’ with a distinct German accent.

2. Requires all non-banned firearms to be registered with the Fuhrer, who promises, of course, never to confiscate them, wink, wink—unless you forget to register them, that is—and "registration certificates shall of course expire three years after the date of issuance unless renewed."

3. A non-banned pistol can be registered, but only "for use in self-defense within that person’s home.” You cannot defend yourself with it even in the home, because it must be locked up and unloaded. You cannot defend yourself outside the home. "The Fuhrer shall require any registered pistol to be submitted for a ballistics identification procedure and shall establish a tribute/payola to be paid for such a procedure.” Oh! and only one pistol can be registered in a thirty-day period.

4. Within two years—1777 for the colonists, 2010 for D.C. residents—you will go to prison and be put in stocks if you have a pistol that is not "microstamp ready" or is an "unsafe pistol" as determined by weirdoes in the Nazi Fascist state of California.

5. Knapsacks with more than ten rounds of ammunition are banned as "large capacity ammunition feeding devices.” Essentially, you will be arrested if you have eleven or more rounds.

Of course the "Fuhrer" is the Chief of Police, but these quotes came directly from the new law. Imagine that the colonists reverently surrendered their "assault weapons" and sought to register their non-banned arms and pay the Chief his "tribute/payola” Imagine that our founders were a bunch of sheepish wimps like we have today in our country who remained subservient to royal tyranny instead of demanding the American Revolution. Imagine that two centuries later we delegated all power to the California legislature and that in Heller v. District of Columbia c (2008), D.C. lost instead of won.

Thankfully, that was not the case. The Supreme Court did ruled against the unconstitutional Washington D.C. gun ban, and held its handgun ban to be in violation of the Second Amendment’s "right of the people to keep and bear arms.” But with Obama’s recent appointment of the Fascist Eric Holder as his attorney general and D.C.´s determination to leave its citizens helpless against the criminals the police can’t control, and won’t respond to, history shows you can’t hold your breath waiting for others to protect your rights or your life. It seems the colonists at Lexington and Concord had it right.

It’s too bad we don’t have the guts to do the same today.

Or--- maybe it's coming…

de Andréa