Wednesday, December 31, 2008

More On Obama’s Eligibility

Does it ever end? I hope not until we win…
There are as many law suits against Obama regarding this issue as there are Ideas about it. It seams every one has a different angle.

By de Andréa

One of the big legal walls that most of the previous suits eventually came up against was the lack of standing, proof of damage, and therefore legal authority to bring suit. This wall may have now been finally breached.

Yet another new case challenging Barack Obama's natural-born citizenship and, therefore, constitutional eligibility to serve as president has the potential to clear a hurdle that has caused several other similar cases' dismissal: --- the issue of "standing."

In the case brought by Pennsylvania Democrat Philip Berg, for example, a federal judge ruled against the lawsuit in deciding Berg lacked the "standing" to sue, arguing that the election of Obama wouldn't cause the plaintiff specific, personal injury.

In Washington State’s Broe v. Reed case, however, plaintiff's attorney Stephen Pidgeon says a unique state statute grants everyday citizens ‘the required standing’.

"These lawsuits have pointed their fingers at the various secretaries of state and said, 'you handle the elections, it's your job [to verify Obama's eligibility],'" Stephen Pidgeon said, "and the secretaries of state have said, 'No, it's not our job. You, the voter, have to prove he was ineligible.’ But when the voters try to do it, the courts tell them they have no standing. A ‘catch-22’ as it were….

Until now…"Here, we have standing by means of the statute of law," Pidgeon continued. "This particular statute provides for any registered voter to challenge the election of a candidate if the candidate at the time of the election was ineligible to hold office."

Furthermore, Pidgeon explained, "In Washington State we also have a constitutional clause in Article 1 that says the U.S. Constitution is the supreme law of land, so it's very much a state issue that the secretary of state has a duty to enforce the U.S. Constitution."

Moreover, one could file a rite of mandamus, forcing elected officials to do the job they were elected to do. Watch a video about Obama's citizenship.
Check out a website called "Obama Forgery ,com"

Washington's secretary of state, Mr. Sam Reed, has opposed the lawsuit, brought by a group of 12 registered Washington voters with Pidgeon's representation, on several grounds, including the argument that the issue is moot now that Obama has been voted upon by the people. This is a little like saying the bank robbery is moot, now that the money has been spent.

Pidgeon argues, however, that even if Obama remains in office two years from now, the issue will not be moot.

"The Constitution's criteria for president are never moot," Pidgeon explained. "Article 2, Section 1 says 'eligible to the Office of President'; it doesn't say 'eligible for candidacy to the Office of President."

Therefore, Pidgeon argues, the Constitution's natural-born citizen clause specifically and expressly addresses the man sitting in the Oval Office, not just the main elected and waiting to get in.

"If, at any time during his tenure, a birth certificate actually surfaces showing [Obama] born in Kenya," Pidgeon said, "he is disqualified from the presidency at any time. And the constitutional crisis that is rising out of this – the longer he's in that office, the greater the problem becomes, because everything he does will be illegal."

The Washington Supreme Court is set to hear Broe v. Reed on Jan. 8, but the entire case may be delayed intentionally, as the plaintiffs wait to see if the court will rule first on a requested subpoena of Obama's birth certificate from Hawaii.

Unlike other states where lawsuits challenging Obama's natural-born citizen status were required to move through lower courts, Washington law grants the case "original jurisdiction" at the state Supreme Court, which means the plaintiff can present new evidence, including – if the court will indeed subpoena it – Obama's birth records.

"We have opportunity to present facts before the Supreme Court, where you wouldn't have that normally," Pidgeon said. "With original jurisdiction, we have the opportunity to present factual argument, and so what we have said to the court is, 'At no time did Senator Obama produce a single piece of evidence upon which the secretary of state could rely to establish that he was a natural born citizen, or that he was even an American citizen, or that he was running under his legal name.’ Those are the three facets of our lawsuit."

Pidgeon also said that the case's primary hurdle now is the natural predisposition judges have toward complying with the democratic will of the people. They rarely "upset the apple cart," Pidgeon said, by overturning the results of an election.

Still, Pidgeon believes pursuing Broe v. Reed is necessary. "I expect the truth of Senator Obama's birth is going to come out. It may not be today, it may not be tomorrow, but the truth of his birth is going to come out, and when that true fact comes out that he was born in Kenya, and or is a British citizen, we will have an unprecedented constitutional crisis in this nation.

"The question is," Pidgeon figures, "will the Washington Supreme Court stand for the rule of law or are they going to stand for an overthrow of the constitutional republic by the will of the electorate?"

"Should Senator Obama be discovered, after he takes office, to be ineligible for the Office of President of the United States of America and, thereby, his election declared void," argues a similar case brought by Alan Keyes and pending in California, "Americans will suffer irreparable harm in that (a) usurper will be sitting as the President of the United States, and none of the treaties, laws, or executive orders signed by him will be valid or legal."

Three of the biggest question are one, why if a Hawaii birth certificate exists as his campaign has stated, Obama hasn't simply ordered it made available to settle the rumors The governor's office in Hawaii said there is a valid certificate but rejected requests for access and left ambiguous its origin: Does the certificate on file with the Department of Health indicate a Hawaii birth or was it generated after the Obama family registered a Kenyan birth in Hawaii?

And two, even if Obama was born in Hawaii wouldn’t his Kenyan born father cause Obama to have dual citizenship with Britain thereby making Obama ineligible?

And three, it is a known fact that Obama attended a Muslim public school in Indonesia which requires students to be citizens of Indonesia which at best makes Obama a naturalized citizen, not a natural born citizen, if he is in fact a citizen at all . We don’t even know what country’s passport he used when he went to Pakistan or why he went there.

THE BOTTOM LINE: The point being is that the American people know very little about this man other than he was indoctrinated as a Muslim terrorist by Islamic clerics and madrassas when he was a young lad. Oh! I nearly forgot that his best friends are Criminals/Communists/Muslim leaders and America hating preachers.

Oh well! Nobody’s perfect…

de Andréa

Tuesday, December 30, 2008

Israel At War---Again

This time they say…”Until the bitter end” one can only hope…

By de Andréa

As of Saturday the 27th of December the Israeli Government had enough of the so-called peaceful nation of Hamas / Palestine in Gaza.

After the last barrage of rockets launched from Gaza exploded in Israel killing more Israeli citizens the Israeli military was set loose on the terrorists of Gaza.

Less that three years after the Israeli withdrawal from the Gaza strip on the northern border of Egypt in an effort to appease the Palestinian terrorists the attacks from Hamas never stopped. One would think that the Israeli’s would surely be cognizant of the ongoing agenda of the Jordanian terrorist refugees that insist on calling themselves Historical Palestinians.

Maybe they have finely at least recognized that the Hamas terrorists are never going to stop until all of Israel is exterminated. This is of course the mantra of all Muslims, and of the entire Nation of Islam from every country in the world. No one made this Muslim agenda clearer than Iran.

Although this is not a likely scenario, the truth is that there will only be peace in the world when all the world is Muslim and part of the Ummah the world Nation of Islam, or--- all the Muslims are gone--- overwhelmingly defeated, and the last of them have unconditionally surrendered.

Unfortunately I have the sick feeling that Israel still doesn’t understand the Muslim Mind, and will end up right back at square one making yet another treaty with these terrorist’s monsters. What is obviously not understood is that treaties, covenants, agreements, deals, or contracts with Islam are meaningless. Before the ink dries the Muslims will plot to attack again and again. They have been repeating this historical scenario since the invasion and defeat of Mecca in mid 600 AD. It was called the treaty of Al-hudaybiyah, two years later Muhammad attacked Mecca defeating it, forcing what was left of the Meccens into slavery.

There is however one more twist to this attack of Israel on the Hamas. Even though the Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas and his office today slammed as "barbaric" and "unnecessary" Israel's air strikes in Gaza, Abbas for months now has been secretly petitioning Israel to launch a massive military raid against his Hamas rivals in Gaza, according to top diplomatic sources in Jerusalem.

The sources, said Abbas and his top representatives have waged a quiet campaign for months now, asking the Israeli government to target Hamas in Gaza just before his term in office is scheduled to expire on Jan. 9.

THE BOTTOM LINE: The sad truth is, the simple solution to this so-called terrorist problem all over the world is just a matter of reading a couple of books. Then we can stop repeating history… If there is anything that Islam understands it is “terror”. The west needs to dish out a little terror of its own. Remember it took the Crusaders of Western Europe 300 years to figure this out. Islam has been doing this for 1400 years now, moreover, they will never stop.

Fight Terror in kind. It’s called “Back firing”… it’s called survival

de Andréa

Monday, December 29, 2008

American Children Brainwashed in Islam

On February 1, 2008 I wrote an article exposing the Brainwashing of British Youth into the agenda of Islamic terrorism called theThe New Faces Of British Youth” It has now come to America…

I have often said that looking into the face of Britain is like looking into a mirror and seeing the future of America. Just in case you haven’t yet joined ACT for America and are not receiving their free news letters, I have decided to publish this one for you. It is revealing of the progress of the cultural Jihad that Islam has made on this continent. Only you can stop it…

de Andréa

ACTION ALERT !! American Children Being Brainwashed in Taliban Madrassa

Dear de Andrea!

Recently I was invited to attend a weekend meeting that included elected officials and leaders of organizations concerned about radical Islam. During that time I had the opportunity to meet with the producers of a documentary entitled “Karachi Kids.” “Karachi Kids” chronicles how children from around the world, including Americans and Canadians, are being sent off to a Pakistani madrassa run by the Taliban, to be brainwashed and sent back to their home countries as Jihadists. The school claims that it has already “graduated” over 100 American children. Please read the press release below and click on to view the trailer.

Then, I urge you to click here to contact your Member of Congress and two U.S. Senators and ask them to support legislation introduced by U.S. Rep. Michael McCaul (R-TX). McCaul’s bill, H.Res 1336, calls for an accounting of how many American children are in radical Islamic madrassas in Pakistan. H.Res 1336 encourages "the United States Secretary of State to work with the government of Pakistan to secure the return to the United States of all American children being educated in madrassas in Pakistan."

Brigitte Gabriel

(Atlanta, GA) - Imran Raza, the director and executive producer of the documentary "Karachi Kids" who discovered up to 80 American children in a Taliban-backed madrassa in Pakistan released the following statement regarding the return of two American children to Atlanta:
I am grateful for the safe return of the two American children from Atlanta from a Taliban- backed madrassa but the mullah claims to have up to 78 more in his institution. The headmaster comes to the United States once a year and personally recruits American children to enroll in his madrassa.

The remaining 78 children must be returned to the United States. This pipeline to jihad must be closed.

Let me be clear - these children do not learn math, or science, or liberal arts. They learn one thing - they memorize over the course of seven years every verse of the Koran coupled with the radical interpretation of their teachers. This is just the first step in integrating these children back to American society. I am proud we did our part so we could say "Welcome Home."

It is imperative that Members of Congress and the State Department undertake an accounting of just how many Americans are in the other 20,000 madrassas in Pakistan. Hundreds remain behind. The Karachi Kids is a documentary about American children in the Jamia Binoria madrassa in Karachi Pakistan. A trailer of the film is available at
Facts About the Binoria Madrassa

Located in Karachi, Pakistan, the Jamia Binoria madrassa was founded by Mufti Muhammed Naeem and espouses Deobandism -- the religion of the Taliban.
The institution houses over 3,000 students including children from the United States and Canada.

Selig Harrison, the Director of the Asian Program for the Center for International Policy recently gave a speech reafng the link between the Jamia Binoria and the Taliban: "In Karachi, the Jamia Binoria, withsome 10,000 students enrolled in eight afted madrassas, displays a banner at its main gate urging Muslims to join the Taliban."

A large number of graduates from the Binoria have become senior es in the Taliban.
Right before 9/11, Osama bin Laden addressed the students emphasizing the importance of jihad.

Mufti claims to have graduated over 100 Americans from his institution and asked what they teach the children, Mufti relied, "Islam, not math or anything else, only Islam."


THE BOTTOM LINE: These are American children, mostly from Arab descent, who will return in seven years as Islamic Jihadists. Children of the so-called “Moderate” warm fuzzy Muslins living next door and who are in your work place. They will carry on the infiltration of the American culture. Notice I said Infiltration, not assimilation; moreover, these children will be the future Jihadists in the unholy war in our streets.

Do yourself and your family a favor, educate yourselves about Islam… The quickest and least expensive way to get started is by doing this; buy two books from a lady who isn’t afraid of Islam and who has devoted her life to saving your lives and your freedom.

Brigitte Gabriel lost her childhood and nearly lost her life to the cultural and subsequent violent Jihad of Lebanon. She tells her riveting story in a book called Because They Hate” it’s about growing up from ages 10 to 17 and living in a hole in the ground in the war zone of violent Islamic terror. Even her warm fuzzy so-call moderate Muslim neighbors and friends turned on her family because Brigitte and her family were Christians and this was, after all, the Jihad of Islam and they were the Kaffaar...

Her latest book “They Must Be Stopped” and subtitled “Why We Must Defeat Radical Islam and How We Can Do It”, will open your eyes to the true agenda of all Muslims, and how you can and must stop them because your government is stagnated in blind deception.

The following chapter titles will give you an idea of how dynamic and hard-hitting this book addresses the issues. "Purists Drink Their Islam Straight" "The Muslim Brotherhood Project for North America" "Reviving the Caliphate: One World Nation under Allah, Super-sizing the Muslim World" "The Subtle Islamization Agenda: Boiling the West Alive" "Madrassas in America and Abroad: Molding an Islamofascist Youth"

The same cultural Jihad that preceded the war or (violent Jihad) in the predominantly Christian Democratic Nation of Lebanon exists right now, right here; in America.

How do we stop it? Get started by Joining Brigitte and me, and join Act for America. Click here to receive a free online subscription to her news letters, and then by reading her two books. Just click on the titles Because They Hate and They Must Be Stopped to order the books on line.

Once you have learned about the agenda of Islam unfolding right here in America in front of the blind eyes of our government and Homeland Security, as well as the Islamic indoctrination of our children in our public schools. Then you can intelligently contact your Federal, State, and local Representatives and tell them what you know about the Muslim agenda in this country. Trust me; you will know more than they do about the infiltration of cultural Jihad in America. Can’t happen in here you say? Think again, it has already happened in America’s greatest Ally, Great Britain. The British people are already living under Sharia law, Parliamentary law is surreptitiously and incrementally disappearing and Great Britain is becoming The Great Islamic State of Britannia.

The alternative is to continue in ignorance and enable Islam to surreptitiously and incrementally infiltrate our society just as they did in the more than a dozen other country’s in the world that are today existing under the bondage of Islamic terror and Sharia law.

Islam offers the Kaffaar three choices: One, covert to Islam, and two, become a Slave of Islam, or three, death. I am offering you, (“the Kaffaar”) only one choice; the forth choice. And that is the choice to fight back…

I strongly suggest, for your sake, the sake of your children, and thsake of a free America, that you click on the Forth Choice… NOW Remember: These Colors Don’t Run…

de Andréa

Saturday, December 27, 2008

Kenyan government puts a gag on Obama family

And you are doing this because…"We are doing this because we want to ensure a better flow of information” say the Kenyan government officials. Just how does gagging someone enable a “better flow of Information” again?

By de Andréa

The Kenyan government has barred unapproved contacts between the media and Barrack Husein Obammah's family.

Family members will be required to receive permission from the government before making any public statements about their famous relative, according to the Nairobi Star.

"We are doing this because we want to ensure better flow of information," Athman Said, an under-secretary in the Ministry of Heritage, told the Obama family in Kogelo.

"The government has decided that you should inform its officers who will be based here if you want to address the media."

Journalists wishing to speak with the family must first be approved by the government.

This is not the first attempt to block press interest in President-elect Obama's African connections.

Prior to the U.S. election, Jerome R. Corsi was detained in Kenya while investigating Obama's close ties to the nation's Muslim Prime Minister /Dictator, Raila Odinga who Barrack Obama helped get elected, orchestrated the detention

Corsi, whose recent book, "The Obama Nation," raised questions about Obama’s country of origin when he was a candidate for president; had scheduled a news conference in Nairobi to discuss his discoveries during his visit this fall. He was however jailed on Orders from Odinga and held without food or water for much of a day until he was escorted onto his already-booked flight leaving Kenya with the sendoff, "See you in hell."

This must be an Obama/Odinga thing because Corsi said “I was able to interview Obama's uncle, Sayid Obama, the brother of Obama's father, when I was doing the research for 'The Obama Nation, but Auma Obama, Barrack’s half-sister, declined an interview by telephone, telling me that the Obama campaign had advised the Obama family not to speak with me, either from the United States by phone, or in person in Kenya."

Two weeks ago, Odinga passed the Kenya Communications Amendment Bill, a controversial measure that gives the state of Kenya the power to raid TV stations and newspaper offices, as well as to control broadcast content. Sounds similar to what Obama did in Missouri during his campaign there, they must have similar goals.

Kenya's press independence was tested in 2006 when armed and masked police officers raided news offices following a series of exposés about official corruption.

While the latest attempt to embargo news about and from the president-elect's African family may anticipate passage of the "media gag" bill, economics, tourism, and boosterism are also part of the equation.

Under-secretary Said, who informed the Obama’s they were muzzled, announced the formation of the Barrack Obama Cultural Home project, which will include a museum, a gallery and a leadership center in Barrack Obama’s birthplace, the family's town of Kogelo. A video featuring Mama Sarah Obama, the president-elect's grandmother who witnessed Barack Obama’s birth in Kenya, will relate the Obama’s' family history. Said added that the Ministry of Heritage is negotiating with the U.S. government to display Obama's publications.

The investment in the family's village so far has caused land prices to double in the past several months. Electricity service has been routed to the community and investors are rumored to be planning hotel construction to serve the tourists expected to travel the "Presidential Heritage Tourism Circuit."

Heritage minister William Ole Ntimama confirmed the government's intent to invest in the project.

"This is a great opportunity to open up the western tourism circuit and we have asked the Treasury to find us some money so that we can roll out a number of projects that will make this a truly memorable cultural site," Ntimama told the Star.

THE BOTTOM LINE: It is certainly a precious fanfare that they are doing to memorialize Obama’s birth place, but how does this qualify Barrack Hussein Obammah to be President of the United States again? I mean, if he was actually born in Hawaii wouldn’t one think the Hawaiian Heritage minister would be working on a plaque or something at the hospital where Obama was born? Oh! I forgot, they can’t find the hospital where Obama was born, not in Hawaii anyway….

Oh well, he's got his picture on the money allready.

de Andréa

Friday, December 26, 2008

U.S. Military Is Preparing For Martial law

U.S. Military Is Preparing For Martial law
We are of course not preparing for Sharia law as we should be, but our tyrannical government is instead preparing for a little war of their own, against who I wonder???

By de Andréa
December 28, 2008

Gen. Tommy Franks, who led the U.S. military operations to liberate Iraq, said in an interview that …“if the U.S. is attacked with a weapon of mass destruction, the Constitution will likely be discarded in favor of a military form of government”.

First our government destroys our economy, (watch a video by Fred Thompson) then the government anticipates riots in the streets because of their orchestrated economic crash so they can disregard the constitution and create a totalitarian dictatorship in the form of “Martial Law” and use the excuse that---well we are being attacked by the terrorist that they have been supporting for years.

A new report from the U.S. Army War College discusses the use of American troops to quell civil unrest brought about by a worsening economic crisis.

The report from the War College’s Strategic Studies Institute warns that the U.S. military must prepare for a “violent, strategic dislocation inside the United States” that could be provoked by “unforeseen economic collapse” or “loss of functioning political and legal order.”

Entitled “Known Unknowns: Unconventional ‘Strategic Shocks’ in Defense Strategy Development, the report was produced by Nathan Freier, a recently retired Army lieutenant colonel who is a professor at the college — the Army’s main training institute for prospective senior officers.

He writes: “To the extent events like this involve organized violence against local, state, and national authorities and exceed the capacity of the former two to restore public order and protect vulnerable populations, the DOD [Department of Defense] would be required to fill the gap.” Freier continues: “Widespread civil violence inside the United States would force the defense establishment to reorient priorities in extremis to defend basic domestic order”

An American government and defense establishment lulled into complacency by a long-secure domestic order would be forced to rapidly divest some or most external security commitments in order to address rapidly expanding human insecurity at home.”

International Monetary Fund Managing Director Dominique Strauss-Kahn warned last week of riots and unrest in global markets if the ongoing financial crisis is not addressed and lower-income households are beset with credit constraints and rising unemployment, the Phoenix Business Journal reported.

Sen. James Inhofe of Oklahoma and Rep. Brad Sherman of California disclosed that Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson discussed a worst-case scenario as he pushed the Wall Street bailout in September, and said that scenario might even require “a declaration of martial law”.

The Army College report states: “DOD might be forced by circumstances to put its broad resources at the disposal of civil authorities to contain and reverse violent threats to domestic tranquility. Under the most extreme circumstances, this might include use of military force against hostile groups inside the United States.”

One can only wonder what these hostile groups might consist of, is it Islamic terrorists, or is it you and me. One can only conclude that the thrust to disarm American Citizens in violation of the Second Amendment, might be included in this plan of Martial law of the DOD. Moreover if it were the terrorists that the DOD is planning a war against then why would the Government want to disarm American citizens? This of course leaves only you and me...

“Further, the DOD would be, by necessity, an essential enabling hub for the continuity of political authority in a multi-state or nationwide civil conflict or disturbance.”
He concludes this section of the report by observing:the “DOD is already challenged by stabilization abroad. Imagine the challenges associated with doing so on a massive scale at home."

The Defense Department has made plans to deploy 20,000 troops nationwide by 2011 to help state and local officials respond to emergencies.

The 130-year-old Posse Comitatus Act’ (Wikipedia), prevents the standing army or the U.S. military from being used against it’s own citizens such as it did illegally in the Waco and the Ruby Ridge incidents. Check out what the USDOJ & Government Watch has to say about the Posse Comitatus Act Passed to prevent exactly what is now being planned.

THE BOTTOM LINE: This is what happens when we allow our government to treat our Constitution as a used piece of toilet paper…

Think about it…

de Andrae

Saturday, December 20, 2008

A Response from American International Group Inc

This is and e-mail received from AIG in response to my concerns about ‘Sharia Finance’ and AIG’s connection to Takaful an Islamic Company in the Kingdom of Bahrain (in Arabic: مملكة البحرين‎, translation: Mamlakat al-Baḥrayn,

By de Andrea

The letter from AIG

Re: Your concern about AIG/Takaful Insurance products
November 23, 2008

Dear Mr. de Andrea,

“We received your email expressing your concern over our announcement that we would begin marketing Takaful insurance products in the United States.

AIG operates around the world and endeavors to provide products that meet the diverse needs of its 74 million customers living in 130 countries and jurisdictions.

Marketing to specific ethnic constituencies is not new or unique to AIG. For instance, AIG businesses have tailored programs for a range of religious organizations, including Methodist churches and synagogues. The concept of Takaful is similar the concept of reciprocal exchange, or mutual insurance. What makes the structure somewhat different is that premiums are held in non-interest-bearing accounts, and any excess profit is distributed back to the policyholders or given to charity. While the Takaful structure is desirable to those whose religious convictions preclude them from engaging in traditional interest-bearing structures, Takaful is also increasingly popular among non-Muslims who feel that the excess charitable aspect is a socially responsible mechanism for the purchase of insurance. In the United States, AIG plans to direct excess profits to U.S. based charitable organizations. These policies are standard homeowners’ policies and are guided by U.S. law. The funds for these policies are held in Shariah-compliant, non-interest bearing accounts at HSBC.

We hope this addresses your concerns.”
Edward M. Liddy, AIG Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

While I am sure this is not from Mr. Liddy, it is likely a form response from one of his many public relations people. The AIG response is a fairly typical one that companies provide when asked about Shariah-compliant products. They usually compare Shariah-compliant products to special products offered to other religious groups, and they almost always characterize the Shariah-compliant product as “socially responsible.” Note the comparison of Muslims to “Methodist churches and synagogues” and the phrase “socially responsible mechanism.” This is certainly ‘politically correct’ and also complies with the religious philosophy of ‘Multiculturalism’.
My response back to Mr. Liddy

November 26, 2008
To AIG Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Re: your e-mail response dated November 23, 2008
Subject: Sharia compliant products:

Dear Mr. Liddy,
There are several problems with your response. First the comparison of Islam to “Methodist churches and synagogues” is a faulty comparison. Methodist churches and synagogues do not require financial products that advance religious law and oppress women or have at its core the call to violent jihad against its “non-religious” neighbors, as Shariah-compliant products do. “Shariah-compliant” is just that – in compliance with Islamic Shariah law. The tenets of Shariah Islamic law include forced child marriages, the beating, and or murder of disobedient women, death sentences for Muslims who choose to convert away from Islam, and the obligation to wage offensive military Jihad if necessary against non-Muslims for the purpose of advancing the agenda of Islamic subjugation of all countries and all people. By offering Shariah-compliant products Mr. Liddy, AIG, whether knowingly or not, is legitimizing, enabling, and endorsing Shariah law and the agenda of Islam to over throw the current American Government and Constitutional law.

Think of it this way Mr. Liddy, would AIG offer a product that was “apartheid compliant, or Communist compliant or Nazi compliant? Of course not, because AIG would know that in doing so, it would legitimize those philosophies and social agendas. To argue that a company can offer a product that is “compliant” with Shariah law, but is not legitimizing Shariah law, is disingenuous at the very least, and or ignorant. So I repeat, AIG is either knowingly or ignorantly legitimizing a religious tyrannical law system that oppresses women, moreover is supremacist, and is in fact the enemy of America.

The Muslim advisory board for AIG’s Shariah-compliant insurance includes a Muslim terrorist named Muhammed Imran Usmani, who is a “who’s who” in the Islamist world and is an outspoken proponent of aggressive jihad and terrorism against the United States. For example, he has issued numerous fatwa’s (religious rulings) that provide material support for terrorism. What “socially responsible mechanism” does AIG provide to “Methodist churches and synagogues” that has an advisory board which includes the disciple of an internationally-known advocate for terrorism?

Muslim “Charities” is a code word for terrorist organizations

In your last response you said, and I quote, “In the United States, AIG plans to direct excess profits to U.S. based charitable organizations.” As if that is a good thing. Shariah-compliant finance requires such charitable giving to go to Muslim charities not just any charity. Do you know that the word benevolence or charity does not appear in the Quran? Charity in Islam is a word deceptively borrowed from western culture. Just think about who directs where the money goes. The Shariah-compliant advisory board does, which in this case includes Muhammed Imran Usmani a disciple of an organization that is an internationally-renowned advocate of terrorism.

Mr. Liddy, currently over two dozen major Muslim so-called “Charities” have been identified by the U.S. government as having links to terrorist organizations. How many other Muslim charities do you think have links to terrorist organizations and have not yet been identified? If it looks, walks, and talks, like a duck Mr. Liddy… The recent Federal convictions in the Brotherhood/Holy Land Foundation terrorism-financing trial, illustrates the complex web that Muslim charities have created to funnel their charitable contributions to terrorist organizations. And as I said, Islam does not teach love and charity, it teaches hate, oppression, slavery, and murder.

What AIG is essentially doing, is offering a financial instrument that will in fact wind up as a conduit for funds to terrorist organizations. Even if you don’t believe that this would ever occur, why would an American company want to put itself in such a precarious position? Why would an American company want to entangle itself with an advocate for terrorism? Why would a company such as yours even take the chance that the financial product it offers could possibly end up funding terrorist organizations? How is this “socially responsible again”? What’s more Mr. Liddy, doesn’t AIG recognize that, if funds from its Shariah-compliant product was found to be going to terrorist organizations, it could be facing, at best, a public relations nightmare, and at worst, lawsuits alleging negligence, and even criminal investigations or Treason?

Should you wish to advise your legal department of the possible legal ramifications of this dangerous and un-American business venture, here is a link to a rather lengthy legal article written by David Yerushalmi, a legal expert on the issue of Shariah law, spelling out the potential civil and criminal liabilities for companies such as yours that engage in Shariah-compliant finance. Titled: SHARI’AH’S “BLACK BOX”: CIVIL LIABILITY AND CRIMINAL EXPOSURE SURROUNDING SHARI’AH-COMPLIANT FINANCE
By David Yerushalmi, Esq.∗

Thank you Mr. Liddy for your response and I hope you will reconsider your decision.

Sincerely, de Andréa
Op-ed writer and editor for ‘THE BOTTOM LINE’

THE BOTTOM LINE: I sincerely hope that this letter does in fact get to the desk of Edward M. Liddy, and as result, he takes a long look at the moral issues regarding the direction of his company as well as the un-American and legal issues surrounding his involvement in Islamic Sharia Finance not to mention the fact that this contributes to the infiltration of Islam into the culture of America. This really typifies the ignorance of not only the ordinary American citizen, who tax dollars are going to bail out AIG, but big business as well as our own governments ignorant involvement in supporting the worst enemy the world has ever known. ‘The Terrorist Nation of Islam’

Something to think about…

de Andrea

Friday, December 19, 2008

Sharia Finance Has Arrived

American International Group (AIG) one of the worlds largest Insurance and financial institutions recently found itself on the skids, but we the people came to their rescue.

By de Andréa

I have written many articles on the Islamic infiltration of America, covering the gambit from Education to the Federal Government. One such type of infiltration is in the financial institutions which I predicted was coming to the U.S. and coming fast. As far back as January I wrote about Global Islamic Finance beginning in Europe then on April 11, I wrote my first article on ‘Shariah Finance’ coming to America.

Well it has come---- and faster than I thought it would

Until now it was mainly confined to the EU since they are already subject to ‘Sharia Law’. It has likely been the financial crises that has sped up this inevitable and important quantum leap toward Islamic Jihad in America.

The article below ran on December 2, in the online “Insurance Journal,” and illustrates how Shariah-compliant finance is establishing a foothold in American financial and insurance markets. As we all know, AIG is the recipient of a massive taxpayer bailout

Take special note of the Sharia-compliant supervisory board. Muhammad Imran Usmani is the son and disciple of Muhammed Taki Usmani. The elder Usmani is a “who’s who” in the Islamist world of terrorism and an outspoken proponent of aggressive and violent jihad. For example, he has issued numerous fatwa’s (religious rulings) that provide material support for terrorism. The infiltration of Islamic Jihad in America has become so far reaching now that I can not keep pace with it. I can’t research and write fast enough and you can’t read fast enough.

The danger of American financial institutions getting into bed with well-known advocates of jihad and terrorism should be obvious to anyone who takes even a cursory look at the agenda of Islam. It was Lenin who stated “The capitalists will sell us the rope with which we will hang them.” In their thirst for capital and profits, the same corporate geniuses who gave us the sub-prime meltdown are going Lenin one better. At least the capitalists in Lenin’s day didn’t put him on their advisory boards and give him control over where money can be invested.

So, as we assemble the puzzle, we see that (1) our tax dollars are being used to bail out a huge insurance conglomerate that (2) is now offering Shariah-compliant insurance that (3) is under the direction of an advisory board that includes the son and disciple of one of the world’s leading advocates of Islamic terrorism.

Below you will read an article from the Insurance Journal that talks about the AIG adoption of an Islamic company called Takaful Enaya on the Island of Bahrain.

Originally a possession of the Persian Empire, the Kingdom of Bahrain (in Arabic: مملكة البحرين‎, translation: Mamlakat al-Baḥrayn, literally Kingdom of the Two Seas) is an island microstate in the Persian Gulf. Saudi Arabia lies to the west. Qatar is to the south across the Gulf of Bahrain.
Until Bahrain was forced to embrace Islam in AD 629, it was a center for Nestorian Christianity. In the early 7th century, Bahrain was one of the first places in Arabia to become an Islamic state. The prophet Muhammad murdered all the Christians in Bahrain despite its great distance from Muhammad’s base in Medina...

What’s in a Name?
The company name Takaful is a combination of the Arabic root word Taqi used in the word Taqiyyah which roughly translated into English, means deceit, added to the English suffix word ful making up the word deceitful. Adding AIG makes the company name, American International Group Deceitful Insurance Inc Enaya is an adopted Islamic word for insurance since there is no word in Arabic for the western word Insurance.

Islamic Takaful Insurance is based on a Quranic principle of "Ta'awon" roughly translated means mutual assistance or social program. Profits made from insurance premiums to AIG Takaful Enaya will be used to promote Jihad and terrorism in America. Under Islamic ‘Shariah Finance Law’, profits must go to ‘Islamic Charities’ which is Muslim code for terrorist’s organizations

The word “Charity “or “Benevolence” does not appear in the Quran

AIG Offers First Takaful Homeowners Insurance Product for U.S.
December 2, 2008
Original article:

Source: AIG Commercial Insurance

Risk Specialists Companies, Inc. (RSC), a subsidiary of AIG Commercial Insurance, is introducing what it says is a first in the U.S.: a homeowners insurance product that is compliant with key Islamic finance tenets and based on the concept of mutual insurance.

The Takaful Homeowners Policy is underwritten through RSC member company A.I. Risk Specialists Insurance, Inc., in conjunction with Lexington Insurance Co. and in association with AIG Takaful Enaya. Headquartered in Bahrain, AIG Takaful Enaya was established in 2006 to provide Takaful products, including accident and health, auto, energy, property and casualty products.

The Takaful home policy is the first installment in Lexington Takaful Solutions, a series of Shari'ah-compliant (Takaful) product offerings in the U.S.

According to Ernst & Young's 2008 World Takaful Report, Takaful was estimated to be a $5.7 billion market globally with over 130 providers in 2006. The Takaful market is estimated to be in excess of $10 billion by 2010.

Takaful is similar to mutual insurance and cooperative risk sharing but there are key differences including a clear segregation of funds owned by participants and those owned by the insurance operations entity. Investments of funds are also restricted to avoid companies involved in entertainment, alcohol, pork and other elements prohibited by Islamic law.

Muslim countries only account for 5 percent of the global insurance market although they represent 25 percent of the world's population, according to AIG, which launched its Takaful operation in October 2006. The Takaful Homeowners Policy builds on LexElite, the homeowner’s policy from Lexington that is sold throughout the U.S. The Takaful Homeowners Policy is available in all 50 states.

According to Jim Crain, associate vice president and personal lines underwriting director for Risk Specialists, the coverage, terms, commissions, and sales procedures are the same for these new products as they are for LexElite.

"The introduction of Takaful products in the U.S. represents an important and emerging growth opportunity for AIG Commercial Insurance. We are pleased to offer socially responsible solutions to this segment of the domestic market," said Matthew F. Power, president, Risk Specialists Companies, Inc.

AIG Takaful Enaya is licensed by the Central Bank of Bahrain and its Shari'ah Supervisory Board is composed of Shari'ah scholars Sheikh Nizam Yaquby, Dr. Mohammed Ali Elgari and Dr. Muhammad Imran Usmani.

Risk Specialists Companies, Inc. is a U.S. surplus lines broker providing access to specialty casualty, property and personal lines insurance from Lexington and other AIG companies.


Read More on this subject,
Posted: December 05, 2008 By Chelsea Schilling of WorldNetDaily

THE BOTTOM LINE : as I stated previously, profits made from insurance premiums to AIG Takaful Enaya in Bahrain will be used to promote Jihad and terrorism in America. Under Shariah Finance Law, Profits must go to Islamic Charities which is Muslim code for terrorist’s organizations.

Islam is a socialist theocracy, meaning that incorporated into the religion of Islam is their form of Government ruled by Islamic Shariah law, (much as we are founded on our Constitutional Law). Shariah Law supports a type of Social Fascism, dictated totally by Shariah.

The question begging to be asked, is doesn’t AIG understand Sharia Law? Answer, I don’t believe the Board of directors of AIG have clue, anymore than the U.S. Government does about the agenda of Islam in America. Somehow no matter what history teaches us about the 1400 on going years of the Jihad of Islam, never missing a beat, never changing one bit or deviating from their ‘Qu’ranic Program’ of supremacy and the subjection of all the worlds’ people, the establishment of the “Ummah” the world Nation of Islam, the West is still under the supernatural satanic spell of Allah. The “Taqiyyah” is a form of deception taught all through the Quran and the Hadith. It is best translated as ‘True Lies”, deceiving one, using a form of the truth, a very powerful type of satanic deception.

For you history buffs, this Taqiyyah deception has been used by Allah since the very beginnings of our documented time, try roughly 4000 BC and again in 610 AD. It has been used to change the course of history as well as the future of mankind, and it is still being used today. Can you see through this deception???

Think about it….

But as for you, be strong; don't be discouraged, for your work has a reward. 2 Chronicles 15:7

de Andrea

Thursday, December 18, 2008

The U.S. Government is Financing Terrorism

Law suit filed this past Monday

By de Andréa
December 18, 2008

Thomas More Law Center filed suit this Monday morning against the U.S. Treasury and the Federal Reserve Board. The Thomas More Law Center president Richard Thompson is asking the court to halt all bailout funds from going to American International Group, Inc. (AIG). Thompson explains why.

"Because that company has a branch that is controlled by Islamic scholars and who basically support the religion of Islam through Shariah and ultimately finance terrorist activities," he says.

Please watch a 25 minute video discussion from the American Family Association about this important issue. Click Here

The discussion reveals some of what I have been writing about for years, Islamic Sharia Law is not only coming to the west as I have been warning, but it is now here in America.

Although the panel on the video does not fully understand Islam, they are at least learning the obvious. They do understand the fundamental truth, that If the American people do not take charge of their own destiny then our own deceived government will lead them into the subjugation of Islam. Moreover as the sign says, Islam will dominate the world.

This video will give you just a peek through the crack in the fence, of the infiltration of Islam into the culture of the west.

The dirty little secret is that we are helping them achieve their agenda of world domination. Listen carefully to the part where thry discuss the Muslim mind...

Read the last article I wrote about Sharia Finance

de Andréa

Wednesday, December 17, 2008

Bill of Rights Day

Imagine todays Washington D.C. Gun Ban Law in 1775

By de Andréa
December 17, 2008

How can the people vote for a President that doesn’t believe in the Bill of Rights? President Elect Barry Hussein Soetoro or Barack Hussein Obama or Barry Hussein Dunham or what ever his name is, born some where on planet Earth, I think, does not believe in the Bill of Rights, and therefore does not believe in America. Barry is for example, more against the right of the American people to maintain the security a free state than King George the III was before the American Revolution.

But this is obviously what the people want, to be ruled by King Barack Hussein Obama the II

Does anybody know what the British were coming to do in 1776, when Paul Revere rode all over the country side shouting---“The British are coming, the British are coming”. Well I can guarantee you, it wasn’t to collect the tea tax. No---the British were coming to collect all the firearms from all the colonists, just as Hitler did in Europe and just as Obama plans to do here in the near future.

Monday December 15 was the little known and never celebrated ‘United States´ Bill of Rights Day,(possibly because our rights are a thing of the past) however, the District of Columbia residents are second-class citizens when it comes to the Second Amendment right/privilege. President-elect Barack Obama certainly does not support it, even as a privilege.

When an amicus brief was filed with the Supreme Court this June supporting the respondent in District of Columbia v. Heller on behalf of 55 senators, the senate president, and 250 representatives as well as the American people and the residents of D.C., Obama declined. Moreover, his voting record in the Illinois State legislature and the U.S. Congress has been more hostile to American gun owners than King George III was in 1775.

What’s in store for the Second Amendment which as the Amendment says “is necessary for the security of a Free State”, come January?

Imagine that at Lexington and Concord, British Major John Pitcairn did not shout "Disperse you Rebels—damn you, throw down your Arms and disperse!” …and that the shot heard ´round the world was not fired. Imagine that instead he read to the assembled colonists the following decree by British Commander-in-Chief General Thomas Gage, modeled of course after the newly-minted and revised 2008 District of Columbia gun ban law:

This even though the Supreme recently ruled that “…the right to keep and bear arms”... is in fact an individual right as the Amendment says. No--- as I have so often said, we have no rights at all, what we have here are privileges with a plethora of restrictions, bans, and rules.

The Newly Revised Washington DC Second Amendment gun ban law…

1. Bans "assault weapons," defined by a long list of various rifles, pistols, and shotguns, and concludes with the catch-all: "Any firearm that the Fuhrer may designate as an assault weapon by rule.” Anyone who disobeys will be imprisoned, ‘said’ with a distinct German accent.

2. Requires all non-banned firearms to be registered with the Fuhrer, who promises, of course, never to confiscate them, wink, wink—unless you forget to register them, that is—and "registration certificates shall of course expire three years after the date of issuance unless renewed."

3. A non-banned pistol can be registered, but only "for use in self-defense within that person’s home.” You cannot defend yourself with it even in the home, because it must be locked up and unloaded. You cannot defend yourself outside the home. "The Fuhrer shall require any registered pistol to be submitted for a ballistics identification procedure and shall establish a tribute/payola to be paid for such a procedure.” Oh! and only one pistol can be registered in a thirty-day period.

4. Within two years—1777 for the colonists, 2010 for D.C. residents—you will go to prison and be put in stocks if you have a pistol that is not "microstamp ready" or is an "unsafe pistol" as determined by weirdoes in the Nazi Fascist state of California.

5. Knapsacks with more than ten rounds of ammunition are banned as "large capacity ammunition feeding devices.” Essentially, you will be arrested if you have eleven or more rounds.

Of course the "Fuhrer" is the Chief of Police, but these quotes came directly from the new law. Imagine that the colonists reverently surrendered their "assault weapons" and sought to register their non-banned arms and pay the Chief his "tribute/payola” Imagine that our founders were a bunch of sheepish wimps like we have today in our country who remained subservient to royal tyranny instead of demanding the American Revolution. Imagine that two centuries later we delegated all power to the California legislature and that in Heller v. District of Columbia c (2008), D.C. lost instead of won.
Thankfully, that was not the case. The Supreme Court did ruled against the unconstitutional Washington D.C. gun ban, and held its handgun ban to be in violation of the Second Amendment’s "right of the people to keep and bear arms.” But with Obama’s recent appointment of the Fascist Eric Holder as his attorney general and D.C.´s determination to leave its citizens helpless against the criminals the police can’t control, and won’t respond to, history shows you can’t hold your breath waiting for others to protect your rights or your life. It seems the colonists at Lexington and Concord had it right.

It’s too bad we don’t have the guts to do the same today.

Or--- maybe it's coming…

de Andréa

Tuesday, December 16, 2008

Offend a homosexual ... Go to prison for 5 years

Teachers, pastors facing 'criminalization of homophobia'

By de Andréa

December 16, 2008

Christians will face prison for speaking out against homosexuality if the Senate passes a bill approved unanimously by the House of Representatives.

The measure is considered the country's newest attempt to promote homosexuality, disguised as an act to combat discrimination, the Catholic News Agency reports.

If anyone prevents actions of "homosexual affection in public or private locations open to the public, they could face up to five years in prison for doing so, the Association of the Defense of Life reports.

The bill also seeks to penalize private and public school administrators with up to three years in prison if they refuse to hire openly "gay" teachers.

According to the CNA, the measure will force prison time for any "moral, ethical, philosophical, or psychological expression that questions homosexual practices."

The ADL claims the bill could spell disaster for churches and teachers.

"[A] priest, a pastor, a teacher or even an average citizen who says in a sermon, a classroom, or public conversation that homosexual acts are sinful, disordered or an illness could be denounced and detained," the association said.

No, this is not in America, not yet anyway. This is now happening in the country of Brazil. A few months ago, the president of Brazil said "opposing" homosexuality makes you a sick person, and he believes such thoughts need to be criminalized. This should remind you of somthing. The thought police maybe...

Brazilian chief Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva, who won a narrow re-election following a cash-for-votes scandals, held the First National Conference of Gays, Lesbians, Bisexuals, Transvestites and Transsexuals to condemn the biblical belief that homosexuality is wrong.

Lula da Silva, on June 5, not only officially opened the event to promote homosexuality across his nation but also issued a presidential sanction for the conference.
Calling for "the criminalization of homophobia," he said opposition to homosexuality is "perhaps the most perverse disease impregnated in the human head."

He said "prejudiced" people need to "open their minds and clean them.” Other speakers encouraged homosexuals to claim to be part of a civil rights campaign that already has brought reforms for treatment of blacks, the elderly, and the disabled. They also announced the nation's public hospitals soon would begin to perform sex changes on people.

THE BOTTOM LINE: Can’t happen in America? Yes it can. If it can happen anywhere it can happen here. Especially if we sit like potatoes in our lap of luxury thinking nothing bad can touch us, after all we have freedom of speech and live in a free country don’t we? I have a question for you. What makes you think so?

The truth be known, we lost our freedom a long time ago. The first time a law was past regulating just one of our rights. That was the day our rights became privileges, regulated by a dictatorial government and we did nothing. If we allow evil to gain just a toe in the door we may as well just open the door wide and allow the government into our homes, and every aspect of our lives. If we don’t stop the destruction of our culture at the first sign of encroachment or infringement, then we have given up all of our rights and freedoms.

A democracy is a government by the few because the many do nothing. This is why democracy is the last type of government the framers of our constitution wanted, they shuddered at the thought. So they created a Constitutional Republic which we allowed to be destroyed already back in May of 1913 with the passing of the 17th Amendment which created a true democracy in America making it easy for the few to run the country. That coupled with the 16th Amendment making our government grow from something the people could manage to the largest most powerful government in the world.

That was the big toe in the door. All the rest are little toes, and they have been walking through the door ever since.

Think about it…

de Andrea

Wednesday, December 10, 2008

Obama Proclaiming His Presidency To The Islamic World

Barack Hussein Obammah will speak to the ‘Muslim Brotherhood’ in Cairo in his first 100 days.

By de Andréa

Barack Obama is planning a major foreign policy speech in an Islamic capital during his first 100 days as president in an effort to mend rifts between the U.S. and the Muslim world. Just how does one “MEND RIFTS” with a Muslim, let alone an entire world full of them? The only way, as Obama knows well, to “mend rifts” with Islam is to submit to Islam and Sharia Law.

Is this what Obama is planning? That is exactly what he is planning---Although… I guarantee you it will not be that subtle. You can expect a little slight of hand, an old Islamic doctrine called Taqiyyah; it is one of those nasty things found in the Quran.

Helene Cooper of The New York Times spoke to several sources, including diplomats, about which Islamic capital Obama might choose, and the consensus was Cairo, Egypt.

The reason: Process of elimination.
A speech in Baghdad would appear to validate the Iraq war, which Obama as a Muslim must of course be opposed. A visit to Damascus, the Syrian capital, “would look as if he was rewarding the Syrians”, said Ziad Asali, president of the American Task Force on Palestine, a Palestinian terrorist organization, “that it is just too soon for that,” he told Cooper. Stealth and incrementally is the way to properly deceive the stupid Kuffaar.

Asali also ruled out:
 Ramallah on the West Bank, noting that “Palestinians seek Jerusalem as their capital.”
 Tehran in Iran. “Too soon for that.” Amman, Jordan. “Been there, done that.”
 Islamabad, Pakistan. “Too dangerous.”
 Ankara, Turkey. “Too safe.”
 As for Jakarta, Indonesia, where Obama spent part of his youth, “people would yawn about that,” said Asali. One of Obama’s foreign policy advisers ruled out Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, and other capitals around the Persian Gulf.

Cooper concluded: “It’s got to be Cairo. Egypt is perfect, moreover, it is the home of the Muslim Brotherhood, a terrorest organisation which operates freely in the U.S. It’s certainly Muslim enough, populous enough and relevant enough. It’s an American ally, but there are enough tensions in the relationship that the choice will feel bold.”

Why don’t we just all invite a Muslim to lunch this week and show them that we’re a regular bunch this week? We could all have a group hug and all get along… Yes we could do that, providing we all converted to Islam, adopt ‘Sharia Law’ and help carry out the Muslim agenda of bringing the world under submission to Allah.

I think I am actually going to be Sick…

Whichever of the enemies Muslim capitals Obama might choose, press reports don’t explain why Obama feels it necessary to give a speech to our enemy so early in his new administration. Setting the stage for surrender I suppose.

During the presidential campaign Obama indicated U.S. foreign policy was too skewed in favor of Israel and that he would seek a balanced approach in his administration. Oh sure, a balance between Jews and Supremacists, as I recall that didn’t work out so good with the Nazi’s.

Obama is still dogged with claims that he is a secret Muslim, an accusation he denied. Of course, it wouldn’t be stealth if he actually told the truth straight out now would it?

In fact, Obama has been raised a Muslim and continued his Muslim religion when meeting the Rev. Jeremiah Wright a Black Muslim of the Malcolm X and the Farrakhan group in his early 20s after he moved to Chicago.

Obama was born in Kenya, his father was a Muslim. His Mother divorced this man and later remarried an Indonesian Muslim who became Obama’s Muslim stepfather. Obama claimed his Mother was and American Christian, I’m sorry, it is real hard for me… no, impossible for me to believe that a Christian woman would marry not one, but two Muslim men who what nothing more than to kill Christians.

The couple moved to Indonesia with the young Obama. There he gave up his Kenyan citizenship and became a citizen of Indonesia, to be able to register at two schools as a Muslim student.

Earlier this year, Obama campaign spokesman Robert Gibbs claimed: "Senator Obama has never been a Muslim, was not raised a Muslim, and is a committed Christian." One can only wonder how being a committed Christian fits into all this Muslim stuff…I mean just when and how did his Christian conversion occur???

In his autobiography, "Dreams From My Father," Obama mentions studying the Koran and describes the public schools as “Muslim schools.” Obama’s campaign web site later removed the claim made by Gibbs that Obama was not a Muslim.

THE BOTTOM LINE: Let’s take the present, encapsulate it, and bring it back into history, just a little. It is not so far back that one would have to refer to an old dusty history book in order to find the story. There are many of us left that were children at the time and have either heard the story’s first hand like me, or were even adults at the time.

Let’s say that it was 1942 and a candidate for president was born in the United States from an American Christian Mother and a German Nazi Father. The mother divorced the baby’s father, married yet another German Nazi and moved to Germany where the boy was sent to Nazi schools, and indoctrinated as a Nazi. Later, as the boy grew up. his mother brought him back to the US where the Nazi party paid for his education in American Ivy league schools. After he finished school in the late 1930’s he went to Chicago, married a political Nazi, and after hooking up with the criminal political machine there in Chicago he went into politics. With the help of the underground political criminals there he became a State Senator. And later ran for the US Senate where he won as well. After a couple of years in the US Senate he made a run for President of the United States against another US Senator, a decorated American war hero and again with the help of the criminal underground and his Nazi supporters in Germany won the Presidency in 1942. He was inaugurated in January of 1943 right in the middle of the Second World War with the Nazi’s.

Now bear in mind, every one in America knew about his associations with known criminals and anti Americans, enemies of the State, as well as his Nazi supporters, his Nazi background, and dual German /American citizenship.

Although this may sound like an impossible made up night mare of a story, that couldn’t possibly have happened, it is nevertheless absolutely true and it did in fact happen in history.

The part :( Couldn’t possibly have happened) is partially correct, because it couldn’t possibly have happened in 1942, but it did happen in 2008.

This is a documented overlay of our President Barrack Hussein Obama, and as they say only the names and places have been changed.

Think about it…

de Andréa

Tuesday, December 09, 2008

Another Twist In Obama’s Citizenship Case

The Supreme Court is finishing up its deliberation today on whether or not they will hear the case of Obama’s citizenship.

By de Andrae

With protesters gathering and praying on the front steps, the U.S. Supreme Court met again in conference today to discuss whether or not to hear a case challenging Barack Obama's eligibility to be president.

Even if Obama was born in the United States at the very least Obama holds dual citizenship with the U.K. said writer and protester Roger Bredow. Like Obama, Bredow is "A British citizen, and a citizen of the United States, at birth."

According to Bredow – and the case the Supreme Court reviewed today – even dual citizenship makes Obama ineligible to take the oath of office. Apparently Kenya at the time of Obama’s fathers birth was under British control and anyone born in Kenya at that time was a British citizen, making Obama’s father a British citizen and even if Obama was physically born in the U.S. he would by law hold dual citizenship British and American, making him ineligible to run for president of the United States. This coupled with the fact that Indonesia does not allow any kind of dual citizenship and requires that students attending public school be citizens of Indonesia, he would have been forced to give up any other citizenship he might of had. So no matter what country Obama was a citizen of, he would not be a natural born citizen of the United States under U.S. Constitutional law. No one knows what Passport Obama traveled on to Pakistan, American, British, Kenyan, or Indonesian. Moreover, no one really knows what his name is. Is it Barack Hussein Obama or Barry Soetoro or Barry Obama or Barry Dunham???

That being said it is still highly doubtful that the Supreme Court will decide to hear the case, if for no other reason than it would open up a can of worms as well as making America an embarrassment to the rest of the world.

The case of Leo Donofrio verses New Jersey Secretary of State Nina Mitchell Wells, which claims Obama does not meet the Constitution's Article 2, Section 1 "natural-born citizen" requirement for president, was initially denied a hearing by Supreme Court Justice David H. Souter, but Justice Clarence Thomas agreed to bring it back for review again today. In order to go forward in the process, the case needs four of the Supreme Court's nine justices to approve a full hearing.

In the Picture "To be honest with you," Bredow confessed, "I thought I might be the only person here in front of the Supreme Court today."

Donofrio's original suit sought a court order to stop the Nov. 4 presidential election. When that was denied, he amended his complaint to stop the Electoral College from certifying Obama as the winning candidate when it meets Dec. 15.

Unlike many of the lawsuits regarding Obama's "natural-born citizen" status, the Donofrio case makes no allegation that Obama was born on foreign soil. Instead, Donofrio contends Obama was a British citizen at birth, because of his fathers citizenship in Kenya, a British colony.

"Don't be distracted by the birth certificate and Indonesia issues," Donofrio writes on his Natural Born Citizen blog. "They are irrelevant to Senator Obama's ineligibility to be president. Since Barack Obama’s father was a citizen of Kenya and therefore subject to the jurisdiction of the United Kingdom at the time of Senator Obama's birth, then Senator Obama was a British citizen 'at birth.”

Obama's website confirms that Donofrio is correct about the Democrat's citizenship at birth, but says his dual citizenship with Britain expired, leaving him with only American citizenship.

Donfrio, however, contends that the Constitution was written in such a way to exclude dual citizens like Obama.

"The Framers of the Constitution, at the time of their birth," Donofrio writes, "were also British citizens, and that's why the Framers declared that, while they were citizens of the United States, they themselves were not 'natural born citizens."

"Therefore," Donofrio summarizes, "even if he were to produce an original birth certificate proving he was born on U.S. soil, he still wouldn't be eligible to be president."
The Donofrio's case is only one of many cases challenging Obama's eligibility to be elected president under the Constitution.

The California case states, "There is a reasonable and common expectation by the voters that to qualify for the ballot, the individuals running for office must meet minimum qualifications as outlined in the federal and state Constitutions and statutes, and that compliance with those minimum qualifications has been confirmed by the officials overseeing the election process," the complaint said, when in fact the only current documentation is a signed statement from the candidate attesting to those qualifications.

"Since [the secretary of state] has, as its core, the mission of certifying and establishing the validity of the election process, this writ seeks a Court Order barring SOS from certifying the California Electors until documentary proof that Senator Obama is a 'natural born' citizen of the United States of America

"This proof could include items such as his original birth certificate, showing the name of the hospital and the name and the signature of the doctor, all of his passports with immigration stamps, and verification from the governments where the candidate has resided, verifying that he did not, and does not, hold citizenship of these countries, and any other documents that certify an individual’s citizenship and/or qualification for office.

The "certification of live birth” posted by the Obama campaign is just that, a "certification of live birth” and not an official American birth certificate and cannot be viewed as authoritative for proof of citizenship, the case alleges.

"Hawaii Revised Statute 338-178 allows registration of birth in Hawaii for a child that was born outside of Hawaii to parents who, for a year preceding the child’s birth, claimed Hawaii as their place of residence. The only way to know where Senator Obama was actually born is to view Senator Obama's original birth certificate from 1961 that shows the name of the hospital and the name and signature of the doctor that delivered him."

The case also raises the circumstances of Obama's time during his youth in Indonesia, where he was listed as having Indonesian citizenship. Indonesia does not allow dual citizenship, raising the possibility of Obama's mother having given up his U.S. and British citizenship.

Any subsequent U.S. citizenship then, the case claims, would be "naturalized," not "natural-born.” A technicality maybe, but that is the way the law is.

de Andréa

Friday, December 05, 2008

Natural Born Clause in Constitution Stupid

The natural born clause in the Constitution is stupid, so says Sarah Herlihy an associate lawyer in a Chicago-based firm. She has advocated for the elimination of the U.S. Constitution's requirement that a president must be a "natural-born" citizen, calling the requirement "stupid" and asserting it discriminates, is outdated and undemocratic.

By de Andréa

This long awaited case goes before the U.S. Supreme Court today. The Supreme Court Justices will decide whether they will hear the case.

The paper was written in 2006 by Sarah Herlihy, not so coincidently; just two years after Obama had won a landslide election in Illinois to the U.S. Senate. Herlihy is listed as an associate at the Chicago firm of Kirkland & Ellis..

Click here to read the article by Herlihy, it is available online under law review articles from Kent University. The issue is the subject of nearly two dozen court cases in recent weeks, including at least two that have gone to the U.S. Supreme Court.

There have been substantiated accusations that Obama was born in Mambassa Kenya, not Hawaii as his campaign has stated. His paternal grandmother has stated she was in attendance at his birth in Mombassa. While Hawaii officials say they have seen his birth certificate, they have declined to release information from it.

The Certification of Live Birth from Hawaii that the Obama campaign posted on the Internet is not considered by critics to be authentic and thereby doesn’t resolve the issue, since during the 1960s when Obama was born, the new state issued the document to infants not necessarily born in Hawaii

There also remain unanswered questions about his youth, when he lived and attended school in Indonesia which requires Indonesian citizenship, and later when he traveled to Pakistan which didn’t at that time allow U.S. passports. The questions include whether he gave up a U.S. citizenship to attend school or traveled on another nation's passport to Pakistan at a time when U.S. passports were unwelcome there.

Answers to those issues could determine whether Obama meets the Constitution's demand for a "natural-born" citizen.

Herlihy's published paper reveals that the requirement likely was considered in a negative light by organizations linked to Obama in the months before he announced in 2007 his candidacy for the presidency.

"The natural born citizen requirement in Article II of the United States Constitution has been called the 'stupidest provision' in the Constitution, "undecidedly un-American," "blatantly discriminatory," and the "Constitution's worst provision," Herlihy begins in her introduction to the paper titled, "Amending the Natural Born Citizen Requirement: Globalization as the Impetus and the Obstacle."

What Sarah Herlihy doesn’t seem to realize, is that one must change the Constitution before the fact, not subsequent to electing a foreign Muslim as president of the United States.

She concludes that the "emotional" reasons to oppose changing the Constitution will prevail over the "rational" reasons demanding a change.

"The current American perceptions about the effects of globalization and the misunderstanding about what globalization actually is will result in Americans deciding that naturalized citizens should not be president because this would, in effect, be promoting globalization, Herlihy wrote.

"Although this argument is admittedly circular, because globalization is the thing that makes the need to abolish the requirement more and more persuasive, Americans' subsequent perceptions about globalization are the very things that will prevent Americans from embracing the idea of eliminating the natural born requirement.
"Logical Americans are looking for a reason to ignore the rational reasons promoted by globalization so that they may vote based on their own emotions and instincts," she wrote.

Read all the evidence about Obama's birthplace in Jerome Corsi's "The Obama Nation."

She blamed support for the constitutional provision on "fear, racism, religious intolerance, or blind faith in the decisions of the Founding Fathers."

In the body of her argument, Herlihy said the constitutional provision simply is outdated.
"Considering that the Founding Fathers presumably included the natural born citizen clause in the Constitution partly out of fear of foreign subversion, the current stability of the American government and the intense media scrutiny of presidential candidates virtually eliminates the possibility of a 'foreigner' coming to America, becoming a naturalized citizen, generating enough public support to become president, and somehow using the presidency to directly benefit his homeland," she wrote.

"The natural born citizen clause of the United States Constitution should be repealed for numerous reasons. Limiting presidential eligibility to natural born citizens discriminates against naturalized citizens, is outdated and undemocratic, and incorrectly assumes that birthplace is a proxy for loyalty.” Many of the reasons for keeping the limit, she wrote, "are based primarily on emotion."

THE BOTTOM LINE: Today, Friday, December 5, 2008 the U.S. Supreme Court will look at the evidence and decide if they will hear the case of Obama’s questionable citizenship.

A web blogger suggested, "So it sure looks like Obama's people have looked into the matter of 'natural born' as far back as early 2006. What is even more disturbing is that it would appear that they are following the thought of: 'If the facts do not support the theory, destroy the facts!"

"Garbage he says"

Article 2, Section 1, of the Constitution of the United States, "No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty-five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States."

This is garbage says a spokesman for the Obama campaign

Ill have you know, Mr. Barrack Hussein Obammah, the Constitution of the United States is NOT "garbage" and furthermore, securing the rights of the people under the Constitution is NOT "garbage" either!The Obama campaign's response is an elitist, condescending ‘hate America’ slap in the face of all Americans, even the ones deceived enough to vote for him. No one is above the law and Team Obama cannot make the question of Obama's eligibility go away by disrespecting the American people - and the Constitution of the United States.

de Andréa

Thursday, December 04, 2008

Mumbai Terrorists Were From The U.K. And Pakistan

The al-Qa'ida-linked Lashkar-e-Toiba involved in the Mumbai massacre were Mushahadeen terrorists trained in Muzaffarabad, capital of Kashmir, they were incited by speeches from their leader in Lahore.

By de Andréa

Yes the terrorists in the Mumbai attack were from Pakistan and England. Both Pakistan and the U.K. are Islamic States under Sharia law, and would you believe allies of the U.S.

As the sole surviving terrorist was interrogated in Mumbai, security sources said that 10 terrorists were picked by LET (Lashkar-e-Toiba) for the suicide mission. Typical of the Islamic agenda, they were ordered to "kill until your last breath" and murder up to 5000 people. They did so after provocative speeches by Hafiz Mohammed Saeed last month in Lahore, capital of the Punjab.

Saeed, described as LET's supreme religious and political head, declared in one speech: "The only language India understands is that of force, and that is the language it must be talked to in." Ironically it is also the only language that Islam understands.

The email claiming responsibility for the Mumbai attack minutes after it started last Wednesday was generated on a computer based in Pakistan Americas closest ally in the Middle East besides Israel. A satellite telephone captured from the terrorists revealed calls made to numbers in Pakistan during the attacks.

Officials said the terrorists' route to Mumbai had been recorded on GPS co-ordinates contained in the satellite phones. The 10 terrorists -- most of whom were Pakistanis -- were ordered to undergo training to attack Mumbai. The captured gunman, Ajmal Amir Kamal, 21, reportedly told intelligence sources the group had trained openly in Muzaffarabad before heading to the nearby Mangala dam for lessons in marine commando techniques.

The group then visited Rawalpindi, which adjoins Islamabad, the Pakistan capital and site of the Pakistan army headquarters. From there, the group took a train to the port city of Karachi, where, heavily armed, they boarded a freighter for the trip to Mumbai. Along the way, they became nervous about Indian coastguard activity and almost aborted the mission.

They "dragooned" a less conspicuous, passing fishing boat into service, shooting dead four of its crew members. The skipper of the fishing boat and another crew member took them closer to Mumbai before they, too, were killed in typical Islamic fassionOne was decapitated and the other had his throat slit.

Close to shore, they transferred to small speedboats for the run into the two landing points they had selected in Mumbai - Sassoon Docks and Badhwar Park, on Cuff Parade.
Conflicting evidence obtained by intelligence agencies suggests that the group may have had local support, and that one or more of its members may have been staying locally, possibly even in the Taj Mahal hotel.

A British link to the attacks was raised over the weekend when a senior Indian official claimed that Brit’s were among the militants. Vilasrao Deshmukh, the chief minister of Maharashtra state, in which Mumbai lies, was quoted on an Indian television station as saying that British citizens had been detained. British MP Patrick Mercer, a former Tory security spokesman, said he had been given information that at least two of the terrorists had credit cards and other identifying documents that linked them to Dewsbury, West Yorkshire, in northeast England.

MI5 and British counter-terrorist police are keeping in close touch with their counterparts in India and are alert to the possibility that Brit’s with Pakistani origins might have been involved. Significant numbers of young British Pakistanis have taken part in terrorist training in Pakistan.
Terror analyst Praveen Swami said that at a meeting of key LET leaders in Lahore on October 19, LET leader Saeed, who insists he is only head of the Jamaat-ud-Dawa welfare organisation, made plain his view of Pakistan's neighbour. "India, he claimed, was building dams in (Indian-controlled) Jammu and Kashmir to choke Pakistan's water supplies and cripple its agriculture,"

Mr Swami reported Saeed as saying. "Earlier, in an October 6 speech, Saeed claimed that India had 'made a deal with the United States to send 150,000 Indian troops to Afghanistan' and that it agreed to support the US in its existential war against Islam.

Finally, in a sermon to a congregation at the Jamia Masjid al-Qudsia (mosque) in Lahore at the end of October, Saeed proclaimed that there was an 'ongoing war in the world between Islam and its enemies'.

THE BOTTOM LINE: I wish the world understood what Hafiz Mohammed Saeed proclaimed: “that there was an 'ongoing war in the world between Islam and its enemies'”. Islam understands this, the West does not. We blindly believe that we are at war with a very, very few extremists / insurgents / terrorists, anyone but God forbid the Nation of Islam. The West has been in a World War since at least the turn of the century and we haven’t yet identified who we are at war with.

Europe has already lost the war with Islam and they are not even aware of it. You think there might be a deception going in here? Could the entire Western World be under the satanic spell of Allah’s deception as is taught in the Quran and the Hadith? Ya think???

Homegrown Islamic Brit’s have attacked England’s subway system and now Mumbai (Bombay) India. Soon homegrown ‘American Muslims’ who are already traveling to Pakistan for terrorists training will be attacking Americans in America as well as in Israel and anywhere there are Christians and Jews.

The main targets in Mumbai were American and British Christians, murdered by Pakistani and British Muslims. Within the next decade America too will be an Islamic State under Sharia Law. That is unless we wake up from the satanic spell of Islamic deception.

Every time another terror attack by the militants of the Nation of Islam occurs it is a wakeup-call to the Western world. But alas we are deceptively content to sleep, lying down on our lounges by the pool sipping our Mint-Juleps and wishing for better days

I have news for ya-all, better days are not forthcoming unless we ------ and yes that includes you Mint-Julep sipping lounge potatoes, get up and contact your State and Federal Representatives and tell them that you want the government to stop interfering and screwing up the business of private enterprise and Capitalism and start doing their Constitutional job of protecting this Nation from the foreign Nation of Islam. The State of Michigan now has a larger Muslim Terrorist population than the entire country of Afghanistan.

There are now more ‘Hamas Terrorists’ in America than in the Gaza Strip. Every Mosque in the United States teaches the Islamic Jihad of America, by infiltration of Government, Financial institutions, Schools, Cities, Churches, etc. and the eventual establishment of an Islamic State and Sharia Law as they have already done in Great Britain. Even the Arch Bishop of Canterbury now bows down to Sharia Law.

The war with Islam my friend is not going on in the Middle East or in some faraway foreign land. It is going on right here in America, right in your own State, possibly in your own town or neighborhood. If is hasn’t yet effected you personally, it will. And when it does it will be too late to do anything about it, short of defending your own life and the lives of your family. The question is, are you prepared to do that?

If not, I would suggest that you fight against Islmic Jihad now while it is still non violent. You can do this easily even from your pool side.

What can you do???
Join Act for America If you haven’t already done so, then do yourself and your family a favor; educate yourselves about Islam. The quickest, easiest, and least expensive way to get started is by going to my general web site THE BOTTOM LINE and page down and read all the articles on Islam and then buy two books from a lady who isn’t afraid of Islam or telling the truth about what is going on in America, and who has devoted her entire life to saving your lives and your freedom.

Brigitte Gabriel lost her childhood and nearly lost her life to first -- the same cultural Jihad of infiltration that we are also now experiencing, in America, and second, the subsequent violent Jihad of Lebanon in the 1970’s. She writes her riveting story in a book called Because They Hate” it’s about growing up from ages 10 to 17, with bullets and rockets flying over her head. She lived in a hole in the ground, in the middle of a war zone of violent Islamic terror for seven years. Even her warm fuzzy so-call moderate Muslim neighbors turned on her and her family because Brigitte and her parents were Christian Lebanese (Phoenicians) and this was, after all, the Islamic Jihad of Lebanon and they were the hated Kaffaar...

If you contribute nothing toward this war against Islamic Cultural Jihad going on right now, right here in America, then you had better prepare yourself for the violent, militant Jihad that follows. And if you don’t prepare yourself for a bloody war in the streets of your neighborhood, then you had better prepare yourself and your family for death…I don’t know how I can make it any clearer than that.

In her latest book They Must Be Stopped subtitled, Why We Must Defeat Radical Islam and How We Can Do It, you will have your eyes opened to the true agenda of all Muslims.

The following is an example of some of the chapter titles that will give you an idea of how dynamic and hard-hitting this book addresses the issues. "Purists Drink Their Islam Straight" "The Muslim Brotherhood Project for North America" "Reviving the Caliphate: One World Nation under Allah, Super-sizing the Muslim World" "The Subtle Islamization Agenda: Boiling the West Alive" "Madrassas in America and Abroad: Molding an Islamofascist Youth"

The same cultural Jihad that preceded the war or (violent Jihad) in the predominantly Christian Democratic Nation of Lebanon exists right now, right here; in America.

How do we stop it? You and your whole family can get started by joining with Brigitte and me, and join Act for America, click here to receive a free online subscription to her news letters, and then by reading her two books. Just click on the titles Because They Hate and They Must Be Stopped to order the books on line.

Once you have learned about the agenda of Islam unfolding right here in America in front of the blind eyes of our government and Homeland Security, as well as the Islamic indoctrination of our children in our public schools. Then you can intelligently contact your Federal, State, and local Representatives and tell them what you know. Trust me; you will know more than they do about the infiltration of cultural Jihad in America. Can’t happen here you say? Think again, it is already happening here and has already happened to America’s greatest Ally, Great Britain. The British people are already living under Sharia law. Parliamentary law is surreptitiously and incrementally disappearing and Great Britain has become The Great Islamic State of Britannia.

The alternative to this is, to continue in ignorance and enable Islam to surreptitiously and incrementally infiltrate our society just as they did in the more than a dozen other country’s in the world that are today existing under the bondage of Islamic terror and Sharia law.

Islam offers the Kaffaar three options: One, covert to Islam, and two, to become a Slave of Islam, or three, you can choose a horrifying torturous death.

I am offering you, (“the Kaffaar”) only one choice; the forth choice . And that is the choice to fight back now…

I strongly suggest, for your sake and the sake of your children, that you click on the forth choice

Remember: These Colors Don’t Run…

de Andréa