'Homosexual' activists say, 'We will BURY you'

Threats are made against Christian workers who oppose homosexual agenda

The war continues...

By de Andréa

Ben Patrick Johnson, a Heterophobic board member for Equality California has come out against the Bible-based Capitol Resource Institute, which works on behalf of family and Biblical moral values in California, especially among its lawmakers.

"If you continue your efforts, we will BURY you," said an e-mail from Ben Patrick Johnson, to his "colleagues" at the CRI, according to a statement from the Christian organization. I wonder if they are going to bury us after they kill us, or before. Either way it sure sounds like a threat of war to me.

"For a group that purports to expand tolerance and civil rights, Equality California is not practicing what it preaches," CRI said.

Johnson threatens “we have every intention of your group going down, as have others who oppose our human (homosexual special) rights.”

It is shameful that a group that represents itself as promoting tolerance and civil rights would stoop to the very tactics it accuses CRI of using. Not once has CRI personally attacked opponents in such a degrading and vicious manner," said a representative of the organization. Moreover, neither am I; I am simply fighting back in self defence.

"In a video diatribe against CRI posted on his website, Johnson declares that CRI and its supporters are 'hate peddlers' and 'conservative, religious prejudice peddlers.’ He further declares that we are 'smirky, self-righteous folks' who have 'launched an aggressive campaign against legislation to protect homosexual youth in California's and ultimately in all America's schools.’ This statement reveals not only the vitriolic language this supposed 'tolerance' group uses, but also the true agenda behind such legislation as SB 777.

SB 777 is a plan that would require all public schools in California to eliminate anything that could in any way reflect "adversely" on the homosexual lifestyle choice.

It would mean for example, the words "mom" and "dad" would be banned from school text books and from being used as depicting a normal life style. It is a plan much like the California Assembly approved a year ago, but Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger vetoed it.

This group of heterophobic mutants are bent on not only getting the rest of society to swallow special homosexual rights but these hederophobes plan on abolishing as many rights as they can for the rest of the country.

"As you can see, CRI is up against radical, aggressive Heterophobic hate mongers. To be spewing such hateful, inflammatory rhetoric indicates that they are fearful of the truth that CRI communicates to the people of California and the rest of America. We should be crystal clear in response to the outrageous accusation that we want homosexual youth to be 'abused and degraded.’ CRI believes that all children should be protected from violence in their schools. That is why it is essential to restore discipline and order in our classrooms. Pushing radical social experimentation will only perpetuate intolerance and violence.” Moreover the threat “WE WILL BURY YOU” requires an act of violence, should I [we] prepare to defend my [our] self [s].

The e-mail from Johnson, according to CRI, said:
"Dear colleagues at the Capitol Resource Institute, "I am a firm supporter of freedom of speech, and therefore I support yours, even if it in direct contrast with my own. However, we all use the media and the internet to spread our message: and with no hubris intended, I advise you -- if you continue your efforts, WE WILL BURY YOU ... with public opinion, with media, and ultimately with legislation. EQCA passed NINE bills last year to protect basic dignities and we have every intention of your group going down, as have others who oppose our human rights.”

An earlier description of SB 777 from CRI noted that it "forcibly thrusts young school children into dealing with sexual issues, requiring that homosexuality, bi-sexuality, and trans-sexuality be taught in a favorable light. Pushing this radical homosexual agenda in California schools will stifle the truth in favor of political correctness and will inevitably conflict with the religious, moral convictions and free speech of both students and parents," said CRI Executive Director Karen England. "The full ramifications of this sweeping legislation could affect the entire nation as most textbook companies tailor their material to their number one purchaser: California."

THE BOTTOM LINE: This type of language brings too mind images of the Communist leader Nikita Khrushchev pounding his shoe on the podium of the United Nations when he declared that Communism would bury America. The irony is not lost on us – Communists squelch all opposing speech, just as the modern "Tolerance" movement uses the religion of “Political Correctness” to silence all opposing viewpoints. The homosexual agenda intends on sweeping and controlling the nation. If bills such as this are signed into law it sets a precedent for the surreptitious and incremental destruction of the moral fabric and Constitutional freedom that we enjoy and represent to the rest of the world.

What I fail to comprehend is why would a self-described mutation of nature, if as they say, is in fact what homosexuality really is, then what would attempting to proselyte a heterosexual child to try homosexuality accomplish. If homosexuality isn’t a lifestyle one chooses; then all this homosexual education is ludicrous and irrelevant. It would then be like being born with Down syndrome or (Trisomy 21) and then trying to convince society that it was normal and therefore everyone should have Trisomy 21. If it is not elective then it is not elective… Then Homosexuals need to do what they need to do and leave the rest of us alone.

But of course this is not what the homosexual movement is about. It is about a get in your face agenda, special rights for a special group of people. Moreover no one else should have these same rights. This philosophy does not belong in a democracy where the same rights are for everybody.

Example, although some should not, everyone has the same right to marry. If one chooses not to, under the 6000 year old accepted world culture of a man and a woman, then one doesn’t have to. One can choose to remain single, hence the right to choose. But Freedom and rights does not mean that just because one is a member of PETA and loves his goat that one should have a special right to marry it.

de Andréa