Thursday, January 18, 2018

Democrat Congress In Collusion With Muslim Terrorists


"All governments are run by liars and nothing they say should be believed."
-I. F. Stone

 

Democrat Congress In Collusion With Muslim Terrorists

 


By de Andréa

Opinion Editorialist for
‘THE BOTTOM LINE’

Posted January 18, 2018



Here is the real story of collusion…

Islamic spies had access’ to congressional servers under the Obama DeepState

The Democrat DeepState leadership in collusion with Muslim spies, is the biggest expose’ of treason and espionage in the Federal Government in recent history, and yet the media refuses to report it. But then the media is in COLUSION with the DeepState conspiracy.  Instead, the media continues to chase a bogus fabricated Russia/Trump accusation for which there is no evidence of collusion, solely to try to cover their own corruption and to smear and destroy President Trump.
There is no doubt that the Democrat leadership aided and abetted this jihad spy ring. Question: when can we expect indictments of at least a third of congress?  Answer: as long as Washington is run by the DeepState…never my friend, never!
Over the eight years of the Obama regime I exposed several of the nearly one hundred treasons acts by Obama and his hate America cronies. Some by Congress, some by the State Department, the FBI, the NSA, the DOJ, some by the DHS and some by Obama himself. Every one of them were sourced and contained enough supported evidence to call for a grand jury investigation. But not a one was even reported on in the mainstream news, and there were no indictments.  The FBI even threatened to shut my blog down.  My reply was: “Do what you think you got to do, I will just start another blog.” As you can see I’m still here!  
In this’ expose’ of DeepState treason, and this is not the first time I have addressed this inside job of treason, the House investigators found indications that a House server was being used for nefarious purposes and that Muslim spies were reading and/or removing information” and “was used to store documents taken from other offices.” The server was that of the House Democrat Caucus, a DeepState group of the DNC that was run at the time by then-Rep. Xavier Becerra.
The Islamic jihadi congressional infiltrators named are: Imran Awan, his wife Hina Alvi, his brothers Abid and Jamal, and his friend Rao Abbas, all Pakistani-born Muslims whose lives are filled with reason for being on the watch list. Abid’s Ukranian wife Natalia Sova and Haseeb Rana were also involved in the Awans’ activities but curiously departed the House payroll prior to the investigation.  The feds did pick up the head of the Muslim spy ring trying to flee to Pakistan.
In a New York Times interview with President Donald Trump, he asked about this issue.
“Whatever happened to this Pakistani guy who worked with the DNC?”  President Trump asked in an interview published Thursday by the New York Times. Trump said, there was tremendous collusion on behalf of the Russians and the Democrats. There was no collusion with respect to my campaign. But there is tremendous collusion with the Russians and with the Democratic Party. Including all of the stuff with the — and then whatever happened to the Pakistani guy, that had the two, you know, whatever happened to this Pakistani guy who worked with the D.N.C.? Whatever happened to them? With the two servers that they broke up into a million pieces? Whatever happened to him? That was a big story. Now all of sudden [inaudible]. So I know The New York Times is going to — because those are real stories. Whatever happened to the Hillary Clinton deleted 33,000 emails after she got [inaudible] — which you guys wrote, but then you dropped — was that you?”
A grand jury in August returned an indictment in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia charging Awan and his wife, Hina Alvi, with a total of four counts, which included federal bank fraud and conspiracy. Awan has pleaded not guilty to all charges. (source)

They sent the stolen info to foreign terrorists.
“House investigators concluded that Democratic IT aides made unauthorized access to congressional servers in 2016, allegedly accessing the data of members for whom they did not work, logging in as members of Congress themselves, and covering their tracks, according to a presentation summarizing the findings of a four-month internal probe.
Their behavior mirrored a “classic method for insiders to exfiltrate data from an organization,” and they continued even after orders to stop, the briefing materials allege. There are indications that numerous members’ data may have been secretly residing not on their designated servers, but instead aggregated onto one server, according to the briefing and other sources. Authorities said that the entire server was then physically stolen.
When acting on the findings, Democratic leadership appear to have misrepresented the issue to their own members as solely a matter of theft, a comparison of the investigators’ findings with Democrats’ recollections and a committee’s public statement shows, leading 44 Democrats to not conduct protective measures typically taken after a breach — including informing constituents whose personal information may have been exposed.”
You can read the rest of this lengthy report on the Daily Caller, site.


I have often said that the vast majority of the Congress is criminal, the rest are covering for them.  Here’s why.  (A list of the involved members of espionage are below.)

HERE IS A LIST OF 30 of the DEEPSTATE un-american DEMOCRATS WHO HIRED THE isLAMIC JIHADI AWAN BROTHERS and their wives FOR government espionage.  And they are still doing it.  

The list of Congressional traders

THE BOTTOM LINE: If you scan the list you will find an inordinate amount of these DeepState criminal members of Congress come from the hate-America unconstitutional state of California. Seven out of the thirty to be exact.  Twenty-two percent of these DeepState espionage agents come from California, No surprise here! They’re the ones that want to secede from the United States and form their own Social Hegemony.  

“Ask not what your country can do for you, ask what you can do for you country.” President John Fitzgerald Kennedy said that, now there is something you can’ do for your country…Write your Congressional Representative here and ask them to bring charges of treason against the people on the list of traders. Send them this entire article if you want to.   

Thanks for listening my friend. Now go do the right thing, pray and fight for truth and freedom.  If you would like to write me direct with a question or a comment you can contact me at writedeandrae@hotmail.com
- de Andréa

Please pass on this article to everyone on your email list.  It may be the only chance for your friends to hear the truth.
The Fine Print
Copyright © 2005 by Bottom Line Publishing, All Rights Reserved -  Permission to reprint in whole or in part is gladly granted, provided full credit is given.

Disclaimer - The writer of this blog is not responsible for the language or advertisements used in links to referenced articles as source materials.

Wednesday, January 17, 2018

The Many States of California

“Better to write for yourself and have no public, than to write for the public and have no self.”- Cyril Connolly (1903 - 1974)

The Many States of California

 


By de Andréa

Opinion Editorialist for
‘THE BOTTOM LINE’

Posted January 17, 2018



Islamic terrorism is obviously a clear and present danger to safety and freedom in America, but there is an even more serious threat facing the Republic.

Those involved in the destruction of a free republic have been infiltrating strategic posts in American bureaucracies in both federal and state governments for more than a hundred years. Today many federal and state governments behave more like oligarchies - than representatives of the people. In Washington DC we have only one branch of government left. That is - the judicial branch, who now makes’ AND enforces their own far left ideology with impunity. Totally and blatantly ignoring the law that they took an oath to uphold…the U.S. Constitution.  Now the Courts no longer just fulfill, and carry out the law, they illegally make and enforce their own law.

As much of America undergoes a conservative awakening of sorts, the left is radicalizing at a rapid and dangerous pace. They have formed a shadow behind the scenes government now known as the DeepState.

In the wake of Donald Trump’s election, which was, in many ways a catalyst for the political polarization we see on the left, the entire state of California, one of the most un-American states in the union began to yammer on about possibly seceding from the Union. You and I know the result of the last true threat of state secession, it started the Civil war. This temper tantrum became the prototype for the “resistance” movement, who patently  oppose President Donald Trump on every possible subject, in every possible way, for no reason other than he’s not criminal Hillary Clinton who is one of the leaders of the DeepState.
Now, a different kind of California secession movement has spawned itself, this time with the rural parts of current California hoping to separate themselves from the urban population centers that dominate the state’s cultural and political trade.
With the reading of their own version of a Declaration of Independence, founders of the state of New California took the first steps to what they hope will eventually lead to statehood. CBS Sacramento reports they don’t want to leave the United States, they just want to leave California.
“Well, it’s been ungovernable for a long time. The highest taxes in the country, indoctrination type education, you name it, and we’re rated around 48th to 50th from a business climate and standpoint in California,” said founder Robert Paul Preston.
The state of New California shown in blue at right, would be a two state solution incorporating most of the state’s rural counties, leaving the urban coastal counties to the current Social Democratic state of California.
But unlike other separation movements in the past, the state of New California wants to do things according to the Constitution, citing Article 4, Section 3 of the U.S. Constitution and working with the state legislature to get it done, similar to the way West Virginia and other states were formed. The Law says: “New States may be admitted by the Congress into this Union; but no new States shall be formed or erected within the Jurisdiction of any other State; nor any State be formed by the Junction of two or more States, or parts of States, without the Consent of the Legislatures of the States concerned as well as of the Congress...” So the U.S. Constitution allows for this with consent of the Federal and state legislatures.

A similar measure has been repeatedly considered in the state of New York, where New York
City’s enormous and overwhelmingly Social Democrat liberal population completely controls the state’s political scene, even though the remaining counties in the state are extremely conservative.
Then there is the California proposal of a 6 state solution shown at right. This has similarities to the New California proposal, in that it isolates the coastal regions.
Should the day ever come where we have to choose which California to visit, I know right where I’ll go. And that is to the northern state of Jefferson.  Which brings yet another proposal, it’s not a new proposal. It’s actually been going on since early 1900, and that is another two state solution. The state of Jefferson in the North and the state of California in the South.     You can get a glimpse of that shown at right.  As you can see it also includes the southern part of Oregon.
 As much as one might like to break California up into six states, it seems highly unlikely to me. Too many people, and too many counties involved. But having northern or the central and southern coast of California secede from the rest of the state seems to me to be a more plausible solution. Moreover, it will still leave the rest of the state to continue to secede from Southern California or the coastal counties.

The populous of the  Central and Southern coast of California have an attitude that – ‘I’ve got mine…to Hell with the rest of you!’ This is a typical elitist’s attitude leading to despotism my friend. Do you realize that there are 9 State legislators representing Northern California and 111 representing central and Southern California? Just a tad out of balance wouldn’t you say!  Is this the balance of power that the Framers envisioned?  I don’t think so. This is how the Hollywood elitists control the state with their fantasy utopian political ideology.

If the Federal government becomes an oligarchy’, and it will, if we continue down this dark road to the DeepState, I might be in favor of states seceding from the United States, but until that time, if a free people are to remain free they must take control of their own states.  Once the states are repatriated then we might have the where with all to return this nation back into the American Constitutional Republic.

Did you know, that under the law we are guaranteed a Republican form of Government not a Democracy? Article 4 section 4 of the U.S. Constitution: The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion; and on Application of the Legislature, or of the Executive (when the Legislature cannot be convened) against domestic Violence”. and shall protect each of them against Invasion.  You will notice that it doesn’t say ‘on Application of the judicial branch of Government. ‘The courts have done nothing but usurp the authority of the legislature and the Executive branch creating Judicial Tyranny.  

A Republican form of government is: having a chief of state who is not a dictator and is usually a president; also: a nation or other political unit having such a government: a government in which supreme power is held by the citizens entitled to vote and is exercised by elected officers and representatives governing according to law; also: a nation or other political unit having such a form of government Source: NMW

What we have evolved into in America, is Social democracy. It originated as a political ideology that advocated an evolutionary, surreptitious and peaceful transition from capitalism to socialism using established political processes in contrast to the revolutionary approach to transition associated with orthodox Marxism.

THE BOTTOM LINE: One thing you can do right now is to write your federal representatives here, (they can’t represent you unless they hear from you) and kindly tell them to grow a spine and take back control of law making.  Legislators, and legislatures alone, have the constitutional power to make law, not the Courts. We have been witnessing judicial tyranny my friend. It’s time to put a stop to this before it’s too late and we have to resort to the last’ resort - violence.

That’ by the way, is the reason for the Second Amendment my friend, “…being necessary to the security of a free state.”

So whether you want a two state, a six state or a no state solution to the tyranny of the social oligarchy I do hope that you consider just what it means to be a free American.

It surely isn’t more anti-Constitutional laws…I know that much!    

Thanks for listening my friend. Now go do the right thing, pray and fight for truth and freedom.  If you would like to write me direct with a question or a comment you can contact me at writedeandrae@hotmail.com
- de Andréa
Please pass on this article to everyone on your email list.  It may be the only chance for your friends to hear the truth.
The Fine Print
Copyright © 2005 by Bottom Line Publishing, All Rights Reserved -  Permission to reprint in whole or in part is gladly granted, provided full credit is given.

Disclaimer - The writer of this blog is not responsible for the language or advertisements used in links to referenced articles as source materials.

Saturday, January 13, 2018

Trump Says He Didn’t Say Any Racist Remarks.

“Better to write for yourself and have no public, than to write for the public and have no self.”- Cyril Connolly (1903 - 1974)


Trump Says He Didn’t Say Any Racist Remarks.  

 


By de Andréa

Opinion Editorialist for
‘THE BOTTOM LINE’

Posted January 13, 2018


First, I automatically don’t believe anything…that’s ANYTHING my friend…that comes from the Communist News Media. Every time there is something outrageous that Trump is supposes to have done or said I wait until all the demons have come out of the woodwork and then I look for the truth.

Second, if Trump said what the DarkSide said he said, I don’t see that as racists as they claim. It would have been the truth. Have you ever been to Hattie or some of the African countries? They are s’rat holes!  And then I found it interesting that this accusation mostly came from people that weren’t even present at the meeting and those that were, are from the DarkSide, the DeepState of the Shadow Government.

Senator Perdue, who was there', said on Newsmax TV:
Sen. David Perdue told Newsmax TV Friday that "I honestly don't remember" the reported words "s***hole countries" used by President Donald Trump to describe certain countries in a meeting Thursday on immigration reform. And I’m’ not the only one that was there that doesn’t remember those words being said. I honestly don't remember that word being used," the first-term Georgia Republican told Newsmax TV's John Bachman in an exclusive interview, "but I do remember the conversation about what's wrong with the current immigration system.
Third, if in fact he did say something like ‘these countries are S*** holes’, if in fact they are’, then wouldn’t that be the truth rather than “racist” as was reported? The Hate America DarkSide always has to play the Race Card because they are the racists.

Fourth, it was reported that Trump used that vulgar description over and over again throughout his conversation. If that were true don’t you think everyone present would have heard it at least once? Were half or more of those present sleeping or passed out?

THE BOTTOM LINE: Anytime the ‘truth be told’ it is as if the demonic DarkSide of the DeepState shudders at the thought, and they need to quickly cover it up with a lie.  Moreover if he did say what was reported, it was certainly a slam against the countries mentioned but it certainly wasn’t racist.

Many previous presidents were at least as vulgar as Trump, President Truman comes to mind.

I didn’t vote for Trump because he was a well-groomed Statesmen and a graduate of a finishing school, I voted for Trump because he’s smart, successful and more importantly he loves America.   

Thanks for listening my friend. Now go do the right thing, pray and fight for truth and freedom.  If you would like to write me direct with a question or a comment you can contact me at writedeandrae@hotmail.com
- de Andréa
Please pass on this article to everyone on your email list.  It may be the only chance for your friends to hear the truth.
The Fine Print
Copyright © 2005 by Bottom Line Publishing, All Rights Reserved -  Permission to reprint in whole or in part is gladly granted, provided full credit is given.

Disclaimer - The writer of this blog is not responsible for the language or advertisements used in links to referenced articles as source materials.

Thursday, January 11, 2018

The Federal Justice System’s Blatant Disregard For The U.S. Constitution


The Federal Justice System’s Blatant Disregard For The U.S. Constitution

 

By de Andréa

Opinion Editorialist for
‘THE BOTTOM LINE’

Posted January 11, 2018   


The law is supposed to be a shield to protect freedom, but the government now uses is as a sword to destroy it. de Andrea
All three branches of the Federal Government have been violating the American Constitution for so long, that if one identifies any improprieties or even blatant Constitutional violations, one is met with – “Well that’s the way it has been for a hundred years.” As if laws are made legal by prolonged existence, whether constitutional or not.
The following ongoing travesty of justice is just one of many thousands of cases that would make Chief Justus John Jay roll over in his grave. Not only does it not have any legal bases because the Bureau of Land Management, the other (BLM), is just one of thousands of illegal unconstitutional departments within the U.S. Federal government.  Long story short, which I have written many articles on, is the fact that the Federal Government cannot own land with the exception of the National Parks Act, and military bases and land occupied by Federal buildings such as the Whitehouse and the Capital building etc.
John Jay by the way was the first Chief Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court. Whose opinion of Constitutional law says it all.  “No legislative act, therefore, contrary to the Constitution, can be valid. To deny this would be to affirm that the deputy is greater than his principal; that the servant is above his master; that the representatives of the people are superior to the people themselves.” - John Jay
And yet the Federal Government has claimed over the years to own more and more of the western United States. And in some states more land than the state and citizens do, as indicated in red on the map. Check out Nevada and Utah.  And anyone the BLM Gestapo says is trespassing on ‘their stolen land’ is subject to arrest by the FBI.  Or to be shot by them.  
This all began in a confrontation and standoff in 2014 near the Bundy Ranch in southern Nevada and then it spread to the State of Oregon and Idaho, people were killed and arrested. 
Last Friday, following a meeting of Tier 1 and Tier 3 Bundy Ranch defendants in court with Judge Gloria Navarro, another trial date was set for October 10. That trial included Eric Parker and Stephen Drexler, who have already been tried twice with hung juries and in other cases non-guilty verdicts. Now, at least a third of Idaho representatives are calling on Attorney General Jeff Sessions to put an end to the illegal badgering of these men with trial after trial, a clear violation of the Fifth Amendment's protections against Double Jeopardy in trials they have already been acquitted, (and yes, I know the "legaleeze" about mistrials and hung juries, but the fact is that under that kind of gestapo thinking, one could try someone indefinitely) until they are sent to the gulags for violating an unconstitutional law.   
Since then, one-third of the representatives of Idaho, the state in which Parker and Drexler live, penned a letter to Attorney General Jeff Sessions asking for him relax the pursuit by Nevada prosecutors against four Idahoans who are charged or have been convicted in the 2014 Bundy Ranch standoff in Nevada.
The letter was authored by State Rep. Dorothy Moon (R-Stanley) and signed by 24 Idaho representatives from the House and Senate last Tuesday stating:  "We believe that the decision by the current U.S. attorney to Nevada to prosecute these men a third time represents disrespect for the rule of law and the jury system."
The four men these representatives are standing up for are Ammon Bundy, of Emmett; Eric Parker, of Hailey; Scott Drexler, of Challis; and Todd Engel, of Boundary County.
"We are tasked with the responsibility to protect our citizens' constitutional rights," the letter stated, noting the Idaho Legislatures has a "high respect for the rule of law."
"We believe that the right to a speedy trial and the presumption of innocence are essential pillars to law, order, and a Republican form of government," the letter continues. "We also believe that a trial by a jury of one's peers is the highest form of justice as set forth by our founders. Ensuring government stays within the bounds of its proper constitutional role empowers the people through a jury's verdict to give clear guidance as to their will."
They then spoke out about the innocence of the defendants who have already been tried and found not guilty.
"We the undersigned believe that in the case of 'The Bunkerville Stand Off' trials in the State of Nevada in which Eric Parker and O. Scott Drexler of the State of Idaho were charged with 40 criminal counts in connection with the above case having been found not guilty speaks volumes to the public of their innocence," the letter states. "U. S. Attorneys have been unsuccessful obtaining guilty verdicts not once, but twice, establishing criteria for dismissal of charges against them according to our standards of justice. Further exploitation of these citizens would be an affront to justice and notice to the public of prosecutorial harassment."
Well, if you ask me that began when they tried the men a second time after failing to prove their case. After all, the burden of proof is on the prosecution to prove guilt, not on those charged to prove their innocence. But then, we are dealing with a government judicial system that has gone off the rails.  We have fought wars over less. 
"We believe that the decision by the current U. S. Attorney of Nevada to prosecute these men a third time represents disrespect for the rule of law and the Jury system," the representatives wrote.  "A third trial would show blatant disregard for tax funds collected from hard working law abiding citizens who are represented by these juries who have found them innocent of 34 of the 40 charges and hung by the very slimmest margins in those where the jury stood deadlocked.  The decisions of 10-2 to acquit in the first trial and 11-1 to acquit in the second trial highlights the narrow margin by which the prosecution hopes to continue their attack."
Then they called on Sessions, the court and the prosecutor to consider Todd Engel's time served as punishment for the minor charges for which he was found guilty. He was scheduled to be sentenced on September 28.’
The letter continues:
"Ammon Bundy, an Idaho resident, remains in custody awaiting trial directly after the final outcome of the pending prosecution's decision with Parker and Drexler.  Ammon has been in custody since January of 2016 without benefit of bail or the comfort of home and familiy in spite of being found not guilty of all counts in the Oregon trial. Ammon has been stripped of normal due process for a prosecution that now seems flimsy as we discover evidence exposed during these previous hung trials of others for similar offenses. This prosecution sends a chilling message to the public who are concerned about federal overreach in their daily lives that is inharmonious to well-established constitutional guarantees. The percentages of jurors causing the hung verdicts in these trials should send a clear signal to the government prosecutors of the jury's reticence to further prosecute these defendants as has clearly been received by the public."
The representatives then call on Sessions to have those in charge of this case end this long enduring action and set Eric Parker and Scott Drexler free, set reasonable bail for Ammon Bundy and allow Todd Engel to use his time served as total sentencing.
Among those signing the letter included House Majority Leader Mike Moyle; Assistant Majority Leader Brent Crane; Treasure Valley Sens. Clifford Bayer and Lori Den Hartog; and Treasure Valley Reps. Judy Boyle, Christy Perry, Brandon Hixon, Greg Chaney, Joe Palmer, James Holtzclaw, Steve Harris and Jason Monks.
“I think it is a complete injustice and a waste of taxpayer money and time to continue to go after these guys after two mistrials,” said Rep. Boyle, from Midvale.  “Let it go. We are not talking about murders, robberies, druggies, rapists. It is continuing to waste the court’s time and federal taxpayers’ money. I know the federal government wants to make a point, but get over it.”
THE BOTTOM LINE: This does not have to go to a third trial in order for it to be considered exploitation and prosecutorial harassment. That has and is still taking place by the prosecution and by Judge Gloria Navarro.
I have said since the end of the first trial, if the prosecution had any sense about them, they would drop the charges against the remaining defendants and spare them and taxpayers any further grief and burden by simply admitting the Federal Government is wrong.
I'm hoping once things settle that we will see each one of these men come together and sue the pants off the prosecution and the judge in the case, as well as Bureau of Land Management goon Daniel P. Love for their reckless and lawless behavior in this entire process. And then take the BLM to the Supreme Court and have the Department declared un-constitutional and abolished.  And then return federally confiscated state land to the states and to the people to whom it belongs. 
Seeing that a new trial date has been set, it appears AG Sessions doesn't care that the Fifth and Sixth Amendments are being violated concerning Drexler and Parker and that other rights are being violated concerning the remaining defendants in the case.  I'm not surprised. After all, Sessions has demonstrated in the past that he doesn't care about the Fifth Amendments protections of life, liberty and property when it comes to asset forfeiture.
You can write your Federal representative HERE, or you can wait until they come after you over some other illegal unconstitutional law, and you end up in the gulags yourself.
At the beginning I said: “The law is supposed to be a shield to protect freedom, but the government now uses is as a sword to destroy it.” I challenge you to think long and hard about that my friend.
Thanks for listening my friend. Now go do the right thing, pray and fight for truth and freedom.  If you would like to write me direct with a question or a comment you can contact me at writedeandrae@hotmail.com
- de Andréa
Please pass on this article to everyone on your email list.  It may be the only chance for your friends to hear the truth.
The Fine Print
Copyright © 2014 by Bottom Line Publishing, All Rights Reserved -  Permission to reprint in whole or in part is gladly granted, provided full credit is given.

Disclaimer - The writer of this blog is not responsible for the language or advertisements used in links to referenced articles as source materials.