Thursday, March 15, 2007

The 9th Circuit Court Censors Christians



"The city of Oakland has interpreted this district court's ruling to mean that Christianity has no place in our society and should be subject to punishment”.

If we choose to become silent, then we shall become silenced”

By de Andréa
A ruling from the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals has concluded that municipal employers have the right to censor the words "natural family," "marriage" and "family values" because it is hate speech.
The ruling came in a case being handled by the Pro-Family Law Center, which promised an appeal of this attack on our First Amendment. "We are going to take this case right up the steps of the United States Supreme Court," said Richard D. Ackerman, who argued the case along with Scott Lively. "We are simply unwilling to accept that Christians can be completely silenced on the issues of the day – especially on issues such as same-sex marriage, parental rights, and free speech rights," he said. "If we fail to get U.S. Supreme Court review, however, it will be up to each individual Christian in the United States to stand up for their rights to be heard on the issues of the day. If we choose to be silent, silenced we shall be," he said.
The decision from the court came as a result of a dispute over the promotion of the homosexual lifestyle within the city offices of Oakland, Calif. It found that municipalities have a right to dictate what form an employee's speech may take, even if it is in regard to controversial public issues.
"Public employees are permitted to curtail employee speech as long as their 'legitimate administrative interests' outweigh the employee's interest in freedom of speech," said the court's opinion by judges B. Fletcher, Clifton, and Ikuta, who noted that the writings are "not appropriate for publication.” In other words free speech is what the court says free speech is. We are in the cusp of losing our First Amendment rights, especially freedom of religious expression or any expression that doesn’t conform to the Godless Anti-American politically correct folks.
As the Pro-Family Law Center noted, the court "completely failed to address the concerns of the appellants with respect to the fact that the City of Oakland's Gay-Straight Employees Alliance was openly allowed to attack the Bible in widespread city e-mails, to deride Christian values as antiquated, and to refer to Bible-believing Christians as hateful. When the plaintiffs attempted to refute this blatant attack on people of faith, they were threatened with immediate termination by the City of Oakland. The Ninth Circuit did not feel that the threat of immediate termination had any effect on free speech."
The case had developed when two city employees who wanted to launch a group of people who shared their interests posted a notice on a city bulletin board – after a series of notices from homosexual activists were delivered to them via the city's e-mail system, bulletin boards and memo distribution system.
The notice said:
Good News Employee Associations is a forum for people of Faith to express their views on the contemporary issues of the day, with respect for the Natural Family, Marriage, and Family values. If you would like to be a part of preserving integrity in the Workplace call Regina Rederford or Robin Christy
But Robert Bobb, then city manager, and Joyce Hicks, then deputy director of the Community and Economic Development Agency, ordered their notice removed, because it contained "statements of a homophobic nature" and promoted "sexual-orientation-based harassment."
That decision was made even though homosexuals already had been using the city's e-mail, bulletin board, and written communications systems for promoting their views. In fact, one city official even used the e-mail system to declare the Bible "needs updating," but no actions were taken against those individuals.
According to Robert Bobb and Joyce Hicks, "The city of Oakland has interpreted this district court's ruling to mean that Christianity has no place in our society and should be subject to punishment”.
Ackerman said I want to believe that our Supreme Court will ultimately decide this case on the values of Constitutional Law and instructions set forth in motion by the nations Founders,”
THE BOTTOM LINE: One may have become accustom to hearing about governments all over the world outlawing Christianity as well as people being persecuted for it, but now unless we do something about it, it will prevail and become common place right here in America. “If we choose to become silent, then silenced we shall become”
de Andréa

1 comment:

John D said...

I suspect the point here is that if a person described Christian as "Christofascists," this would also (appropriately) be described as hate speech.

In what I've read about this story, I cannot help but assume that there was more to the e-mail than we are hearing.

Nevertheless, what has been widely cited does intimate that those who are not Christian lack integrity.