A Covenant with the Devil

History, if Ignored may in fact destructively repeat itself.

By de Andréa

Note the Bishops hailing Hitler as the god of this world.
So soon we forget, in 1933 the Catholic Church entered into a covenant with the Nazi régime. In 2008 the Church of England endorses Islamic Sharia law as the Law of Great Britain.


The Concordat between the Vatican and the Nazis

Source---Wikipedia

Cardinal Secretary of State, Eugenio Pacelli (later to become Pope Pius XII) signs the Concordat between Nazi Germany and the Vatican at a formal ceremony in Rome on 20 July 1933. Nazi Vice-Chancellor Franz von Papen sits at the left, Pacelli in the middle, and the Rudolf Buttmann sits at the right.

The Concordat effectively legitimized Hitler and the Nazi government in the eyes of Catholicism, Christianity, and the world.

“Adoption of Islamic Sharia law in Britain is now unavoidable”, said the Archbishop of Canterbury

The Archbishop of Canterbury has in 2008 said that “the adoption of Islamic Sharia law in the UK is unavoidable and that it would help introduce social cohesion”

Click here for the whole story

So is history repeating itself? Well as they say, “if it walks like a duck”…
In 1933 no one except maybe Churchill and certainly no one in the Vatican, read Mein Kampf. Today no one, except of course the Muslims, is reading the Quran, especially not the Archbishop of Canterbury.

Unlike Hitler’s third Reich with the all out war to capture all of Europe, today’s Islam is instead stealthily and incrementally infiltrating the societies of Western Countries. The agenda is the same; the Ideology of Muhammad’s Islam was actually the source philosophy for Hitler’s Nazism.

I do not see a decisive difference between what went on with the Nazi deception in the 30’s and what is being played out with Islam on the world stage today. We have the same historical agenda being repeated, not just once again but twice again and we are being sucked into the trap of Allah for yet a third time. (The first time was of course before the Crusades at around 900 AD).

In AD 900 I could understand falling for the deception of Islam, after all the Europeans had no history to speak of to fall back on or to learn from, even though one would think that they would have figured it out before 300 years had gone by. But just what was our excuse in the 30’s, what’s more what is our excuse today??? America as a Nation has been confronted with the bullying if Islam for more than two hundred years now, and we still haven’t got it figured out, moreover, we have the internet, “The Information Highway”, I mean, come on…we haven’t got another 100 years.

Islam declared war on the United States 200 years ago.
The ruthless barbarism of the Nation of Islam is certainly not new to the United States of America. More than two hundred years ago the newly established United States made its first attempt to fight an overseas battle to protect its private citizens by building an international coalition against an unconventional enemy, moreover, it still continues today. Then, the enemies were Muslim pirates and piracy. The focus of the United States and a proposed international coalition was the Islamic Barbary Pirates of Tripoli in North Africa.

After the United States won its independence in the treaty of 1783, it had to protect its own commerce against dangers such as the Tripoli Barbary pirates of Islam. As early as 1784 Congress followed the tradition of the European shipping powers and appropriated $80,000 as tribute to the Barbary States. Thomas Jefferson soon discovered that paying the slaves “Jizya-Tax” to the Muslims was like pouring water down a dry well. Paying the ransom would only lead to further demands, Jefferson argued in letters to future presidents John Adams, then America's minister to Great Britain, and James Monroe, then a member of Congress.

As Jefferson wrote to Adams in a July 11, 1786, letter,” I think it would be best to effect a peace thro' the medium of war. Paying tribute will merely invite more demands. The only solution is a strong navy that can reach the Muslim pirates”, Jefferson argued in an August 18, 1786, letter to James Monroe: "The Barbary States must see the rod; perhaps it must be felt by some of them. . . . Every national citizen must wish to see an effective instrument of coercion, and should fear to see it on any other element than the water. A naval force can never endanger our liberties, nor occasion bloodshed; a land force would do both, it will be easier to raise ships and men to fight these pirates into reason, than money to bribe them."

When Jefferson became president in 1801 he refused to accede to Tripoli's demands for an immediate payment of $225,000 as well as an annual payment of $25,000. The Islamic pasha of Tripoli then declared war on the United States. Although as secretary of state and vice president he had opposed developing an American navy capable of anything more than coastal defense, President Jefferson dispatched a squadron of naval vessels to the Mediterranean. As he declared in his first annual message to Congress, “I have sent a small squadron of frigates into the Mediterranean.” . . .

One cannot get around what Jefferson heard when he went with John Adams to wait upon Tripoli’s ambassador to London in March 1785. When they inquired, “by what right did the Barbary States prey upon American shipping, enslaving both crews and passengers.” It was then that America’s two foremost envoys were informed that “it was written in the Koran, that all Nations who should not have acknowledged Islam’s authority were sinners, and that it was their right and duty to make war upon whoever they could find and to make slaves of all they could take as prisoners, and that every Mussulman who should be slain in battle was sure to go to Paradise.” Source—Wikipedia

It seems nothing has changed since then, except America’s ignorance.

One can easily see how early on, America learned how to deal with Islam, John Adams knew that compromising, giving in to their demands, or being tolerant of Islam was just opening the door to a wild river of destruction, moreover, the only action Islam would respect would come out of the end of a cannon. How did he know that???

Why then, have we regressed back to the blindness of the Europeans of 900 AD?

In the words of Thomas Jefferson July 11, 1786, “I think it would be best to effect a peace thro' the medium of war.” Why did he say that? Did he know something then, that we don’t know today? Well, one thing he knew for sure is that the Muslims are liars; at least these Muslims were liars. The demanded bribe was paid (the Slave-Jizya-Tax) to leave our ships alone and the return of the hostages and guess what? Yes they lied and didn’t leave our ships alone and didn’t return our sailors.

So why do we continue to make peace with the so-called Palestinians, over and over and over again? Because I guess, unlike Jefferson who obviously learned the first time, we, on the other hand, are stuck on stupid. Apparently we, as the Europeans of 900 AD have another hundred years to go. I can’t help but wonder if Jefferson read the Quran…

If Jefferson didn’t, it is sure that John Quincy Adams did, he had this to say about Islam…

“In the seventh century of the Christian era a wandering Arab of the lineage of Hagar [i.e., Muhammad] the Egyptian, combining the powers of transcendent genius, with preternatural energy of a fanatic, and the fraudulent spirit of an imposter, proclaimed himself as a messenger from heaven, and spread desolation and delusion over an extensive portion of the earth. Adopting from the sublime conception of Mosaic Law, the doctrine of one omnipotent God; he connected indissolubly with it, the audacious falsehood, that he was himself his prophet and apostle. Adopting from the new Revelation of Jesus, the faith and hope of immortal life and of future retribution, he humbled it to the dust by adapting all the rewards of his religion to the gratification of the sexual passion. He poisoned the sources of human felicity at the fountain, by degrading the condition of the female sex, and the allowance of polygamy; and he declared undistinguishing and exterminating war, as a part of his religion, against all the rest of mankind. THE ESSENCE OF HIS DOCTRINE WAS VIOLENCE AND LUST: TO EXALT THE BRUTAL OVER THE SPIRITUAL PART OF HUMAN NATURE.... Between these two religions, thus contrasted in their characters, a war of twelve hundred years has already raged. The war is yet flagrant… While the merciless and dissolute dogmas of the false prophet shall furnish motives to human action, there can never be peace on earth and good will towards men.” John Quincy Adams (Emphasis is Mine) source ---Wikipedia

To enter into peace negotiations with Muslims is no less than making a covenant with the devil. We have known this for a thousand years, and yet we blindly continue down the same ignorant path to certain destruction. Why; --- is still the Question?

Denial is what paves the path for Islam to deceive the “Western Mind”, denial of anything greater than ourselves. Note that Adams refers to Allah the god of Muhammad and of Islam as “an Imposter, a fraudulent spirit, who proclaimed himself as a messenger from heaven”. If one is in denial of heaven or the existence of God the creator of all things, then one is vulnerable to the deception of the “Fraudulent Spirit” that Adams refers to. And it is the supernatural deception of Allah the fraudulent spirit, which drives Islam in its relentless goal of world conquest and the subjugation of all its people.

Yes, even Islam is deceived; Islam is being used as a tool of deception to carry out the agenda of Allah, the fraudulent spirit. This, my friend, is why it took 300 years for the Crusaders to comprehend Islam, only then did they set out to do the thing they knew they must do, eliminate the tool in the hand of Allah.

Of course they where not completely successful, they just didn’t have the where with all to completely destroy Islam. If they had, it would be unlikely that Nazism would have been born, or that we would be fighting the same deceived people driven by this same fraudulent spirit today.

The doctrine of this supernatural deception can be found throughout the Quran it is what causes this stuck on stupid blindness of the West to the truth of Islam. In Arabic it is called the “doctrine of the Taqiyyah” and is what is taught to Muslims from childhood.

There is not a single English word that translates “Taqiyyah”. The word deception alone does not cover it, the best description is “True Lies”. When one can convincingly deceive another with the truth, then one is supernaturally deceived.

An example that comes to mind is when a Muslim says that Jihad really means “Personal Struggle” If one is satisfied with that definition then one has been deceived with the truth. Remember Mein Kampf? It was also a personal struggle, Hitler’s personal struggle in the conquest of the world, which is interestingly the same personal struggle and agenda of Islam. It is each Muslims personal struggle to contribute to this agenda. Moreover the greatest contribution a Muslim can make to this world domination is personal martyrdom.

Those who are deceived say…”Oh, well…I thought it meant war, murder, and mayhem etc... Oh, well… if it’s a personal struggle then I guess it’s OK right???.” And they go merrily on their way, totally deceived about the demise of their future. I have heard this scenario so often, its makes me nauseous

THE BOTTOM LINE: The West has been deceived that the core-value of Islam is peace. “Taqiyyah”; the true lies again. Peace for Islam and the world will only come when all the earth bows to Allah. And everyone in it is subjected to Islamic Sharia law. This is why it is called the “Religion of Peace”. “The Ummah”, the establishment of the World Nation of Islam, and the resurrection of the twelfth Caliphate to rule the earth…

Are you ready to accept it? Or are you ready to fight it???

Remember, if you make a covenant with the devil, you will only get burned…

de Andréa