The Supreme Court to Review Barack's Citizenship

The case challenging his name on the ballot is finally set for 'conference' review on December 5, 2008.

A follow up on previous article titled “Obama’s Birth Location”

By de Andréa

This case challenges President-elect Barack Obama's name on the 2008 election ballot citing questions over his citizenship has now been scheduled for a "conference" at the U.S. Supreme Court. Finally, an official investigation into at least one of the hundreds of shady characteristics of Obama’ past.

These conferences are private meetings of the justices at which they review cases and decide which ones to accept for formal review. This case is set for a conference review on Dec. 5, just 10 days before the Electoral College is scheduled to meet and make formal the election of al-Barrack Hussein Obammah as the nation's first Black-Muslim Socialist president.

The Supreme Court's website listed the date for the case brought by Leo C. Donofrio against Nina Wells, the secretary of state in New Jersey, over not only Obama's name on the 2008 election ballot but those of two others, Sen. John McCain and Roger Calero.

Calero was born in Nicaragua in 1969. He and his family fled to L.A. Ca in 1985. Calero is now a permanent resident alien holding a green card since 1990. While in Los Angeles, Calero joined a socialist movement and helped mobilize support against Proposition 187 in the early 90s. Calero is a convicted felon in 1988 on drug charges. In December 2002, immigration police arrested Calero upon his return to the United States at the Houston Airport from a conference held in Havana, protesting the Free Trade Area of the Americas. He was threatened with deportation in 2002 as a result of his previous conviction in 1988. The fact that Calero was able to run for any office in the United States is problematic. The fact that Calreo was able to run for President speaks volumes to the corrupt and slipshod way the government now operates

In defense of John McCain, he was born in 1936 at Coco Solo Naval Air Station in the Panama Canal Zone, to naval officer John S. McCain, Jr. and Roberta Wright McCain. At that time, the Panama Canal was under U.S. control. Moreover, any child born to an American in the military is considered by law to be born on U.S. Soil.

The case, unsuccessful at the state level, had been submitted to Justice David Souter, who rejected it. The case then was resubmitted to Justice Clarence Thomas. The next line on the court's docket says: "DISTRIBUTED for Conference of December 5, 2008."

If four of the nine justices vote to hear the case in full, oral argument may be scheduled.

The action questions whether any of the three candidates are qualified under the U.S. Constitution's requirement that a presidential candidate be a "natural-born citizen."

According to America's Right blogger Jeff Schreiber, there also was a development in a second case presented to the Supreme Court on the same issue.

His report said the Federal Election Commission now has waived its right to respond to a complaint brought by attorney Philip Berg.

First; "There are a number of reasons why the respondents here would choose not to respond. First, because the court only grants between 70 and 120 of the 8,000 or so petitions it receives every year, perhaps they just liked their odds of Berg's petition getting denied.

Second, because they have made arguments as to Berg's lack of standing several times at the district court level and beyond, perhaps they felt as though any arguments had already been made and were available on the record. Or, perhaps the waiver shows that the FEC and other respondents do not take seriously the allegations put forth by Berg, and did not wish to legitimize the claims with a response," the blogger speculated. "Another thing which is not completely clear is whether the FEC is filing for itself or on behalf of all respondents," he added. "If it were just the FEC filing the waiver, I must say that I'm surprised," Berg told America's Right. "I'm surprised because I think they should take the position that the Supreme Court should grant standing to us. I think they have a responsibility not only to Phil Berg, but to all citizens of this country, to put forth a sense of balance which otherwise doesn't seem to exist.”

"However, if this was filed by the FEC on behalf of the DNC and Barack Obama too, it reeks of collusion," he said, noting that the attorney from the Solicitor General's office should be representing federal respondents and not the DNC or Obama.

THE BOTTOM LINE: Questions surrounding at least this aspect of Obama's shady candidacy are seemingly beginning to see the light of day. Can you just imagine if Obama was now disqualified from the Presidency? This conjures up all kinds of possibilities. It seems to me that heads would role for those on the Federal Election Commission to have allowed it to get this far as well as to totally ignore all the evidence/questions/allegations that have been flouting around from the beginning.

Well, it will be interesting to see if ‘Justice or Corruption’ will continue to prevail. Call me negative, but I have a feeling that corruption has become the standard…

de Andréa