Friday, December 29, 2006


by de Andréa

If our electorates were cognizant of the contents of this article; more importantly if they cared enough about it to put it back into practice, it would turn this country around, and put it back on its original vestige of the aegises of liberty. Moreover, the future of this Free Nation, just may be preserved for our grandchildren, and future generations.

I am going to wax a little philosophical now, so bear with me please.

The only purpose of law in a Free Nation is to protect our God given inalienable rights. There are no gray areas. If a law does not protect a right of a free citizen, it then infringes upon it, and has no place in a free society. Not so long ago, this was the goal of the Constitutional Architects of America. However, because of the bane incremental destruction of our Constitutional rights by our own Federal, State, and Local governments, the Architects would not even recognize this Nation today as their own design.

We have a Congress with an insatiable need to pass laws; any law, especially if it restricts something, controls someone, or takes something away from someone. It has become a tool of power instead of protection. Moreover, a Supreme Court that has blatantly violated the very Constitution that it is charged with protecting, it is illegally legislating unconstitutional laws from the bench, as opposed to doing its definitive job of upholding Constitutional Law and protecting the rights of free citizens.

Any law that violates Constitutional Law is no law and should not be enforced by any law enforcement officer or upheld by any court,” John Jay 1st Chief Justice U.S. Supreme Court, (1789). “All laws that are repugnant to the Constitution are null and void.” Marbury vs. Madison, 5 US (2 Cranch) 137, 174, 176, (1803) An incredible contrast to what we have today, our Supreme Court is making rulings that are blatantly in violation of the Constitutional rights of all U.S. citizens.

The existence of a people and or property precedes the existence of law, so the function of law is only to guarantee their protection. Law requires the use of force, and consequently should be used only where force is necessary to protect the rights and property of a free people. This is justice and the purpose of law.

Every individual has the right to use force for lawful self-defense. It is for this reason, that the collective force may lawfully be used, which is only the organized combination of individual forces, and cannot legitimately be used for any other purpose. Law is solely the organization of the individual rights of self-defense, which preceded the existence of law.

The legislator does not have absolute power over persons or their property; the existence of persons or property preceded the existence of the legislator and so his function is only to protect their safety. It is not the purpose of law to regulate our thoughts, wills, beliefs, education, religion, opinions, businesses, or pleasures, or any God given right. The purpose of law is to protect the free exercise of these rights, and to seek legal punishment of any person or organization that interferes with the exercising of these rights.

Another misconception is that the purpose of law is the prevention of crime, the truth is, that law is not meant to prevent crime at all, it only defines the wrongdoing. One might believe the concept of more laws less crime, if that were true we would not have crime in this country at all. We have more laws, rules, regulations, and ordinances, Local State and Federal on the books in The U.S. than the rest of the world combined. In fact, the opposite is true, if there were no law, there could not be any crime, because without law we would not define the action as a crime. This does not mean however, that there would be no wrongdoing.

In a free society, one should be able to do anything one would wish to do, hence the meaning of freedom, and to be liberated. If one cannot, one should question whether one truly lives in a Free State. Of course, there is always the proverbial exception. In this case, one should consult the basic law of freedom, what without, all freedom would self-destruct through chaos. The law of freedom says that in a Free State one can do anything one wants to do unless it encroaches, infringes, or denies another person their freedom to exercise their rights. If our legislators would use this basic law as a guide for all laws, we certainly would not be sailing off into an oppressive society.

One only needs to ask the question. Is our system of law and government still effectively doing its definitive job of protecting our inalienable rights? Or, are our elected legislators and appointed Judges using their power to incrementally and diametrically dismantle the original design and philosophy of what the architects worked so diligently to construct? Havegently to we reached, or will we soon reach the point in our history where we will have to say to ourselves, America may still be a free nation by comparison, but it is no longer definitively a free nation.


The Constitutional Architects of America were not irrational extremists or a product of ancient times that are not relevant in today’s world. Quite the contrary, these Pre-American patriots were philosophical Idealists that not only had the ability to understand history but had the foresight to document the establishment of a society that would be protected from the reprise of the past, for all the rest of time.

The documentation of ones rights was to serve as a permanent reminder that this is a Free Nation, unique in everyway; moreover, it was to establish our own history of protected liberty by putting pen to paper. The U.S. Constitution was never meant to be a temporary philosophical essay.

The incremental disestablishment of America’s rights not only leads to crime and chaos but will ultimately pilot this liberated Nation back into oppression and tyranny. We will have come full circle in our history, all because we have lost sight of our history, and the purpose and philosophy of law.

The irresponsibility of the Citizenry of this Country to abandon the legislators to seek their own direction in government, is leading to an ever increasing cogency of the perversion that takes place when a government is left up to its own volition.

This Country, according to the documentation of our Forefathers was, and is unlike any country on this earth, to be a government by, and for the Free People of this Nation, but it is sadly moving surreptitiously toward an independent power.

As mentioned earlier, the purpose of law is only to protect the inalienable rights of its citizens. I challenge anyone to point to a law that was passed by our electorate in the in the previous 100 years that meets that criteria. That is, any law that upholds supports and or strengthens our rights, liberty, and freedom. If one cannot be found, this means that every piece of legislation that has been signed into law in the passed 100 years has been to restrict disable or to totally defeat our God given rights of freedom and liberty. How many rights do you think we have left, before we can no longer call ourselves a Free and liberated Nation?

THE BOTTOM LINE: The most basic right we have as human beings is the right of self defence. The preservation of one own life is not only a basic human right but is a basic human instinct. The new philosophy of the liberal left is to create a dependent society, one in which the citizens will learn to depend on government for ones every need, no matter what the cost, even if it is at the expense of freedom and the demise of innocent human lives.

de Andréa

Tuesday, December 26, 2006

A Christian Beaten

Islam’s Agenda

A Christian Beaten for “Polluting"a Public Drinking Glass

Brought to you by The Voice of Martyrs.

Nasir Ashraf, is a Christian stone mason, and was brutally attacked by Muslims just outside Lahore.

While working on the construction of a room at a school near Manga Mandi in Pakistan, Nasir took a break after becoming thirsty. He drew water and drank from a glass chained to a cemented public water tank next to a mosque, which was reserved for poor people. Returning to the construction site, a Muslim man asked him, “Why did you drink water from this glass since you are a Christian?” The man accused Nasir of polluting the glass. The Muslim man yanked the glass off the iron chain, broke it, and threw it in a garbage can. The man summoned other Muslims to the scene, furiously saying, “This Christian polluted our glass.” Hearing this, the incensed mob began beating Nasir, yelling that a Christian dog drank water from their glass.
The Muslims encouraged bystanders to beat Nasir because according to the Quran it would be a “good deed that would benefit them in heaven” The attackers pushed Nasir off a ledge onto the ground. The impact of the fall dislocated his shoulder and broke his collar bone in two places. This knocked Nasir unconscious and he did not regain his senses until he awoke in a clinic.

This reminds me of America several decades ago when in the south, this was common treatment of black Americans in similar circumstances. Only then, it was because of Ignorance, the way Nasir was treated by the Muslims is because of an agenda. This agenda can be found in Islam’s unholy book, the Quran. This kind of treatment of anyone, anywhere, anytime, who is not a Muslim, is ordered by their god Allah. Christians are referred to in the Quran, as, The Children of the Book, and are to be converted to Islam or made a slave, or killed. Nasir was obviously protected by his God Jehovah or he most certainly would have been killed.

THE BOTTOM LINE: This agenda is the same for Muslims in America; it is just a matter if time. When Islam has, as they have in Europe, achieved a formidable population, they will continue to carry out this same agenda right here in the United States, as they have all through history, anywhere, anytime, and everywhere else on this earth. We were ignorant decades ago when we practiced a similar atrocity, and we are ignorant today of what Islam is and who the Muslims are. Moreover, unlike America, Islam will never change; NEVER, we are fools if we think otherwise...

de Andréa

Friday, December 22, 2006

Illegal Alien Statistics

From the L.A. Times

Edited and formatted by de Andréa

Illegal Aliens are a foreign invasion of America. According to the U.S. Constitution the Federal Government is charged with protecting this Nation from any kind of a foreign invasion, whether it is Military, Economic, or a Citizen invasion.

1. 40% of all workers in L.A. County (L.A. County has 10.2 million people) are working for cash and not paying taxes. This was because they are predominantly illegal aliens, working without a green card.

2. 95% of warrants for murder in Los Angeles are for illegal aliens
3. 75% of people on the most wanted list in Los Angeles are illegal aliens
4. Over 2/3 of all births in Los Angeles County are to illegal alien Mexicans on Medi-Cal, whose births were paid for by taxpayers.

5. Nearly 25% of all inmates in California detention centers are Mexican nationals here illegally.

6. Over 300,000 illegal aliens in Los Angeles County alone are living in garages.

7. The FBI reports half of all gang members in Los Angeles are most likely illegal aliens from south of the border.

8. Nearly 60% of all occupants of HUD properties are illegal aliens.

9. 21 radio stations in L.A. are Spanish speaking.

10. In L.A. County 5.1 million people speak English. 3.9 Million people speak Spanish. (There are 10.2 million people in L.A. County).

From the bureau of statistics:

Less than 2% of illegal aliens are picking our crops, but 29% are on welfare. Over 70% of the United States' annual population growth (and over 90% of California, Florida, and New York) results from the invasion of Illegal aliens.

The cost of this illegal invasion, to the American taxpayer in 1997 was, (after subtracting taxes immigrants pay), a NET $70 BILLION/year, [Professor Donald Huddle, Rice University]. The lifetime fiscal impact (taxes paid minus services used) for the average adult Mexican immigrant is a NEGATIVE number.

29% of inmates in federal prisons are illegal aliens. If they can come to this country to raise Hell and demonstrate by the thousands, WHY can't they take charge over the corruption in their own country?

On February 15, 1998, the U.S. and Mexican soccer teams met at the Los Angeles Coliseum. The crowd was overwhelmingly pro-Mexican even though most lived in this country. They booed during the National Anthem and U.S. flags were held upside down. As the match progressed, supporters of the U.S. team were insulted, pelted with projectiles, punched, and spat upon. Beer and trash were thrown at the U.S. players before and after the match. The coach of the U.S. team, Steve Sampson said, "This was the most painful experience I have ever had in this profession."

Did you know that immigrants from Mexico and other non-European countries can come to this country and get preferences in jobs, education, and government contracts? It's called affirmative action or racial privilege. The Emperor of Japan or the President of Mexico could migrate here and immediately be eligible for special rights unavailable for Americans of European descent.
Corporate America has signed on to the idea that minorities and third world immigrants should get special, privileged status. Some examples are Exxon, Texaco, Merrill Lynch, Boeing, Paine Weber, Starbucks and many more.

Did you know that Mexico regularly intercedes on the side of the defense in criminal cases involving Mexican nationals? Moreover, that Mexico has NEVER extradited a Mexican national accused of murder in the U.S. in spite of agreements to do so?

According to the L.A. Times, Orange County, California is home to 275 gangs with 17,000 members, 98% of which are Mexican and Asian illegals

According to a New York Times article dated May 19, 1994, 20 years after the great influx of the legal alien invasion from Southeast Asia, 30% are still on welfare compared to 8% of households nationwide. A Wall Street Journal editorial dated December 5, 1994 quotes law enforcement officials as stating that Asian mobsters are the "greatest criminal challenge the country faces.” Not bad for a group that is still under 5% of the population.

Is education important to you? Here are the words of a teacher who spent over 20 years in the Los Angeles School system. "Imagine teachers in classes containing 30-40 students of widely varying attention spans and motivation, many of whom aren't fluent in English. Educators seek learning materials likely to reach the majority of students and that means fewer words and math problems and more pictures and multicultural references."


I remember hearing about the legal immigrants that came through Ellis Island. They wanted to learn English. They wanted to breathe free. They wanted to become Americans. Now, illegal aliens come here with demands. They demand to be taught in their own language. They demand special privileges ... affirmative action. They demand ethnic studies that glorify their own culture, and dilute American culture.

THE BOTTOM LINE: These statistics alone do not begin to show the long term damage that the U.S. Federal Government has done to America, its Heritage, its Culture its Economy, its Freedom, its Rights, its Safety, and much more too far reaching to even comprehend, all because of the selfish Globalist Theocracy of a few liberal extremists bent on advancing their agenda of Global socialism, at the expense of the liberty of American Citizens. This is the result of ignoring the very foundation of a Nation once founded on the principals of fairness, hard work, law, responsibility, freedom, and inalienable rights. These can all be found in the U.S. Constitution along with the legal responsibility of the U.S. Government to protect this Nation from a foreign Invasion that would seek to destroy the very fabric of this last and only free Nation on this planet.

de Andréa

Saturday, December 16, 2006


By de Andréa

According to the Jerusalem Post, the French military protecting Lebanon will fire on Israeli reconnaissance planes flying along the Israeli Lebanese border.

The French Islamic Military Is in charge of the so-called multinational U.N. peace keeping force protecting the terrorist organization known as Hezbollah of the Nation of Islam, from any further attack by the Israeli defence forces.

The French continue to defend this Islamic terrorist group in Lebanon, despite the continued violation of a U.N. order to release the two IDF soldiers kidnapped by Hezbollah last July.

The Post said that France has deployed a squadron of drone aircraft along the border to gather intelligence, and is prepared to shoot down any Israeli AF flights that they regard as a threat to Lebanon. The Israelis regard these recon flights as necessary to ensure that Hezbollah does not violate the terms of the cease fire.

If one didn’t know any better one would have to regard France as unofficially declaring war on, or at the very least threatening Israel, while defending the terrorist Nation of Islam, safely from behind the skirts of their Mother the U.N. I can’t help wondering if they will shoot and then run, or if they will run first, and then shoot. Or will they just run??? In any event, it is very French.

I find it, if nothing else, at least a little unfair that no matter what Israel does; it is condemned by the U.N… As far as I can see, all that Israel really wants is a little piece of the patch of land that used to belong to their ancestors, and was returned to what was left of them after the Holocaust of the Second world war by the U.N. in 1948. However since then, the Nation of Islam with the help of the U.N., Germany, Russia, and France has been trying to take it away from them yet again a piece at a time. Historically this land had never belonged to the Lebanese or the Palestinians, it was called the land of Canaan during the time of the Exodus from Egypt and the reign of Ramses II: in, or about the middle of the 12 century BC in Biblical history Canaan was called the land of the Giants.

The so-called Palestinians are actually Jordanian terrorist exiles and have never historically occupied that land, the area known as Gaza was during the Biblical time of Judah and the Israeli occupation, occupied by Philistia or the Philistines, the sea people, they are believed to have come from the Island of Caphtor, the historical Island of Crete in the Mediterranean Sea, driven off the island by famine. Moreover they have absolutely no relation to the so-called Palestinians. Palestine was never a Nation, it was just an area. Just as there is no Nation of Saharans living in the Sahara, or Sinians living in the Sinai, there were never any Palestinians living in Palestine. Even Canaan was not an organized country; it was occupied by City States, among them the largest was Hazor; of less than 40,000 people, the Fortress- City of the Canaanites, which later became King Solomon’s Royal Garrison.

No where in history was there ever a race of people or a Nation called Palestine, from before the Exodus through the establishment of Israel, to the Babylonian Empire, to the return and the reconstruction period, to the Roman Empire. And yet for some unknown reason we recognize the Palestinians, and give these exiled Jordanian Islamic Terrorists credence, even most of modern Lebanon was part of the land of Canaan originally occupied by the Nation of Israel a hundred or so miles north of Damascus in Syria, and as far north as Kadesh, in what is now Lebanon, the coastal land was occupied by the Phoenicians. Moreover, Judah of Israel stretched south to the southern end of the Dead Sea to the territory of the Amalekites just north of Egypt, and from the Jordan river valley, to the Gaza Strip.

THE BOTTOM LINE: If one would simply read their history book one could easily see that Israel is not trying to be hoggish and demand all the land of their ancestors, all they want is just a little slip of this earth in the vicinity of their ancestry to call their own and live in peace. But instead they are attacked, and threatened by a mythical ancestral people who call themselves Palestinians that wine about their mythical ancestral land that did not even exist in history. Even Lebanon did not exist until after the occupation of Phoenicia and Syria by the Roman Empire beginning in about 64 BC.

Why doesn’t the world give these otherwise peaceable Israeli people a break? They have been conquered numerous times, enslaved numerous times, separated, and spread all over this earth, nearly exterminated and then almost 70 years ago now, were given this little slip of land and still, they are scorned, attacked, blown up, kidnapped, and then they are forced to give up some of what little land they have. I do believe that England and America are the only true friends these people really have. The Jews have among the oldest history of any people alive today; most certainly in that region of the world. They deserve to live in their land, and to live their lives, and to be left alone to live in peace.

It seems to me that I must have read somewhere in an old dusty history book, that France once supported America in their quest for peace and liberty. I believe they even gave America a statue so that we wouldn’t forget. Moreover, if memory serves me correctly I think that we liberated the French from Nazi tyranny, not so long ago. I guess France must have forgotten; I hope America doesn’t forget as well.

de Andréa

Thursday, December 14, 2006


By de Andréa

Isn’t it interesting that when some of us read; whether it is a text book, a novel, the Bible, or the Constitution, and despite what is written, we are cognizant only of what we want to perceive is written.

A prime example if this phenomenon is the First Amendment, the first part of article 1 of the Bill is, “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion”…Commonly referred to as THE ESTABLISHMENT CLAUSE. The interesting part is, that there is an ever growing blindness to the second, and just as important part of that protected right, known as THE EXERCISE CLAUSE. …”or prohibiting the free exercise thereof;”… Congress shall make no law prohibiting the free exercise of religion, as well as a law to establish a national religion.

George Masson, the architect of the Bill of Rights was no one’s fool. When he wrote that part of the first Amendment, which was to prevent government from controlling religion as it had done so often in the past, Masson included the right of exercising ones religion to place balance in the law. Moreover, if one will notice it reads free exercise not just exercise, otherwise one might interpret it to mean limited exercise.

Not only is the government ordered to stay out of our religious beliefs, but is prohibited from the interfering encroachment of freely exercising our religion. As with all of our rights as human beings and Free Americans our rights do not come from the Government or the Constitution, but as it is written in the declaration they come from our creator. The Constitutional Amendment is just the written documentation of what the right is. Moreover, it does not guarantee the right; the right is not only given to us by our creator but it is also guaranteed by our creator.

This is what the Constitutional Framers knew to be true, and so the document was written with that discipline as its foundation. This is why no one, including any government can change, alter, modify, or otherwise deny one their rights.

While one cannot be forced to adopt any kind of religious belief, one equally cannot be denied the right to freely exercise ones own beliefs. To freely exercise means publicly as well as privately, if this were not true then it would be a limited exercise not a free exercise. To display the Ten Commandments in a public school does not mean that it is a violation of the establishment clause. If in fact the U.S. Government forced or even endorsed the display of a religious belief it would be a violation, but if it is freely expressed then it is upheld by the exercise clause.

Nativity scenes at Christmas or Menorahs at Hanukkah, A cross on a church or a grave, a crescent star on a mosque, a Star of David on a synagogue or in a window, a religious symbol displayed on clothing or on ones automobile is-free exercise, whether it is displayed in public or private. Saying the rosary or praying or reading ones holy book on public property, is free-exercise. Even in government buildings the display of the Ten Commandment in our Courts, the very foundation of law around the world is built on the Ten Commandments, and the government buildings belong to the free people, who’s right it is to freely exercise their beliefs.

As long a the Congress itself does not pass a law establishing a religious doctrine then the people have the right to the free exercise of their various beliefs, freely, in public or private.

The First Amendment does not constitute a separation of Church from State with respect to the free exercise thereof; it prevents the State from making laws respecting any religion. In other words there is not a Separation Clause in the first Amendment or any other Amendment for that matter, or in the entire Constitution or any other U.S. Government document legal or historical.

As mentioned at the beginning, we are only Cognizant of what we want to perceive. We will choose to read what is not written; and we will choose not read what is written.

THE BOTTOM LINE: The basic law of freedom demands that all laws, legal and binding be written to protect the inalienable rights of a free person, conversely no law, legal and or binding can legally be written to deny a free person of their rights, if this is not respected, then we have lost our freedom, religious or otherwise, and are living under an oppressive tyranny...

Happy Birthday Bill of Rights! Born December 15, 1791 you are 215 years old on December 15, 2006. May you live forever…

de Andréa

Wednesday, December 13, 2006


Are the lives of Judges more valuable than yours???

By de Andréa

In spite of the additional security of our courtrooms across the country, as a result of the courtroom shootings in Atlanta and Chicago approximately a year ago, judges are arming themselves on the job.

Cynthia Stevens Kent, a Texas Judge in the 114th district Court where last year a man killed his ex-wife and son, says “Texas Judges carry guns all the time now, when it comes to personal defence, one must take personal responsibility”.

The New York State Unified Court System has decided that it is ethical for a judge to carry a gun into the court room for personal protection. In Nevada, and Oklahoma, Incidents there, have prompted new rules to allow judges to bring their guns into the courtroom.

A recent shooting in the 2nd Judicial District Court in Reno Nevada Prompted U.S. Senator Harry Reid, an avid anti-gunner, to introduce legislation to increase security in both State and Federal Courthouses.

A potential disaster was averted by Judge Thomas Thornburgh a district Judge in Oklahoma, when he grabbed his gun and held a prisoner at Bay until other deputies arrived. This resulted in the Oklahoma legislature passing a law that would specifically allow Judges to carry guns in the courtroom.

This coming year the State of Kansas plans to pass legislation to permit Judges to carry guns into the courtroom.

If anyone in this country is protected, it is the President of the United States and Judges. In every courtroom there is normally a Bailiff (an armed cop) and several other cops’, including those accompanying prisoners, in the immediate area.

With all the police protection that judges have, at least while on the job, they still believe that they must be responsible for themselves and have the right to carry a gun for their own personal protection.

Now don’t misunderstand; I believe, no! I know, a judge has not only the responsibility, but the right to defend him or her self on the job or anywhere else for that matter. Police, according to a U.S. Supreme Court ruling, do not have any more responsibility than anybody else in protecting citizens, their responsibility lies with enforcing the law.

The problem I have with all this sudden interest in allowing judges to protect their own lives by carrying a gun on their person is when has the life of a judge become more valuable or more important than yours or mine? Moreover where in the Second Amendment does it say that only cops judges and criminals have the right to bear arms to protect themselves?

Please correct me if you think that I am wrong, but I always thought that the Bill of Rights was for the people, as the Second Amendment says …”the right of the people to keep and bear arms”… or are the people that the Constitution refers to, just special people? Senators for example, like Diane Feinstein are allowed to carry a gun on their person while they author bills to restrict or ban guns altogether from the common ordinary law abiding citizen.

If judges cannot depend on the security and the police that are all around them everyday, how can the ordinary citizen depend on the police to come to their rescue, and protect their lives when they themselves look death right in the eye?

THE BOTTOM LINE: With all my research into the intent by the architects of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights penned by George Mason of Virginia 215 years ago this month, I have found that all the documentation in the First Ten Amendments were written to protect the rights of the people and not just the rights of government people or any special elite people such as judges, police officers, senators, or even Presidents, and certainly not criminals.

No, the Second Amendment does not give the people their rights; it simply documents the inalienable rights that we have as American citizens; they are given to us, as the declaration says, by our Creator. Every law abiding citizen in America, including people who believe that they are special, as well as judges, yes and even Diane Feinstein have the right and responsibility to …”keep and bear arms”… for their own personal defence and protection. It is the law, moreover it is the same right for everyone.

de Andréa

Link to the story, Judges Packing Pistols, click on this: By Amanda Bronstad The National Law Journal 12-7-06

Sunday, December 10, 2006

The Second Amendment is Unconstitutional

By de Andréa

This one really chaps my hide:

The lawyers for the District of Columbia have decided that the Bill of rights is unconstitutional, at least the Second Amendment is. Well do you know what? I have decided that lawyers are unconstitutional.

That’s right, no where in the Constitution is it written that lawyers have the right to decide anything, including what they can have for breakfast and when or where they can relieve themselves. I am sure getting fed up with these self appointed so-called experts of the U.S. Constitution that have never read the document much less researched the history of this inspired Law.

How do I know this? Because I have read the Constitution and I have a stack of books 18 inches high on the history and the meaning of the second Amendment alone, and I have read and studied them all. Moreover, if these D.C. lawyers would have done their homework they wouldn’t be flapping their gums with so much ignorance.

According to the D.C. Metropolitan Washington times, these Legal Geniuses in the District of Columbia have said that according to the Second Amendment, only Militias are supposed to have any weapons. I will let you decide, it does not take a Law Professor to understand this. Quote, Article II The U.S. Constitutional Bill of Rights, “A well regulated Militia, (comma) being necessary to the security of a free State, (comma) the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, (comma) shall not be infringed. (period)

So, what we are reading here, written by the framers obviously with an IQ somewhat higher than our Washington D.C. lawyers, are, that two God given rights, not Government privileges, shall not be infringed. There is one obviously necessary [right] here, in order to secure a free State, (comma) [because it says so] and that is, there shall be a “Militia” well regulated, and then a second [right], “the right of the people (that is “t h e p e o p l e”, for the lawyers who can’t read fast) to Keep and bear arms”. Then both [rights] are followed up with “Shall not be in fringed. Which means in plain American, ‘don’t even think about messing with this right.

How anyone with an IQ above 30 can misinterpret this Second Article of the Amendments so badly, is a mystery to me, unless one with a purpose, has the agenda to pervert this particular part of the supreme law of this country, or possibly the whole body of the Constitution for that matter. Naw, that would be criminal and un-American, wouldn’t it?

Todd Kim is one of these legal geniuses in D.C. that has had such a difficult time comprehending such a straight forward document, moreover, he has obviously spent to much time learning how to manipulate and circumvent the law that he has had absolutely no time to study Constitutional History, much less the Philosophy of Law. I do wonder though, just what cereal box Mr. Kim has fished his State Bar license out of.

We interpret the Second Amendment in Military terms” says Todd Kim the District’s solicitor general who has told the U.S. Court of appeals that “the city has the authority to ban all weapons”. Really; I wonder if he means kitchen knives, ball bats and finger nails as well? Who does this south end of a north bound donkey think he is. No one, repeat, no one, has any authority to deny a God given right except God. The Law says “SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED” that means by anyone including you, Mr., Todd Kim.

Anyway, who cares how Mr. Kim interprets anything, he is not a Supreme Court Judge. Moreover, there is nothing military in the Second Amendment, if Mr. Kim is referring to the word militia; first, any second grader can see that the reference to Militia is to the security of a free State and not the right of the people to keep and bear arms, and second, Mr. Kim is really showing his ignorance of American History here, the Militia was never a Government Military as we know it today, it was a bunch of rag tag ordinary citizen farmers (PEOPLE) with guns, that liberated this country from the oppression from which Mr. Kim obviously wants us to return.

The Minutemen was just such a citizens Militia that defended this country’s freedom back in the late 1700’s just as today’s Minutemen Citizens Militia is still defending this Nation from an enemy foreign invasion down on our Southern Border. (Something by the way that our Government Military refuses to do) But of course Mr. Kim wouldn’t know anything about that, because Mr. Kim is too busy trying to aid the criminals and enemies of this Nation by doing his best to create a defenseless oppressed nation out of the U.S. before our enemy even has a chance to defeat us.

If Mr. Todd Kim the District of Colombia’s solicitor general has his way, this country will be completely disarmed except for a few military solders and an even smaller police department, and an awful lot of criminals, this country would then be ripe enough to be plucked by the criminals and the rest of the enemy that Mr. Kim so legally supports with his brand of Totalitarian law.

THE BOTTOM LINE: For Mr. Ignorant Todd Kim’s information, the Bill of Rights is directed to the people not to the Government. The government has no rights or powers except that which is found in the Constitution and or that the people may accord to it from time to time. (Read the 10th Amendment Mr. Kim) The people, on the other hand, have as the declaration says, Inalienable rights given to them by their creator and can be only taken away by their creator. Mr. Todd Kim must believe that he, and he alone, is god, with as he says, the “authority to take away all weapons”.

I have news for you Mr. High and Mighty Todd Kim District [Solicitatator]; I am breaking your crown, and taking you down off of your throne, because a god, you are not. The Bible, (God’s law) which if you were a real lawyer, you would know, says that there is only one God, who has set us free, and has given us all of our rights, and you Mr. Kim, are not any kind of a god. Moreover you would do well to ask God’s forgiveness for the feeble attempt at impersonating Him.

de Andréa

Saturday, December 09, 2006


By de Andréa

You may have thought the Dubai issue was over; Dubai Ports World, owned by the United Arab Emirates whose purchase of ports in the U.S. caused a ruckus earlier in the year, will likely be one of the Security Screening company’s whose job it will be to look for nuclear weapons being smuggled into the U.S. from ports including Oman, Korea, Honduras, and the U.K.

The foxes to guard the chicken coop
On February 24 2006 I wrote an article titled Port Gate, and on March 24, 2006 I wrote a follow up article, titled Port Gate is not over; shortly after that, thanks to the outrage, Congress rejected the idea of having the Nation of Islam, (our enemy), be in charge of Americas Ports, a kind of no-brainer if you ask me, but considering the blind deaf and dumb in Congress, it was a wise choice.

However, now, we again have Dubai Ports World from the United Arab Emirates who has delivered nuclear materials to North Korea and Iran in charge of making sure that Islam does not send a Nuke to the U.S. for Christmas. As I have said many times in the past, moreover I will say it again; our Government hasn’t got a clue who our enemy is.

In the afternoon of Thursday the 7th of December 2006 the anniversary of the attack on Peril harbor the Department of Homeland Security, the Department of Energy, and the State Department announced this wonderful program as part of the SAFE port act which also includes the installation of radiation detectors at 22 U.S. ports by the end of this year.

Since Congress overturned the purchase of U.S. ports by Dubai Ports World, Dubai has yet to sell any of those Islamic owned American ports. Is anyone really steering the Good Ship America through the Islamic pirate infested seas of this world?

I feel so much safer now that Islam, our enemy will be looking out for the safety and wellbeing of America. Moreover, I am sure that they will do at least as well as our own homeland security, who is still scratching their heads about how to secure our borders, in the meantime our private citizens are taking care of it, they are called the Minuteman Vigilantes.

THE BOTTOM LINE: We, Americans are dependent on our enemy Islam for oil; we are dependent on our enemy China for the ammunition to fight a war as well as the great economy that we have, and now we will be dependent on Islam, our enemy to protect us from nuclear attack. Islam is by the way the enemy that we are at war with, the one that attacked New York and D.C. For some reason I always thought it was our own Governments job to protect this Nation from its enemy. It appears that is becoming our enemy’s job to protect us from our own Government, someone certainly needs to.

de Andréa

Thursday, December 07, 2006


By de Andréa

Governor Jim Doyle of Wisconsin and Mayor Tom Barrett of Milwaukee, both have an inordinate amount of innocent people’s blood all over their politically correct hands and their offices. So how did this outrages bloody crime occur?
A simple abuse of their power.

Twice in the past three years Governor Jim Doyle with the support of Mayor Barrett has vetoed legislation that would have allowed concealed carry (CCW) Permits for law abiding citizens to defend and protect themselves from being killed or seriously injured by violent criminals. When are the citizens of America going to stop electing these crazy people to their State Governments that have on their agenda to murder innocent law abiding people and protect the gun wielding criminals.

As harsh as that may sound, it is, in fact the bold truth, these ignorant people continue to elect to high office the people with the worst criminal minds in history, (a title of a recent previous article). Both Governor Doyle and Mayor Barrett know exactly what they are doing, unless they live in a vacuum or they can’t read. I think that I can safely eliminate vacuums and illiteracy. That leaves the fact that they do know as well as you and I do, according to FBI stats, by denying law abiding citizens their Constitutional Right to keep and bear arms, violent crime will increase and increase at nearly the same rate of legislated anti-gun laws.

Since these vetoes by Governor Doyle and other anti-gun legislation in Wisconsin’s Capital, murder and other violent crimes have been on the rise in Milwaukee and all through the State of Wisconsin. “Every homicide victim in Wisconsin is a human sacrifice on Jim Doyle’s altar of political correctness” said the director of THE CITIZENS COMMITTEE FOR THE RIGHT TO KEEP AN BEAR ARMS Joe Waldron. Waldron went on to say, “the truth is that Doyle is disarming the wrong people; instead enabling citizens to defend themselves, he has perpetuated the risk of the working environment, for predatory violent criminals, moreover, the Milwaukee murder rate proves it”.

THE BOTTOM LINE: Shame on you Governor Doyle, you should be locked up along with your criminal murdering friends. The blood of the innocent is as much on your hands, as it is on the hands of the murdering criminals you support and protect.

de Andréa

Saturday, December 02, 2006


By de Andréa

I am sure glad that there are only a very few Muslim Extremists, Insurgents, Terrorists, or whatever way or however one desires to be deceived. Isn’t it interesting though, that the world seems never to run out of these very few Radical Murdering Terrorist Extremists. Since before the Christian Crusades, for over 1000 years we still have not run out of the very few fringe bad Muslims, after all there is always at least one bad apple in every barrel, right?

I wish the few gallons of gas in my tank were like the few bad Radical Muslim Extremists, it would never run out of gas. Moreover as when the Catholic Church had a few bad Priests and Cardinals in their Churches, they got rid of them, because a few bad apples can spoil the barrel. Then why don’t we see the [good] Imams of Islam at least helping the Western Nations to get rid of these so-called, very few bad Muslims Extremists? After all if it is true, that there are just a very few bad Muslims it would be in the best interest of Islam to pick out and dispose of these few rotten apples, and if there are so few, it should take very little effort or time to purge this Peaceful Nation of these extremely few bad renegades.

I remember right after November 11, 2001 the preferred way to refer to these few bad Muslims, was Fundamentalists. The definition of fundamentalists according to Webster is a 20th century Protestant movement, emphasizing the literal interpretation of the Bible. I wonder how many buildings these Protestants Fundamentalists blew up or how many thousands of non-fundamentalists or non-Christians they murdered. Maybe they just didn’t do it out in the open as the few Muslim Fundamentalists do, and are the Protestant Fundamentalists still secretly making war on the rest of the world? Moreover, if not, why? What ever happened to these Muslim Fundamentalists anyway, were they replaced with these very few Muslim Extremist murdering terrorist insurgents?

In the Judaic/Christian Bible, Jehovah, the God of Abraham commanded that we shall not murder anyone, so Christians do not, fundamental or not. In the Muslim Quran, Allah the god of Muhammad commanded that Muslims shall make slaves of and or murder all infidels (non-Muslims), so Muslims do, fundamental or not.

Why hasn’t there been a few Radical Christian Extremist or a few Buddhists, or Nudists, or Hindu’s, Scientologists, or Methodists, Philosophers or any other religious group of people who believe in something or someone; making war on the rest of the world; simply because they believe in something different? Oh yes, the Nazis. But of course it was just a very few bad Nazis that tried to murder a Nation, and conquer others, for the purpose of shoving their beliefs down the throat of the rest of the world. Like the so-called majority of the moderate middle of the road Muslims, most of the Nazis were good, loving, and warm fuzzy people. Of course we can’t leave out the Japanese Imperialists, we all know of course, that there were only a very few Japanese Imperialist Extremists that we were fighting all over the Pacific Ocean, and this is why if necessary, we were finally prepared to bomb the Islands of Japan right off the map to stop them. Recently there were a few 80 plus year old Japanese found in the caves of a South Pacific Island still fighting the Second World War, approximately 60 years later, but of course there were probably just a very few Extremists among them.

THE BOTTOM LINE: If one is old enough to remember or had read ones history book, one would have found that this is exactly what the media was saying about the Nazis in the 1930’s. “Oh, these are just a few radicals, and therefore not a significant threat”. If at that time, the rest of the world would have read Mine Kampf, the hand book of the Nazis, written by their god Adolph Hitler, the war could have been won before it began. If now the West would educate themselves about this enemy, by reading the Quran, the Handbook of Islam, written by their god Allah, this war could also be won nearly overnight.

I guess ignorance is bliss, however in the case of Islam, just as in the case of the Nazis, what you don’t know, will eventually murder you, if not you, then your children and their families, what’s worse they will curse you for your blissful lazy complacent, ignorance. Isn’t it so much easier just to sip ones Mint-Juleps around the swimming pool, and to just repeat all the rhetorical media disseminated nonsense, that one has been indoctrinated with, through the academics at our colleges, and our Governments Religion of Political Correctness, than it is to track down the truth for oneself???. Of course it is, so go back to sleeping off your hangover, after all your children may even find it in their big bloody hearts to understand and forgive you for putting them through the Hell that you could have stopped if you just would have got of your duff an shook your fist in the face of Satan. Have a quiet and blissful nap, ZZZ…

de Andréa

Thursday, November 30, 2006


By de Andréa

The Bible is about to replaced by the Quran in the Congressional swearing in ceremony. Will America willingly adopt the Quran as the new symbol of American values?

Keith Ellison, D-Minn., a Muslim and a recently elected Representative to the U.S. Congress, has not wasted any time in the attempt to convert America to Islam. He [Congressman Keith Ellison] has announced that he will only place his hand on the Quran while he takes his oath of office to the U.S. Congress.

In the interest of multiculturalism and political correctness, will the U.S. Government allow this blatant shift of American values, by moving this Country completely off of its over 200 year old foundation, just so that we will be loved by our warm fuzzy enemies, the Muslims. With a great amount of bloodshed and strife, this country has been built on the Judaic-Christian belief in God the Creator of all things, who Congressmen Keith Ellison’s own Nation of Islam has vowed to destroy?

I have to admit that this action completely blows my theory of surreptitious incrementalism regarding the infiltration of Islam’s agenda to destroy the very fabric of American liberty. Instead, it just cuts right to the chase of the Islamicization of this Country and the destruction of the very core of American Judaic-Christian values.

What America has chosen to symbolize its basic belief and trust, has been acceptable to take a Congressional oath on, for Jews, Secularists, Mormons, Scientologists, yes even Agnostics and Atheists, for over 200 years, but not for a Muslim. This because the agenda of a Muslim and the agenda of Congressmen Keith Ellison, Democrat Minnasota is to convert America to Islam, starting with the totally blatant and outrageous demand that the citizens of this Free and Liberated Nation of America should discard the Christian and Hebrew Bible, and now accept the Islamic Quran; this book of world conquest, our own enemies guide book to kill and destroy or convert America as well as the rest world to Islam, as the new symbol of Americas core values.

THE BOTTOM LINE: This is the most outrages, offensive abuse of America’s freedom that I have ever heard of. This should be a contumelious insult to every American Citizen.

de Andréa

Criminal Minds

November 29, 2006

By de Andréa

In spite of the fact that most of the Democrats that were elected to the Congress this fall were at least somewhat conservative, the far left wing politicians again have won control of this once Constitutional Republic. Some of these leftwing extremist Government officials are bigger perpetuators of crime than the criminals on our streets. The following are some of the biggest Criminal Minds in American history, hiding behind the cloak of an elected government representative: Nancy Pelosi, Hillary Clinton, Patrick Leahy, John Conyers, Dick Durbin, Joe Biden, Ted Kennedy, Harry Reid, Herb Kohl, and Charles Schumer, just to name a few.

These are just a few examples of the people in Government who have not only sworn to uphold and protect our inalienable Constitutional rights, but should be at least interested in ways to reduce crime in our society, but they nevertheless have been, while in office, doing everything possible to cultivate and perpetuate crime in our cities, and even in our homes.

Anyone with half a brain, (and I am sure that these afore mentioned people have at least half a brain,) is cognizant of the fact, that when a government outlaws guns, only outlaws will have guns because criminals do not respect or obey gun laws or any other law for that matter. So if these people are not brain dead, at least not totally, then could they possibly have a reading problem? If in fact they can read statistics as well as the rest of us, then the only remaining logical conclusion one can come to, is that they have the worst criminally warped minds in history, and are purposely creating and perpetuating gun crime in our Cities and States, through there legislation of un-Constitutional gun laws. The question always begging to be asked in the cases is why? Why would one want to disarm the citizens of a Nation? Simple answer, tyranny; as long as a government has nothing to fear from its citizens, there is tyranny. This is why these Liberal extremist gun banning legislators pass laws restricting and eventually banning guns, the obvious agenda is to create a police State.

Every time our legislators, State, Federal or local, pass yet another gun restricting law, three things are accomplished, one is, that all of America looses a little more of its Constitutional rights, the second is that more criminals are enabled an encouraged to commit violent crimes, and the third, we get closer to a Police-State. More and more violent criminals can confidently wield guns in the commission of a crime without fear of getting shot because law-abiding citizens are restricted by law and therefore are not likely to possess a gun. Eventually only police and criminals will have guns; this is definitive of a police State. Moreover, this is diametrically opposed to the purpose of the Second Amendment (…”being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear arms”,…) a police State, is not a free State. The extreme liberal agenda is the surreptitious and incremental destruction of liberty by passing more and more laws restricting guns, first by banning certain guns and then ultimately the banning of all guns, all in the name of fighting crime, an obvious masquerade for governmental power and tyranny.

One must understand that these anti-gun laws are specifically directed toward law abiding citizens, and not criminals, because by their very nature, criminals do not obey laws. No amount of denying guns to the law abiding is going to improve crime, it will only enable it, and in most cases innocent citizens such as school children, will be totally vulnerable to gun crime. This is why as anti-gun laws increase, gun crime eventually increases at nearly the same rate.

Crime statistics prove that when fewer guns are in the hands of law abiding citizens, more guns are in the hands of criminals. Putting it another way the more anti-gun laws there are, the more gun crime there is. Moreover these Government legislators with at least half a brain, know this as well as you and me, and still they continue, with purpose to pass these crime perpetuating laws.

In case one is not convinced of these statistics one only needs to go to the FBI crime Stats, the latest available Stats are through 2004. A prime example of this is the crime rate in our Nations Capital where since laws passed 1977 the District of Columbia has had a virtual gun-ban. So, are their no guns in D.C.? Of course there are guns, they are just not in the possession of law abiding citizens, and as a result the violent gun crime rate is among the highest in the Nation, and in the world, per capita in any city including Baghdad. The law abiding citizens of the inner city of D.C., are virtual prisoners in their own homes, gun crime exceeding Baghdad where most are killed by other means such as explosives. In D.C. approximately 80 percent of all murders are committed with a gun, this, in a city where there are no legal guns? This typifies the statement that “more gun laws, more crime”, as well as, “if one outlaws guns only outlaws will have guns” or as John Lott a leading statistician puts it “more guns less crime”. John Lott wrote a book by the same name, where he proves his statement. Ironically the mayor of D.C., who in the past has embraced the gun ban; two years ago was robbed at gun point in his own home, and has since softened his stand for the gun-ban. It is amazing how sometimes personal experience can be the best teacher.

According to the 2004 FBI crime data, guns were used in 61.1 percent of homicides in New York City, 75.2 percent in Chicago, 77.5 percent in Baltimore, and a whopping 79.6 percent in Washington D.C., all in direct relationship to the amount and extent of anti-gun laws these States and Cities have. By contrast the entire State of Vermont has the lowest gun crime in the nation, maybe in the world (per capita) at only 9.1 percent. Moreover, Vermont has no State gun laws whatsoever; if under Federal law, one can legally own a gun, then one can carry a loaded gun anywhere in the State of Vermont without any kind of permit whatsoever, with the exception of a Federal building, because of course Federal laws must still be enforced.

Despite these high murder rates in these so-called gun-free zones, the overall crime rate in the U.S. has been going down at approximately the same rate that the right to Carry Concealed Weapon CCW in the U.S., has been on the increase in our Cities and States. 40 of the 50 States now have Shall Issue CCW permits. (Shall Issue, means the State shall issue a CCW permit on demand to anyone that is at least 18 years old and passes all the requirements) Again more statistical proof that the more guns in the hands of law-abiding citizens, the more the crime rates decrease.

Anywhere in the world where the restrictions of gun ownership is at its lowest, the crime rate is at its lowest as well, and by contrast where gun restrictions are at there highest, not only gun crime but all violent crime and home burglaries are also among the highest. Several years ago now, all in the name of lowering the violent gun crime rate, a number of countries have all but completely banned some or all guns. Among these countries are Canada where since their extreme gun restrictions the crime rate has gone up 35 percent, Australia’s virtual gun ban has caused an increase of 68 percent, and with the gun ban in the U.K. where people are afraid to leave their homes, especially after dark, have experience and increase of 87 percent in gun related crimes. One has nearly a 70 percent chance of getting mugged and or robbed on the streets of London if walking alone after dark. Moreover if one were to protect themselves with a weapon of any kind such as a ball-bat or a knife, one could find themselves arrested for battery or worse, and their [would be attacker] set free to mug and rob again the following evening.

Is it any wonder that the crime goes up in these cases? No, especially when the insanity of these government criminal minds is allowed to prevail. What is typical is that the innocent are prosecuted in this upside down world, while the criminal perpetrators go free. A friend once said to me, yes but there is more to it than that. (My answer); While I am sure that is true, the fact still remains, that if criminals go free, and the innocent are prosecuted, and our governments legislate more and more anti-gun laws, crime goes up no matter how much more there is to it.

A classic well known case of this happened in the UK. The following is a true story that occurred just outside London, shortly after their gun ban went into effect...

Shot guns are still allowed out in the country side of England but if one should use a gun to defend oneself even in a rural area one would not only go to jail, but could, with the aid of the British Government, be sued by the perpetrator of the crime. Just such an incident happened to a Mr. Tony Martin, an English farmer, living out in the country just outside London, and during the third in a series of early AM break-in’s and burglaries, with again no response or help from the police, Mr. Martin pointed his shotgun down the stairway inside his house at two armed men; and with a gun pointed at him, he fired his shot gun killing the first man and wounding the second. Mr. Tony Martin was sentenced to 20 years in a British prison and was sued, with the financial aid of the British Government, by the family of the dead criminal as well as his wounded accomplice, and to add insult to the wrongful imprisonment of Mr. Martin, the wounded burglar went scott free.

THE BOTTOM LINE: While similar cases have happened in the U.S., so-far none have been so blatantly outrages as what has happened to Martin. However if the insanity of these unprincipled anti-American Government officials with the worst Criminal Minds in the history of this country, are allowed to continue on this incremental path of crime and destruction of our Constitution; what happened to Mr. Tony Martin, will become common place in America as well as an increase in unopposed government power, and tyranny.

Vote Freedom First
Remember, the purpose of the second Amendment is to protect the security of a Free State. Please write or call your Federal and State Representatives, and ask them why they insist on promoting crime and tyranny by legislating anti-Constitutional gun laws???

de Andréa

Monday, November 27, 2006


The big lie

By de Andréa

America does not have an immigration problem, it has a security problem. The immigration issue is just a ruse to side step the real problem that the Federal Government does not want to address. If the U.S. Government would be forced to admit that they have been lying to the American people, they would be obligated by Constitutional Law to secure the borders of this sovereign Nation.

The requirement that the Federal Government protect this Nation from a foreign invasion is at the very core of this Constitutional Republic. But as long as they can continue to get away with calling it an immigration problem they avoid dealing with the real problem of securing our borders.

From the onset, this issue has been wrongfully addressed as ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION. If one would just stop and think about the idea of identifying this problem as illegal immigration, one would already know that this is a lie. This because one cannot immigrate into this country illegally, immigration is a legal process, and is not therefore a problem. These are illegal alien perpetrators, not illegal immigrants. They have not immigrated, illegally, legally or any other way except an invassion of a foreign Nation.

There is nothing wrong with our immigration system, it has worked very well since the 1800’s when we processed thousands of immigrants every day through Ellis Island and other points of entry, and I might add, without a computer, creating papers when they didn’t exist and doing health exams right on the spot. The system has been in place for 200 years and to say it doesn’t work is just a lie to mask the real issue, and responsibility. The system works fine when the rules aren't ignored.

These are foreign aliens, invading this country, not illegal immigrants, and they are here illegally for whatever reason, and therefore fall under the constitutional identification of a foreign invader, we are at war, for crying out loud. The Federal Government is required by Constitutional law to protect this nation from any kind of foreign invasion

I cannot speak for anyone but myself in making this next statement, but if anyone; repeat, anyone pointed a gun at me and I was armed, they would be dead, as simple as that. Moreover, if someone fired at me and I was lucky enough not to be hit, I would find the threat and take it out.

I have said that because of the following, these are real intelligence summary reports obtained from the Department of Homeland Security, (or Insecurity, depending on how naive one is) of a few incursions by drug traffickers and the Mexican military along our southern border. [These have been obtained under the freedom of information act]

MEXICAN MILITARY ENCOUNTER (ARMED/THREATENING) RIO GRANDE VALLEY/BROWNSVILLE - "As the boat proceeded to go down river towards the scene, the [Border Patrol] Agent on board advised via radio that several Mexican soldiers were pointing their rifles in his direction. The Agent decided for his safety and the safety of the crew to turn back, but advised that the soldiers were still aiming at them." (2005)
MEXICAN MILITARY SIGHTING - TUCSON/DOUGLAS STATION - "The [Border Patrol] Agents were returning to their assigned area when they heard four distinct gunshots coming from Mexico. The gunshots were fired when the Agents were approximately 10 feet away." (2005)
MEXICAN MILITARY SIGHTING (ARMED) LAREDO/ZAPATA: "This boat, which appeared to be a Mexican Military boat, was providing security and escort for the two others that were later found to be transporting 2,716.53 pounds of Marijuana.” (2003)

Other reports describe shots fired from black Mexican military helicopters invading U.S. air space in the process of protecting drug smugglers or coyotes smuggling illegal aliens.

As long as one does not properly identify the problem, one will not properly identify the solution. By not demanding that the Government do its job, every American is allowing our Administration to get away with this lie and the avoidance of doing their sworn Constitutional duty of protecting the people of this Nation.

On the rare occasions when an American border petrol agent has returned fire, out of fear for his own life, he has been fired from his job, prosecuted and jailed not only for protecting his own life and that of other agents, but for doing his Constitutionally sworn duty of protecting this country from a foreign invasion.

It must take a very special kind of person to be a border guard. I have a difficult time understanding just why they don’t all walk away and get a job at Wall Mart, the pay would probably be better and besides the customers don’t usually shoot at you. Moreover one would likely not get fired, tried and jailed for doing ones job, it must have something to do with spree de corp. or patriotism or something.

THE BOTTOM LINE: The people of this great nation sure have a poor excuse for a government when private citizens have to go out on the borders and risk their lives as well as to be heckled and called derogatory names by the White House just to do the job that our Government is Constitution bound but refuses to do. There has been approximately 251 dangerous incursions by the Mexican Government and U.S. border Guards since 1996. If one would identify this situation properly one would have to call this an act of war by the Government of Mexico 251 times. I guess since the 911 attack by another foreign Nation who is also allowed to waltz into this country because of the lack of border protection by our Federal Government; the shock of being attacked by a foreign invader has seemed to have worn off. Does this mean America has become NUMB or DUMB?

If one’s country were one’s home
If one had a home security department in one’s own house, and the house had no doors or windows to keep the good, bad or the ugly out; the lie that one had a home security department or system would soon be evident and understood by the neighbors, friends, and criminals alike. Why does this fact not dawn on the citizens of America? Moreover, if it does, why doesn’t everyone write their congressional representatives and tell them that we know about the big lie??? BUILD A FENCE NOW!!!

de Andréa

Thursday, November 16, 2006


No racism here!
Someone is finally saying it. How many are actually paying attention to this? I am becoming very weary of being the brunt of this nonsence. There are African Americans, Mexican Americans, Asian Americans, Arab Americans, Native Americans, etc., then there are just plain Americans. But ironicly there does not seem to be any white or European Americans.

The so-called Minorities pass me on the street and sneer in my direction. They call me "White boy," "Cracker," "Honkey," "Whitey," "Caveman" and that's OK. But if I would call them, Nigger, Kike, Towel head, Sand-nigger, Camel Jockey, Beaner, Gook, or Chink ... They would call me a racist, so I of course will not do that.

They have the United Negro College Fund. The Martin Luther King Day. The Black History Month. United Arab Organization. The Cesar Chavez Day. They have Yom Hashanah, Mauled Al-Nabi and the NAACP, and they have BET, but if we had WET (White Entertainment Television) we would be racists.

If we had a White Pride Day, They would call us racists. If we had White History Month, we would be called racists. If we had any organization for only whites to "advance" OUR lives, we would be racists.

We have a Hispanic Chamber of Commerce, a Black Chamber of Commerce, and then we just have the plain Chamber of Commerce. I wonder who pays for that.If we had a college fund that only gave white students scholarships you know we'd be racists.

There are over 60 openly proclaimed Black Colleges in the US, yet if there was one "White college" THAT would be a racist college.In the Million Man March, They believed that they were marching for their race and rights. If we marched for our race and rights, you would call us racists.

They are proud to be black, brown, yellow, and orange, as they should be, and they are not afraid to announce it. But when we announce our white pride they call us racists.

They rob us, carjack us, and shoot at us. But, when a white police officer shoots a black gang member or beats up a Hispanic drug-dealer running from the law and posing a threat to society they call him a racist, or charge him with a hate crime.

I am proud as well, as I should be. But, they call me a racist. Why is it that only whites can be racists?

I am proud to be a white European American as well as a minority, and I am not a racist. Could it be that some of the people hollering the loudist about racism are the REAL racists?

de Andréa


Feinstein and Boxer the Exterminators

By de Andréa

While the NRA and other organizations are fighting to preserve American Constitutional rights, our so- called California Representatives, Senators Bunny Boxer and Di Fi Feinstein have been exercising their equal rights of fighting to destroy them. But that is old news; recently they have taken on a whole new agenda as well.

Now in addition to spreading their anti-American Propaganda all over this Nation, as well as authoring bills to destroy our second amendment rights they have shrewdly, as only they can do, slipped an amendment into the Military Construction Appropriations bill that will lead to the extermination of hundreds of healthy protected endangered animals.

Yes our global warming weed hugging animal rights advocates are actually exterminators in disguise. Moreover they have come out of the closet again, and are showing their true hypocritical colors.

In October of 06 President Bush signed the 2007 Defense Authorization Act, which included a provision saving hundreds of elk and mule deer on Santa Rosa Island off the coast of California from extermination; this because of a court order that was to begin in 2008, and the slaughter to be completed by 2011.

The elk and mule deer on Santa Rosa Island are unique and invaluable, as they are free from all the diseases that plague these same animals elsewhere. Moreover they are used as breading stock to be introduced into existing herds on the mainland that are failing from diseases such as Chronic Wasting Disease (CWD) and others.

On November 14 the dynamic duo Senators Boxer and Feinstein attached an amendment to the Military Construction Appropriations bill that will overturn current law which protects these unique animals from extermination. NRA’s Chief Lobbyist Chris Cox is calling on Congress to stop Senators Boxer and Feinstein from killing hundreds of extraordinarily healthy animals.

THE BOTTOM LINE: Again the hypocrisy of the far left with their weed, insect, and animal rights agendas, that have many times take precedence over human rights, have become conspicuously obvious, especially in the political pandering of these two electorates.

de Andréa