Climate

PART I

Just a little update on the global warming Hoax

By de Andréa

The latest Climate data has just been release, but don’t forward this e-mail to All Gore because he doesn’t know how to read. He just talks, and talks and talks…

You know all those little sensors that the bureau of climatology has tied to buoys at deferent depths in the oceans all over the world? Well it seems that the purpose of those little sensors is to measure the temperature of the ocean water everywhere on earth.

The data has been gathered from all those little thermometers, compiled, computed, and for the last five years of data it shows no increase in the average temperature of the worlds oceans. If one adds this to the drop in average air temperature in the last two years, we have an average two year drop in overall earth temperature by .05 degrees.
And no, this drop in temperature is not due to greenhouse gases or any other kind of gas.

Consensus is not science
One must realize that consensus in science doesn’t hold water or anything else for that matter; it is the discovery of scientific fact that proves science, no matter who believes it or disbelieves it. In other words consensus doesn’t change or affect the facts.

Mr. Albert Gore does tell the truth in one respect, and that is that he relies completely on consensus. Moreover, I just thought you ought to know, this consensus comes from scientists whose grant money comes from Global Warming Advocates.

Science and history actually shows that the earth has been cooling with short periods of warming since the last warming cycle that gave Greenland its name, that’s when the Danes and the Norwegians farmed most of Greenland. Yes Greenland used to be a green land. And incase you haven’t checked lately it is now pretty much covered with Ice.

The Irish grew grapes in Northern Ireland, and the Russians farmed Siberia. Just think what a little global warming would do for agriculture while we are using up farm land for building like crazy nearer the equator.

Anyway if their really is global warming, what you see in the picture is probably the cause.

PART II
CO2
If Carbon dioxide emissions really are a problem on our planet, it just may be that we may need more of it instead of less…

What the world needs now, is more CO2.

An environmental solar scientist by the name of David Archibald recently said, ‘There will be significant Global Cooling very soon.”

While the rest of the green people are sewing the seeds of a global-warming panic, there is at least one scientist that is swimming up stream attempting to sew a seed of a different color. So for you global warming nut’s there may be help on the way…

You should have heard the silence at the Hong Kong conference designed to persuade the airline industry to cut back on its production of so-called greenhouse gases to fight "global warming."

The "Greener Skies 2008" conference had just heard from David Archibald, a solar scientist asserting that climate change is mostly dictated by solar cycles, and not carbon dioxide levels as the climate control freaks would like to indoctrinate you with.

Archibald didn't just tell the group not to worry about carbon dioxide emissions. He told those gathered they should figure out ways of increasing CO2 output.

"In a few short years, we will have a reversal of the warming of the 20th century," Archibald warned, according to Cargo News Asia. "There will be significant cooling very soon. Our generation has known a warm, giving sun, but the new generation will suffer a sun that is less giving, and the earth will be less fruitful. Carbon dioxide is not even a little bit bad – it's wholly beneficial in a solar warming cycle" Check out the effect of natural air pollution on the cooling effect of Global Dimming.

One observer at the February conference said there would have been fewer jaws dropping had Archibald stripped off his clothes before the assembled.

"Plant growth responds to atmospheric carbon dioxide enrichment," he continued. "In a world of higher atmospheric carbon dioxide, crops will use less water per unit of carbon dioxide uptake. Thus the productivity of semi-arid lands will increase the most."

But the real shocker was not just his view of carbon dioxide. Unlike most of those in the conference, Archibald doesn't see a future threat of global warming, but an imminent and dire future of global cooling.

"We will need this increase in agricultural productivity to offset the colder weather coming," he said. "It also follows that if the developed countries of the world want to be caring and sharing to the countries of the Third World, the best thing that could be done for them is to increase atmospheric carbon dioxide levels.”

THE BOTTOM LINE: Controlling the weather… The next thing will be the attempt to control the orbit and the rotation of the earth to make the days longer, to slow time so it will seem that we live longer. Controlling the weather is just as big an illusion; I believe that God figured out how to do this all by Himself a few billion years ago.

We might be more productive if we would spent our time and our intelligence trying to reverse the direction of our society and return to the roots of our Christian culture before we lose sight of it all together.

It just makes more since too me, to be responsible for our own actions rather than wasting our time trying to do Gods job…

de Andréa