Thursday, March 20, 2008

Shariah Law Comes Again to Harvard U


While Americans stand by and watch their country, their freedom, and their rights slip incrementally away, Islamic Cultural Jihad in America is still moving along as planned

By de Andréa

This is of course good news if one is a Muslim. Or even if one has the absence of thought such as an Agnostic and doesn’t care one way or another. But if one is an Atheist or has any other philosophy or beliefs other than the oppressive rule of Islam, and or loves freedom of choice, the direction of this Ideologue is nothing short of disastrous.

On March 15th I posted a story about Shariah Law Coming to Australian Universities titled Islam Demands, clamoring for classes to be scheduled to accommodate prayer times, and for segregated male and female dinning and recreation facilities. Today it comes again to America, Harvard University after incrementally giving into previous Islamic Demands has once again and again given in and has adopted a policy of banning men from one of its gyms a few hours each week, to accommodate Muslim women. This is Shariah Law preempting the culture of America. .

This comment made by Ola Aljawhary one of the Muslim women who requested the change gives one, just a peek, into how Muslims think: “The majority should be willing to compromise," she said. "I think that's just basic courtesy. We must show tolerance and respect for all others.” Nice sounding words, but is this “respect for all others,” not just Muslims, and being “willing to compromise,” and isn’t “tolerance,” a two way street?

As some of the Brits, the French, and the Dutch have learned, the answer is “no.” When the Archbishop of Canterbury stated that the imposition of Shariah law is “unavoidable,” and necessary for “social cohesion” in England, without knowing it, he was also acknowledging that the answer is a resounding “no.”

It is obvious that it is just a matter of time until all “Public Indoctrinational Institutions” will incrementally be completely under oppressive Muslim Shariah Law, and everyone else’s rights, beliefs, and liberties will be quintessentially subordinate to the Muslim ideology.

Do Islamic countries allow for free expression of religion by non-Muslims? Do they “tolerate” those whose beliefs are contrary to those of Islam? Do they “compromise” with non-Muslims? No, no, and no. Why not? Because doctrinal Islam asserts not only the supremacy of Allah and Islam as a religious belief, but the supremacy of the political ideology embedded within Islam that dictates how a society and its government and laws should be ordered. It brooks no tolerance or compromise.

If you accept, as do all Muslims, what the Quran and the Hadith teach about the supremacy of Islam and Allah, about not only the right, but the duty of all Muslims to forcefully subordinate all other beliefs to Islam and Allah, then it is perfectly logical to conclude that Muslims have the right to demand accommodations for their beliefs that subordinate the beliefs of everyone else to theirs.

This is the theological rationale and justification for Islamic Jihad, whether by violence or the infiltration of “Cultural Jihad” – the subversion and ultimate conquering of a society from within by means other than physical violence. For what is Islamic Jihad but the call to subjugate “infidels” to the “supreme” religion of Islam and Allah?

What may seem as a harmless test of Harvard's famed open-mindedness is just one of many steps toward the ultimate total uncompromising control of Shariah Law. The university has today banned men from one of its gyms for a few hours a week to accommodate Muslim women who say it offends their sense of modesty to exercise in front of the opposite sex. Tomorrow it will be yet another demand of Muslim oppression imposed upon everyone else in the attempt to drag the whole world back to the seventh century under the oppression of Shariah law, we are committing tolerance suicide ...

The policy is already unpopular with many on campus, including some women who consider it sexist.

"I think that it's incorrect in a college setting to institute a policy in which the majority of the campus gets wronged or denied a resource that's supposed to be for everyone, for the sake of a few" said student Lucy Caldwell, who also wrote a column in The Harvard Crimson newspaper critical of the new hours.

The trial policy went into effect Feb. 4, about a month after a group of six Muslim women, with the support of the Harvard College Women's Center, asked the university for the special hours, spokesman Robert Mitchell said.

"We get special requests from religious groups all the time and we try to honor them whenever possible," Mitchell said, noting that the school has already designated spaces for Muslim and Hindu students to pray. The truth is that when Jews or Christians request special accommodations, the nonexistent “Separation of Church and State Law” is evoked, and accommodations are denied.

No men are allowed in the gym between 3 p.m. and 5 p.m. on Mondays, and between 8 a.m. and 10 a.m. on Tuesdays and Thursdays. Even the staff during those times are all women.

The special hours allow the Muslim women, who adhere to traditional dress codes by covering their hair and most of their skin while in public, to dress more appropriately for exercising, said Susan Marine, director of the women's center.

"It's a pretty big breach of their moral and religious code for a man to see them with their hair uncovered and it's just not possible for them to be in a mixed environment," she said.When student Kareem Shuman showed up to work out at the gym on Monday, he was turned away but said he didn't mind. "Knowing it was requested by women of my faith -- it's very understandable to me," said Shuman, 21, who figured he'd just come back later for his workout.

Other men find the new hours inconvenient to class schedules. Nick Wells, a junior who wrote an opinion piece in the Crimson criticizing the policy, suggested setting aside one room for women. "It's not that I am opposed to the idea of helping people in religious groups or women in general, but I just think Harvard is not being fair to people like me who have other classes to attend during gym hours for men.

An Associated Press reporter who went to the gym Monday did not even see any Muslim women entering. Efforts to reach some of the women who requested the policy through the Women's Center were unsuccessful. The reason for this, is that it is not the need for segregation, but the Islamic agenda of securing one more Shariah law.

Kent Blumenthal, executive director of the National Intramural-Recreational Sports Association, which has 660 member colleges and universities nationwide, said he could not think of any other institution with a similar policy. "It seems in some ways contrary to the purpose of campus recreational programs, which is all about access," he said.

Harvard's policy is no different from commercial gyms that cater partially or even exclusively to women, said Ibrahim Hooper, a spokesman for the Washington-based Council on American-Islamic Relations, a known terrorist support group, “The Muslim bashers portray it as the world coming to end, but if women have a couple hours a week to work out in private, I don't see it as a major issue, he said.

THE BOTTOM LINE: While the Muslim terrorist Ibrahim Hooper may be correct, in this case, if one separated it from the context of all the rest of the surreptitious and incremental Islamic demands is not a major Issue. But it is not an unusual isolated case; it is one in a string of carefully orchestrated changes in the culture of our collage campuses. Moreover this same Infiltration of Islamic Shariah law is incrementally taking precedence over our local, State and Federal laws as well.

Remember the turtle beat the hare with slow and carefully placed steps…

de Andréa

No comments: